STUDY: Al Gore Might Have Beaten Bush If There Had Been More Warming

Daily Caller News Foundation Energy

Former US Vice-President Al Gore (Shutterstock/stocklight)

More Al Gore because [insert politically incorrect joke or blog policy violation here] ~ctm

From The Daily Caller

Photo of Michael Bastasch

Michael Bastasch

Former Vice President Al Gore might have won the 2000 presidential election if the temperature had been slightly higher on election day, according to a new study.

“Based on our model, an increase of only 1°C (1.8°F) may have made Al Gore the 43rd United States President instead of George W. Bush, as Gore would have won in Florida,” researchers wrote in a study published online Wednesday.

“It is often mentioned that ‘the heat is on’ during presidential campaigns, and our findings indeed clarify that temperature matters when it comes to actual voting,” wrote U.S. and European researchers.

Researchers claim they found evidence increases in state-level temperatures from one election day to the next increase voter turnout, and that warmer weather may even help incumbent parties.

“We found that increases in state-level temperatures from one election to another are related to increases in state-level voter turnout, and increases in votes for the incumbent party,” co-author Jasper Van Assche of Ghent University said in a statement.

But the authors note the overall effect of temperature on elections is “relatively small,” but could matter in close election — like the 2000 presidential election.

President George W. Bush eked out a victory against Gore in 2000 after a close recall in Florida. Had it been slightly warmer, Gore may have won, according to the study.

Interestingly enough, both Gore’s global warming films have segments dedicated to his loss in the 2000 election. Maybe more global warming would have helped?

So how credible is this study? All this writer can say is correlation does not equal causation.

Follow Michael on Facebook and Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 24, 2017 6:05 pm

Thank Gaia…

Reply to  afonzarelli
August 25, 2017 1:51 am

Someone was actually paid for this research?

Bill Powers
Reply to  HotScot
August 25, 2017 10:54 am

My first though exactly, followed by where is the qualifier, or there it is “…may have made Al Gore…”
STFU researcher Jasper Van Assche of Ghent University and all the other “..U.S. and European researchers.” This is just more Post-Modernist propaganda completely fabricated out of whole cloth and unverifiable.

Reply to  afonzarelli
August 25, 2017 11:24 am

Turning off the AC on a hot day worked for Hansen …

Reply to  co2isnotevil
August 25, 2017 1:05 pm

And Tim Wirth also?

August 24, 2017 6:07 pm

When I read ““Based on our model” I reach for my gun.

Curious George
Reply to  Lancifer
August 25, 2017 8:00 am

Read Asimov’s “Franchise”. Improved modeling makes actual voting unnecessary.

Reply to  Lancifer
August 25, 2017 8:25 am

All academic activity has doubled since Big Brother decided research was to be purely theoretical. Output has tripled, and society benefits are a much different number than before.

Tom Halla
August 24, 2017 6:19 pm

The Goracle must have never heard of the Gore Effect. Did he campaign in Florida?

August 24, 2017 6:22 pm

“Based on our model” says it all.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  markl
August 24, 2017 7:56 pm

Breaking news!
Al Gore Might Have Beaten Bush If There Had Been More Folks Voting Democratic…
Film at 11

Reply to  markl
August 24, 2017 8:43 pm

What’s wrong with models?
F=ma is a model. PV=nRT is a model. Needs a lot of fudge factors in the real world, but pretty functional at modelling the behaviour of most gases under changing conditions. Search ideal gas law if you are not familiar with this model. Here is another, entirely empirical. W=Wi*10*((1/P^.5)-(1/F^.5)). Works great. You have to apply the 8 fudge factors, but works great at modelling the power required by a ball mill to grind rock. Search Fred Bond work index if you are not familiar with this empirically derived model. The utility of a model is determined by its ability to predict. Climate models don’t do a very good job of predicting anything useful. As such they are mostly useless. Not because they are models, but because they are models that don’t predict. You did know that those equations you learned in high school science were models didn’t you?

Reply to  John Eggert
August 24, 2017 10:09 pm

The time and place where I was first exposed to F=ma, PV=nRT, etc. was in high school in the early 1960s in Washington State, and we called them formulas. In college in the mid 60s the formulas were expressed as functions; and in grad-school I was exposed to simulation & modeling using computers. So when I think of modeling – particularly in the context of climatology – I think of algorithms implemented in compute programs – not static formulas.

John from Europe
Reply to  John Eggert
August 24, 2017 10:58 pm

A formula is worlds apart from a computer model. Simple as that.

Reply to  John Eggert
August 25, 2017 1:13 am

John from Europe August 24, 2017 at 10:58 pm
A formula is worlds apart from a computer model. Simple as that.

You do know that the computer is solving formulas don’t you.
The problem here, and with climate models, is that we are dealing with a chaotic system. Even the IPCC admits that climate models can’t make actual predictions because of that.
In this case, if there had been a greater increase in warming, and if Florida had actually been in danger, the other candidates would have reacted. We have no idea of who would have been the Republican candidate for instance.
With chaotic systems, like human affairs and the climate, there are so many confounding variables that precise prediction is impossible.

Brad Keyes
Reply to  John Eggert
August 25, 2017 8:32 am

One of your examples seems wrong to me.
“Force = mass times acceleration” is not a model, it’s a definition (unless I’m mistaken).
My understanding is that such definitions tell us nothing falsifiable (or verifiable) about the natural world. They’re purely analytic; they weren’t derived empirically, and can’t be tested empirically.
I’m not disputing the rest of your interesting comment.

Reply to  John Eggert
August 25, 2017 11:20 am

Brad Keyes August 25, 2017 at 8:32 am
… “Force = mass times acceleration” is not a model, it’s a definition

Even that formula breaks down as objects approach the speed of light. I can’t think of any formulas that are always appropriate in all circumstances.
How about: 1 + 1 = 10

There are 10 kinds of people, those who understand binary, and those who don’t.

Reply to  John Eggert
August 25, 2017 12:01 pm

A model is a bird or a guy (note my PC acceptance there) strutting a catwalk, on the front of a glossy fashion magazine, or displaying their ripped bodies in a movie. They represent what filmakers imagine what we should all aspire to, and represent their illusion of reality.
Computer models are no different.

Brad Keyes
Reply to  John Eggert
August 25, 2017 9:39 pm

something tells me you might be right:
“Even that formula breaks [F = ma] down as objects approach the speed of light.”
But remind me: what’s the correct, relativistic version?
And whatever it is, doesn’t it pose a problem for your next statement:
“I can’t think of any formulas that are always appropriate in all circumstances.”

Reply to  markl
August 24, 2017 11:20 pm

“Based on our model” says it all.

Truer than you realize. All of us if we know anything, know it because we have modelled the world into a coherent picture.
Models are our only route to knowledge. That is not the problem. It is models that do not work, that is the problem.
And therein lies the fault in Left Brain thinking. Models define the reality that we experience, and define human behaviour, but they do not define whatever is the case, beyond human conception of it.
Left thinking teaches people to understand everything in terms of a righteous natural world oppressed by a class of capitalists who have taken ownership, enslaved the people and threaten to damage the world.
This is why it is so necessary for any who have wealth to spend their time virtue signalling their dedication to political correctness – the shape of the Revolution.
It is a model that is popular, because it makes small minds who want to be bigger minds feel empowered. Their failure is due to the Establishment. Marxism is ultimately the refuge of sore losers. It excuses failure, and turns it instead into resentment.
The problem is, it doesn’t work. Not to create a coherent society: it is inevitably destructive creating societies that hate themselves.
Contrast the fairy tale it replaced, of skygods That actually made people humble, and accept failure, but strive to be better. A very handy thing for civilisation to believe in.
What can you say? Jesus told kinder stories than Karl Marx, and both were lapsed Jews…?

Reply to  Leo Smith
August 25, 2017 1:54 am

Exactly so.
Things have taken a bad turn. In my youth we aspired to human rights and equal treatment for all. Black voters should be registered and their kids should have a good education. Women should be able to aspire to the highest offices in the land. etc. etc.
Now, the left sees everyone as an oppressed minority deserving special rights and protections. I am the oppressor because I’m a white male no matter what I do or the what are contents of my heart. That is absolutely no way to build social cohesion. It’s also corrosive to the ‘victims’ because they will blame their victimhood for everything and won’t strive to make themselves better. link
Christianity was a solid anchor for our society. Marxism doesn’t come close to being a viable replacement.
The best takedown of left brain thinking is The Master and His Emissary by Iain McGilchrist. He points out that folks whose right brains are disabled have certain characteristics, the main one being that they become disconnected from reality.

Reply to  Leo Smith
August 25, 2017 12:07 pm

You are also an unrepresented minority in that you are a climate sceptic.
We climate sceptics deserve the same rights as all other minorities and no one should have the right to sneer at, or defame us, because of our beliefs.
Now whilst that is a tongue in cheek comment, were the liberals really concerned for the welfare of minority groups, I wouldn’t have to point this out, they should be doing it for us.
Not that I would jump on that moronic bandwagon, I’ll fight my own fight.

Gary Pearse
August 24, 2017 6:23 pm

Good thing it hasn’t warmed since 2000!

August 24, 2017 6:23 pm

It’s hot in Florida, hotter makes it LESS likely for people to come out. Lived there, done that.

Reply to  Wyatt
August 25, 2017 12:12 pm

You mean more people express their hitherto unrealised sexual preferences when it’s cooler?
Cool, man.

August 24, 2017 6:28 pm

Gore might have beaten Bush if the Republicans hadn’t been able to rig the shonky US election system. Gore as president would have probably done a bit less harm than Bush as president, and a lot less harm than Gore as prophet of Man Made Global Warming.

Pat from Tyers
Reply to  RoHa
August 25, 2017 12:04 am

And if Arthur was Martha he’d be my auntie.

Phil R
Reply to  Pat from Tyers
August 25, 2017 6:16 am

According to today’s progressive ideology, Arthur can be Martha and your uncle can be your auntie, and as long as that is their choice you have to accept it.

Reply to  Pat from Tyers
August 25, 2017 12:17 pm

Just to add some PR balance here.
Martha could be Arthur and your Uncle.
But then Robert’s your Mothers Brother which makes him Bob’s your Uncle.
Stare at the word ‘Uncle’ for a moment. What weird word, who thought of that?

Reply to  RoHa
August 25, 2017 7:25 am

Gore would have won if he had only won Tennessee which would have made Florida irrelevant, but not even people in his home state could bring themselves to vote for him.

DD More
Reply to  RoHa
August 25, 2017 11:40 am

RoHa you have it wrong if the Republicans hadn’t been able to rig the shonky US election system.
Statistical analysis of the election results from down ballot voters, extra percentage of votes for president vs not votes, and the physical improbability of creating a ‘Hanging Chad’ on a single card punch. Review states the Gorical & team took a wire punch and in a couple of counties Double Punched about 35,000 cards, most thru Al’s name, but about 5000 thru Buchanan’s name. Algore’s team just miscalculated how much he was loosing by. Great paper, but cannot refind from 2001 timeframe.

Gunga Din
Reply to  RoHa
August 25, 2017 12:20 pm

If Gore had won then “The Deplorable” voters would have come out of the woodwork several elections sooner.

Gunga Din
Reply to  Gunga Din
August 25, 2017 12:36 pm

(Provided the Republican nominee wasn’t another “same-old-same-same-old)

John M. Ware
Reply to  RoHa
August 25, 2017 5:42 pm

Gore as president would likely have been a weak-tea precursor to Obama, just as blindly leftist. He might or might not have bowed to Arabian potentates, but he would have done plenty of damage in other ways. His doctrinaire wrongness on climate would have cost us just as dearly as Obama’s did.

Chris Norman
August 24, 2017 6:36 pm


Pop Piasa
Reply to  Chris Norman
August 24, 2017 8:01 pm

Come to think of it, if there had been more warming the models might actually be somewhere close to correct.

Brad Keyes
Reply to  Chris Norman
August 24, 2017 9:13 pm

Αɩκα! (This is Sparta, Chris. When in Rome, and all that.)

August 24, 2017 6:40 pm

More Al Gore because [chucky (~ctm) is goring us to death]…

August 24, 2017 6:47 pm

For those on the left, all things are political, even the weather. I guess anything to blame is better than admitting your ideas will not sell.

August 24, 2017 6:48 pm

Another pathetic excuse, if Gore had carried his own home state he would have won. Thank the Gods he didn’t, the people of TN knew him well enough to avoid him and save us all.
But global warming causes hanging chads. Derp.

Reply to  Severian
August 24, 2017 7:08 pm

NOW she can!

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Severian
August 24, 2017 8:23 pm

Severian, you are correct.

August 24, 2017 6:48 pm

[insert politically incorrect joke or blog policy violation here] ~ctm….ROTFL

Mickey Reno
Reply to  Latitude
August 25, 2017 5:26 am

What Happened to Hillary Clinton? I’ll answer for her, since she’d likely die before she’d answer truthfully.
o I got old and frail.
o My Parkinson’s disease began to exhibit when I became tired, in spite of many people trying to help me keep my true condition hidden.
o I was tired often, and so unable to campaign in many states.
o I was unlikable, to the point many said I was officious, nasty, vindictive and bitter.
o I was selfish and controlling, and I joined with many other high Obama administration officials who conducted my official government business using a private e-mail address in violation of law.
o My only agenda was the continuation of that of my far left, socialist predecessor. Open borders, political correctness run amok, the appeasement of Islamist facists, more redistrbution, more regulations, less freedom, more power in the hands of regulators and federal bureaucrats, high rates of taxation, lower spending on military readiness, higher spending on welfare, health care, and entitlements, eternal deficits and growing debt without end, onerous energy costs due to hostility towards fossil fuels and the fiction of CO2 as a pollutant, and the normal tribal victim group identity politics of the Democratic party.
o I never articulated a personal vision for why I wanted to be president, at least not any beyond my own personal ambition, a sense of entitlement that it was “my turn.”
o I lied often. I made it clear that only a fool could possibly trust me.
o I blacked out and fell down, having my handlers catch me and carry me into my van. It’s a good thing I was catheterized or the world would have seen me wet my pants, too.
o Finally, more states voted for Donald Trump than voted for me. But it was MY TURN!

Gunga Din
Reply to  Latitude
August 25, 2017 12:29 pm

Mickey Reno,
You forgot one.
o Despite being a part of the “most transparent administration in history”, somebody exposed what I was trying to hide.
(I believe she and the MSM call that “Fake News”.)

Bill Illis
August 24, 2017 7:03 pm

The election is in November.
By that time, people are talking about how cold it is regardless if it is warmer than previous years.
Why are they always trying to find excuses for why their left-wing candidate didn’t win? How about the simple explanation that 51% of the voting population didn’t want them to be President. Why didn’t Hillary win? She didn’t have that other 2% or 3% that wanted her to lead. She still got a sizable number but she needed to capture another 2%.
Gore was even worse than Hillary in terms of getting the over-the-top vote which is always the question.

Reply to  Bill Illis
August 24, 2017 7:07 pm

She needed more illegal immigrants.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
August 24, 2017 8:11 pm

Maybe if the Hollywood crowd had campaigned for her a little harder before she lost…

August 24, 2017 7:06 pm

You know, I never considered that.

Reply to  jorgekafkazar
August 24, 2017 7:34 pm

Very astute… except basically every pigpen I’ve seen, has a roof.
hmmmm !!
Deep thought needed !!

Pop Piasa
Reply to  jorgekafkazar
August 24, 2017 8:04 pm

Andy, you’re conflating hogsheds with pigpens. You obviously weren’t raised on a farm.

Reply to  jorgekafkazar
August 24, 2017 9:40 pm

Are you saying that pigs can’t fly, but hogs can,
hence a hogpen needs a roof so it becomes a shed ??
Sorry, I guess I’m just puzzled by all this. 😉

Reply to  jorgekafkazar
August 24, 2017 11:23 pm

pighuts have rooves cos of global warming.
pigs get sunburn. They are forest dwellers

August 24, 2017 7:15 pm

“All this writer can say is correlation does not equal causation.”
Oh, you’re no fun.

August 24, 2017 7:18 pm

Did Bush collude with anyone/thing?

Pop Piasa
Reply to  Jones
August 24, 2017 8:19 pm

Only the NeoCons.

Pamela Gray
August 24, 2017 7:26 pm

Hmmm. Wonder what the political models would predict on the pending downward stairsteps to a stadial cold period. It seams to me these kinds of warm-period studies are rather self-serving.

Reply to  Pamela Gray
August 24, 2017 9:07 pm

They’re all pretty sure they’ll be dead before that becomes a problem.

August 24, 2017 7:27 pm
Reply to  JBom
August 24, 2017 9:09 pm

Go polish the tail fins John Small Berries!

Robert B
August 24, 2017 7:39 pm

Nope. I only watch horror films occasionally even if its warm.

August 24, 2017 7:40 pm

Weatherwise, other states are very different than Florida in early November. While cold and rainy weather in more northern states might restrict voter turn out, early November weather in Florida is usually ideal for going out and about. It is highly unlikely that any election day in Florida is going to be ‘too cold’ for voting, nor would voter turn out in the Sunshine State be boosted by warmer temperatures. Warmer temperatures might actually hurt voter turnout in Florida. One simply connect take what happens in other states and apply it to the very different climate of Florida.
It looks like another study that doesn’t pass the 5th grade science fair standard.

Brad Keyes
August 24, 2017 7:51 pm

“Al Gore Might Have Beaten Bush If There Had Been More Warming”
But would he have wanted to? The Presidency wouldn’t leave him much time to hire a mechanical cherry-picker and film a carbon-credits infomercial. Lest we forget political history:
1996: Clinton-Gore ticket wins
Vice President Gore’s last-minute blueprint for saving the atmosphere has to be postponed for another 4 years when America refuses to let him leave the White House.
Behind the scenes, Gore is said to be furious at the planet’s setback, chewing his campaign staff out for making him “so god__mn f______ likeable.”
(According to pollsters, however, the true drawcard for most Dem voters was the Clinton ’96 ticket’s law-and-order platform, Sex Molesters Should Get Four More Years.)

Brad Keyes
Reply to  Brad Keyes
August 24, 2017 7:57 pm

Sorry, Nobel-Oscar winning carbon-credits infomercial.

Wayne Townsend
August 24, 2017 7:54 pm

My wife asked, “and how much warmer would it have to have been for Hillary to have won?” My answer: “Much colder — hell freezing over.”

Jeff Labute
August 24, 2017 7:58 pm

Looks as though Bush will need a restraining order if it gets any warmer.

R. Shearer
August 24, 2017 8:05 pm

If only he weren’t a lying bore.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  R. Shearer
August 24, 2017 8:26 pm

A crying Gore
A lying bore
A socialist wh***
Oh, dear. Did that come out of me?

Brad Keyes
Reply to  Pop Piasa
August 24, 2017 9:18 pm

You forgot one of your fellow poet, Homer’s, favorite phrases: [a pile of] smoking gore.

Patrick MJD
August 24, 2017 8:11 pm

Doesn’t matter. All of you in the US who voted out the messiah are going pay big time!

Reply to  Patrick MJD
August 24, 2017 8:56 pm

No matter what happens, the media will once again try to sell the ridiculous notion that the Federal Government should be able to take the disaster out of natural disasters. Since that is impossible, Trump will fail, no matter how good the response is. I am sure the media is already writing their scathing reviews.
Harvey looks to be a very bad situation. After slamming the coast near Corpus Christi tomorrow evening, it is likely to meander over Southeast Texas for almost a week! That is a nightmare scenario for flooding, making rescue and relief efforts extremely difficult. One local official in the linked article above spoke to the reality of the situation:
“Long has stressed in interviews with The Washington Post that state and local officials need to improve their emergency readiness and recognise that it is not the federal government’s responsibility alone to respond to natural disasters.
Long has also urged citizens to understand that they will often be their own first responders in a crisis.”
That is the message that emergency management has been trying to convey for decades. The national media does a huge and dangerous disservice when it implies that the Feds should be their to take care of everything, as if federal employees and vehicles are somehow immune to the high winds and flooded roads that are a disaster to everyone else. FEMA will do the best it can, and the President will have very little to do with it.
It’s just a shame that the media makes it worse with misinformation, and then tries to blame the President, who has less responsibility for the problems than they do.

Reply to  jclarke341
August 24, 2017 9:15 pm

Great observation jclarke. Used to be I had about 100lbs. of dried beans and enough chili powder to get me through a few weeks. Not anymore but it used to be.

Jeff in Calgary
Reply to  Patrick MJD
August 25, 2017 9:52 am

Holy Cow, that was sudden. They are expecting it to make landfall as a Major Storm. Yesterday it was a tropical storm most people weren’t paying any attention to.

August 24, 2017 8:56 pm

The panhandle of Florida contains a lot of military bases, and they tend to vote Republican. The fact that the news media reported a Gore win BEFORE the poles closed in the panhandle isn’t mentioned. A lot of people heard that and dropped out of line. The vote would have been even less close if that hadn’t happen. The MSM are a piece of …..? Need I say more?

Gunga Din
Reply to  Jim Masterson
August 25, 2017 1:06 pm

Lots of things went on in the MSM to try to put Gore in office then (and Hillary this last time).
One thing I’d like to see is a law that an election for a Federal office “results” for a state can’t be declared/called until after all that states polls have closed.
(The Florida panhandle is in a different time zone than the rest of the state.)
“Freedom of the Press”?
When they “declare” a state, they are not expressing an opinion. They are declaring a fact.
If the vote in Florida was that close, why declare that Gore had won before all the polls were closed?

August 24, 2017 9:05 pm

The model shows that Gore voters were fair-weather friends for the Tennessee Democrat.

August 24, 2017 9:09 pm

If pigs could fly, a lot more people would use umbrellas, too.

Brad Keyes
August 24, 2017 9:15 pm

To think, we came *this close* to finally getting an answer to the question:
“name one negative impact of global warming.”
(But paradoxically, even if the example were available, our opponents couldn’t have brought themselves to name it.)

August 24, 2017 9:26 pm

Gore really does think he won Florida in 2000. That’s what he told one of the late night talk show hosts just last week.
So I guess that makes at least two fantasies Gore takes seriously enough to think they are reality. The Delusion is strong in this one.

Gunga Din
Reply to  TA
August 25, 2017 1:10 pm

Gore tried to cherry-pick the recount. Recount only certain locals rather than the whole state.

Gunga Din
Reply to  Gunga Din
August 25, 2017 1:13 pm

PS Anybody know if the temperature in Miami-Dade County was below or above normal that November?

August 24, 2017 9:52 pm

While this study might be correct it is worth pointing out as they did that in a close election almost anything can change the outcome. And the closer the election the more of a role tiny things can play. In the 2000 election Florida was essentially a tie and the winner was determined not by the number of votes but rather by the courts interpretation of which votes should be counted.
Another example would be that Gore would have won if the ballots had been better designed so 5000 or so Palm Beach County residents would have cast their vote for Gore rather than Pat Buchanan by mistake.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Germinio
August 25, 2017 4:58 am

Let me clear up some things. First you must realize that the Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections was a Democrat and the ballots were approved by the Democrats in charge. In 1996 they had the same problem but because Bill Clinton won Florida by a good margin no one complained. But they did file that info away for use in later elections should there be a close call, which is what happened in 2000. They had an army of lawyers on standby and they descended on Palm Beach County immediately when it looked bad for Gore. Second, the U. S. Supreme Court intervened because the Florida Supreme Court was changing the election law by decree. All election results had to be certified and filed with the Florida Secretary of State by a certain date in accordance with Florida law so that the results could determine which party would select the electors and have them vote and submit that result as prescribed by Federal law. The FSC attempted to change the law and give an unlawful extension to that date which put the Florida vote in jeopardy of not being certified in time for the electors to be selected, vote and certify that result on time. The FSC was almost all Democrats and their purpose was to delay the Florida vote past the Federal deadline thus keeping electoral votes from going to Bush. The FSC had no authority to make changes to the State voting law and thus the USSC stepped in to nullify the FSC interference and uphold the Florida deadline as the law prescribed. That forced Palm Beach County to certify their vote by the lawful deadline without delay.

Reply to  Tom in Florida
August 25, 2017 6:22 am

Nice summary, Tom. I lived in Florida at the time and had to keep telling my relatives elsewhere what was really going on. The liberal MSM just couldn’t except and report the facts. What the FSC tried to do was clearly illegal and blatantly partisan. It was embarrassing.

Mickey Reno
Reply to  Tom in Florida
August 25, 2017 12:10 pm

After the US Supreme Court slapped down the Gore recounts, the Miami Herald actually undertook an effort to recount the Miami-Dade and Broward County under-vote ballots, just as Gore was asking. The process was moot, of course, but this was a very leftist paper, a paper that desired a Gore victory, behaving like a sore loser in a poker game, who, after folding his hand and handing the pot to the winner, also demands to see what card would have been dealt to him had he not folded. Anyway, they did the count, and the result actually transferred a few votes from Gore to Bush, expanding his lead from around 600 votes to more than 1000. Al Gore knows all about this, but he never mentions it.

Mickey Reno
Reply to  Tom in Florida
August 25, 2017 12:17 pm

I’d just like to add “Thank you all you stupid Ralph Nader voters in Florida!” And to remind my fellow republicans, conservatives, libertarians, Libertarians, and Republicans, and Independents, too, not to be a stupid Ralph Nader voter when it comes to voting in YOUR next election.

Tom Halla
Reply to  Mickey Reno
August 25, 2017 1:04 pm

Mickey, the Nader (and Buchanan) voters may have so disliked both Gore and Bush they knew what they were doing.

Reply to  Germinio
August 25, 2017 6:22 am

“Another example would be that Gore would have won if the ballots had been better designed so 5000 or so Palm Beach County residents would have cast their vote for Gore rather than Pat Buchanan by mistake.”
The Left claims those votes were done mistakenly, but how do they explain the thousands of votes Pat Buchanan got the previous time he ran in Florida in the same voting districts? Perhaps those who voted for Buchanan before, decided to vote for him again in 2000.

August 24, 2017 10:22 pm

So how credible is this study?
Correct question is “Who paid for this study?”
In the beginning, when God gave brain to man, they all wanted a new computer model instead.

Reply to  petermue
August 24, 2017 11:28 pm

In the beginning, when God gave brain to man, it was so Man could run models in his head.
Religion was there to make sure they weren’t too destructive…

James Bull
August 24, 2017 10:32 pm

This sounds like an ideal plot for what used to be called a “B” movie horror film. Anyone fancy putting money into it?
James Bull

Hoyt Clagwell
August 24, 2017 11:54 pm

I believe the left will eventually achieve their greatest dream by downloading their conciousnesses into computers that will allow them to live forever within their models where they control everything, and there are never any bad consequences for any action. The twist will come when they realize that they have trapped themselves in a universe where the future is always known, there is no chaos, there are no surprises, and they go mad from boredom.

John Robertson
Reply to  Hoyt Clagwell
August 25, 2017 9:10 pm

What makes you think they are not already mad?

August 25, 2017 12:22 am

Well, they did find it in the years after through “improvements”

peanut gallery
August 25, 2017 12:57 am

I guess being a pompous dip $#%^ had nothing to do with it… right…

August 25, 2017 1:06 am

Now finally Al Gore can blame something on LACK of global warming …..

August 25, 2017 5:08 am

So there’s a positive correlation between temperature and voting fraud?

August 25, 2017 5:28 am

Yeah, and I might have won Wimbledon if I could swing a tennis racquet.

Reply to  PaulH
August 25, 2017 11:41 am


August 25, 2017 6:26 am

If… If a bullfrog had wings…
A bullfrog has no wings. Never had them, never will.
The bullfrog and his weepy minions should just get over it.
But,like hanging chads, they just won’t let go

August 25, 2017 6:51 am

Gore would have won the presidential election but he lost his home state of Tennessee. Actually, he lost it twice. He was a US Senator until the people of Tennessee, fed up with his lies, voted him out. When he ran for president and the people of Tennessee had another opportunity, we rejected him again. Stockpiling tar and feathers in case he ever comes back.

Reply to  Hillwilliam
August 25, 2017 11:40 am

Thanks for the reminder.

Jeff in Calgary
August 25, 2017 9:31 am

While I recognize that there may have been a few votes (enough to alter the final results) if it had been hotter that day, 1°C is hardly noticeable for a human. I do not believe it. Maybe 10° or 15°…

August 25, 2017 11:39 am

The Butterfly Theory of Chads is so fascinating.

Joel Snider
August 25, 2017 12:19 pm

The blanket assumption being that more turnout would have elected Gore.

Gunga Din
Reply to  Joel Snider
August 25, 2017 1:25 pm

But Floridians could have wrapped themselves in a blanket to go out and vote if it was a cold day.
Maybe it was the lack of a predicted hurricane or other intensifying severe weather that would predict in the future because of our past and present and present CO2 emissions is what caused his past failure?
Oh, wait. Wasn’t the “Ozone Hole” his thing back then?
He lost because he was “out in the ozone”?

August 25, 2017 7:56 pm

Such an outcome could be called a political eclipse and dark omen.

August 26, 2017 1:01 am

I believe this is positioning for the possibility (probability?) that they will lose “bigly” in November next year.
“It wasn’t the Russians this time – it was Global Climate Change! We need more money! Our credit card address checker is unaccountably down at the moment, but, please – send whatever you can!”

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights