From The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and University of Chicago and the “Trump could never win, our polling is accurate” department.
Most Americans want the government to combat climate change, some willing to pay a high amount
The largest shares of Americans say they oppose the repeal of the Clean Power Plan and the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.
Sixty-one percent of Americans think climate change is a problem that the government needs to address, including 43 percent of Republicans and 80 percent of Democrats, according to a new survey from the Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) and The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
Those numbers are even higher when only those who believe in climate change are asked. Seven in 10 Republicans and nearly all Democrats who believe climate change is happening think the government needs to take action. When asked about key climate policy decisions, the largest shares of Americans say they oppose the repeal of the Clean Power Plan and the withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement.
While many Americans favor policies that would help the country lower emissions, questions on how much they would personally be willing to pay to confront climate change (in the form of a monthly fee on their electric bill) reveal great disparity. While half are unwilling to pay even one dollar, 18 percent are willing to pay at least $100 per month.
“These results put the polarized climate debate in sharp relief, but also point to the possibility of a path forward,” said Michael Greenstone, director of EPIC and the Milton Friedman Professor in Economics, the College, and the Harris School at the University of Chicago. “Although half of households said they were unwilling to pay anything for a carbon policy in their monthly electricity bills, on average Americans would pay about $30 per month, as a meaningful share of households report that they are willing to pay a substantial amount. What is particularly striking is that it’s projected to cost less than $30 per person to pay for climate damages from the electricity sector. So, while the raw economics appears to be less and less of a problem, the open question is whether it is feasible to devise a robust climate policy that accommodates these very divergent viewpoints.”
The survey also reveals new insights into how Americans view hydraulic fracturing. The number of people who say they favor fracking more than doubles when presented with evidence that it will save them money, while fewer change their opinion on fracking when presented with environmental or health arguments. Specifically, Americans’ support for fracking jumps from 17 percent to 41 percent when presented with evidence that it will save them $250 annually on their personal natural gas bill. Meanwhile, the 41 percent who initially said they opposed fracking increased to 51 percent and 58 percent, respectively, when presented with health and environmental arguments against it.
“Public opinion around many energy issues tends to be fluid, with people often defaulting to partisan starting points. But this survey shows an opportunity for consensus building through discussion and debate,” said Trevor Tompson, director of The AP-NORC Center. “Majorities of both Democrats and Republicans agree that climate change is happening, and there are signs that consensus could happen on other issues, too.”
Additional findings from the survey include:
- Seventy-two percent of Americans believe climate change is happening, including 85 percent of Democrats and 61 percent of Republicans. Nineteen percent remain unsure.
- Political party and belief in climate change are the main determinants of whether people are willing to pay a modest fee to combat climate change, as opposed to education, income, or geographic location. Democrats are consistently willing to pay more than Republicans.
- Fifty-seven percent support actions taken by some mayors and governors to honor the goals of the Paris climate agreement despite U.S. withdrawal, and 55 percent think their state and local government should do more to address climate change. A third say they should stick to the status quo.
- Climate change and energy policy are very or extremely important to 48 percent and 54 percent of Americans, respectively, while at least two-thirds say health care, the economy, and terrorism are important policy priorities.
- Thirty-five percent oppose the direction of energy policy in the United States, while 45 percent lack an opinion and only 17 percent support the direction. Republicans are more likely than Democrats to favor the direction of energy policy, but they are most likely to lack an opinion.
- Roughly equal shares of Americans favor, oppose, and neither favor nor oppose the construction of the Keystone and Dakota Access pipelines.
- Forty percent of Americans oppose the repeal of the Clean Power Plan, which the Trump administration is reviewing. Thirty-seven percent lack an opinion, while just 20 percent favor its repeal.
- More Americans lack an opinion on the use of fracking in the United States than support it: 37 percent neither favor nor oppose fracking, 17 percent favor it, and 41 percent oppose it.
- An equal number of Americans either support or lack an opinion on the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, while the largest number opposes withdrawal: 42 percent oppose it, 28 percent support it, and 28 percent neither support nor oppose withdrawal. Half of those who support withdrawal say the agreement was too costly for the United States.
###
About the Survey
This survey was conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and with funding from EPIC. Data were collected using AmeriSpeak Omnibus®. The survey was part of a larger study that included questions about other topics not included in this report. Interviews for this survey were conducted between Aug. 17 and 21, 2017, with adults age 18 and over representing the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Panel members were randomly drawn from AmeriSpeak, and 1,038 completed the survey by web or phone, depending on respondent preference. The overall margin of sampling error is +/- 4.1 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level, including the design effect. The margin of sampling error may be higher for subgroups.
Here is the Survey:
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
One of the reasons people don’t believe in CAGW is that it conflicts with their lived experience. If you prod them with a poll question, they will give an answer that they think makes them look better.
Folks my parents’ age know that the weather in the dirty thirties hasn’t happened since. We actually had climate refugees then. Woody Guthrie wrote a song about Dustbowl Refugees.
And John Steinbeck wrote a novel or two.
Bad news for them !
“While half are unwilling to pay even one dollar” !!!
Actually, I want $100 monthly as compensation for being subjected to this crap without adequate warning labels.
Excellent. Contributions can be made 100% voluntary.
“Climate damages”. A damaged climate — seriously? If only we could remove some of that killer H2O from the atmosphere…
When I was involved in politics I was taught that Communists always vote. Same goes for loony left activists.
The really, really big question:
http://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/7600/V1FMoa.png
So statistically, no change.
Correction: AmeriSpeak members willing to pay big bucks to combat climate change.
Meanwhile Warren Buffet pays big bucks to buy a network of truck stops. That’s after buying up the coal hauler railroad in BNSF. Making money off the suckers pays well.
In the interest of fairness, those who are willing to pay to fight “climate change” should be allowed to do so.
What was the percentage of respondents who could define the word “climate” and the phrase “climate change”?
That’s because Democrats never spend their own money.
55% of respondents would also probably say that they think think their state and local government should do more to address plate tectonics and entropy too.
But, what do they fear the most?


45% of respondents were smart enough to know that they don’t have a fracking clue about energy.
Who cares?
How many of the 77% who oppose or have no opinion on the CPP are in favor of their lights actually coming on when they flip a switch and would prefer not to have skyrocketing electricity rates?
Are 41% of Americans really that stupid?
Ratification of a treaty requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate. 42% support for a treaty falls a bit short. I wonder how much overlap there was between the 41% who oppose fracking and the 42% who opposed 86’ing the Paris deal?
I hereby state unequivocally and categorically my willingness to pay 100% of my salary to fight space aliens.
We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender!
I am forming a resistance movement. If you will e-mail me your banking records, I will make sure that you get prominent mention in our next news letter.
For once, I am 100% in support and more than in 100% encouragement of what supposed to be offered and proposed by this survey and its conclusion, especially when a type of new consensus been contemplated.
Let’s be fair, and allow these guys to have a fair chance in jumping and running the next stage of wind and solar power.
You never know, all of us, me included, that actually are against it, at some point may be proven wrong, clearly.
What better place than USA can this be attempted at this stage in a fair and square way.
If the people wanted, then these guys should offer it and even encouraged when at it,,,,,,,, and let’s wait and see, and probably in the end accept that most of us here were wrong, all along………fair, will that not be!
I am not been sarcastic, if any one wonders, honestly…….let us make Griff for once happy..:)
cheers
LOL, you used the phrase “fair and square”.
Buwhahahahahahahah. Oh stop. You’re killing me. I can’t stop laughing.
Most people aren’t aware that, should they wish to pay more taxes, there is a line on their tax form to contribute above and beyond their govMINT obligation.
I believe that is how we need to solve this global warming funding problem. Add a line item to every utility bill allowing each household to contribute, voluntarily, whatever they think is fair and affordable. If you wish to pay 30 or 100 dollars extra each month you now have a vehicle to assuage your guilt at expelling CO2 into the atmosphere. Methinks the actual percentage of donors will not come close to matching the survey respondents and may actually approach zero.
I have found that people are often “willing” to do many things, but are unable when the opportunity presents.
i would like all Americans to pay me 30 dollars each year to fight climate change for them. Paying me to fight climate change through prayer is about as effective as any other approach. Climate change has been going on for eons and will continue to go on for eons whether Mankind is here are not. Do not mix up true climate change with weather cycles that are part of the current climate. Our global climate has been changing so slowly that it takes groups of very sophisticated instruments many decades to even detect it. Americans need to understand that extreme weather events to include floods and droughts are part of the current climate so that puting a hault of climate change will not eliminate extreme weather everts.
The paleoclimate record and the work that has been done on climate models supports the idea that the climate change we have been experiencing is caused by the sun and the oceans over which Mankind has no control. There is no real evidence that CO2 has any effect on climate and plenty of scientific rational to support the idea that the climate sensifity of CO2 is zero. So even if we removed all the CO2 from the Earth’s atmosphere, the action would have no effect on climate however life as we know it would come to an abrupt end. This is all a matter of science.
Since Mother Nature is the culprit here, my prayers will be as effective as anything else to control Mother Nature and to get her to stop changing the Earth’s climate. One may also consider sueing Mother Nature in the court system but it would be very difficult to collect on a judgment since Mother Nature does not have any money. No one knows how to get Mother Nature to obey a cease and desist order.
ARE PEOPLE IN THE WESTERN DEMOCRACIES GETTING STUPIDER? I suspect they are.
Maybe it is because of our education system, which is dominated by leftist ideologues who have little real-life experience. These imbeciles cling to Harpo-Marxist fantasies that killed several hundred million people during the 20th Century and destroyed the freedoms of billions more.
Can you imagine members of the Great Generation, who suffered through the Great Depression, fought in World War 2 and Won the Peace believing Al Gore’s global warming hysteria?
Can you imagine the current crop of ultra-delicate “snowflakes”, who take great offence at the slightest slight (real or imaginary), interacting with veterans and civilians who survived the horrors of WW2?
I think there are a whole lot of people today who are far too stupid to vote. We should have big billboards with skill-testing questions, that read:
“IF YOU CAN’T ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS, JUST STAY HOME – YOU ARE ‘WAY TOO STUPID TO VOTE!”
Best, Allan 🙂
Tell the lie long enough – bingo! It’s now the truth!
To show how unlikely it is that people are worried about CAGW, go to the UN’s own poll, myworld2015.org, where some 10million people have responded to state what matters concern them for the future.
When last I looked , concern about climate change was dead last from a field of about 14 issues.
From the article: “When asked about key climate policy decisions, the largest shares of Americans say they oppose the repeal of the Clean Power Plan”
I wonder how many of these poll takers actually know any details about the Clean Power Plan. I suspect most of them don’t have a clue what it involves.
Reminds me of the joke with the punch line: “we already know what you are, we’re just negotiating the price”. (Ask your father for the joke part…)
I’m certainly willing to pay to fight climate change, but if I give $100 to the Al Gore Fundorama, how can I be sure that all $100 will go to the 40% of climate change that MAY be caused by humans?
Does the other $60 go to Mother Nature, Inc.?
“1,038 completed the survey”. Surely I am misreading the figure. Does the sample only consist of 1,038 adults?
According to the most recent census estimates that I have seen there are approximately 248 million adults living in the USA.
1,038 adults represent about 4 out of every 1,000,000 adults in the whole population (c/f CO2 400 parts per million).
I have no idea of what distribution the surveyors have assumed for the population but to suggest that a sample of this size can have a 95 percent confidence level with an error of only +/- 4.1% is ludicrous.
The sampling is especially un-representative when you deliberately select the people who are polled, as in this survey.
Then there are other biases, such as only polling people during the day- that is sure to bias the sampling in favor of those who are home during normal 9-5 working hours – then you have a poll of home-makers and the unemployed.
It means the poll is 100 percent accurate 4.1 percent of the time.
A sample size that large might give meaningful results, if it was random. The group used in this study was not, so it is just a press release on the writer’s concerns.
From the people who believe in climate change. ” The cheques in the mail”. Oh yeh! Sure.
Australians polled recently-
http://joannenova.com.au/2017/09/62-of-australians-dont-want-to-pay-even-10-a-month-for-renewables/
and you’d suspect the Don’t Know/Not Saying? are being coy given most know what the PC answer should be. Mind you saying you’re prepared to cough up and actually doing so are entirely different matters and given the number of politicians running around like headless chooks suddenly very interested in reducing power prices and preventing blackouts we can draw an obvious conclusion.
Obviously they didn’t ask the deplorables who voted for President Trump wanting him to undo a lot of what the “elite” have done.
James Bull