Another ridiculous 'canary in the coal mine' claim: 'Record hot year may be the new normal by 2025'

Record hot year may be the new normal by 2025

No matter what we do, it is inevitable that the record hot year of 2015 will soon become an average year

From the UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES (home of the Ship of Fools)

The hottest year on record globally in 2015 could be just another average year by 2025 if carbon emissions continue to rise at their current rate, according to new research published in the Bulletin of American Meteorological Society.

And no matter what action we take, human activities had already locked in a “new normal” for global average temperatures that would occur no later than 2040, according to lead author Dr Sophie Lewis, from the Australian National University (ANU) hub of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (ARCCSS).

However, while annual global average temperatures were locked in, it was still possible with immediate and strong action on carbon emissions to prevent record breaking seasons from becoming average – at least at regional levels.

“If we continue with business-as-usual emissions, extreme seasons will inevitably become the norm within decades and Australia will be the canary in the coal mine that will experience this change first,” said Dr Lewis.

“That means the record hot summer of 2013 in Australia – when we saw temperatures approaching 50°C in parts of Australia, bushfires striking the Blue Mountains in October, major impacts to our health and infrastructure and a summer that was so hot it became known as the “angry summer” – could be just another average summer season by 2035.

“But if we reduce emissions drastically to the lowest pathway recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (RCP2.8), then we will never enter a new normal state for extreme seasons at a regional level in the 21st Century .”

The idea of what the term “new normal” actually means was the cornerstone of this new research. It has often been used when talking about climate change but it had seldom been clearly defined. Dr Lewis and colleagues have now developed a scientific definition for the term.

“Based on a specific starting point, we determined a new normal occurred when at least half of the years following a record year were cooler and half warmer. Only then can a new normal state be declared,” she said.

After this process was used by the researchers to determine new normal conditions for global average temperatures, it was used again to examine record hot seasonal temperatures at a regional level.

Using the National Computational Infrastructure supercomputer at ANU to run climate models, the researchers explored when new normal states would appear under the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change’s four emissions pathways.

The research team then examined seasonal temperatures from December to February across Australia, Europe, Asia and North America.

The results revealed that while global average temperatures would inevitably enter a new normal under all emissions scenarios, this wasn’t the case at seasonal and regional levels.

“It gives us hope to know that if we act quickly to reduce greenhouse gases, seasonal extremes might never enter a new normal state in the 21st Century at regional levels for the Southern Hemisphere summer and Northern Hemisphere winter,” Dr Lewis said.

“But if If we don’t act quickly Australia’s “angry summer” of 2013 may soon be regarded as mild. Imagine for a moment, if a summer season like 2013 became average. The likely impacts of an extremely hot year in 2035 would beyond anything our society has experienced.”

###

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

100 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Powers
November 7, 2016 4:13 pm

When you have the primary media outlets in tow you can make any claim you wish and it will be so. We have gone beyond revising history to revising reality right before your very eyes. Poof! It’s not science, it’s magic!!

Michael Kelly
November 7, 2016 4:24 pm

The “record” exceeded the previous record by something like 0.2 C. That’s within measurement error. Interestingly enough, it also occurred in winter in the northern hemisphere.
But what I really wonder about is the statement that “some parts” of Australia experienced temperatures “approaching 50 C.” How closely did they approach? 50 C is 122 F. I lived in the Inland Empire of Southern California for 28 years, and experienced 116 F (46.7 C, “approaching” 50 C) for several weeks every summer. Barstow was well over 120 F during the same time. Somehow I survived. And so, before housing displaced it, did a thriving orange growing region. I just don’t see the down side of warmth.

Philip Schaeffer
November 7, 2016 4:33 pm

Anthony, could you add a link to the source of the article?

nankerphelge
November 7, 2016 4:46 pm

“But if If we don’t act quickly Australia’s “angry summer” of 2013 may soon be regarded as mild.”
I live in this sunburnt country and have never heard that phrase although I now note it has a presence as the “angry summer” or the “summer of extremes”!
These are the BOM figures for Melbourne. What are these people talking about?.
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/cdio/weatherData/av?p_nccObsCode=36&p_display_type=dataFile&p_startYear=&p_c=&p_stn_num=086038
They accuse others of cherry picking! Give me a break.

rd50
Reply to  nankerphelge
November 7, 2016 5:45 pm

In your table, data between 1973 and 2002 are missing.

nankerphelge
Reply to  rd50
November 7, 2016 6:00 pm

Thanks rd50. That is a straight copy and paste off the BOM records. I did not notice but wrongly assumed it was a complete record. I was more looking at the right hand side columns with the means.

Ray Boorman
November 7, 2016 5:39 pm

I don’t trust any scientist, who claims to have found a very dangerous problem, who then also claims to know what political policies a nation must follow to avert the dangers they have discovered. You can be a scientist who discovers things, but that does not make you an expert on matters political &/or economic who can predict the future.

old44
Reply to  Ray Boorman
November 7, 2016 6:52 pm

Our esteemed leaders trust them (if it involves increased taxes)

TomRude
November 7, 2016 5:40 pm

Since they cook the temperatures, it will always go up and it will always be a new normal…
It is a self fulfilling prophecy since when it’s hot it is because of global warming and when it is cold it is also because of global warming…
Should 1 km of ice build above New York it will be extreme global warming…

Marcus
November 7, 2016 5:48 pm

I wish someone here, that is much smarter than me,would ask the “Alarmists”, what temperature is it that you are seeking, and where on planet Earth should it be ?? If the Tropics cool down, then the North will get get unbearably cold…If the North heats up, then the Tropics will be unbearably hot, as per their models…soooo, what exactly do they want ? I was born in the semi far North of Canada, moved to the South of Florida and then returned to the North of Canada again in a 40 year span…The temperature differences were huge…and I am still alive with very little side affects..I think..?

Reply to  Marcus
November 8, 2016 6:24 am

Except obviously, you must be mentally deranged.
How else would you explain a skeptic willing to destroy the earth just so you can drive a car.
More’s the pity.

November 7, 2016 5:55 pm

It’s too soon to tell. The recent el Nino might have produced a step change in global mean temperature, as the 1998-1999 seems to have.

Bindidon
Reply to  matthewrmarler
November 8, 2016 2:53 am

Maybe due to the accumulation of some heat in the ocean which for whatever reason couldn’t escape to space?

Reply to  Bindidon
November 8, 2016 10:25 am

Bindidon: Maybe …
In the CO2 climate discussions and investigations, that is my favorite word.

Mickey Reno
Reply to  Bindidon
November 8, 2016 11:12 am

… and which might have been sequestered in the deep oceans for hundreds or thousands of years for all we know.

old44
November 7, 2016 6:49 pm

Guess we will just have to wait for another 10 years of government grants to find out if it’s true.

rwisrael
November 7, 2016 7:50 pm

How are we all still alive ?

November 7, 2016 8:04 pm

Receiving no publicity in Australia is the fact that the south west quarter of the country had its coldest September mean temperature since 1897, based on readings from the 15 ACORN weather stations south of Geraldton and east to Eucla. The BoM’s September update (http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/mwr/aus/mwr-aus-201609.pdf) also shows that in a huge portion of inland Queensland, spreading into northern NSW and South Australia, maxima were as much as 6C below average. The bureau’s colour-coded map describes September max in the area simply as “Lowest on Record”.
In the Western Australia capital of Perth, May-Oct had the 5th coldest mean temperature for that six month period since 1910, according to the adjusted ACORN dataset. An analysis of these temps is at http://www.waclimate.net/september-coldest-2016.html
The national mean temperature for October was 0.5C below average, with max 0.29C cooler than average and min 0.73C cooler than average across Australia. Again, the BoM temperature maps show a portion of inland Queensland had a mean temperature of Lowest on Record during October.
The southern chill is caused by a mass of cold water that emerged in February off the WA coast and then spread across the Southern Ocean, now reaching as far east as Tasmania (which is why Tasmanian Carolyn above needs a heater and blanket even though we’re a week into November).
The cold SST is reflected in temperatures of the three southern capital cities of Adelaide, Melbourne and Hobart. Hobart’s average min was about 0.5C cooler in the second half of October than the first half. In Adelaide, the second half of October had average min 1.5C cooler than the first half and max 0.4C cooler than the first half. Melbourne average min and max were both 0.7C cooler in the second half of October than the first half. It should be the other way around as summer approaches.
NOAA records suggest it’s been many years since cold SST of this intensity and breadth enveloped Australia’s southern coastline. The BoM has predicted the cold SST will dissipate by the end of spring (in the southern hemisphere) … i.e. within a month, although the NOAA maps suggest even more cold over a widening ocean area this past week. If the Southern Ocean and southern Indian Ocean continue to feed cold air over southern Australia this coming summer, coupled with a likely La Nina influence from the north-east, some 12 monthly average cold records could be endangered by autumn next year.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  waclimate
November 8, 2016 1:56 am

Nope! All we see here on the other side of Aus in Sydney, is fire storms…worst evah, earliest start evah blah blah blah…
Hannam at the Sydney Morning Herald is posting an alarmist article almost every day!

Bindidon
Reply to  waclimate
November 8, 2016 3:06 am

waclimate on November 7, 2016 at 8:04 pm
Receiving no publicity in Australia is the fact that the south west quarter of the country had its coldest September mean temperature since 1897…
Maybe, but it is not unknown. Look at these world temperature maps for september 2016:
– GISS:comment image
– UAH6.0beta5:
http://www.nsstc.uah.edu/climate/2016/september/SEPTEMBER%202016.png
It doesn’t happen all the time that such a strong correlation is visible between surface and troposphere measurements. So it must be a huge cooling event.
But please don’t confound a local situation with that of the entire globe around it, which begins with north and east of… Australia.

ren
Reply to  Bindidon
November 8, 2016 5:35 am
Bindidon
Reply to  Bindidon
November 10, 2016 4:05 am

Yes ren, but those in the Grand North above 60 °N look quite nice too, especially when comparing them with Nick’s GHCN-ERSST mix:comment image
The discrepancy between surface and troposphere measurements in the SH still is very great as expected, but the concordance above 45 °N is imho more and more surprising.

ren
November 7, 2016 11:19 pm
ren
November 8, 2016 12:51 am

At the temperature anomalies of the northern Pacific is clearly influenced by the temperature of Siberia.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/ocean/cdas-sflux_ssta_global_1.png

ren
November 8, 2016 1:00 am

High temperatures from New York City, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., will be around 10 degrees Fahrenheit below normal for mid-November. The gusty northwest winds will make it feel even colder.
Saturday will be the coldest day of the weekend.
Warm clothing will be required for any outdoor activities on Saturday as AccuWeather Realfeel® Temperatures will be in the 30s from Washington, D.C., to Philadelphia and in the 20s from New York City to Boston.
http://vortex.accuweather.com/adc2004/pub/includes/columns/newsstory/2016/650x366_11071433_hd31-1.jpg

Niff
November 8, 2016 2:32 am

Imagine for a moment…..that they cannot understand their own ironic words…..

November 8, 2016 6:16 am

I’m thinking maybe 2 years after the El Nino.

ren
November 8, 2016 7:18 am

Weak solar wind and very high galactic ionizing radiation in the lower stratosphere.
http://images.tinypic.pl/i/00838/53vz9v2yox95.png

Resourceguy
November 8, 2016 7:20 am

Question: If climate change or even a shorter term cycle caused trees to keep their leaves for an extra month or two, what would that do to carbon levels etc.?

November 9, 2016 8:10 am

Did you see that picture? The Earth is on fire! DOOOOOOM!

Philip Schaeffer
November 9, 2016 3:33 pm

Still waiting for a link to the source for this article.
[try using Google in quote marks “Record hot year may be the new normal by 2025” – we aren’t here to fulfill requests you can easily do yourself -mod]

Philip Schaeffer
Reply to  Philip Schaeffer
November 10, 2016 3:54 am

What? So it’s ok to publish an article written by someone else, without a link to the original because you could google search and find it? Isn’t this basic journalism 101? If you are going to quote someone, shouldn’t you automatically provide a reference to where you got the quote from?
Or is it OK to expect people to take your word for it?
I can’t believe that we’re even arguing over whether you should provide a reference to the source when you quote someone. Are you reading this Anthony?

Michael Carter
November 11, 2016 4:02 pm

It is all odd. Broadcast from Radio New Zealand: “October was the hottest on record, 1 degree above the average” Stop. And yet having farmed in the same location for 50 years I find that it has been a cool slow spring. We get an immediate indication from local dairy farmers: the milk in their vats. Its down due to low soil temperatures and grass growth. They have not been able to shut up areas for silage yet. It is usually mostly done by now. Deciduous trees are 3 weeks late in leaf burst.