HBO’s falsified Chernobyl “documentary”
Imagine HBO doing a similar profit-making film about the tragic Chilean rugby team
Dr. Kelvin Kemm
Late in 1972, Uruguayan Air Force flight 571 was taking a college rugby team and family members from Montevideo, Uruguay to Santiago, Chile. It carried five crew members and 40 passengers.
As the aircraft crossed the frozen Andes, the pilot made a tragic navigation error and descended towards what he thought was Pudahuel Airport. The aircraft struck a rocky mountain ridge. Both wings were sheared off, and the aircraft fuselage raced like a toboggan down the steep snow-covered slope, coming to rest on a glacier.
Only 33 survived the crash, and five more died during the freezing night that followed. Seventeen days after the crash, an avalanche struck the wrecked remains and killed eight more. The remaining starving and half-frozen survivors were devout Catholics – highly moral and responsible, but facing certain death, while the dead lay frozen outside in the snow.
After personal agonizing and prayer, they made the dramatic decision to eat their deceased fellow passengers. One team member was a medical student, who explained that brains and certain other organs contained valuable nutrients. So they ate those as well as the human flesh. Two of the strongest survivors set off on an incredible 38-mile (60-kilometer) trek to find rescuers.
After a staggering 72 days on the glacier, the remaining survivors were rescued, two days before Christmas. Despite initially reacting in horror, people worldwide ultimately sympathized deeply with the plight and decisions of those survivors, who prayed over their dead comrades and cut pieces from the bodies only with great sorrow, reverence and respect.
A television program portrayed their agonizing saga honestly, accurately and sympathetically.
However, imagine if decades later another producer decided to make a new “dramatized” version. It begins with the aircraft crash, fractured fuselage ride down the mountain and snowy desolation. But then it descends into “artistic license,” to ensure more horror, more viewers (more profits).
Imagine the new “inspired by true events” version showing callous survivors slashing bodies with axes and using machetes to tear out livers and hammers to smash skulls for the brains. After dinner they play a wild drumming rhapsody on the fuselage, using human bones as drumsticks as they sing.
How do you think TV audiences would respond? With sympathy and understanding for the survivors – or revulsion and disgust? Would they call for forgiveness – or demand prosecution?
If this sounds absurd, it has a very real recent counterpart that took similar liberties with the facts in order to make a more “dramatic” program and attract more viewers. I watched both the Chilean rugby team television program a few years ago and the recent HBO-produced TV series “Chernobyl.”
The Chernobyl tragedy is also an undeniable part of history. People died, though fewer than 60. Things went terribly wrong, for many reasons. But today tourists visit the Chernobyl area and wildlife thrives.
So what actually happened? Did reality come anywhere close to what HBO presented in its program?
The HBO production apparently recorded record viewership figures. That was undoubtedly good for the network’s bottom line. But was it honest income, to be proud of?
As a nuclear scientist, I can tell you the fundamental story of the sequence of events of the 1986 Chernobyl accident as portrayed by HBO was correct. Issues around governance and procedure as portrayed by HBO were essentially correct. But other important aspects were false or falsified.
The blood and skin peeling scenes, for example. Sadly, the producers lied – intentionally or incompetently, it seems, to gain box office income. They succeeded in that goal. But they insulted us nuclear scientists and insulted the intelligence of viewers who knew a bit more science than most of HBO’s audience. The HBO producers also led many viewers down a twisted path to further ignorance and confusion, which certainly should not be the objective of any honest history documentary.
The series tended to show the Soviet authorities of the day as uncaring and unskilled. That was not true. Yes, Chernobyl happened during the formality and rigidity of the Soviet communist system of the era. And yes, the military-type hierarchy of the time did play a role.
However Russian nuclear scientists had actually and for some time worried greatly about that particular Chernobyl reactor design and had voiced their concerns to senior authorities. Albeit slowly, those authorities were responding. Tests of failure systems were being conducted.
Chernobyl had been ordered to carry out one such test, to assess the speed of response to a failure. A test had been set up. Chernobyl staffers were instructed to create a deliberate failure mode situation, to see how the reactor responded. This was arranged and was supposed to have been done in the daytime, when the main skilled team was on duty.
However, high demands for electricity in the district caused them to delay the test until around midnight, when the lower calibre night shift team was on duty. In addition, the more senior decision makers in the line-of-command had gone home.
To clip all the technicalities very short: when the intentional test procedure started to go wrong, worried and inexperienced Chernobyl technicians made some wrong moves and rapidly compounded the unfolding drama. As the reactor spun out of control, the rapid communications line via local headquarters to Moscow did not function properly; the seniors had gone home and could not help.
Moreover, that reactor type had been built to an out-of-date design that contained a large amount of highly combustible graphite. It caught fire. Someone correctly called the fire brigade – which responded quickly, but mistakenly attacked the fire as if it were a burning woodworking factory.
The firemen bravely attacked the flames – without fully realizing that the smoke carried radioactive dust and other harmful material. Lumps of burning graphite that lay scattered around contained radioactive debris from the initial gas blast that blew the reactor to pieces.
Other first responders were also brought in: police, military, helicopter pilots. All did their duty, as they would have in any other major fire. But radioactive dust and smoke were swirling around.
Human bodies do not become radioactive in a situation like that. What can happen is that someone, like a fireman, leaves the scene with radioactive dust on his clothes and maybe in his hair. Any radiation protection officer present would then make him take all his clothes off and take a good shower, before going home.
Firemen were not radioactively contagious, as HBO portrayed. A fireman could not have irradiated his pregnant wife at home, as HBO claimed. Her baby could not have died of heart and liver disease as a result; that too is pure HBO bunk. Something like playing music on the aircraft fuselage in the Andes, using human bones as drumsticks. Very good for viewer horror, but very far from the truth.
A very large dose of nuclear radiation will undoubtedly kill a person. But skin will not peel off one’s face. In fact a human can pick up a fatal dose of radiation in under an hour and not even know it. The person would go home in apparently perfect condition, but then start to feel as if he had eaten rotten fish for lunch. Vomiting would result and flu-like symptoms would set in. Over a couple of hours this would lead to shaky hands and wobbly legs, bad vision and a general breakdown of body functions. Death would come quite quickly, within days. But in reality no viewer-riveting skin peeling off the face, or blood dripping from anywhere would occur.
After the real Chernobyl incident, 29 fire-fighters died – from what medics call “synchronous injuries.” In other words “a combination of factors.” Undoubtedly radiation exposure played a major role. But those brave men also attacked high-temperature flames, breathed in dense toxic smoke and physically exerted themselves under terrible conditions. There were numerous other errors, as well.
It seems HBO producers did not consult any nuclear physics specialists, or medical people knowledgeable in the field. They relied on more dramatic emotional advice.
HBO must have made a lot of money with the series. Their shareholders are no doubt very pleased. But HBO has not done any service to the truth or to the education and enlightenment of viewers.
The series was “fiction inspired by real events” – not a “documentary.” HBO should issue apologies.
Dr Kelvin Kemm is a nuclear physicist and CEO of Nuclear Africa Ltd, a project management company based in Pretoria, South Africa. He does international consultancy work in strategic development.
This goes the same for the recent earthquakes in Los Angeles. People are fearing a mega quake of the magnitude seen in the Dwayne Johnson movie San Andreas. But geologists have been stressing that that movie is just hyped up for Hollywood. The quake in the film is described as being 9.6 +; but geologists have studied the San Andreas Fault and have explained that the fault line is only capable of 8.3 magnitude. Of course casualties would be inevitable, but Los Angeles won’t be completely annihilated like in the film. The city would undoubtedly suffer severe damage, but nothing Hollywood scale. This is proof that Hollywood hypes up drama to sell their movie, and these films usually leave people in a state of paranoia.
Why now?
Ukraine’s economy is a catastrophe, and they may not be able to guarantee reactor safety.
So much for Britain’s geopolitical gambit. Is this movie simply for ransom money?
Well, if Brussels brings them into the EU, which after all was the reason they and Obama overthrew the government and put outright Nazis (Azov brigade) in power, it will have to pay for the mess, which means Germany.
Germany trying to denuclearize, go green, will likely buck. Not sure if this has yet appeared on TV.
By the way was there ever a movie about the British Windscale/Sellafield 1958 nuclear fire classified for 28 years?
what more bollox you talking??
“they may not be able to guarantee reactor safety.”
They MAKE reactor parts for the Russians in Kharkov, make aircraft, have a thriving IT industry and do a lot of sub contracting!
They even make engines for Russian military helicopters at Motors SYCH
Heard of Antonov??
I have been to a lot of hi tech forums in Ukraine, and many of them would leave so called “advanced” countries floundering!
Have you ever been there??
If one country is unable to guarantee reactor safety it would be the UK today, cos Teflon Tony and his side kick Gordon threw the entire industry under a bus and flogged it off!!
Ukraine is at war. Its economy is collapsing without Russia. IMF bailouts with conditions, and now 2 lng pipelines bypassing it completely, leaves Kyev in a desperate state. Provocations were expected.
Ukraine has 4 nuclear plants with 15 reactors. Notwithstanding the greenie anti-nuclear tone here:
https://bankwatch.org/project/zombie-reactors-in-ukraine#safety
Neighboring countries have requested nuclear safety data under various treaties, all refused.
I’ll bet some are getting very nervous.
Nuclear geopolitics is toxic.
There’s a gigantic amount of mega bollox been washed up on this thread.
I have worked in radiation work years ago (next to Harwell), and my Dad’s best friend was the head of the RPB England no less, attached to the MRC.
I had a friend in the UK recently repeat a whole load of the utter nonsense shown in the film about Ukraine. I had to assure him, most airline cabin staff and passengers routinely get much higher doses of radiation flying around northern Europe than in much of the Chernobyl exclusion zone.
Being as I now in live in one of the most radioactive places in Europe and own a radiation counter, I can assure you Uranium/Thorium isotopes are dangerous, domestic high levels of Radon are also dangerous especially when mixed with the presence of other known carcinogens such as tabacco smoke, and asbestos particles (extremely common all over Europe).
However burning giant amounts of coal particularly in China probably releases more radioactive isotopes into the environment than chernobyl, and then the fly ash gets turned into concrete to build airline runways, housing blocks and motorways.
If you start to look closer the danger is not in Ukraine or Japan, it’s under your feet or already in the food chain!
Wow, you are such a tallented writer!
No doubt you have access to all the real and original ststistical facts of the incident.
The number of death resulting in that catastrophical incident – 60, seems to be the close to the Russian official released numbers!
Congrats!
NO, I happen to be interested in scientific facts, partly because I have actually worked in the industry (was my student job in holidays) helping to dismantle a proton synchrotron, and partly because most of Dad’s colleagues were working in the early iterations of CERN.
We might just know a little about it, instead of people quoting acres of hearsay and spouting pages full of utter bollox.
Dad’s first comment about the accident at Pripyat, was “the Russians did something really dumb by not having containment buildings and vessels”.
That was self evidently true, and not a policy adopted anywhere in the west.
Let’s talk about the ACTUAL casualties shall we (under 100), most of which were as a result of ignorance, stupidity & plain bad luck.
They also were woefully ignorant of obvious stuff as simple & ancient as the archimedes principal.
Then, the authorities deliberately exposed their population to high levels of radio isotopes, active dust, and failed in a duty to provide children and families with rapid access to medication to limit the ingestion of radio iodine via the dairy and milk products food chain.
That was criminal negligence.
Indeed it was the (late) decision to SCRAM the reactor that led to the operators downfall, although any fool could have told them, doing what they did was suicidal when poisoning the reactor criticality with noble gases.
Hmm if you insist in committing suicide, can you do it quietly and not do a “German wings” style mass suicide please?
Do we have any sequel remotely similar in France, the UK, Germany, Lithuania, Finland?
Answer me please?
However,-
Let’s say being as a number of us are from a Welsh background, (as was Idris in MRC) we might make it nice and clear, where were the highest numbers of casulties to be found in the energy transformation and generation industries, (still true today btw).
>COAL MINING<
As people clearly have ADD and Amnesia here it is in all its glory:-
https://welshcoalmines.co.uk/DisastersList.htm
we most remember:-
"Senghynydd at the head of the Aber Valley, …e story of the deep pit explosion of 1913, when 434 men and boys in this village of less than 5,000 met their deaths in the greatest colliery disaster in British history.
We also remember that lots of coal miners meet a painful end thanks to silicosis, with years of horrible loss of breath and weakness.
Does this happen in the nuclear industry?
NO
Now to put it in perspective:-
According to the China daily, China produced 35 percent of the world's coal last year, but reported 80 percent of the total deaths in coal mine accidents, according to statistics with the State Administration of Work Safety
This means that coal mining has become the most deadly job in China, and it doesn't date from yesterday…
On April 26, 1942, a gas and coal-dust explosion in Benxihu Colliery killed 1,549 miners, making it the worst disaster in the history of coal mining.
2013 1049 workers were killed in Chinese coal mines in this year alone.
There are deliberately no more officially released stats.
India:-
Alongside ship-breaking, mining has the distinction of being the most dangerous profession in India, as is the case in a number of developing economies such as China and Brazil. Industry insiders….concede that official numbers could be much lower than the actual deaths that take place deep inside the mines.
Can I invite you to confirm to me how many have died directly as a result of the incidents at Fukushima or even Kishtym or Pripyat?
Please be my guest.
Oh btw we have detectable amounts of radiocaesium from Ukraine in the Baltic states, nearby Russia, nearby Finland, and of course over the water in Sweden, to the extent that in some of those places it's forbidden to cut down trees and burn them for heating.
They are already at 1/2 life ONE.
However, the background radiation levels in our part of the world (from that accident) are simply saturated out by the large quantities of natural Uranium and Thorium in the ground who's daughters produce large amounts of pollutants in the drinking water with radium (up to 700% permitted norms) and the radon gas present in apartments at up to 10X the maximum permitted levels.
I guess it's nice to know there are mass media that are more interested in promoting fictional accounts of Chernobyl's so called deadly influence, compared with the radioactive bricks and roofing tiles produced directly from our Ordovician clay every day of the week, with levels of radiation often exceeding that in Ukraine's exclusion zone, incorporated into new buildings in all innocence, and of course airport runways like that of Warsaw airport clearly made of fly ash uranium laden concrete.
Just carry on believing what you like.
I prefer my geiger-muller.
Odd, still no mention of Sellafield/Windscale, 1957, a 5 out of 7 major UK incident. 28 years classified, and Normandy given no warning. Makes the Soviets look like angels. Apparently a very similar graphite pile burned like the Pripyat version. And flying plutonium north in Cesna’s beggars the imagination!
Not known if HBO or anyone else ever did a movie…
Of course this, like Pripyat , is used to terrorize anyone who even mentions nuclear power in the region.
Result, insane green 100% nuts running around spouting nonsense.
Worse, Hiroshima terror was used to push a kindergarten solar model (homogenous H ball) which is really damaging fusion research, and the main reason the sun is discounted in climate. It most definitely is not a quiet H ball.
This show never pretended to be a documentary. In a documentary you have the narrator explaining events. This was in the style of historical fiction. There will always be some dramatic license there. The author admits it. You should listen to the podcasts where he explains changes that were made to the story.
However, “Guest Blogger” has “Falsified” way more than the HBO story did.
The firemen did in fact become radioactive. The contamination was not only on their clothes and skin, it was also in their lungs and gut. Ludmilla’s baby did in fact die. I understand she wrote a book about her experiences.
Radiation burns do in fact cause blisters and peeling skin. You can find pictures on the internet. For example, take a look at Harry Daghlian’s injuries.
I don’t understand why “Guest Blogger” was so hyper-negative about this, and why he (purportedly a nuclear scientist) is so ignorant about facts that are well documented. Given the title of his post “HBO Falsifies …” I would call this FAKE NEWS.
Another purported “fact” from “Guest Blogger” is that fewer than 60 people died. That’s neatly close to the Soviet propaganda number. How many deaths can be attributed to it is very controversial, and somewhat statistical. (That is, of the 50,000 evacuated from Pripyat, some number of them would have gotten cancer even without the explosion. The difference between what statistics would have expected and what actually occurred, could be attributed to the explosion, but all the figures are difficult to collect. Pripyat’s residents have been spread around, and finding how many of them died from cancer is difficult. The Soviet Union didn’t want to count them anyway.)
It is widely reported that all of the helicopter pilots died from radiation, and they are never counted. It is widely reported that a quarter of the miners died within ten years. The premature deaths of Liquidators is never counted.
In conclusion — “fewer than 60” is nothing more than an ignorant propaganda number.
And “Guest Blogger” accuses HBO of “falsifying” things? Who is this guy?
Vested interests
You say this can’t happen the way they said it happened. Reality says otherwise.
You say nuclear safety officers would have been on site, having the firefighters take off their gear and decontaminate immediately. Reality says no such thing happened, and that they were in their radioactive equipment all the way to the hospital. The equipment is still in the basement.
You say Ignatenko’s wife wouldn’t have absorbed radiation from him, and their kid would be fine. Reality says she was indeed irradiated, and lost the kid. Sure, there was an inconsistency in saying the baby would have absorbed the radiation but she’s ok, but what you’re saying is downright false.
Finally, you say the incident had nothing to do with the shortcomings of the soviet system. This is patently false, and is an insult to the memory of Legasov, who killed himself to bring attention to a system that routinely hid hard truths from even its own people.
This whole article reads as a hit piece against a good piece of television by people who want to continue presenting the illusion that radiation is, as a whole, harmless.
“This whole article reads as a hit piece against a good piece of television by people who want to continue presenting the illusion that radiation is, as a whole, harmless”
Oh dear a piece spouting mountains of rubbish.
Did you read anything I wrote?
“From the horses mouth”, Idris would never have held anything like the sweeping opinions you are broadcasting all over your pile of unproveable blather.
He (head of radiological protection for the UK), would maintain ANY dose of radiation is TO BE AVOIDED.
In the case that accidents happen (which invariably do) thanks to… the strange and interesting properties of heavy metals like Plutonium, we have to have what’s called a MITIGATION STRATEGY.
It is a highly professional area, quite contrary to the expressed opinions of many shown here.
RPB people are very aware of the dangers of high energy ionising radiation, and prolonged exposure to high doses.
They are even more aware of the dangers of finely divided particles and ingestion into places that the body finds incredibly dangerous and remain there to cause major long term damage.
These are totally different things, which is probably why Chernobyl despite it’s enormous “pomp and circumstance” trumpetting and lambasting of the soviets passes by the collossal mass poisoning of the American people by more than 200 US atmospheric nuclear weapons tests over a period of nearly 2 decades in Nevada.
Chernobyl maimed and injured relatively few people and despite the total disregard shown for human life in the USSR , many are still alive today.
US servicemen were nowhere near so lucky!
GO look yankees what was happening on your doorstep, and stop looking up Ukraine’s A.. ss
You have done MANY MANY times worse!
Now, dear!
If you knew 1mg about this complex subject instead of spouting all kinds of junk science, you would know, YES, contaminated clothing and garments are a serious hazard, especially to the levels you would find all over a serious nuclear accident site….
BUT:-
ingestion of a TINY qty of say, Polonium 210 is into the body (a normally harmless alpha emitter) is a far far more dangerous poison than being irradiated by say 200R of strong gamma flux.
Why is this?
Finely divided dust with heavy metals embedded in it, attracted by static electricity (typical of radon and it’s daughters), fine dust from DU exploded munitions found all over Iraq and in some places in Serbia… thanks to our yankee friends again….
It gets into the lung linings much as does asbestos and causes a slow an lingering death decades later without being able to establish any obvious cause.
Not establishing causes for the 1000s of cancer deaths was deliberately perpetrated on US soldiers in Nevada, evacuating the islanders from Bikini and making believe all would be fine, when the biggest nuclear accident of all time happened on America’s watch when testing the first H bombs…
Hey let’s get this straight guys!
Chernobyl was just a “drop in the bucket” compared with the nuclear filth the US test scientists poured on unsuspecting US army personnel with the BAKER test, and the disastrous castle BRAVO.
read it and digest:-
“The test resulted in nuclear fallout that rained down on inhabitants of the atolls near the site of detonation and serviceman working on Operation Castle.
Critical fallout occurred in the Rongelap, Rongerik, Alinginea and Utirik atolls in the Marshall Islands. Evacuations organized by the United States were too slow to limit the lethal doses of radiation and, in many cases, inhabitants did not know about the nuclear test or the consequences of nuclear fallout.
In one tragic example, around five hours after Castle Bravo detonated, radioactive powder began to fall on Rongelap Atoll.
Believing that this powder was snow, many inhabitants played in and ate the powder.
For years later, inhabitants of the island experienced numerous health problems, including birth defects. An estimated 665 inhabitants of the Marshall Islands were overexposed to radiation. ”
An hour and a half after the detonation, nuclear fallout reached a Japanese fishing vessel, the “Lucky Dragon No. 5,” which was around 80 miles east of the test site. Ultimately, one of the 23 crew members died of acute radiation poisoning, while many others faced serious health effects.
So please stuff that up the CHERNOBYL program pipe and smoke it!
re: “fine dust from DU exploded munitions found all over Iraq and in some places in Serbia… thanks to our yankee friends again”
Let’s see what kind of “munitions” this may involve, because, the term “munitions” is a rather broad term and one may be inclined to think that ANYTHING that the military ‘threw’ at an enemy target contained DU.
On page 4 we find the reason for, and the purpose of, DU use:
Depleted Uranium (DU) Munitions
o Due to its extreme density (1.7 times the density of lead), DU is used as:
– The armor plating,
– Penetrator kinetic energy munitions for its mass and pyrophoric properties under conditions of extreme temperature and pressure.
On page 14 can be found a table labeled “The following ammunition contains DU cartridge penetrators” indicating which munitions contain DU.
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1508/ML15084A371.pdf
People. It’s drama. And very well done drama. And technically far more accurate than most if not all the nuclear disaster fairy tale dramatic films out there.
As TV movies based on reality goes, Chernobyl was excellent. Sure there was artistic license taken and composite characters… but, heck, Obama had more probably “composite characters” in his autobiography than Chernobyl did.
Chernobyl was not an indictment on Nuclear power, it was an indictment on big government, Bernie Sander’s style socialism. Not one “Big Corporation” or “Billionaire” was blamed for Chernobyl. This makes it unique for most “man made disaster” TV movies based on reality.
Nuclear Scientist’s and a military General were the hero’s of Chernobyl, the movie. How can a movie be anti-Nuclear, if Nuclear scientists are the hero’s? If Chernobyl was anti-Nuclear, they would have made some composite journalist be the hero’s.
Uruguayan. The rugby team was Uruguayan.
Don’t nitpick.
It was NOT a documentary, not supposed to be a documentary, you are just being a whiny baby.
Besides: nobody in the show ever said the “face-peelings” were from the radioactivity. These medical situations DID occur, but it was from exposure to the heat and flames, high-pressure steam, etc. The audience is meant to see this and wonder the same things that the witnesses did: “is that from the radiation!?!”, Which is exactly what the firemen and other townspeople feared at the time. They didn’t know, so we, the audience, is left with the same curiosity …even though, as it turns out, it was from flames, heat, etc.
It was a very entertaining show and that is the sole purpose of entertainment – to entertain. It’s not supposed to be a video class on the effects of radioactivity. And as far as accuracy, they got so many details correct, as far as home life in Chernobyl in that era (vehicles, clothing, phones, license plates, street lamps, etc), that what they did was impressive.
And the purpose of the story was to portray the terror the people experienced and the heroic response that was pulled together – courage in the face of terror. And that show succeeded in such an endeavor admirably.
Hang on sir. Yes, HBO overdramatised and exaggerated certain aspects of the event but it wasn’t a documentary and never claimed to be. You even said yourself: “I can tell you the fundamental story of the sequence of events of the 1986 Chernobyl accident as portrayed by HBO was correct. Issues around governance and procedure as portrayed by HBO were essentially correct.”
The series was not even about the disaster, it was about communism. “Chernobyl” was supposed to show what a disgrace, an absolute pile of shit, a black stain on humanity communism was. And it showed it spot on.
As a person born one day after the incident in what was then Peoples’ Republic of Poland I can assure you that the show perfectly depicted not only the political climate of that time but also the way people, cities and everyday items looked and how ordinary people behaved. In my opinion it was a very, very good show.
The people of Pripyat in the show actually seemed to have a higher standard of living than the averagec Soviet from what I have read.
According to the wife of the firefighter portrayed in the show, his skin came off repeatedly as white film. Apparently he and some others had crawled around the reactor core itself. The one guy’s face actually had partially rotted off, which the makers of the show said they did not want to show as they did not want to be too overly-graphic. They also said the purpose of the show was to educate about Chernobyl and the Soviet system’s lies, not frighten about nuclear power.
As for this claim of the Soviet authorities being caring or competent at all, I find that very hard to believe. They repeatedly lied to their own people, and even allowed a major celebration to go on while telling the Soviet authorities in the area to get out.
I also am curious about the claim of saying Chernobyl had no protective shell for containment. The thing is, given the two explosions which occurred, would a shell have made any difference? Or would it have just been blown apart?
“Late in 1972, Uruguayan Air Force flight 571 was taking a college rugby team and family members from Montevideo, Uruguay to Santiago, Chile. It carried five crew members and 40 passengers.”
Similar story with settlers trekking Donnerpass – the yellow pages were always greedy for punch lines.
The same Pulitzer that pushed horror stories for money funded the “honorably” Pulitzer-Preis did this with money “earned” with yellow pages.
https://www.google.com/search?q=settlers+trekking+donnerpass&oq=settlers+trekking+donnerpass&aqs=chrome.
And “satires”. https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-huawei&ei=-RImXZSPMq3mrgTj27SgCQ&q=yellow+pages+satire+comic+bringing+up+father&oq=Yellow+pages+satire+comic+bringing+up+fathr&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.
The same mass media that made the Bounty a “capital crime” scene:
https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-huawei&biw=360&bih=518&ei=ahcmXcXUFOzmrgSDwrfoDw&q=captain+william+bligh+of+the+bounty&oq=Captain+William+Bligh+bountt&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.