Guest essay by J.I. Thacker
The Te Moeka o Tuawe (REF 1) is a southern-hemisphere glacier in New Zealand that is unusual among glaciers in that its terminus is very close to sea level in a temperate zone. Although relatively long – about 13 km – the glacier has been receding since about 2009 because of anthropogenic climate change, which scientists say is caused by fossil-fuel carbon emissions.
From Wikipedia’s description of the Fox glacier in New Zealand:
Fed by four alpine glaciers, Fox Glacier falls 2,600 m (8,500 ft) on its 13 km journey from the Southern Alps down to the coast, with it having the distinction of being one of the few glaciers to end among lush rainforest only 300 metres (980 ft) above sea level. Although retreating throughout most of the last 100 years, it was advancing between 1985 and 2009. In 2006 the average rate of advance was about a metre a week. In January 2009, the terminal face of the glacier was still advancing and had vertical or overhanging faces which were continually collapsing. Since then there has been a significant retreat, with the 2009 high level clearly visible as vegetation line on the southern slope above what is left of the lower glacier today.

That Te Moeka o Tuawe is retreating should not be surprising. Currently, nearly all glaciers have a negative mass balance and are retreating to the extent that they are contributing 30% of the current rate of sea-level rise (REF 2). The IPCC stated in 2007 that Himalayan glaciers could be gone by 2035(REF 3). “The Arctic is screaming,” said Mark Serreze, senior scientist at the US government’s snow and ice data center in Boulder, Colorado (REF 4).
Glacial retreat can have unexpected knock-on consequences like reducing the availability of drinking water for downstream communities, as well as increasing local temperatures via decreases in albedo: even old ice has twice the reflectance of bedrock exposed as it retreats.
The unique location of Te Moeka o Tuawe gave cryoengineer Dr. Eric Fox (REF 5 – no relation to the glacier) an idea.
“I thought it would be an ideal place to test a theory I had about glacial dynamics,” he tells me via Skype. “The idea is to supplement the glacier with an ice-mimic, a surrogate substance with similar spectral properties to frozen water but much higher levels of stability.”
The logistics of the glacier slowing experiment are quite difficult – that’s why the low-altitude terminus of Te Moeka o Tuawe is so important. The project involves reinforcing the glacier with 57,000 tonnes of the substitute ice, which would be impossible to transport to a high-altitude terminus.
Fox’s team decided on creating reinforcing ice by combining regular ice with a complex, but easy to manufacture, molecule called (2R,3R,4S,5S,6R)-2-[(2S,3S,4S,5R)-3,4-Dihydroxy-2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]oxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4,5-triol (REF 6) for the initial trial. The molecule is based on natural compounds, and is harmless to plants, wildlife, and to humans. In nature, the compound is present in many plant roots, fruits and nectars, and serves to store energy, primarily from photosynthesis.

“It is very important that we do no harm to the environment in our attempt to slow the retreat of the glacier. That’s why the team settled on this naturally occurring compound. It was my idea to add a dash of 5-Methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)-cyclohexan-1-ol (REF 7),” Fox notes. My compound has interesting cryo-properties. And it even smells good.”
Fox calls the experimental glacier trial a “Win-win-win” scenario.
“We’ll slow the glacier’s retreat, increase albedo, and because the chemical substitute contains a high proportion of carbon, it effectively locks up Carbon that would otherwise be polluting the atmosphere.”
It is expected that after the application of this compound to the reinforcing ice, retreat of Te Moeka o Tuawe is going to be slowed and eventually the glacier will be as good as new, returning to its maximum volume observed in 2009. The scientists are calling their project “Fox’s Glacier Mint.”

References
REF 1 Known by Western interlopers as Fox Glacier.
REF 2 Gardner et al. 2013; Science 340 (6134): 852–857.
REF 3 It was apparently a typo.
REF 4 He said it about ten years ago about something else, but it seemed somehow apropos to mention it here.
REF 5 Also, by pure coincidence, the name of the inventor of Fox’s Glacier Mints.
REF 6 (2R,3R,4S,5S,6R)-2-[(2S,3S,4S,5R)-3,4-Dihydroxy-2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]oxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4,5-triol is known by the great unwashed as sucrose.
REF 7 5-Methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)-cyclohexan-1-ol a.k.a. Menthol.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This is why I don’t care anymore; when I have to read stupid ideals like this, with man and his ridiculous intentions to alter. You know, whether you agree with this or not- there is a difference between deliberately having an influence and unknowingly having an influence. Its the intent that counts. But like I said, I don’t care anymore, cause I know where this is going. Total Recall anyone???
What if the glacier is receding because of completely natural causes, and this so-called idea that CO2 is the cause……..is false, and this dude along with others and their pathetic ideas are just a waste of time.
Overall, since the last ice age, these things have been steadily in decline, and now this dude wants to spend all of his energy trying to be a hero…… for this idea that Man is behind the great decline-BULL! Just leave it alone, and spend more time living out of the heart instead of the mind.
correction! where ever I used the word dude, just add an s for DUDES!!! I.E. TEAM OF SCIENTISTS
The ‘substance’ with the complicated name is a disaccharide sugar. Technically it is made by linking two molecules of a hexose (6-carbon) sugar together, making it a chemical cousin of ordinary table sugar – C12H22O11.
They are literally planning to sugar-coat the ‘problem’ – no exaggeration!
Ha, I knew something wasn’t right when I noticed the lack of a claim that it was being done to preserved the glacier for our great-grandchildren.
Typo – “preserve” not “preserved”.
This poly was sported further up the New Zeeland glacier trying to stop it moving downhill.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/science/2017/04/01/TELEMMGLPICT000124658542-large_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqSxN68L6G5kQEFFnh-ONTtD2l3WlYlN3m8T_Skm95DA0.jpeg
Any other suitable comment would be appreciated, I can think of at least two but they are not pc.
“You think this is funny?
You should see how I make a #2!”
April Fools Day. Can we declare AGW a successful April Fools gag and move on. Seems very efficient.
You got me, but only because my first questions were “What good does slowing the melting do?” and “Doesn’t the melting help cool the overheated atmosphere?”, but I should have caught on that they were (allegedly) going to do an experiment instead of just modelling the results. Happy April Fools Day!
Ha ha ha ha! I was taken in for a while. Worthy of The Onion I would say (-:
must say
almost fell for it as well
the picture looked convincing enough.
Yet the people in NZ were complaining about the cold in recent years and the subsequent poor harvests, eg, strawberries…
Sickening. Idiots. Miscreants. Liars. Scum of the earth types…….Did I miss anything?
Oh I know what I missed….4-1. But global warming is such a parody to begin with, who ever knows for sure? 🙂
The give away to me was in part that 57,000 tonnes is a tiny, tiny plug of ice ~2 million cubic feet or a cube 120 feet on each side.
Am I the only one who gets this?
It’s April 1st. Everything JIT wrote is true.
Additional comments are part of the string along.
Later, all will be revealed.
😛 Ha ha
The NSF Arctic ‘Science’ Program is receiving solicitations for ‘research’ funding as an open call!
Knowing that the NSF personnel have no background in chemistry, geology, glaciology, geophysics, hydrology, meteorology, mathematics and physics, i.e. they are all geographers, political science and social science majors, they will not only fund the project but increase the budget to $5 million just to “up it to Trump”!
So hurry and send it in!
Look for a plackard with “Save Fox Glacier” at the ‘March For Science’ and a big fat He-She ‘Tranz’ screaming “NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOO” for 148 seconds at a time.
ha ha
It has been fun this morning. So many “unusual articles” all on the same day!!! http://county10.com/first-90-kangaroos-released-in-wyoming/
Every day is April Fool’s Day for the CAGW crowd! 😀
My feeling exactly PaulH. We seem to have had a lot of April the 1sts. these last few years…hard to do anything to improve on the warmist efforts.
Or maybe the Kiwis should simply accept glacial retreat for what it is – the making of new lands that are incredibly beautiful and support massive diversity of wildlife that cannot exist on/under/within a glacier.
I simply point to Yosemite as the perfect example. If the glaciers that made Yosemite valley still existed, there wouldn’t be much reason for any human to pay it any attention at all … while today Yosemite is considered the jewel of the entire Sierra Nevada Range, a truly beautiful, productive, diverse habitat equaled nowhere else on the planet .. and all courtesy of melted glaciers.
And when they’re finished with this little task the next project is to have the sun rise in the west.
(2R,3R,4S,5S,6R)-2-[(2S,3S,4S,5R)-3,4-Dihydroxy-2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]oxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-3,4,5-triol. is sugar if anyone is interested
In the 17th century didn’t burn witches to prevent glaciers advancing? Maybe we could burn some crimatologists to prevent them retreating 🙂
So part of this glacier, or a nearby glacier with similar properties and history, will be used as a control…right?
| /\ | ! LoL ! | /\ |
“the glacier has been receding since about 2009 because of anthropogenic climate change, which scientists say is caused by fossil-fuel carbon emissions.” But the reality is that the climate change we have been experiencing is caused by the sun and the oceans over which Mankind has no control. Human caused climate change has not been observed.
The real problem here is how to produce the mint and sugar candy and transport it ti the glacier without making use of fossil fuels in any way. One must also keep the mint candy dry or else it will melt.
Russian Foreign Ministry today posted following guide on their FaceBook page :
– If you want a Russian diplomat to invite your political opponent for an ‘off the record’ meeting select one (1).
– To secure services of Russian hackers, select two (2).
– For the service to interfere in the foreign elections, select three (3).
True, with the date of posting 1st April 2017. Nice to know that the ageing veteran Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov still has a sense of humour.
I can’t tell that the arctic is screaming from my location, but I am quite optimistic that the arctic is greening. Would you prefer a mound of ice over a pasture for your cattle?
I heard ice screaming once. It sent a chill down my spine.
HMS Prince of Wales to be Propelled by Wood Pellets
How about having the Prince of Wales be propelled by wood pellets? High velocity wood pellets.