Friday Funny: Liberals are in such disbelief/shock on Myron Ebell appointment for EPA transition, he has a Snopes page

This is hilarious. Over the past couple of days on Twitter and Facebook, I’ve seen dozens, perhaps even hundreds of meltdown tweets like this:

ebell-freakout

There’s some others far worse that are in full meltdown mode:

 

https://twitter.com/wantedalex101/status/796888758742175744

It even made Scientific American, who even seemed incredulous as they wrote the article:

sciam-ebell

There is so much incredulity, that Snopes had to make a page saying that it was in fact true. Screencap follows:

ebell-snopes

In September 2016, candidate Donald Trump announced his intention to appoint Myron Ebell to lead his administration’s transition team at the Environmental Protection Agency. Ebell currently serves as the director of the Center for Energy and Environment at the libertarian think tank the Competitive Enterprise Institute. He also chairs an initiative named the Cooler Heads Coalition, which, according to Ebell’s official bio:

…comprises over two dozen non-profit groups in this country and abroad that question global warming alarmism and oppose energy rationing policies.

Ebell openly declares himself to be a climate change skeptic who disputes the severity of human activity on Earth’s climate. On this point, Ebell has been extremely consistent: He argues that anthropogenic global warming, if it happens at all, is a minor issue that has been usurped by liberals to expand the federal government. He has stated in many different venues that he intends to dismantle the scientific consensus around anthropogenic global warming, as discussed in this October 23 2012 interview with PBS Frontline’s John Hockenberry:

EBELL: […] What we’re fighting is the expansion of government. And there are many pretexts for expanding government.

HOCKENBERRY: Opposing government action on climate change to defend American freedom is a perfect fit.

EBELL: We felt that if you concede the science is settled and that there’s a consensus, you cannot— the moral high ground has been ceded to the alarmists.

HOCKENBERRY: So you had to go to work and break down this consensus.

EBELL: Yes. And we did it because we believed that the consensus was phony. We believed that the so-called global warming consensus was not based on science, but was a political consensus, which included a number of scientists.

More here: http://www.snopes.com/trump-taps-outspoken-climate-denier-to-oversee-epa-transition-team/

We live in interesting times.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
366 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 11, 2016 3:52 pm

Riots, death threats, threats of succession, you’d think all those racist conservatives were upset about a leftist being elected… oh wait!

John W. Garrett
November 11, 2016 4:01 pm

Job #1:
EPA declares CO2 is NOT a pollutant.

Reply to  John W. Garrett
November 11, 2016 4:06 pm

+ Lots.
With a Memo – in bold type – to the various UN hangers on:
ILO, IMO, IMetO, ICAO, and the rest.
CO2 is good – it is plant food.
Auto

Thumper
November 11, 2016 4:11 pm

I believe Obama’s full statement was “elections have consequences and at the end of the day I won” said to Eric Cantor 1-23-09.

Duncan
November 11, 2016 4:13 pm

Just wow. This video just sums up everything I am thinking as a Conservative and he voted for Hillary. I would comment but the video speaks for itself.
Leave it to the British to politely say Fyou.
https://www.facebook.com/JonathanPieReporter/videos/1044777035645189/

John W. Garrett
Reply to  Duncan
November 11, 2016 6:50 pm

That may be one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen.
What a hoot !

RAH
Reply to  Duncan
November 11, 2016 7:54 pm

Excellent.

Eugene WR Gallun
Reply to  Duncan
November 11, 2016 11:51 pm

Duncan —
Thank you! Great video. And everything the guy said was absolutely right.
Except for one thing.
The left can’t honestly debate because if they tell their “Truth” no one would vote for that nonsense. Remember, their stuff has been put to practice — always with diastorus results.
I can remember Mao calling for debate — Let A Thousand Flowers Bloom! And a year later those who had tried to debate found themselves suddenly arrested and shipped off to labor camps.
Eugene WR Gallun

Reply to  Duncan
November 12, 2016 12:06 am

+1

Duncan
Reply to  Duncan
November 12, 2016 10:22 am

Yes very powerful. If only ever liberal could see this and then begin understand and accept responsibility for what they have created. We would not see riots in the streets of the USA, nor the finger pointing. Whenever something does not go their way, it is someone else’s fault.
Germany is next in 2017, Merkel is gone, the liberals last bastion of hope, their last defender, MARK MY WORDS.

troe
November 11, 2016 4:20 pm

A courageous appointment and a very good sign. Experience informs us that massive pressure will be brought to maintain the status quo. Myron Ebell is well outside all of that and this is a pocketbook issue for the politicians.
Give em hell Myron

Ross
November 11, 2016 4:22 pm

This is interesting. Donald Trump announced this in September, as mentioned above, but the alarmists have just found out about it or acknowledged it. It shows they either did not read about DT’s policies etc. or they blindly thought there was absolutely no way Clinton would lose and just ignored what he said.

Bruce Cobb
November 11, 2016 4:53 pm

So, who’s going to lead the world now on “climate change”, with the US out of the picture? Don’t all step up at once now.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
November 11, 2016 5:22 pm

Probably California…

Gary Hladik
Reply to  J. Philip Peterson
November 11, 2016 6:38 pm

“Probably California…”
Or the Independent People’s Republic of California (or Califoregon?) if certain lunatics get their way. 🙂

Eugene WR Gallun
Reply to  J. Philip Peterson
November 11, 2016 11:53 pm

J. Philip Peterson — Laughing, laughing laughing! — Eugene WR Gallun

Merovign
November 11, 2016 5:31 pm

Some people can’t speak without lying.
These aren’t “climate skeptics,” they’re panic skeptics and bureaucratic control skeptics.

Reply to  Merovign
November 11, 2016 5:43 pm

Pow! +100

Amber
November 11, 2016 5:42 pm

Cut the EPA by 50% within 6 months and put the money into Infrastructure .
Rolling the EPA into Energy so the economic interests of the country are factored into decisions would correct a major flaw in government .
See you Gina maybe someone in California will take your act on . They love to run businesses off too .
But don’t worry all those Regs you have been spewing out will get made into recycled toilet paper .

troe
November 11, 2016 5:50 pm

Won’t it be wonderful when the sun comes up and we breathe clean air the morning after destroying their corrupt edifice.

Rob
November 11, 2016 6:16 pm

The EPA needs to be neutered in such away that it can never again be a problem. Or closed down all together and its duties shifted to the states.

groweg
November 11, 2016 6:19 pm

It is a sad commentary on science that moving beyond the “global warming” hoax comes from a political development rather than scientists arriving at the truth from considering the data. But I guess you have to take progress any way you can get it.

RAH
Reply to  groweg
November 11, 2016 7:46 pm

The issue was political from the get go. A mechanism for social change.
So the science nor the scientists can be separated from it.

TA
November 11, 2016 6:32 pm

I knew it was going to be fun if Trump was elected. Starting off with a bang!
Donald says one of these days we are all going to be so sick of winning. I don’t think so, Donald, I like winning. I don’t think I will ever get enough to make me sick. Yeah, it’s going to be fun.

RAH
Reply to  TA
November 11, 2016 7:41 pm

It’s going to be a hoot. Just checking out The Drudge Report to see the cover of ‘The New Yorker’ and checking the videos at The Media Research Center is a barrel of laughs. While driving up to Chicago for a three stop load I listened to the National Proletariat Radio (NPR) and had a chuckle or two. The left is completely unhinged! I can’t remember so much pure venom being projected by the MSM about any President elect ever. They’re scared shitless. But I’m sure once they dry their tears and change their diapers they will start to collude to bring Trump down in a more coordinated manner. What they don’t seem to understand is that the very people that voted from Trump rejected them every bit as much as they rejected Hillary and nothing they can say or do will change that.

Reply to  RAH
November 11, 2016 8:42 pm

Did you see the pictures of all the buses that took the protesters to Austin Texas for one of the “spontaneous” demonstrations?
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/figures-anti-trump-protesters-bussed-austin-fakeprotests/
I know people are angry. The ones to keep an eye on are the ones holding a match to the fuse…and the ones renting the buses.

groweg
Reply to  RAH
November 12, 2016 8:00 pm

It would be nice to see federal funds for NPR ended under the Trump administration.

November 11, 2016 8:14 pm

Ghostbusters – Dogs and Cats living together…

R.S. Brown
November 11, 2016 9:37 pm

An interesting artifact from the election:
As we drove from Kent (Ohio) to Canton today for a setup at an antiques show,
we noticed the county Dem/Repub party workers, and some of the municipal/
county folks had cleared the political yard sign debris from sight.
There were NO yards signs left up for Hillary’s campaign in a 40-mile drive.
There are STILL a goodly amount of Trump/Pence signs up on private property
along the road sides.
Just anecdotal, but telling if the phenomenon is widespread.

RAH
Reply to  R.S. Brown
November 12, 2016 4:52 am

During the election silly season I drove through IN, IL, WI, MI, OH, PA, WV, VA, MD, CT, NY, NJ,MA, KY, TN, MS, MO many times. Trump-Pence signs far out numbered Hillary signs nearly everywhere I drove in all of them during the months leading up to the election. One would see an occasional Bernie bumper sticker but Hillary stickers were very rare. Nothing like the way it was with Obama campaign signs and stickers in 2012. Even in most urban areas in the eastern states where Hillary had the strongest showing the lack of enthusiasm was evident.

jeanparisot
November 11, 2016 9:57 pm

How did I not know about the cooler heads coalition until now?

Galane
November 11, 2016 11:06 pm

Hopefully they’ll change things so man-made reservoirs, canals, etc cannot be called “wetlands” then “protected” by banning people from using them. Places like Lake Lowell, impounded by dams and dikes built in 1980 and 1911. The water attracted various animals, who got along just fine with the boaters, water skiers etc for decades.
But now it’s the Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge with a ton of rules, regulations and restrictions to “protect the wildlife” that never needed any protection, and wasn’t there until the dam was built. https://www.fws.gov/refuge/Deer_Flat/visit/rules_and_regulations.html
Theodore Roosevelt created a lot of these refuges at man made irrigation and recreation projects, but it’s only in recent times that the EPA has decided that means human use of what humans built for their use has to be severely restricted.

Chris Wright
November 12, 2016 4:06 am

This seems to be incredibly good news, but as a Briton (who voted Leave), I’m not sure what it means. Is it likely Myron Ebell will be appointed head of the EPA? I certainly hope so. When Donald Trump becomes President in January, will he have the power to fire the present head of the EPA and to appoint Myron Ebell?
.
I certainly hope so. When the EPA called CO2 a “pollutant” it was obvious they had lost any concept of reality. CO2 is a trace gas that is natural, clean, invisible, harmless in normal concentrations, and it is what trees and plants breathe in. It is a sad irony that the people who call themselves “green” demonise the very thing that makes the world green.

Reply to  Chris Wright
November 12, 2016 6:46 am

A bar chart, Figure 5 in http://globalclimatedrivers.blogspot.com puts CO2 level in context.

Griff
November 12, 2016 5:34 am

So Ebell talks to the scientists and all the scientists, as near as makes no difference, tell him, no, it is real, and by the way we aren’t involved in this to expand the government.
And all the other scientists in all the other countries in the world, they say, yes, we’re with the US scientists on that. And we aren’t involved in expanding anyone’s government.
and then we get into political opinion driving muzzling of science.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Griff
November 12, 2016 5:52 am

What color is the sky the planet you’re on Griffy?

Duncan
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
November 12, 2016 6:47 am

I’ve seen Griff post here numerous times, even if ‘we’ don’t agree with him, insulting his intelligence, shouting him down does not do anything. Griff made a logical statement (from his point of view), he did not insult anyone (this time). I’d prefer to see you explain to him a counter argument, or your opinion, opposed to doing the exact same thing the establishment has done to us “deniers” for 20 years. Don’t become one of ‘them’. We could do with more interaction from other points of view so we don’t all live in a bubble. Sometimes a whisper is easiest to be heard.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
November 13, 2016 12:36 am

Griff has been debunked over an over…

Duncan
Reply to  Griff
November 12, 2016 10:42 am

Griff, “political opinion driving muzzling of science.” this is the pot calling the kettle black
University of Colorado banned questioning of climate change, this even extended to online discussion too. The ‘muzzle’ was already on the dog, time to take it off!!!
http://louderwithcrowder.com/university-of-colorado-bans-students-questioning-climate-change/

ClimateOtter
Reply to  Griff
November 12, 2016 11:12 am

Griff: provide your evidence. Especially as to numbers of scientists. Please avoid quoting from rigged ‘97%’ polls.

Reply to  Griff
November 12, 2016 11:25 am

Griff, thinks it is ok for scientists to be mouth piece for propaganda.
How charming of you.

Tom in Florida
November 12, 2016 6:11 am

A salute to Mr Trump

November 12, 2016 6:24 am

It’s a start, a good start, but mind the increasing water vapor and declining water tables.

Tom Williams
November 12, 2016 8:46 am

Saturdays NYT article quotes him to the effect that the 2015 Clean Energy Policy will impede economic growth.
Probably not as much as five feet of water in lower Manhattan, but what the hell.
I’m hoping for the best, but this guy, Banning, and Pence are storybook bad guys. We’re in for a rough ride.
“May you live in interesting times.”

November 12, 2016 8:56 am

Once again the limousine leftists show us why Trump won and why they will keep losing.

alacran
November 12, 2016 10:30 am

Can we really call those people “Liberals”? No! We can’t! They are Eco-Fascists or at least a sort of “Special-Democrats” disparaging those as populists, who are not of the same opinion!

AndyG55
November 12, 2016 2:17 pm

OT.. Tim Blair in Australia starts the search for all this social misfits leaving the USA after the TRUMP election..
ENJOY ! 🙂
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/blogs/tim-blair/help-them-find-a-home/news-story/61fce29d7ce9ed95fee75c70963d2eaa