
Alan H. Taylor
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
h/t Dr. Willie Soon / Daily Caller – After weeks of climate change rhetoric, California Governor Jerry Brown has decided to do something practical to reduce Californian fire risk, by proposing a relaxation of regulations governing logging and tree thinning.
California fires: Governor proposes easing logging rules to thin forests
By PAUL ROGERS | progers@bayareanewsgroup.com | Bay Area News Group
PUBLISHED: August 23, 2018 at 4:14 pm | UPDATED: August 24, 2018 at 4:27 amFaced with the worst summer fire season in 10 years, Gov. Jerry Brown is proposing broad new changes to California’s logging rules that would allow landowners to cut larger trees and build temporary roads without obtaining a permit as a way to thin more forests across the state.
The proposal — which has the support of the timber industry but is being opposed by more than a dozen environmental groups — would represent one of the most significant changes to the state’s timber harvesting rules in the past 45 years.
The legislative session ends for the year next Friday. On Thursday, the details were still being negotiated by legislative leaders and the governor’s office behind the scenes and had not yet been formally introduced in a bill or put up for a vote.
“They are trying to get to some kind of a deal,” said Rich Gordon, the president of the California Forestry Association, a timber industry group. “They are looking at what can get done politically.”
Under Brown’s proposal, private landowners would be able to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter — up from the current 26 inches — on property of 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit from the state, as long as their purpose was to thin forests to reduce fire risk. They also would be able to build roads of up to 600 feet long without getting a permit, as long as they repaired and replanted them.
Timber industry officials say the changes are needed to cut red tape and increase incentives for landowners, particularly in the Sierra Nevada, to thin pine and fir forests that have become dangerously overgrown after 100 years of fire fighting.
…
Governor Brown’s proposal comes in the wake of harsh criticism of the role radical greens have played in obstructing sensible forest management.
In my opinion there is no doubt of a direct connection between senseless environmental obstructionism perpetrated by radical greens, and the unnecessary deaths of people caught in fires made worse because of that green obstructionism.
Regardless of whether climate change is contributing to California’s fires, improved forest management will mitigate the risk. If there is no timber or vegetation to burn, there can be no fire.
Cutting fire breaks, cutting access roads, performing more controlled burns, thinning dead wood just waiting to go up like a torch, reduces the risk of fires getting out of control, reduces the intensity of wildfires if they do get out of control, and makes it easier for firefighters to regain control of large fires.
Governor Jerry Brown’s proposal is a good start – but I suspect a lot more will have to be done, and fast, to undo the harm done by decades of mismanagement, red tape and green obstructionism.
Update (EW): added extra highlighting to the quoted article – more than a dozen environmental groups are opposed to relaxation of logging regulations.
I can already hear the environmental purists screaming.
Now that Trump has straightened out Jerry Brown on the need to manage the forests and woodlands, Jerry needs to think about what he is going to do with all that wood.
I would suggest that Jerry make a deal with the UK to sell them wood for their wood-burning powerplant. Jerry could also build wood-burning powerplants in California and use those cut trees right on site. Win/win!
Another selective information from the CBC about the size of BC forest fires…
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/the-future-looks-grim-after-2-years-of-devastating-b-c-wildfires-1.4801181
The journalist, Bethany Lindsay quotes The Canadian Partnership twitter feed of https://www.canadawildfire.org/about claiming that the 2018 season is second only to the 2017 season…
https://twitter.com/CanadaWildfire/status/1034098090813210624/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1034098090813210624&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cbc.ca%2Fnews%2Fcanada%2Fbritish-columbia%2Fthe-future-looks-grim-after-2-years-of-devastating-b-c-wildfires-1.4801181
Yet according to Wikipedia, the 1950 Chinchaga fire has burned about 1,4000,000 hectares alone, known as the biggest forest fire in North America. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fires_in_Canada
No mention of this fire? Because it straddles Alberta… How convenient.
Meanwhile, the usual University professor rehashing the weak jet stream stuff and stagnant weather…
While Moonbeam seeing the light would be a wonderful story, that I not how I read this article. I dealt directly with a state legislature for around a decade. So any bill that was not introduced early in session, gone through committee(s), had little chance of passage. So this is so much PR or spin leading up to the midterm elections. There are trying to give people the idea that the Sacramento politicians have suddenly become reasonable. The various environmental groups are part of the Democratic Party base, though often taken for granted like other parts of the Party base they will certainly not ignore them.
Also, Moonbeam as I understand it is term limited so he can say “see I proposed a solution” while knowing that the bill will not pass and the next Governor will inherit the problem. Even if he were not term limited the enviros could keep the bill tied up in court for a decade, just long enough for fuel to build.
The thing that gets me about environmental zealots, not true environmentalists, is that they believe in “preservation” not “conservation”.
Preservation guarantees massive fires and damage and the fact that Brown acknowledges this means it must be true, but, wait for the backflip
Trump tweeted him to do so.
You remember?
Rule No. 1: Everything is Trump’s fault. Period. LOL.
OT / related: clearing forest for brown coal mining –
https://www.google.at/search?q=hambacher+Forst+cutting+green+activists&oq=hambacher+Forst+cutting+green+activists&aqs=chrome.
About time. Someone would eventually sue California for ruining the air quality in neighboring states – intentionally. Following the instructions of a bunch of idiots in the Sierra Club is pandering at the risk of the health of Californians, Oregonians, and Nevadans. Maybe more.
I still think a law suit is in order. Here in the Reno area we’ve only seen the local mountains about 50% of the time since June. That’s the second year in a row they’ve been destroying our air quality. It’s one thing to have been stupid last year, but two years in a row….