Giovanni: The Bridge Between Data and Science


From Eos.

Using satellite remote sensing data sets can be a daunting task. Giovanni, a Web-based tool, facilitates access, visualization, and exploration for many of NASA’s Earth science data sets.

This time-averaged satellite map of the March aerosol optical thickness off the coast of western Africa from 2003 to 2016 incorporates several of the new capabilities of NASA’s Giovanni data visualization infrastructure. Credit: Giovanni

By Zhong Liu and James Acker 24 August 2017

Since the satellite era began, researchers and others have used data collected from Earth-observing satellites, but using satellite-based data sets remains challenging. Putting data into a common format, handling large volumes of data, choosing the right analysis software, and interpreting the results require a significant investment in computer resources, labor, and training.

A new infrastructure system has been designed to assist a wide range of users around the world with data access and evaluation, as well as with scientific exploration and discovery. This system, the Geospatial Interactive Online Visualization and Analysis Infrastructure (Giovanni), was developed by the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center (DISC).

The paramount goal of Giovanni is to provide scientists and the public with a simplified way to access, evaluate, and explore NASA satellite data sets. Here we describe the latest capabilities of Giovanni with examples, and we discuss potential future plans for this innovative system.

Challenges of Using Satellite Data

The need for large-scale observations is increasing as global observations become more important for understanding global change processes.Over Earth’s vast oceans and remote continents, traditional large-scale, ground-based programs to observe the atmosphere, ocean, and land surface can be difficult and costly to deploy and maintain and are therefore impractical for providing adequate long-term observational data for research and applications. However, the need for large-scale observations is increasing as global observations become substantially more important for understanding global change processes like temperature and precipitation shifts.

Satellite instruments can overcome surface observation limitations by making repeated, synoptic observations of the Earth’s land surface, ocean, and atmosphere. For example, NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS) project is a global observation campaign consisting of a coordinated series of polar-orbiting satellites intended for long-term global observations, enabling improved understanding of Earth’s geophysical systems.

However, many researchers find it challenging to access and use NASA data. Heterogeneous data formats, complex data structures, large-volume data storage, special programming requirements, diverse analytical software options, and other factors often require a significant investment in time and resources, especially for novices.

By facilitating data access and evaluation, as well as promoting open access to create a level playing field for nonfunded scientists, NASA data can be more readily used for scientific discovery and societal benefits. Giovanni was developed to advance this goal. With Giovanni’s assistance, researchers around the world have published more than 1,300 peer-reviewed papers in a wide range of Earth science disciplines and other areas.

A Brief History of Giovanni

Giovanni was initiated and developed for faster and easier access to and evaluation of data sets at GES DISC [Liu et al., 2007; Acker and Leptoukh, 2007; Berrick et al., 2009]. The first implementation of Giovanni was an online visualization and analysis system for tropical rainfall data sets from NASA’s Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM).

As the project gained popularity, scientists requested that more satellite data sets be included in Giovanni. To address this demand, we created multiple discipline- or mission-based data portals. The current Giovanni has evolved further, featuring a new unified Web interface to support interdisciplinary Earth system research, allowing synergistic use of data sets from different satellite missions.

A Wide Selection of Data Sets

Giovanni provides access to numerous satellite data sets, concentrated primarily in the areas of atmospheric composition, atmospheric dynamics, global precipitation, hydrology, and solar irradiance.

More than 1,600 variables are currently available in Giovanni. The Web interface has keyword and faceted search capabilities for locating variables of interest (Figure 1). For example, a search for “precipitation” returns more than 100 related variables. A user performing a faceted search can filter for variables based on satellite missions (TRMM, Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM)), instruments, spatial or temporal resolution, or other categories.

Fig. 1. More than 1,600 variables are available for visualization and analysis in the Giovanni Web interface, shown here. Users have access to commonly used analytical methods and visualization, various search capabilities, and file formats that support GIS data exploration. Input and output data can be downloaded for further analysis. Credit: Giovanni

The operating lifetimes of low-Earth-orbiting satellites are often quite limited (on the order of 5 years), far less than the 30 years recommended by the World Meteorological Organization for developing climatology data sets. Some users, however, may still wish to conduct preliminary studies with these satellite data sets to obtain information on spatial distribution and interseasonal variation. Giovanni provides the capability to derive climatological maps and time series based on user-defined time periods (see Figure 2).

Fig. 2. The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) precipitation climatology (1998–2016, millimeters per day) for boreal summer (June, July, and August). Credit: Giovanni
Analytical Features

Giovanni includes many commonly used analytical and plotting capabilities for capturing spatial and temporal characteristics of data sets. Mapping options include time averaging (Figure 3), animation, precipitation accumulation (Figure 4), time-averaged overlay of two data sets, and user-defined climatology (Figure 2). For time series, options include area averaged, differences, seasonal, and Hovmöller diagrams (Figure 5).

Fig. 3. July 2016, the hottest month ever on record for the globe. Shown are Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) day surface temperatures (in kelvins). Credit: Giovanni
Fig. 4. Accumulated rainfall (millimeters) from GPM Integrated Multisatellite Retrievals (IMERG) Final Run (version 4), showing a record-breaking flood event in Louisiana in August 2016. Credit: Giovanni
Fig. 5. Hovmöller diagram of TMPA monthly precipitation (millimeters per day) in the tropical region (5°S–5°N) showing El Niño–Southern Oscillation events between 1998 and 2016. Credit: Giovanni

Cross sections, applicable to 3-D data sets from NASA’s Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) instrument and Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) data analysis program, include latitude-pressure, longitude-pressure, time-pressure (Figure 6), and vertical profile.

For data comparison, Giovanni has built-in processing code for data sets that require measurement unit conversion and regridding. Commonly used comparison functions include map and time series differences, as well as correlation maps and XY scatterplots (area averaged or time averaged). Zonal means and histogram distributions can also be plotted.

Fig. 6. Quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) seen from the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), between 1980 and 2017. Credit: Giovanni
Visualization Features

Visualization features include interactive map area adjustment, animation, interactive scatterplots, data range adjustment, choice of color palette, contouring, and scaling (linear or log). The on-the-fly area adjustment feature (Figure 7) allows a user to examine a result map interactively and in detail without replotting data.

Fig. 7. El Niño reduced the phytoplankton productivity of Pacific coastal waters off Central America during the 2015–2016 winter, indicated by lower chlorophyll concentrations (milligrams per cubic meter). Credit: Giovanni

Giovanni also provides animations, which are helpful for tracking the evolution of an event or seasonal changes. Interactive scatterplots allow identification and geolocation of a point of interest in a scatterplot. Adjustments of any of these plots provide customized options to users.

Formats Facilitate Many Applications
Fig. 8. Time series of area-averaged TMPA monthly precipitation (millimeters per month) for California, showing record-breaking droughts (2012–2015), followed by 2016–2017, the wettest winter ever recorded in Northern California. Credit: Giovanni

To support increasing socioeconomic and geographic information system (GIS) activities in Earth sciences, we have added shapefiles (a geospatial vector data format) for countries, states in the United States, and major watersheds around the world. Available functions for these shapefiles are time-averaged (Figure 4) and accumulated maps, area-averaged time series (Figure 8), and histograms. Land-sea masks have recently been added.

All data files involved in Giovanni processing are listed and available for download in the lineage page generated simultaneously with the visualization. Available output image formats are PNG, GEOTIFF, and Keyhole Markup Language (KMZ), and they can be used for different applications and software packages. For example, KMZ files are conveniently imported into Google Earth (Figure 9), where a rich collection of overlays is available.

Fig. 9. NASA’s Aura satellite views nitrogen dioxide (NO2, as concentration per square centimeter) from Fort McMurray wildfires in Alberta, Canada, in May 2016 (imported from Google Earth as KMZ). Credit: Giovanni

All input and output data are available in the Network Common Data Form (NetCDF) formats, which can be handled by many off-the-shelf software packages. Furthermore, users can bookmark URLs generated by Giovanni processing for reference, documentation, or sharing with other colleagues.

Future Plans

With the latest features and applications, Giovanni simplifies access, evaluation, and exploration of NASA satellite data sets.With the latest features and applications, Giovanni simplifies access, evaluation, and exploration of NASA satellite data sets. Despite these achievements, we still need to improve Giovanni to accommodate increasing demand for more analytical and plotting capabilities, more data sets, and advanced information technologies to make data exploration simple and productive.

Future plans include visualization and analysis of satellite orbital data sets (Figure 10), more data sets from other data centers, additional analytical methods and visualization, and analysis of multisatellite and multisensor measurements.

Fig. 10. A sample of satellite orbital data sets from GPM’s Microwave Imager (GMI) showing surface precipitation of Tropical Storm Nanmadol on 3 July 2017. Credit: NASA Panoply

Data sets in Giovanni currently consist of variables mapped on uniform space-time grid scales, so nongridded or satellite orbital data sets remain largely untapped, even though they commonly provide higher spatial resolution. Adding orbital data sets to Giovanni could aid research requiring increased data resolution and coverage.

Data sets from other data centers and satellite missions will further enhance Giovanni for better understanding of Earth as an integrated system. Barriers still exist in the development of Giovanni for interdisciplinary studies and intercomparison among data sets. For example, terminologies in data sets can vary significantly between Earth science communities, requiring coordinated efforts to reach consensus and develop standards for uniform data products.

The NASA-wide User Registration System (URS) is also expected to enhance the Giovanni user experience. For example, with URS, users can set frequently used preferences in their profiles, record and retrieve their personal history of data set exploration, and establish their own data collections.

Data product developers can upload their test data and compare them with observations and other well-established data sets in Giovanni to identify issues in their products, a useful capability to improve data quality. Giovanni developers will also be able to better understand their users through profiles and other statistics collected from URS, so that they can develop more user-friendly services.

Creating a community tool with such a large scope is challenging, and fully realizing this tool requires active participation from the user community.In summary, a wide variety of new features is available now in Giovanni, but it remains a work in progress. Creating a community tool with such a large scope is challenging, and fully realizing this tool requires active participation from the user community. We encourage users to provide their opinions as Giovanni continues to evolve.

Read the full story here.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
August 31, 2017 12:16 pm

Interesting tool. I hope it does not get stepped on.

August 31, 2017 12:42 pm

Though I did not know what I was doing and my android system has not been tested on the site, I went into Giovanni and obtained a humidity map overlay. So it works even with my untested system at least to some degree. I am impressed.

Mariano Marini
August 31, 2017 12:46 pm

I hope it provide raw data and not “anomalies”.

Reply to  Mariano Marini
August 31, 2017 4:47 pm

you dont want raw satellite data.
that would be digital counts from sensors
with no physical units.
you have to apply models to the data before
they become meaningful

August 31, 2017 1:57 pm

Apology for interrupting.
Arctic Mission Terminated at 80N
Pen Hadow and the crew are heading back for home.
(zoom in on the yellow marker)

August 31, 2017 2:50 pm

Steven Mosher says: August 31, 2017 at 5:45 am
“Bigger problem might even be that a GCM year is 360 days”
Now that is a can of worms.
In the simplified world that climate models represent the Gregorian calendar of 365/366 days is not always used. For historic reasons some GCMs have been set up to have a ‘simpler’ calendar. Some models omit the leap day and use a calendar of 365 days. And a few models use a 360 day calendar in which each month is assumed to be 30 days.
So much for yearly energy balances then.
Do they take the whole years 365 days heat and stuff it into 360 days?
No wonder the world is heating up

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  angech
August 31, 2017 3:08 pm

Not to mention the effect it has on seasonal temperatures, precipitation, etc. With a 5-day per year shift, you get a full seasonal shift in 18 years; March winds up hosting the summer solstice, etc. But I’m sure that won’t have any effect on 100-year predcitions, er, projcetions. Nosiree Bob, not at all. /sarc

Reply to  angech
August 31, 2017 4:27 pm

The biggest problem is that they started with 360 days in the first place. All the simplifications of convenience cast even more doubt on believeability.

Reply to  phil
August 31, 2017 10:29 pm

The models match observations well enough to tell us what a simple EBM will.
doubling pre industrial c02 is not a good idea

Paul Penrose
Reply to  phil
September 1, 2017 6:10 am

Not even wrong.

Reply to  angech
August 31, 2017 10:31 pm

not really angech.
Its a problem for what webby wants to do, but for 98% of the other uses of GCMs its not a problem.
The great skill of the GCMs tells you that already.

Reply to  Steven Mosher
August 31, 2017 11:26 pm

Steven – you left off the /sarc.

August 31, 2017 3:14 pm

This is a brilliant product. So will the “adjustments” be done before being loaded into Giovanni, or will “novices” get to see the raw, unadjusted data? I guess my question is, will this make it harder, or easier, to find REAL, unbiased data?

Reply to  Aphan
August 31, 2017 4:49 pm

you have never worked with satellite data obviously.

August 31, 2017 3:27 pm

Seems like a very sophisticated data visualization tool for serious research based on satellite data. Looks like money well spent, unlike so much of ‘climate science’.

Reply to  ristvan
August 31, 2017 4:31 pm

Actually seems like a “we’re running out of space projects in the budget. What do we do now?”

Reply to  ristvan
August 31, 2017 5:20 pm

its been around for a while.

August 31, 2017 3:44 pm

The Canadian government has just announced their competing version :

Luc Ozade
August 31, 2017 10:00 pm

It sounds good. But I was under the impression that climastrologers already knew all the answers…. and the science was settled?
So I suppose that with this new (or recent) method of recording data, it won’t be truly useful for evaluating swings for another 30 years or so – until they have built up sufficient data to class it as being climate, as opposed to weather.

August 31, 2017 10:28 pm

read the IPCC they will tell you what elements are known with virtual certainty, high confidence, low confidence etc..
We dont use the data just to see “swings”
Its easy to use the exsiting cloud data to disprove Svensmark for example

Paul Penrose
Reply to  Steven Mosher
September 1, 2017 6:21 am

As usual, your intentionally cryptic postings add nothing of value to the discussion. Perhaps you think you are being erudite, but the reality is the opposite. If your purpose here is to sow confusion and derail any meaningful conversation, you are doing a good job.

Johnny Cuyana
Reply to  Paul Penrose
September 1, 2017 12:01 pm

Paul P., I find truth in your written opinion; especially in that while, Steven appears to be a rather bright and well-informed individual, his style and objectives — whatever they may be … besides, as you state, ostensibly cryptic — reduce him to being something of a troll. His writing suggests to me that he is of an intellectual level where he would be able to contribute so much more to a meaningful positive discussion, but, for some reason, he chooses to do otherwise, often in a brash manner; which is why I chose to write this response to your comment … in the hope that he, in the future, would use his intellect and knowledge to contribute in a fashhion more positive.

Paul Penrose
Reply to  Paul Penrose
September 1, 2017 3:21 pm

I am not optimistic that Steven will change his ways, but like you, I encourage him to do so.

Mariano Marini
September 1, 2017 1:10 am

you dont want raw satellite data.
that would be digital counts from sensors with no physical units.
you have to apply models to the data before they become meaningful

Are you saying that there is no IR camera to get the Earth temperature?
From satellite we can see a man walking on the street, isn’t then possible have the same in infrared spectrum?
I’m telling this because I’m ignorant in the matter, so I’ll always available to learn (Socrates docet)!

Paul Penrose
September 1, 2017 6:23 am

This looks like it could be a good tool. It would be better if the code was open source, but the government seems generally adverse to that notion. They talk about transparency, but seldom, if ever, practice it.

%d bloggers like this: