From CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Deep-sea corals reveal why atmospheric carbon was reduced during colder time periods
We know a lot about how carbon dioxide (CO2) levels can drive climate change, but how about the way that climate change can cause fluctuations in CO2 levels? New research from an international team of scientists reveals one of the mechanisms by which a colder climate was accompanied by depleted atmospheric CO2 during past ice ages.
The overall goal of the work is to better understand how and why the earth goes through periodic climate change, which could shed light on how man-made factors could affect the global climate.
Earth’s average temperature has naturally fluctuated by about 4 to 5 degrees Celsius over the course of the past million years as the planet has cycled in and out of glacial periods. During that time, the earth’s atmospheric CO2 levels have fluctuated between roughly 180 and 280 parts per million (ppm) every 100,000 years or so. (In recent years, man-made carbon emissions have boosted that concentration up to over 400 ppm.)
About 10 years ago, researchers noticed a close correspondence between the fluctuations in CO2 levels and in temperature over the last million years. When the earth is at its coldest, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is also at its lowest. During the most recent ice age, which ended about 11,000 years ago, global temperatures were 5 degrees Celsius lower than they are today, and atmospheric CO2 concentrations were at 180 ppm.
Using a library of more than 10,000 deep-sea corals collected by Caltech’s Jess Adkins, an international team of scientists has shown that periods of colder climates are associated with higher phytoplankton efficiency and a reduction in nutrients in the surface of the Southern Ocean (the ocean surrounding the Antarctic), which is related to an increase in carbon sequestration in the deep ocean. A paper about their research appears the week of March 13 in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“It is critical to understand why atmospheric CO2 concentration was lower during the ice ages. This will help us understand how the ocean will respond to ongoing anthropogenic CO2 emissions,” says Xingchen (Tony) Wang, lead author of the study. Wang was a graduate student at Princeton while conducting the research in the lab of Daniel Sigman, Dusenbury Professor of Geological and Geophysical Sciences. He is now a Simons Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow on the Origins of Life at Caltech.
There is 60 times more carbon in the ocean than in the atmosphere–partly because the ocean is so big. The mass of the world’s oceans is roughly 270 times greater than that of the atmosphere. As such, the ocean is the greatest regulator of carbon in the atmosphere, acting as both a sink and a source for atmospheric CO2.
Biological processes are the main driver of CO2 absorption from the atmosphere to the ocean. Just like photosynthesizing trees and plants on land, plankton at the surface of the sea turn CO2 into sugars that are eventually consumed by other creatures. As the sea creatures who consume those sugars–and the carbon they contain–die, they sink to the deep ocean, where the carbon is locked away from the atmosphere for a long time. This process is called the “biological pump.”
A healthy population of phytoplankton helps lock away carbon from the atmosphere. In order to thrive, phytoplankton need nutrients–notably, nitrogen, phosphorus, and iron. In most parts of the modern ocean, phytoplankton deplete all of the available nutrients in the surface ocean, and the biological pump operates at maximum efficiency.
However, in the modern Southern Ocean, there is a limited amount of iron–which means that there are not enough phytoplankton to fully consume the nitrogen and phosphorus in the surface waters. When there is less living biomass, there is also less that can die and sink to the bottom–which results in a decrease in carbon sequestration. The biological pump is not currently operating as efficiently as it theoretically could.
To track the efficiency of the biological pump over the span of the past 40,000 years, Adkins and his colleagues collected more than 10,000 fossils of the coral Desmophyllum dianthus.
Why coral? Two reasons: first, as it grows, coral accretes a skeleton around itself, precipitating calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and other trace elements (including nitrogen) out of the water around it. That process creates a rocky record of the chemistry of the ocean. Second, coral can be precisely dated using a combination of radiocarbon and uranium dating.
“Finding a few centimeter-tall fossil corals 2,000 meters deep in the ocean is no trivial task,” says Adkins, Smits Family Professor of Geochemistry and Global Environmental Science at Caltech.
Adkins and his colleagues collected coral from the relatively narrow (500-mile) gap known as the Drake Passage between South America and Antarctica (among other places). Because the Southern Ocean flows around Antarctica, all of its waters funnel through that gap–making the samples Adkins collected a robust record of the water throughout the Southern Ocean.
Wang analyzed the ratios of two isotopes of nitrogen atoms in these corals – nitrogen-14 (14N, the most common variety of the atom, with seven protons and seven neutrons in its nucleus) and nitrogen-15 (15N, which has an extra neutron). When phytoplankton consume nitrogen, they prefer 14N to 15N. As a result, there is a correlation between the ratio of nitrogen isotopes in sinking organic matter (which the corals then eat as it falls to the seafloor) and how much nitrogen is being consumed in the surface ocean–and, by extension, the efficiency of the biological pump.
A higher amount of 15N in the fossils indicates that the biological pump was operating more efficiently at that time. An analogy would be monitoring what a person eats in their home. If they are eating more of their less-liked foods, then one could assume that the amount of food in their pantry is running low.
Indeed, Wang found that higher amounts of 15N were present in fossils corresponding to the last ice age, indicating that the biological pump was operating more efficiently during that time. As such, the evidence suggests that colder climates allow more biomass to grow in the surface Southern Ocean–likely because colder climates experience stronger winds, which can blow more iron into the Southern Ocean from the continents. That biomass consumes carbon, then dies and sinks, locking it away from the atmosphere.
Adkins and his colleagues plan to continue probing the coral library for further details about the cycles of ocean chemistry changes over the past several hundred thousand years.
###
The study is titled “Deep-sea coral evidence for lower Southern Ocean surface nitrate concentrations during the last ice age.” Coauthors include scientists from Caltech, Princeton University, Pomona College, the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Germany, University of Bristol, and ETH Zurich in Switzerland. This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, Princeton University, the European Research Council, and the Natural Environment Research Council.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009281916300551
This article is correct in that soil is a source of CO2. The microbes oxidize
the upwelling methane. When methane hits the atmosphere, it does not
sink, it rises. Soil is not a methane sink as the USEPA would have you
believe.
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/17607/20141010/methane-hotspot-in-us-southwest-considerably-underestimated-study.htm
The methane in this photo represents a picture of low/no/oxidized methane
in the dark blue pixels. The lighter blue to red pixels represents unoxidized
methane.
The hotspot near Four Corners is a very arid spot, therefore; there is not
enough moisture in the soil to support the microbes required to oxidize the methane.
Spots in the photo which are yellow have either less methane or less moisture
than is required to support the microbial culture sufficient to oxidize it.
Oxidized hydrocarbons are the main source of CO2.
Volcanoes are a minor source.
“He is now a Simons Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow on the Origins of Life at Caltech.” Yes, I’m also curious on where the current life at CalTech might have originated.
This concept (warming driving CO2 in the atmosphere) was explored by Ohio State’s Professor of Energy Conservation Robert Essenhigh in 2001 in a research Viewpoint: http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/nowarm.htm
They beclowned themselves in the first paragraph. There has been no definitive proof that CO2 has any more than a tertiary effect on the climate, so they begin with a big nothingburger fail in the first sentence. I am afraid I didn’t read past that. I may go back and finish it when I need a good belly laugh!
when i was very young i discovered a cold beverage holds its co2 and after they warm they go “flat” because the co2 gets released……logical our oceans would work in a similar way…..of course this means the temperature is what drives the co2 levels and matches the actual historic record of co2 LAGGING behind the temperature moves…..strange a layman can use simple basic science and see the truth.
Aw Man there goes my next climatology paper Bill. (Taylor)
I was gonna prove how the hotter it got, the more CO2 a soda held, until it exploded; but only ”soon”
and at the same time, my model program was going to show that
climate math indicated more was coming out,
than was ever put in.
Like the Green House Gas Effect, where a rock can’t be gotten warm enough by heating it with fire,
in a vacuum, with one mode of energy in, and one mode out.
It’s put into a bath of cold nitrogen and oxygen;
and when that still doesn’t get it warm enough,
refractory insulating media are suspended in the bath
so less and less of the light from the fire
gets to the firelight warmed rock.
Which of course makes more and more light come out of the rock,
as less and less light, gets in.
Paleo data shows no relationship between co2 and temp for the last 600 mm years. Look it up. http://www.biocab.org/carbon_dioxide_geological_timescale.html
Here is another possible cause for more plankton growth in the far southern ocean during glaciation.
Glacial periods are associated with low insolation in the far northern hemisphere due to Earth’s orbital cycles. During those times the southern hemisphere is receiving maximum solar insolation. And plankton likes sunlight.
Land vegetation also plays a part in this.
For one thing, the forests die back (which reduces the annual cycle in and out of Carbon) but then ALL that extra C4 grassland replaces the forests.
Grass is actually a more effective Carbon sink because when it dies each winter, a large portion of the Carbon gets stored into the soil. Each acre of grass sequesters about 0.3 tons of Carbon each year (700 pounds).
Take the current extent of grassland and expand that by 500% and how much extra Carbon does the soil pack away each year. Some equilibrium is then reached until the planet warms up again and CO2 levels start going back up and the forests take back the grassland and soak up the Carbon and it re-enters the annual in and out of the Carbon cycle.
No climate scientist is going to get into this because they get fired if they bring it up.
Maybe CO2 is a cause for the 1 or 2 degree ocean warming over the last 100 years. But perhaps… might the 1 or 2 degree ocean warming caused the increased CO2? We need to look at other things like land use change on albedo and heat capacity/transmissivity effects?
“As the sea creatures who consume those sugars–and the carbon they contain–die, they sink to the deep ocean, where the carbon is locked away from the atmosphere for a long time. This process is called the “biological pump.
[…]
That biomass consumes carbon, then dies and sinks, locking it away from the atmosphere”
=====================
This kind of fictional story telling is a legacy of the deeply flawed fossil fable.
Anyone familiar with how life works–people who open their eyes and look, for example–know it isn’t true.
quote:
* * * * * * * *
“This is the freshly dead carcass of a thirty ton grey whale
It’s only been on the bottom for 6 weeks, but already…
* * * * * * * *
But we know that it IS true over long time scales, otherwise we would not have limestone hills and coal deposits.
However, the real question, is can this process work over just 80,000 years? And then go into reverse and release all that CO2 again within 5,000 years. That, is the real problem.
R
OK it’s only a press release, not even an abstract, but as press releases go, it appears to have been written by someone who actually read the paper and more or less understood it (that’s a novelty!)
First they start off with CO2 drives temperature (well of course they had to)
Then they present some good data that is probabaly new, about nitrogen isotopes.
Then they conclude that temperature drives atmospheric CO2.
Wonders will never cease. They are denialists pretending to be warmists. Sheep in wolves’ clothing (or whatever)
Their careers may suffer if their colleagues bother to read past the first line.
Smart rock, you are probably right. However, I’ve reread it 3 or 4 times, if you read it one way, that’s true and another, it sounds like they are hedging, but that could be as you say , sheep in wolves clothing.
Is the 1st 3 paragraphs standard for getting something published ? If so, I’ll copy and paste that.
Is this phenomenon becoming increasingly common? If so, it would imply the crackup of the paradigm.
“It is critical to understand why atmospheric CO2 concentration was lower during the ice ages. This will help us understand how the ocean will respond to ongoing anthropogenic CO2 emissions,”
This (nonsensical) statement shows a complete lack of understanding of how control loops and feedback operate.The author needs to do a little study on either industrial process control or electronics, to gain an understanding of how cause and effect apply to any system involving a feedback loop.
Geologic iron dust isn’t bioavailable. Iron oxide is fairly tough, weathered iron oxide even more. What makes iron bioavailable is the sulfate anion.
Now, about ocean carbon sequestration..the greatest volume of carbon is in methane clathrate. And these deposits derive their stability from hydrostatic pressure, not just temperature. Falling sea levels from continental glaciation would cause dissociation of clathrates which would increase carbon dioxide levels.
Remember, methane clathrates have 10 times as much carbon as all petroleum ever extracted and will be extracted in the future.
Henry’s Law is a Physical Law, not a political consensus of ill-informed opinion that calls itself a ‘law’. For those non-scientists in the room, it means that the warmer the water, the more easily dissolved gases can escape from solution. Conversely, cooling the water allows it to hold more dissolved gases. Temperature is the driver. It does NOT mean that adding gases to water will lower the temperature.
tadchem,
You made me smile even as I considered the irony of you having to state this in writing. 🙂
The reason he has to state it in writing is because the same DemonicRats running the scam also run the Education System,
and they simply stopped teaching children gas mechanics – the simplest phase of matter – when the wackos at the head of the climate bureaus, running the scams, decided they didn’t want to talk about Venus’ instrument-laden probes landing and proving the bullshit story an utter fabrication of ridiculous nature,
and they didn’t want any kids or adults in the education system,
talking about gases and vapors and the LAW that rules over them: the Ideal Gas Law.
Spoken by a long-time atmospheric chemist and applied natural chemist.
Oh I know why, but thank you for elaborating. It’s just that here, in discussions amongst the very smart, and the not so smart, it’s ironic that the most basic principles often get ignored as if they don’t matter.
My study of climate change has been focused on how it influenced the evolution of the horse from 55 to 60 million years ago to present. The most complete book on this subject is German paleoanthropologist, Dr.Jens Lorenz Franzen, whose work has been closely associated with mammalian fossils at the Messel Pit in Germany.
I did not read anything about the size of the glaciers or their movement across the landscape, sometimes moving rocks, sediment, and other debris for hundreds of miles during the discussion of cold periods. The truth is that the surface land during these periods was largely covered with ice, in some places, the ice was nearly a mile and a half thick. As a result of the amount of water on land, the oceans were much shallower, at least around land. Most grazing herbivores used these coastal grasslands for habitat. The modern horse that evolved in N. America around 1.7 mil years ago, has teeth that are specialized to allow grazing of coast grasses as well as more tender ones.
I think it is important when discussing CO2 levels during glacial periods to keep in mind that most of the grass and plant growth is found in coastal grasslands around the continents. These low-lying areas did not get the rainfall that the higher areas where glaciers formed. Areas around the East Coast are surrounded by barrier islands and shallow water lay between the mainland and the barrier islands. In some areas, these coastal grazing lands extended almost to the continental shelf.
I am interested in finding out if these low levels of CO2 could reflect the probability that after long periods of glaciation (or stadials) plus the deposit of rocks, sediment and other debris on top of what was previously top soil could have led to long periods where very little plant or animal life could survive until birds as well as small and midsize animals could deposit seeds. How long a process would this be? And could the barrenness of the land help to explain the low levels of CO2, even after the interstadial period had been in process for a few thousand years?
Scientists believe that the large megafauna survived during the stadials and hot interstadials, and perished during the periods after abrupt, rapid global warming occurred melting sea ice and flooding coastal grasslands. Apparently normally paced (?) transitions between stadial and interstadials during the time before humans arrived in N. America had only led to a few minor migrations and re-emigrations over millions of years. The horse always returned to N. America. This last time, the Spanish just returned him a few hundred years ahead of schedule.
I know that you are interested in CO2 stored in the atmosphere and the concentrations found in the oceans. However, the types of plants and animals that are found in a an area during a particular period of climate history, if the timing can be determined to the same level of accuracy used in other measures might help explain some of the mystery of Co2 as well as what really caused a species who shares 70% of our DNA to disappear. sometime between 10,000 and 7,600 years ago.
I hope that you could consider my question and provide some sense of the likelihood that this could occur.
Christie Finn