Scientists identify a temperature tipping point for tropical forests

Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

IMAGE
IMAGE: An aerial view of a tropical forest along the eastern Pacific Ocean shoreline of Barro Colorado Island, Panama. view more  Credit: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute photo

All living things have tipping points: points of no return, beyond which they cannot thrive. A new report in Science shows that maximum daily temperatures above 32.2 degrees Celsius (about 90 degrees Fahrenheit) cause tropical forests to lose stored carbon more quickly. To prevent this escape of carbon into the atmosphere, the authors, including three scientists affiliated with the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) in Panama, recommend immediate steps to conserve tropical forests and stabilize the climate.

Carbon dioxide is an important greenhouse gas, released as fossil fuels are burned. It is absorbed by trees as they grow and stored as wood. When trees get too hot and dry, they may close the pores in their leaves to save water, but that also prevents them from taking in more carbon. And when trees die, they release stored carbon back into the atmosphere.

Tropical forests hold about 40% of all the carbon stored by land plants. For this study, researchers measured the ability of tropical forests in different sites to store carbon.

“Tropical forests grow across a wide range of climate conditions,” said Stuart Davies, director of the Smithsonian’s Forest Global Earth Observatories (ForestGEO), a worldwide network of 70 forest study sites in 27 countries. “By examining forests across the tropics, we can assess their resilience and responses to changes in global temperatures. Many other studies explored how individual forests respond to short-term climatic fluctuations. This study takes a novel approach by exploring the implications of thermal conditions currently experienced by all tropical forests.”

By comparing carbon storage in trees at almost 600 sites around the world that are part of several different forest monitoring initiatives: RAINFOR, AfriTRON, T-FORCES and ForestGEO, the huge research team led by Martin Sullivan from the University of Leeds and Manchester Metropolitan University found major differences in the amount of carbon stored by tropical forests in South America, Africa, Asia and Australia. South American forests store less carbon than forests in the Old World, perhaps due to evolutionary differences in which tree species are growing there.

They also found that the two most important factors predicting how much carbon is lost by forests are the maximum daily temperature and the amount of precipitation during the driest times of the year.

As temperatures reach 32.2 degrees Celsius, carbon is released much faster. Trees can deal with increases in the minimum nighttime temperature (a global warming phenomenon observed at some sites), but not with increases in maximum daytime temperature.

They predict that South American forests will be the most affected by global warming because temperatures there are already higher than on other continents and the projections for future warming are also highest for this region. Increasing carbon in the atmosphere may counterbalance some of this loss, but would also exacerbate warming.

Forests can adapt to warming temperatures, but it takes time. Tree species that cannot take the heat die and are gradually replaced by more heat-tolerant species. But that may take several human generations.

“This study highlights the importance of protecting tropical forests and stabilizing the Earth’s climate,” said Jefferson Hall, co-author and director of the Smithsonian’s Agua Salud Project in Panama. “One important tool will be to find novel ways to restore degraded land, like planting tree species that help make tropical forests more resilient to the realities of the 21st century.”

The Agua Salud project asks how native tree species adapted to an area can be used to manage water, store carbon and promote biodiversity conservation at a critical point where North and South America connect.

It is also noted that one of the first permanent tropical forest study sites in the world, located at STRI’s research station on Barro Colorado Island in Panama, is currently not being monitored for the first time in 40 years as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, giving scientists less of a handle on any climate change effects that may be in play.

Steve Paton, director of STRI’s physical monitoring program, notes that in 2019 there were 32 days with maximum temperatures over 32 degrees Celsius at a weather station in the forest canopy on the island, and a first glance at his data indicates that these exceptionally hot days are becoming more common.

###

From EurekAlert!

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

80 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Powers
May 24, 2020 7:54 am

These alarmist never run out of new CAGW problems but at the same time continue to talk as if they are stuck on stupid in some fairy tale world where mankind can stop using fossil fuel and support a nearly 8 Billion population.

My conspiracy theory is that they are working on a way to return the world population to a time say the early 1800’s when the population was around 1 Billion or 1950 at 2.5 Billion and then keep it there.

I think over population is the Elites greatest fear and de-population is their vision for the future, with of course, these talking heads and government funded scientists and bureaucrats envisioning they will all have a reservation on the ark that will spare them from the de-population when it occurs.

Suppose that the Corona Virus was a test run for when they release their Satan bug. Before that happens they will have a vaccine and control who lives and who gets sacrificed to save the resources for the more deserving.

We have a lot more to fear from these Globalists and their One World Central Authoritarian Governance than a few degrees increase in global surface temperatures wiping out tropical forests.

ferdberple
May 24, 2020 8:13 am

The tropical rain forests regulate their own temperature. The leaves in the forests change their angle to maintain optimum temperature for photosynthesis.

An interesting coincidence, the temperature of the tropical rain forests is the minimum temperature at which a naked human can survive. Outside the tropical rain forests we need fire and clothing, or we die of exposure.

Contrary to what climate science teaches, humans are adapted to handle heat. It us our technology that allows us to survive in cold areas. Take away that technology to save the planet and minimize co2, and you eliminate humans from much of the planet. It is just that simple.

Clyde Spencer
May 24, 2020 10:01 am

“All living things have tipping points: points of no return, beyond which they cannot thrive.”

Well, obviously, if a species gets down to one male survivor, that is a tipping point. The general number is undoubtedly larger, particularly for herd animals that use their numbers as a defense against predators, such as zebra or musk ox, to name a couple. But, it is a misrepresentation to make the quoted statement as justification for a following claim that rising temperatures are an existential threat. That is because most life is mobile and can retreat to more hospitable zones. Even those that can’t move will probably be able to adapt or evolve to be tolerant of the slowly increasing temperatures. This claim is more of the Chicken Little syndrome. Humans already find tropical climates enervating. Yet, Attenborough claims that the tropics support 50% of the species of life, with only 3% of the Earth’s area.

Clyde Spencer
May 24, 2020 10:14 am

” and a first glance at his data indicates that these exceptionally hot days are becoming more common.”

Science of this quality gives me confidence that we are getting good advice — not!

tty
May 24, 2020 10:55 am

In the Paleogene the average temperature in the South American rainforests was 30-34 degrees and they did just fine:

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature07671

markopanama
May 24, 2020 12:52 pm

Well, I actually live in Panama. This report is the worst kind of fake news.

I know the island and some of the people who “work” there. It is a pimple in a vast ocean of water. Nothing that happens there has any meaning for the mainland.

For starters, the west coast of Panama is the terminus for the Pacific ITCZ. Sea surface temps vary widely depending on El Nino/La Nina. This is a confounding variable for any surface temps measured on the island.

Temperatures are remarkably stable – Willis is exactly right about the thermostat. However, rainfall is wildly variable and unpredictable. Which is why we set up a network of weather stations on the mainland to get an idea of the variability. It may rain 2″ in a month at my house, and 12″ three miles away at Lloyd’s house. We have accurate temperature records going back 20 years. No significant temperature changes.

A single weather station with no long term records on an offshore island is as useless as… pick your metaphor.

Next, the temps are governed by adiabatic cooling. Go 500 feet above sea level and they are about 3F cooler. We live at 4,200 feet and my min/max thermometer, which has been running for a year or so, is showing 66/77F. Go up 500′ to our neighbor’s and it would be something like 64/74. 99.9% of the rain forest is above the level of that island. Panama is after all, a mountain range.

As a scientist, it’s painful to see the clickbait prostitutes and profiteers taking over the temples of science. Thanks to WUWT for exposing them for what they are.

Robert of Ottawa
May 24, 2020 1:01 pm

Does anyone listen to these proclamations of DOOM anymore?

Atomic war
Global cooling
Nucular winter
Over-population
Starvation
Limits to growth
Global Warming
Y2K
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Global Warming
Climate change
Sars
Banking collapse of 2008
Trump
Wuhoo Flu

Yes, Virginia, we ARE all going to do.

The End is Nigh, and always has been.

May 25, 2020 5:22 am

What actually happens is that during centennial solar minima, El Nino conditions increase, which reduces rainfall in the tropical forests, resulting in increased CO2 output from the forest regions. During full glacial states there are near permanent El Nino conditions and the tropical forest regions dry to the point of collapse and are greatly reduced in area. A net increase in climate forcing does the reverse, it increases La Nina conditions and increases rainfall to the tropical forests.

Mervyn
May 25, 2020 6:07 am

I lived in the tropics for some years … Kenya… The Seychelles. I wouldn’t show this study to the locals in such tropical countries. They’d simply laugh at this paper.

Verified by MonsterInsights