
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
The US Senate is considering funding for albedo modification geoengineering experiments – pumping particles or aerosols into the stratosphere, to reflect sunlight back into space, and counter the alleged impact of elevated CO2 levels on global climate.
According to ScienceMag;
To fight global warming, Senate calls for study of making Earth reflect more light
Budgetmakers in the U.S. Senate want the Department of Energy (DOE) to study the possibility of making Earth reflect more sunlight into space to fight global warming. Earth’s reflectivity is known as its albedo, and the request to study “albedo modification” comes in the details of a proposed spending bill passed by the Senate appropriations committee to fund DOE, the Army Corps of Engineers, and related agencies for fiscal year 2017, which begins 1 October. The bill does not specify how much money should be spent on the research.
Critics argue that albedo modification and other “geoengineering” schemes are risky and would discourage nations from trying to reduce their emissions of carbon dioxide, the heat-trapping gas that comes from the burning of fossil fuels and that is causing global warming by absorbing increasing amounts of energy from sunlight. Still, climate researchers say they should find out what its potential of albedo modification might be.
“The recommendation is great,” says Joyce Penner, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Albedo modification “is not a solution to global warming, it is only a way to avoid, perhaps, a tipping point in the climate.” David Keith, an atmospheric physicist at Harvard University, says, “Ignorance is not a good basis for making decisions, so learning more about this is extremely valuable even if we find out that it will never work.” Keith adds, however, that the few existing studies suggest albedo modification could help ameliorate some effects of global warming.
The call for further research comes in a bill that would provide $5.4 billion for DOE’s Office of Science next year. It also builds on the recommendations of a February 2015 report from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) entitled Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth. That report warned explicitly that albedo modification shouldn’t be deployed now because the risks and benefits were far too uncertain. Still, the committee urged further research to find out what those risks and benefits might be.
It is difficult to imagine a more ridiculous waste of taxpayer’s money.
The US spends taxpayer’s money regulating coal plants, forcing any coal plants which survive Obama’s war on energy, to fit expensive scrubbers, to remove particulates from their emissions.
If this measure is passed, the Department of Energy will get to spend even more taxpayer’s money, burning sulphur and other compounds, to generate and emit the same types of particulates which the US government previously forced domestic US coal plants to scrub.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Why don’t they just spray atomized BRAWNDO (The Heat Mutilator) into the air.. it’s got Electrolytes, it’s what the planet craves
Great a government project. What could possibly go wrong?
Solar radiation management governance
https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/solar-radiation-governance/
Cambridge
http://www.srms-cambridge.eng.cam.ac.uk/
David Kieth has been talking about this for years
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/cheap-controversial-solution-climate-change/
Now if they are talking openly of it that means there have been discussions long before that and experiments carried out at the very least, going public is when you want to sell it to the public!
Why don’t all the AGWCC proponents test their theory in a much more easily measured approach: they could all shave their heads, men, women, TGs, every one of them, and then stand outside to see if the reflective albedo of their shiny noggins will reduce the global average temperature by some miniscule fraction of a degree? It wouldn’t cost very much, just the amount for a new Gillette razor blade.
What, those pin heads?
Would not add up to even as much as if my cats bleach their black hair to blonde to look like WWF wrestlers.
If I remember correctly the UN has access to 800 refueling planes left over from the cold war, that were used for refueling nuke bombers and air fleets. They can be re-purposed for SRM.
The patents exist, an extensive list of them.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they have been at it since the 90s experimenting with this.
Such a thing would surely create cooling which obviously creates the potential for weather to move heat around. So an intensive SRM project and any expected outcome would be nothing but whims of fancy.
I would think it is not best to randomly throw in energy imbalances willy nilly into the weather systems and just hope the outcome is not a bad one.
I doubt there was 800 refueling planes world wide, even at the height of the cold war.
Those planes are all owned by the govts that bought them, the UN has no access to them.
Sheesh, try a little fact checking.
Typo marko lol, 80, in my haste I hit 0 twice.
AS pointed out by Alan, there are a huge number of KC 135s and those are most associated with SRM activities, though some claim they are killing us all intentionally 😀
The US Military has the large majority of the KCs though rather than the UN nations in general.
Even I didnt think that many were 135s produced.
They are pretty easily re-purposed for aerosol spraying.
Remember Operation Popeye? The weather war in Vietnam, pretty sure it involved spraying stuff in the atmosphere, I haven’t looked at it closely, that was the 60s maaaannnn 🙂
Alan, that’s the number produced, not the number still in service.
Is this really news in 2016?
“CIA outsources its research center on climate engineering JULY 25, 2013
The National Academy of Sciences of the United States will take 21 months a study program on ” Climate Engineering: technology assessment and discussion of impacts ” [ 1 ]. The information would be passed unnoticed if the bimonthly Mother Jones did revealed funding: CIA [ 2 ].”
http://www.voltairenet.dotorg/article179597.html
A list of patents relating to weather geoengineering.
Please dont associate my post with any doomsday theory, I am not advocating anything like that, it’s for the sake of curiosity about what geoengineering methods may be possible, it includes well knows tech such as for crop spraying, I guess someone really wanted to fill out the list, most people probably never read it when they cite it, the usual mindless nonsense.
I find some interesting in that the dates are like 1920s. Almost 100 years since we’ve been looking at this kind of thing
1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
http://www.aircrap.org/evidence/patents-directly-related-to-geoengineering/
Interesting; however,. the 4,000 members of the class of Swedish citizens who filed litigation in 2014 state that the components in spraying have been determined by analysis to be consistent with the Weisbach patent, including 10 micron aluminum oxide particles. Given the current acceptance of government disinfo, conflating this spraying with the numerous patents for agricultural applications may be effective disinfo for those unfamiliar with the analyses of precipitates.
April 1, 2014, charges were filed against the Swedish government and three of its agencies to the nation’s Chanceller of Justice for widespread and systematic violations of the much heralded “public principle
(“offentlighetsprincipen” similar to FOI). The violations occurred when the government failed to respond to over 4,000 citizen requests for information related to the ubiquitous spraying of aerosols over the country from aircraft
(a ka “chemtrailing”) that has been going on for several years.
https://chemtrailsplanet.files.wordpressdotcom/2014/04/citizens-file-60-million-suit-against-government-failure-to-respond-to-chemtrails-questions.pdf
NASA Goddard Space Flight heliophysicst Douglas E. Rowland provides an update from 1920. He states that 3 types of chemtrails are currently used in this Dec. 2015 video, the first time since 1979, according to his statement. His contact info is included in the video. Rowland uses the term “chemtrail” in this conversation; the caller doesn’t mention chemtrails.
NASA Scientist Says There Are Different Types of Chemtrails
https://www.youtubedotcom/watch?v=r2AD36sNZ70
This subject always leads to very murky waters lol, the more you dig the more depressing it gets.
“The former U.S. Secretary of Defense, Robert S. McNamara, was aware that there might be objections raised by the international scientific community but said in a memo to the president that such objections had not in the past been a basis for prevention of military activities considered to be in the interests of U.S. national security.
The chemical weather modification program was conducted from Thailand over Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam and allegedly sponsored by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and CIA without the authorization of then Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird who had categorically denied to Congress that a program for modification of the weather for use as a tactical weapon even existed.[3]”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Popeye
FYI I never cite a wiki as a source that proves anything, absolutely not! Just for info
2010 University of Calgary Geoengineering Cost Analysis Using Jets October 30, 2010 Aurora Flight Sciences Final Report. For Dr. David Keith.
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/sites/default/files/file/pdfs/jet_trails/25_1_2010_University_of_Calgary_Geoengineering_Cost_Analysis_Using_Jets_October_30_2010_Aurora_Flight_Sciences_Final_Report_Keith.pdf
2009 Geoengineering the Climate-Science, Governance and Uncertainty September 2009 Royal Society Report
http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/sites/default/files/file/geo_scheme_16/16_2009_Geoengineering_the_Climate_Science__Governance_and_Uncertainty_September_2009_Royal_Society_Report.pdf
F**king insane.
This Albedo Modification Geoengineering Proposal is a proposal like the one to pay men to dig holes and then pay other men to fill them in, and makes as much sense, possibly less sense.
I hate to give the Alarmists ideas, especially concerning this idea, but if they want to block sunlight, a better way, especially as a test, would be to put a sunshade in orbit to block out a portion of the sunlight. Don’t mess with the Earth’s atmosphere.
That would give NASA something useful to do, and the experiment could be controlled much better that way.
There is no need to mess with the Earth’s atmosphere because there is no evidence that there is anything wrong with the Earth’s atmosphere, that needs to be fixed.
Better idea – how about we call Earth the “control” planet, and tell NASA to do their experiment on Mars, instead.
So the Government is going to declare war on Global Warming. What could possibly go wrong?
Let’s see: War on Drugs, War on Poverty…et. al. invariably resulting in more of the things we wage war against plus the inherent bonus that arises from the law of unintended consequences which invariably result in higher fees and taxes and the reduction of individual liberties.
Brilliant!
No money would be spent on actual geoengineering. The bill doesn’t call for performing albedo modification. It says the DOE should review the findings of the National Academy of Sciences and look into the potential impacts of albedo modification. Many other nations are studying this as well and the DOE is directed with determining what effects it may have. But I’m sure you didn’t bother to read the actual bill text.
pd2413
So, obviously you would support a clause REQUIRING that same bill support the DOE and Federal Farm Agencies provide multi-year multi-billion dollar subsidies (er, studies) to show the proven trillions of dollars of advantages that greater CO2, greater fossil fuel use, and a generally warmer climate is providing the world’s poor, the world’s middle class and the world’s economies?
According to my former senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson, they’ve been geoengineering a long time. Bless her heart that she at least told me the truth.
[Deleted. This site does not entertain Chemtrails discussions. -mod]