NASA’s Airborne Mission to Explore the Global Atmosphere
Ice sheets, deserts, rivers, islands, coasts and oceans — the features of Earth’s surface are wildly different, spread across a vast geography. The same is true for Earth’s thin film of atmosphere and the mix of gases it holds, although the details are invisible to human eyes. Pollutants emitted to the atmosphere — soot, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides — are dispersed over the whole globe, but remote regions are cleaner, by factors of 1000 or more, than areas near the continents. A new NASA airborne campaign aims to map the contours of the atmosphere as carefully as explorers once traced the land and oceans below.
The Atmospheric Tomography, or ATom, mission is the first to survey the atmosphere over the oceans. Scientists aboard NASA’s DC-8 flying laboratory will journey from the North Pole south over the Pacific Ocean to New Zealand and then across to the tip of South America and north up the Atlantic Ocean to Greenland. ATom will discover how much pollution survives to the most remote corners of the earth and assess how the environment has changed as a result.
“We’ve had many airborne measurements of the atmosphere over land, where most pollutants are emitted, but land is only a small fraction of the planet,” said Michael Prather, an atmospheric scientist and ATom’s deputy project scientist at University of California Irvine. “The oceans are where a lot of chemical reactions take place, and some of the least well understood parts are hard to get to because they are so remote. With ATom we’re going to measure a wide range of chemically distinct parts of the atmosphere over the most remote areas of the ocean that have not been measured before.”
While the majority of the flight path takes the DC-8 over the ocean, the science team expects to see influence from human pollution that originates on land.

Credits: NASA
“Humans produce a lot of pollution, and it doesn’t just disappear when it’s blown off the continents. It goes somewhere,” said atmospheric scientist Steve Wofsy, ATom principal investigator at Harvard University. “We know it gets diluted in the atmosphere, it gets washed out by rain, but we want to understand the processes that do that and where and how long they take.”
The suite of 20 instruments aboard the DC-8 will measure airborne particles called aerosols and more than 200 gases in each sampled air patch, documenting their locations and allowing scientists to determine interactions. The science team will use ATom’s collected data on the air’s chemical signatures to understand where pollutants originate, and where and how quickly these climate gases react chemically and eventually disappear from the atmosphere.
ATom is particularly interested in methane, ozone and airborne particles called black carbon, which have strong effects on climate and which all have both human and natural origins. Methane and tropospheric ozone, are two greenhouse gases that linger in the atmosphere for weeks to decades–much less time than the century that carbon dioxide remains in the air. Nevertheless, the short-term effects of methane and ozone pollution today are expected to contribute almost as much as carbon dioxide to changing the climate in the coming decades.
ATom’s first flight is planned for July 28, a there-and-back trip over the tropics between Palmdale, California and the equator. On July 31, the mission begins its around-the-world trip lasting 26 days. It’s the first of four deployments that will take place over the next three years in different seasons. The data collected will be used to improve atmospheric computer models used to predict future climate conditions into the 21st century as well as to provide checks and calibration in otherwise unreachable areas for several major satellite systems, including NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) and the European Space Agency’s TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI).
The ATom mission is funded by NASA Headquarters and overseen by the agency’s Earth System Science Pathfinder Program at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. It is one of six large airborne campaigns operating under the Earth Venture Suborbital program. ATom is led by Harvard University and managed by the Earth Science Project Office at NASA Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, California. The DC-8 aircraft is maintained and based at NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center.
###
Exactly how does NASA stretch its budget, as enacted by Congress, to include this boondoggle?
YES! I thought NASA was mainly about space. But it does include the word air…
OCO2 has been orbiting for 2 years now, globally mapping the demon CO2 and a host of other atmospheric components, particulates included. There is almost complete silence and disinterest from the NASA PR department and the few visual data samples shown, strangely mask out the poles, other oddly contoured areas and even whole hemispheres. The few results shown make the “high res computer simulations’ laughably remote from the measured reality.
In orbit…but off message?? https://youtu.be/iUZJddSHyuI
Does anyone have any idea at all how much junk a DC-8 puts into he air? What are these people thinking?
When I was with NASA we had a C-130 we called the NERDAS (NASA Earth Resources, yadda yadda). That baby pumped out some serious junk…
The only pollutants they will be measuring from human, will be their own jet’s exhaust
But climate science is all settled so it is a complete waste to be spending any more money studying it. To me it seems that the spatial and temporal resolution of their data taking is not enough to really learn anything. It might be fun to fly those routs but it is a waste of fuel and the tax payer’s money. The federal government will have to borrow the money to fund this project. I estimate that, with such a huge federal debt, the money the federal government is borrowing today will end up costing the tax payers more than 12 times the amount borrowed to pay back the money over a period of 180 years. Remember the federal government has to pay back the old debt before it can even start paying back any new debt. This is not a good time for such useless projects.
“Methane and tropospheric ozone, are two greenhouse gases that linger in the atmosphere for weeks to decades–much less time than the century that carbon dioxide remains in the air.”
This is a misleading statement by NASA. An attempt to undermine methane as a greenhouse gas, which is 87 times more potent than CO2. The residence time of CO2 is just half of methane (4 yrs vs. 9 yrs) However the half life of CO2 is 40 yrs due to the carbon cycle. It means 82% will be gone in 100 yrs. NASA is comparing two different values – the residence time of methane and the decay rate of CO2 in 100 yrs. Residence time only considers the rate of removal. Decay rate considers the rates of removal and addition. The decay rate of methane can be derived from the methane cycle.
https://web.viu.ca/krogh/chem302/residence%20time%20of%20atmos%20gases%20Table%202.1%20Hobbs.pdf
Here is one opinion on NASA that’s not too good
https://capitalresearch.org/2016/06/nasa/
“President Obama, John Holdren, Lori Garver, and James Hansen have succeeded in their apparent mission to convert NASA’s bold exploration and scientific mission into yet another left-wing propaganda-spewing agency. As House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) observed at a 2014 hearing, “there are 13 other agencies involved in climate-change research, but only one that is responsible for space exploration.”
The next president must halt the ideological war at NASA and work with Congress to provide the funding to unleash the engineers and astronauts who will rebuild America’s leadership in space and high technology for the next generation. The goal should be an “American exceptionalism”-style space program that would truly earn the name given in the Augustine Commission’s report: “a human spaceflight program worthy of a great nation.””
More at the website
“We know it gets diluted in the atmosphere, it gets washed out by rain, but we want to understand the processes that do that and where and how long they take.”
In CAGW, that statement shouldn’t even exist. First, it has been stated and argued that co2 released that is man made lasts hundreds of years in the atmosphere. The IPCC and associates said that and have argued that ,right? And second, they can tell the difference between man made and natural co2 based on isotope ratio differences. They said that too, right? I have a full thumb drive full of arguments about that.
They have some serious problems with the co2 story. I’m just wondering what kind of angle or spin they will put on their findings.