Doing a Good Thing

Guest Opinion by Kip Hansen

 

flowersThere are a lot of good things that you can do in your life.  In fact, doing good things is one of the greatest privileges of being a human being and the opportunities to do good are myriad and diverse.  Many philosophers and religionists claim that one can judge the success of one’s life, the value of one’s life, by the good that one accomplished in their lifetime.  Most of our decisions in day-to-day living are not choices between good-and-evil or right-and-wrong, but fall somewhere along the lines of “Should I do this good thing or that good thing?”.   Thus life gets complicated by the pressures to choose between things that might be characterized as Good, Better, Best choices — and for many of us, such choices are the hardest because each option is itself good and often necessary.

The lovely folks at the New York Times’ Climate Team have made a habit of offering their readers things that they can do to help save the planet — mostly how to save the planet from the humans.  Each week the Climate Team sends out a little email newsletter, called “Climate Fwd:” filled with a mix of scary stories about the climate and “things you can do” to save the environment or stop global warming.  Recent topics included “Climate change is a man-made problem that requires a feminist solution” and “One thing you can do: Think Dairy” —  which suggested that to have a “huge impact” you should consider switching from dairy milk to  “pea milk and yogurt, made from yellow split peas.”  Seriously, I encourage you to sign up for the newsletter — it is an opportunity to be amused by the inanity of “green journalism”.

Last week, the Times’ Smarter Living section teamed up with Climate Fwd: “to pull advice from a recurring feature in their newsletter: One thing you can do.”  Below are eight things that you — yes, you! — can do to care for the planet.

Many of the suggestions are good ideas, good things, that you could choose to do.

SPOILER ALERT:  None of them will have the slightest effect on anything outside of your little tiny one-person world.

Since I’m sure we all want to do our best and save the world (yes…ok…you can put on your favorite super-hero suit and cape so you feel the part…) here are the “8 Things You Can Do to Care For The Planet”:

 

1.  Hang on to your smartphone

A GOOD THING — “The little computer you carry with you requires a lot of energy to assemble. The production of an iPhone 6, for example, released the equivalent of 178 pounds of carbon dioxide, or about as much as burning nine gallons of gas….”  So try to keep it working as long as you can, you see, and if it breaks, consider buying a used replacement.  Besides, it cost upwards to a thousand dollars.  This is sure to have an planet-saving effect on the international cell phone market and you’ll be able to feel proud and publicly exhibit your virtue by making sure all your friends see that you are using an out-dated, scratched-up old iPhone6s.  Hint:  Repeatedly upgrading to the latest model phone just eats up your budget — a bad thing.

2.  Leave leaves

POOR ADVICE — “Leaves provide shelter for worms, moths and some butterflies, which then become prey for neighborhood birds. They also help nourish and fertilize soil, and you won’t burn fossil fuels by using a lawn mower or leaf blower.

Yes, there are better things to do with fallen leaves than the suburban neighborhood solution of raking them up, putting then in bags, and leaving them on the curb for the trash man.

Those of you who live in Fall Leaf Season zones know that the leaves can create an inches thick layer and suffocate any and all but the toughest lawns.  We have three fully mature maples in our yard (think 50 feet tall) and they drop a prodigious amount of leave matter.  While real gardening advice differs, most call for you to use your gas-guzzling lawn mower and  special mulching blades (which we use for all mowing) to reduce the leaves into tiny pieces and spread them evenly over the lawn in the fall while still dry — by mowing over them several times (in other words, extra mowing — not less).

At our house (now that my wife and I are back on land) we mow, mow, mow the leaves on the lawn, leave leaves in the perennial flower beds as mulch and put any extra leaves in the compost pile. (When I say “we” I mean my big strong adult boys.)

3.  Use a dishwasher, not the sink

A GOOD THING, MAYBE —  “Dishwashers have improved over the years: Average models certified by the government’s Energy Star program use 3.5 gallons or less per cycle.”  Compare that to 1.5 gallons of water down the drain if you’re washing under a running faucet.   Putting the day’s dishes in the dishwasher when there are only two of you eating 1.5 meals at home each day can also lead to running a dishwasher 1/4 full and wasting water and electricity.

Maybe the author has always had a dishwasher (he may not be old enough to remember when a family’s enslaved children were made to wash the dishes after dinner). For instance, he suggests: “If you don’t have the luxury of owning a dishwasher, try to do the two-bucket method: When washing dishes by hand, don’t let the water run. Fill one basin with wash water and the other with rinse water.” (Duh…that’s why there are two basins.)

Note that “saving water” is a good thing if you live in an area that has a water shortage or gets it water pumped up from a deep aquifer.  If your use of water simply diverts water that would otherwise flow into the sea, it is a moot point.  (Water is complicated….)

4.  Buy fewer clothes

A GOOD THING —   but not because they use water and chemicals to make clothes!  And not that not all clothes are biodegradable, so “it’s best to wear your clothes for a long, long time.” (hey, but please, wash them regularly, even though it uses water!)  However,  over-consumption is not a good thing — so buying fewer clothes is a positive.

woodstockYou can clearly see the tremendous impact you will make in the global environmental footprint of the fashion industry by wearing used ripped-knee blue genes instead of buying brand new ripped-knee blue genes.  If your fashion sense needs greening-up, visit the lovely little hamlet of Woodstock, New York, where the date never changes — it’s always 1968.

5.  Consider your online order, from click to carrier

A GOOD THING — Buy in bulk to reduce number of shipments, don’t buy-try-and-return.  Good ideas — and just think of the difference that will make in the Global Average Surface Temperature in the year 2200!

6.  Divest from fossil fuel

DUMB  — To his credit, James K. Williamson, author of these “8 things…” correctly offers no reasons why this is a good thing — as it is not.   If you do so publicly, and make a big fuss about it to make sure people are watching, you might get a little boost of virtue signaling — or — others might just think you need a better financial advisor.

Divestment is a strategy that neither fights climate change nor saves the planet.  It just changes who owns the world’s most valuable resources — fossil fuel reserves — and who shares in the profits.

7.  Be mindful of your food waste

A GOOD THING —   But not because “A massive amount of energy goes into producing the food we eat, especially meat and dairy. For example, the production of a single hamburger uses the same amount of water as a 90-minute shower.”  (Note that a long shower is NOT an example of  a “massive amount… of energy” — it is wasting fresh water — a problem in some areas.)

It is morally wrong to waste food.  This includes over-buying resulting in food that goes bad in your cupboard or refrigerator.  Smart buying and better storage avoids waste.  However, not wasting food in your home does not feed the starving children in China — however,  donating the money you save by not wasting food to reputable charities does feed hungry kids.

8.  Tune your heating system

A GOOD THING — “…poorly maintained systems can burn more oil or natural gas than is necessary.”  That is wasteful and hits your budget.  However, the Times’ falsely claims that tuning your heating system willto cut down on indoor particulate matter.

Your furnace or boiler does not contribute to indoor particulate matter air pollution (unless it is seriously broken and vents directly into the house —  you would already know this from the smoke and smell or finding that someone in your home has died due to carbon monoxide poisioning — another reason for getting that tune up.)  While tuning the heating system, check and clean your HVAC system’s outdoor machinery as well — often the heat transfer fins will be clogged with dirt and debris making the system less efficient and eating up your electrical budget.

THE BOTTOM LINE

We have 5 GOOD THINGS, 1 MAYBE A GOOD THING, 1 DUMB THING, and 1 bit of POOR ADVICE.

However, “Caring for the planet” is not a reason to actually do any of the 8 Things — none will have any discernible effect on the planet or on the environment.   Several will make your family budget go a little further — which is a good thing!

Suggestion: File the article under “Climate Silliness” (along with the pea milk and feminist-climate-solutions).

# # # # #

Author’s Comment Policy:

One thing about being human is that we like to think we are rational beings and that we do things for perfectly good reasons.  This proposition is dubious.  Far too often we are just bumbling along and bobbling the balls life has thrown at us — mostly trying to do the right thing.

It does not improve your life to do the right thing for the wrong reasons — or to do the wrong things for the right reason — and by this I mean fooling oneself into thinking your actions are having a bigger or different effect than they really are.  This is where many activists and advocacy groups go wrong — they mean to do good, “Save the Birds” or whatever — but they go off the rails, like the National Audubon Society which sends out strings of misleading scare stories, misinformation, (both Bad Things)  to garner donations to fund their good work of bird conservation.

The Climate Activist Propaganda machine has determined that people will support climate activism if they feel they are really contributing — so they foist off on the public long lists of SILLY THINGS, which are really totally ineffectual, that people can do to “save the planet” thus buying into the whole climate/environmental  craziness.

Address your comments aimed at me to “Kip”… so I’ll see them.

# # # # #

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

110 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dmacleo
March 5, 2019 1:47 pm

note, mulching blades and mulch adapter on mower decks uses a lot more fuel then very sharp (as in sharpen often) normal discharge blades.
when your average mowing runs 4 hours on a tractor you really see this effect.
also you will need to clean out deck itself a lot less often.

sharpen your blades often, use normal discharge. blow into piles (can use mower for this or use bagger) for your winter mulch and composting.
your gas cans, blade bearings and mandrels, wallet, etc will love you.

I run, on average, 60 to 150 cubic yard compost pile including leaves (use horse manure as base) and stopped dealing with mulch setups on decks. not worth the money.

Editor
Reply to  dmacleo
March 5, 2019 2:03 pm

dmacleo ==> Mulching blades do cause one to end up with a lot of very finely chopped gas plastered inside the mower deck — which I clean out once a season when I tip the riding mower up to inspect the blade for sharpness (again, when I say “I” I mean my big adult boys). This grass mush goes in the compost pile. As we have only “grassy areas” (not Better Homes and Gardens lawns) we are pretty lax about grass heights and don’t mow any oftener than necessary (I think this means when my oldest son’s socks get wet in the morning due, grass being higher than his shoes — though this is not a truly scientific observation).

If your average mowing task takes four hours, you have my sympathy

dmacleo
Reply to  Kip Hansen
March 5, 2019 2:23 pm

I only mention this as you mentioned an actual compost pile. I found non “mulched” BUT mowed leaves (I leave grass clippings where they lay, I run good blades sharpened weekly) to give higher heat in compost pile. even when I cannot get massey tractor on site to turn pile.
I also (weekly) sharpen blades for multiple zero turns and push mowers used by friend for commercial lawn care so….3 more blades each week nothing much to do. keep 2 sets, one always sharp swap out sharpen old ones when get chance.
since I converted sand (literally 12 ft deep) to lawn (around actual house site) got lot of experience seeing what worked best. mulch or sharp blades.
blades won. then rest of lot (old cow pasture so is really hay) surrounded by normal Maine trees so get ton of leaves there. plus the trees (used hybrid poplars here, 70+ ft tall in 10 years) I planted for shade and wind block drop a lot…..
just opinion of course, but I think mulching mowers almost as big a scam as AGW. not mulching left me less japanese beetle infestations, etc.
take a chance….try my thinking once season 🙂
worst case is you use less of that evil gasoline LOL
and of course, every lot/situation is different and what works best for me may not work best for you.
just a thought.

Paul Penrose
Reply to  dmacleo
March 5, 2019 2:57 pm

Ug, it’s a major effort to remove the 54″ mower deck on my tractor to get to the blades. Weekly sharpening is not in the cards for me. Yearly is the best I can manage, so I use mulching blades. As to the mess it leaves in the deck, I simply clean it after each mowing. Takes only a few minutes with the garden hose, an adjustable angle adapter, and a small nozzle. I have two acres to mow and this works great for me. I have a plot that was farm land just a few years ago, so there’s no trees or bushes. If I didn’t have a lawn of some kind, the weeks would be so tall and thick I would need a machete to move around the property. I planted fescue to have a more natural look and I cut it as high as the mower will allow (about 5″). So far this has been a reasonable compromise. I use as few chemicals as possible (mostly because they are expensive), but some of the weeds here a very aggressive, so I have to stay on top of them. It’s a lot of work, but my wife and dogs appreciate it.

dmacleo
Reply to  Paul Penrose
March 5, 2019 4:05 pm

I don’t bother removing deck, drive onto ramp of trailer (at angle/orientation that leaves deck room) reach under swap blades. course I do multiple “decks” a week so learned some tricks. I have air guns or (in case of 1 zero turn) air gun AND electric impact/long breaker bar so am used to it.

still…with all this talk about cleaning and blade swaps nobody else has actually checked fuel usage as I have on multiple sized decks (from 46 inch to 72 inch, 22hp to 30hp gas and 23 to 30hp diesel) which was really the big issue.
run your fuel figures.
figure out what works best for you.

DaveW
March 5, 2019 2:39 pm

Darn Kip,

I thought you were giving me a chance to virtue signal about all the flowers I have planted and how the native bees love me for it. Instead, I probably shouldn’t even mention it, but in Australia rinsing dishes is not something one does in polite company. Scrub pan to the rack is the usual path and wipe off any suds with a towel before putting away in drawer or cabinet. When you are living on tank water and the rains are irregular and unpredictable, then you don’t want to waste any. When I lived in a wetter land I had one of those rolling dishwashers like you had and only ran a cycle when it was full. Had to clean out the drain regularly though.

Off this topic, but in reference to your Monarch essay, seems the Monarch people have been arguing for years about what the Eastern NA migration was like before forest clearing. A consensus may or may not exist that there was a smaller migration up and down The Great Plains before they were plowed and it moved east and grew larger as the forests were cleared and weedy milkweeds spread. Lincoln Brower wrote about it here:

https://archive.org/stream/biostor-115918/biostor-115918_djvu.txt

Editor
Reply to  DaveW
March 5, 2019 3:16 pm

DaveW ==> Thanks for the Monarchs link — I will be doing a follow-up sometimes this month.

Our 12 years aboard our sailboat taught us a lot about how to conserve fresh water and when salt water was adequate to the tax.

Editor
Reply to  Kip Hansen
March 5, 2019 3:45 pm

….adequate to the task.

John Bell
March 5, 2019 3:56 pm

Kip – or anybody, okay I gotta ask, if a “god” exists, then where did it come from (what made god) and why can we not detect it? (the god) and what does god do, operationally speaking?

Editor
Reply to  John Bell
March 5, 2019 4:59 pm

John Bell ==> Try William Briggs’ site — where he has run a long-term series on such matters.

Reply to  John Bell
March 5, 2019 9:43 pm

your question extends the notion of temporality and causality beyond breaking point.

Consider: ‘who made God’?

Now implicit in the question is the notion that causality is more fundamental than God, and that time is more fundamental than God. You are so to speak placing this putative God inside the space time causal universe that you consider to exist. In short you have assumed a temporal causal world without God into which a God is to be created.

That is circular thinking just as much as a world with nothing BUT God in it, that then decides, or whatever, to become phenomenal at which point space, time energy and causality appears simultaneously. I.e a sort of Godly Big Fart.

Science today is closer to re-stating Genesis as a creation myth than at any time in the last 400 years.

Of course the personality and intelligence and purposefulness of a Classic God is missing from Science. Occam deems it not necessary, to explain things. So it’s been discarded.

As far as 58% of (US) scientists believing in God. Well 97% of them believe in climate change, so statistically that’s not a big statement innit?

Yours, playfully, and philosophically,

Bewildered, of Britain…

🙂

Johann Wundersamer
March 6, 2019 2:47 am

“4. Buy fewer clothes

A GOOD THING — but not because they use water and chemicals to make clothes! And not that not all clothes are biodegradable, so “it’s best to wear your clothes for a long, long time.” (hey, but please, wash them regularly, even though it uses water!) However, over-consumption is not a good thing — so buying fewer clothes is a positive.”
___________________________________________________

Oh yah! Every green renewable environment protecting caring females is a role model :

https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung&ei=cqN_XLz0KfLNrgTQwZ7oCA&q=germany+50+percent+clothing+dumped+worn+clothes+collection+&oq=germany+50+percent+clothing+dumped+worn+clothes+collection+&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.

StephenP
Reply to  Johann Wundersamer
March 6, 2019 3:20 am

We are told that every time we wash synthetic fabrics significant amounts of ‘microplastics’ go down the drain and into the ocean where they cause problems with plankton.
It seems that we should all be wearing natural fibres?

ozspeaksup
Reply to  StephenP
March 6, 2019 4:05 am

well wool and coton wear well, and last if decent quality.
however Aussie wool os hitting 20$au perkilo or more this year
so woolen clothing blankets etc will be damned pricey very soon.
drought stock losses and possible wartimes tend to make wool a valuable commodity.
the price per kilo for wax has also risen substantially in the last year to well over 5x the price paid for wholesale honey. another hint its being bought up for a purpose we mightnt enjoy.

Editor
Reply to  StephenP
March 6, 2019 7:01 am

Stephen ==> Those microfibers are food for bacteria that eats them in the ocean….lots of research going on in this realm. The truth about pelagic plastic is that plastic items general break down into smaller and smaller pieces which then “disappear” — had people baffled until they looked at these tiny bits in an electron microscope and saw that the bits were simply being eaten by various bacteria.
I’ll be writing here about that soon.

Editor
March 8, 2019 8:07 am

Epilogue:

Fine discussion — and a lot of interest in the best way to deal with fallen leaves — we ought to start a garden and lawn care site!

Seriously, I appreciate all the participation in the comments section here. I am repeatedly surprised by one of two things (and I have no way to determine which of these things it is) 1) The journalists at the NY Times think that their readers are imbeciles who can easily be led by the nose to follow such silly suggestions on “saving the planet” or 2) That the journalists themselves have been brainwashed-by-echo-chamber to be foolish enough to actually believe these things will have a planetwide impact. I grant the possinbility that both are true.

Thanks for participating and….

Thanks for reading.

# # # # #