Claim: Chocolate CAUSES Climate Change

Swiss Chocolate, author angelcandy.baby, source Wikimedia
Swiss Chocolate, author angelcandy.baby, source Wikimedia

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

The Chocolate Climate Worriers have switched tactics, from claiming that climate is going to kill all the cocoa plants, to claiming we should feel guilty about wanting chocolate in the first place.

New Research Suggests Cocoa Trade Fueling Climate Change

Is your chocolate bar damaging the environment?

17/09/2017 8:07 AM AEST

LONDON, Sept 14 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) – Your afternoon chocolate bar may be fueling climate change, destroying protected forests and threatening elephants, chimpanzees and hippos in West Africa, research suggests.

Well-known brands, such as Mars and Nestle, are buying through global traders cocoa that is grown illegally in dwindling national parks and reserves in Ivory Coast and Ghana, environmental group Mighty Earth said.

“Every consumer of chocolate is a part of either the problem or the solution,” Etelle Higonnet, campaign director at Mighty Earth, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

“You can choose to buy ethical chocolate. Or you’re voting with your dollar for deforestation.”

Mars and Nestle told the Thomson Reuters Foundation they are working to tackle deforestation.

“We take a responsible approach to sourcing cocoa and have committed to source 100 percent certified sustainable cocoa by 2020,” Mars said in an email.

Ivory Coast, Francophone West Africa’s biggest economy, is the world’s top cocoa grower.

While the bulk of its 1 million cocoa farmers ply their trade legally, Washington-based Mighty Earth estimates about a third of cocoa is grown illegally in protected areas.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2017/09/16/new-research-suggests-cocoa-trade-fueling-climate-change_a_23211943/

The new chocolate furore seems to be based on a document published by a Washington think tank called “Mighty Earth”.

… The investigation found that illegal deforestation for cocoa is an open secret throughout the entire chocolate supply chain. The process of deforestation for cocoa starts with settlers who invade parks and other forested areas. These settlers then progressively clear the underbrush of forests by cutting down or burning existing trees. The photos presented here document how this unsustainable form of cocoa production leaves behind what are known as skeleton forests: trunks denuded of their crowns and leaves that remain in the cocoa monocultures as ghostly reminders of the great forests that once reigned.

With the forests gone, the settlers then plant cocoa trees, which take years before they are ready for harvest. Each cocoa tree bears two harvests of cocoa pods per year. When cocoa is ready to be harvested, farmers hack o the ripe cocoa pods from the trees with machetes. They split open the pods to remove the cocoa beans, which they then sort through and place into piles. The beans are left in the sun to ferment and dry; this is when the beans turn brown.

It is at this point that a first level of middlemen called “pisteurs” buy the cocoa beans from the settlers, transport it to villages and towns across the cocoa-growing region, and sell them onto another set of middlemen, known as cooperatives. The cooperatives then either directly or through a third set of middlemen bring the cocoa to the coastal ports of San Pedro and Abidjan, where it is sold to Olam, Cargill, and Barry Callebaut, who ship the cocoa to chocolate companies in Europe and North America.

Throughout this path, the illegal origin of the cocoa is apparent. We visited entire illegal towns and villages called ‘campements’ that have sprung up inside Ivory Coast’s national parks and protected forests. Even though these settlements are within protected areas, some boast tens of thousands of residents, along with public schools, social health centers, mosques, churches, stores, and occasionally cell phone towers, in plain sight of government authorities. Pisteurs openly admitted to us that they bought cocoa from inside national parks and protected forests. Owners of cooperatives within the illegal towns spoke openly about sourcing cocoa from protected areas as well. …

Read more: http://www.mightyearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/chocolates_dark_secret_english_web.pdf

What happened when what passes for the Ivory Coast government was pressured into taking action?

… The government of Ivory Coast took action recently against cocoa-driven deforestation by expelling cocoa farmers from Mount Péko National Park (which means “mountain of hyenas” in the local Gueré language). According to a report by Human Rights Watch and the Ivorian Coalition of Human Rights (RAIDH), the evictions were poorly planned and carried out in violation of human rights standards. When we visited Mount Péko after the eviction, we found the park once again filled with cocoa smallholders who had returned. Some smallholders explained to us that when they finally returned to Mount Péko, they simply paid the authorities higher bribes to go back to cultivating their lands in the park. …

Read more: Same link as above

My sympathy is with the illegal farmers. The political situation is horrendous, the report mentions the investigators were prevented from inspecting some regions because of an outbreak of fighting between government forces and rebels. Yet rather than jumping on a boat and becoming part of the global refugee problem, or growing drugs, those “illegal farmers” are trying to make the best of their miserable situation by cultivating cocoa.

We should be giving the farmers a break; but green obsessed Westerners are stirring up trouble for these unfortunates, drawing the attention of corrupt Ivory Coast authorities to a pile of money they haven’t stolen yet, trying to stir up climate controversy against their product, and complaining that these desperately poor farmers should be more sensitive to the environment.

For shame. Let these farmers get on with their lives, with their courageous efforts to make a decent living, to create safety and security for their families in the midst of nightmare circumstances the like of which few of us will ever have to endure.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

162 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
September 16, 2017 11:29 pm

And these people continue to wonder why no one takes them seriously…

September 17, 2017 12:29 am

One can eat ‘Ethical chocolates’ with nasty taste. I like the yummy one.

September 17, 2017 1:26 am

I guess the HuffPo journo didn’t find it ironic writing this up on their iPad shipped from China.

September 17, 2017 1:40 am

CAGW Enthusiasts are now starting to scrape the bottom of their Alarm Barrel in search of any new scare. The public is becoming increasingly bored with the fiasco and returning to deal with real problems.

Vald
September 17, 2017 1:47 am

Almost all the chocolate nowadays is fake anyway, be it adding palm oil and what not. I can only find original recipes in New Zealand.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Vald
September 17, 2017 6:21 am

thank you!
i was looking like the only one reading who isnt fussed either way over chocolate
i dont mind a small amount..but a block usually goes off before i get round to another nibble
and that was my point
chocolate is being adulterated with other oils!
theyre taking the cocoa butter out for high end marketing etc
and substituting crap oils
evidenced by the extremely short shelf life of an opened block…inc cooking choc
dark cooking choc could be kept in cupboard for years and still BE chocolate
recent purchase went pale and crumbly and utterly inedible even to cook with in less than a year.
recent nestle dark with mint turned to powder in 5 months once open.

AndyG55
September 17, 2017 2:45 am

I know , I’m a philastrine for getting away from purity… but
….. currently enjoying Lindt salted caramel chocolate bar.
I’m only going to each half of it now… really I am !!comment image

Reply to  AndyG55
September 17, 2017 4:35 am

I like their new 78% chocolate.

Neil Jordan
Reply to  AndyG55
September 17, 2017 11:04 am

Half? Half? You know the trouble that can be caused when you promise to eat only half. See what happened with Climate Scientist Laurel and Climate Scientist Hardy trying that with a liquid:
https://youtu.be/iMoSu6e1IZ0
Also, in ChromoNutrition, chocolate is in the brown food group. Red food group includes maraschino cherries. Multicolor food group includes M&Ms.
\sarc for the humor-impaired

London247
Reply to  AndyG55
September 17, 2017 2:08 pm

Pah!! Try the Lindt Creme Brûlée. Chocolate and custard. Your taste buds will love you for ever.

September 17, 2017 3:51 am

I know from personal experience that I cause more climate change after eating beans than after eating chocolate!

AndyG55
Reply to  lenbilen
September 17, 2017 4:08 am

Only very local climate change.
Hopefully NOT global !!

drednicolson
Reply to  AndyG55
September 17, 2017 4:46 am

Vegans release more methane than they’ll ever sequester by not eating cow.

Sara
Reply to  AndyG55
September 17, 2017 6:14 am

Veganism is a mental disorder.

Margaret Smith
September 17, 2017 4:04 am

The greens and AGW folk raised not a peep while rain forests were being cleared by big business (and the timber harvested for profit) in preparation to plant eucalyptus trees to harvest ‘carbon credits’. Nothing said about biodiversity!
Small local greens (real greens) could not get the attention of the big greens over the issue. They hadn’t realised the big greens had morphed into big reds and couldn’t care less about the ecosystem.

Nigel S
September 17, 2017 4:04 am

But cutting down US forests to make electricity at Drax in UK is OK?

willhaas
September 17, 2017 4:10 am

The claim is that climate change is caused by human consumers, not only of chocolate but of any other agriculture products or any goods and or services that involve the use of fossil fuels or any other carbon based fuel including wood. The obvious solution is to get rid of all consumers of the above mentioned goods and or services. If you believe that eating chocolate is bad then stop eating chocolate. If you think that the burning of fossil fuels is bad then stop making use of goods and or services that in any way depend upon the use of fossil fuels. If CO2 is bad we must eliminate it from our environment even if it means eliminating all life on this planet along with it.

Tim
Reply to  willhaas
September 17, 2017 7:09 am

They’re working on it.

Sara
Reply to  Tim
September 17, 2017 1:46 pm

I think the ‘They’ should be eliminated first. Just MHO.

commieBob
September 17, 2017 4:29 am

I’m not automatically with the farmers. It all depends on how it’s done.
You can easily google pictures of the border between Haiti and the Dominican Republic. link In some of the photos, the Haiti side of the border is absolutely barren and the Dominican Republic side is lush. I leave it to you as an exercise to explain the difference.

Reply to  commieBob
September 17, 2017 8:20 am

Commie, Haiti is a failed state that doesn’t provide any services.Like Cote d’Ivoire, these people are largely foraging for themselves. Are you not impressed that illegal cocoa growers have built schools and clinics as part of it? They are a role model for the rest of the continent. All the ills that these societies suffer from can be laid at the feet of Europeans. They have to stop meddling now. Trees can be planted again when they have prosperity. These eco nuts are the modern face of the old ецgеиiсs crowd.
Economically, the British left their colonies in superior shape. The French, Belgians and Portuguese left a hell of a mess, precisely what each of these countries to this day have at home (why Britain threw its lot in with continental Europe, which, except for Germany and Netherlands, are basket cases, still is a mystery to me) . The worst of genocide, guerrilla atrocities, lack of infrastructure, etc in Africa is a legacy of these countries. Looking at lode and placer gold resources for a client in Benin (French W. Af ) some years ago, I was shown an area of about a square km that had been excavated and washed for gold in 1942 by the French using forced slave labour – the desolate mess remains.
Haiti has a proud history – a colony of black slaves that rebelled and kicked out the French and have been shunned and punished ever since by France.

Nigel S
Reply to  Gary Pearse
September 17, 2017 9:00 am

Haiti has had a few bumps on the road from Roi Christophe to Papa Doc. Neither treated their fellow Haitians with much kindness or compassion. At least as explained to me when visiting the Citadelle 40+ years ago.

Urederra
Reply to  Gary Pearse
September 17, 2017 9:15 am

Don’t look at Tasmania.

commieBob
Reply to  Gary Pearse
September 17, 2017 1:17 pm

Nigel S September 17, 2017 at 9:00 am
Haiti has had a few bumps on the road …

Someone from the Dominican Republic once quipped to me that: “We had better dictators.”

john
September 17, 2017 4:43 am

Proof that this year has been cooler in New England.
http://bangordailynews.com/2017/09/16/homestead/everything-you-need-to-know-about-those-black-spots-taking-over-some-maple-leaves/
I’m seeing this near Cape Cod, Ma as well.

dudleyhorscroft
September 17, 2017 5:04 am

If chocolate causes Global Warming, what do you suppose “https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tWuG2oPL3o” creates!

john
September 17, 2017 5:29 am

Having 3 members of my family that suffered through breast cancer, I am certain somewhere, some idiot (s) have blamed that in global warming too.
The other day someone on CNN mentioned something about the 1st anendment that so shocked the anchor, it went viral and now that individual is making up t shirts and will donate the procees to breast cancer research.
https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/love-first-amendment-boobs/
How about doing the same with weather? I love the weather and…
Big Joe, you listening?

john
Reply to  john
September 17, 2017 5:35 am

Logo above the image of 2 cyclones would be perfect!

September 17, 2017 5:48 am

How ugly can you get! These awful people were happy with chopping down forests to plant diesel palms and evicting forest dwellers human and animal in the East Indies and Africa. Plantations in Cameroon evicted pygmies from the forest and they have become impoverished welfare sufferers “to save the bloody planet.
I think there should be huge publicity and demonstrations in front of their comfotable evil offices in Washington. Maybe Black Lives Matter might take it on as a project and bring some African and Indonesian community leaders over to participate.

MikeH
September 17, 2017 5:58 am

I find it odd, they worry that an honest business is emitting CO2, but something the left supports is far worse. The making of the batteries for their savior car is destroying the planet, far faster than they will admit.
https://www.wired.com/2016/03/teslas-electric-cars-might-not-green-think/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/04/22/the-carbon-footprint-of-tesla-manufacturing/#5f176b8b6096

Sara
September 17, 2017 6:13 am

The benefits of chocolate as one of the five important food groups* will never be outdone by any modern medicine. Yes, it will love you back. It will also act as a soporific to help you get through menopause (female or male, either one) and in its hot state will warm you in a way no salad can.
*Those five groups are: Pizza, popcorn, chocolate, hotdogs or kielbasa with onions, relish, pickles and mustard, and hot buttered popcorn. Liquid refreshment is optional.
Vegans and SJWs come from that planet that orbits Vega. Can we send them back there? Seriously, they are beginning to lose their death grip on the media. Most of us live in the real world and have real-world, everyday concerns. These people are in the minority, despite their self-assessment of their own importance. We should still be alert to their idiocy, but also willing to kick them to the curb where they belong.

Tom in Florida
September 17, 2017 6:26 am

Following their”logic”, Easter, Valentine’s Day and any time a husband screws up increases the demand for chocolate so those that participate in these actions are just as guilty.

Janice Moore
Reply to  Tom in Florida
September 17, 2017 7:59 am

Glad to see you comment, Tom. I was praying that you and yours would come through the hurricane okay. Hope all is well.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Janice Moore
September 18, 2017 4:20 am

Irma started to break up as soon as it went ashore in Naples. The western eye wall became very weak. We got winds of around 60 mph with gusts to 70 or so. We were lucky, others not so much. Lost power for 4 days, some still without. Venice is ancient Indian burial grounds and once again a hurricane avoided this area.

Todd
September 17, 2017 6:33 am

Within a couple years there will be serious calls for people to be allowed only to eat artificially produced nutrient packs…but I bet the artificial flavors will be good!

London247
Reply to  Todd
September 17, 2017 2:04 pm

Depends if you prefer Solent Green or Solent Yellow

September 17, 2017 7:35 am

According to one side, the life that will do better in the future because of human caused climate change, includes: roaches, ticks, fleas, mosquitoes, rats, mice and weeds.
The solution is simple. Humans should adapt to climate change by adjusting their diet to eating: roaches, ticks, fleas, mosquitoes, rats, mice and weeds. (-:
Funny though, that bad life thrives with slightly warmer temperatures and increasing CO2 but “good” life suffers.
Good life got used to CO2 at 280ppm and a global temperature that was 1 degree colder than this.
Bad life/pests like it warmer with more CO2………..according to mainstream climate change theory.

Sheri
September 17, 2017 7:39 am

I quite buying M&M’s when it was announced the evil company would be supporting energy from weather in future ads. If they’ll lie about where they get their energy from, I would assume they would lie about almost anything. I’m saving a lot of money now since companies went PC—cooking at home, buying as little commercial goods as I can, making what I need. It’s not becuase I think “the old ways” are better, it’s because I think the new companies are deplorables (to borrow a term from a loser).
I do have sympathy for the little guys that are just trying to make a living. However, if I have to support the middle man whom I despise, they are out of luck. Maybe someone can find a direct route to customers and leave out the middle men.

Tom Judd
September 17, 2017 8:24 am

If they suppress the chocolate supply how are all of our betters in DC kinkyland going to be able to jump naked into vats of warm chocolate?

September 17, 2017 9:55 am

Ecoloonies, can eat ALL of their cat mint they want, I don’t care.but leave the Cacao plants alone!

Sara
Reply to  Sunsettommy
September 17, 2017 1:52 pm

No, they may NOT have the cat mint. That belongs to my cats… and other kitties.
So NO!!!
No, I suggest that since they think peculiar foods are better, they try cactus leaves and foods made from algae and yeast, and leave the rest of us alone with our chocolate.

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
September 17, 2017 10:57 am

What exactly does this Mighty Berk organization want to happen to the poor illegal farmers after they stop them growing the means to feed themselves and their families – presumably they want them to go away and die. That seems to be the preferred Green/environmentalist option for anyone who is black, African or Asian.
Dark chocolate is also extremely good for you (although presumably in reasonable quantities and not the amount I suspect most of us would prefer to consume). Can you get chocolate poisoning from eating too much?

Sara
Reply to  Moderately Cross of East Anglia
September 17, 2017 1:53 pm

Define “too much”?

wouldrathernotsay
September 17, 2017 1:58 pm

My favorite cocoa is the Swiss Miss dark chocolate. Mmmmm. I find about 65% dark chocolate about perfect. Since my birthday is coming up, I’m expecting my husband to by some Lindt dark chocolate truffles for me. Sorry, chocolate is a health food – good for my health, which means my husband and kids stay healthy 😉

Verified by MonsterInsights