Guest essay by F.J. Shepherd

Norse Medieval Greenland and Historical Realities
Some people have claimed that Greenland was no warmer 1,000 years ago than it is today. In fact, some have even suggested that it was colder 1,000 years ago. Are such suggestions made to bolster the alleged “unprecedented” warming claim for the past 135 years? Contrary to such claims, history paints a very different picture.
In this essay, I will examine some of the historical facts concerning Greenland starting 1,000 years ago and will then attempt to demonstrate how much warmer Greenland had to be in order to accommodate the history that transpired in this region.
Greenland’s Climate Today
Today, Greenland experiences a polar climate. There should be no dispute about this. The average annual temperature of Greenland sits around -17 degrees C. The only region colder in the world is Antarctica.
Polar climate is divided into two categories: (1) ice cap; and (2) tundra. The majority of Greenland, 80%, is ice capped. The average thickness of this ice cap is about 1.2 miles. Every month of the year has an average temperature below freezing as that is what defines the temperature parameter for the polar ice cap climate.
As for the rest of Greenland, the other 20%, this is the narrow strip of coastland around some of the island. This is the polar tundra category (2) wherein the average monthly temperature of any month does not exceed10 degrees C. I have found a couple of locations on the coast that just barely reach a subpolar classification. The average temperature of July, at these two locations, does exceed 10 degrees C by a fraction of a degree.
Even in the “warm” southern part of Greenland, prime agricultural land and a climate conducive to farming do not exist. Did they exist 1,000 years ago? In part, they had to exist for otherwise, Greenland’s history would be much different.
Greenland Norse History in Brief
We have to start with Iceland that was discovered by the Norwegians and settled by them starting in the 870’s. Starting here is necessary since the Norse Greenlanders came from Iceland.
Please note that Iceland is about 800 miles over the seas from Norway, and that is quite the distance for Norse longships or the knerrir (cargo ships) to travel over a stormy, northern Atlantic ocean. About 25% of the Iceland was covered in forest, for the climate was warm enough to grow trees. It probably had the same subpolar oceanic climate that is has today, or perhaps it was even warmer. The reason why it has few trees now is that they were cleared by the Norsemen to make way for farmland. The Norwegians did what they did best and farmed Iceland. The climate was quite conducive to farming. Within a century, all the good land was taken.
The early settlers came in droves wanting to remove themselves from the control of a growing Norwegian aristocracy under the auspices of an unpopular but powerful monarchy. Thus, the Icelanders were a fiercely independent people and preferred the clan based chieftain political system with its Althing assembly wherein all freemen had the right to give counsel.
Although Greenland is not viewable from Iceland, it did not take long for the Icelanders to learn that there was more land further west. Erik the Red from Iceland explored Greenland and gave it its name. He drew settlers from Iceland to pioneer the southern part of Greenland. Claiming the best land in the south for himself, he became a chieftain. This happened circa AD 985.
Greenland is as far from Iceland as Iceland is from Norway. The Eastern settlement in the south of Greenland is about 800 miles from Iceland. Of the first 25 boats that first set out to settle Greenland, only 14 made the destination. That might give an idea as to how precarious it was to traverse the north Atlantic in the Norse ships. This should also prevent people from suggesting that Iceland supplied the Greenlanders with all their ongoing necessities via ships.
The first Greenlanders brought with them grain seed (probably barley, oats and rye), horses, cattle, pigs, sheep and goats. The wealthier amongst them brought their Irish and Scottish thralls (slaves). They set up a mirror image of the Icelandic system of chieftains and the Althing assembly. More settlers came later from Iceland, and two other settlements were formed: the Middle and the Western.
Greenland on the southern coastal areas throughout the fiords and inlets was well forested at the time – if it was warm enough to have trees, it would have been warm enough to farm. I am quite certain that the Middle and Western settlements were identified as being suitable for farming because they were forested as well.
Greenland Norse settlements lasted about 500 years. For comparison purposes, English-speaking Europeans founded their first permanent North American settlement in Jamestown, Virginia in 1607, and that was just 410 years ago from today.
Greenland Norsemen Society and Culture
When the Greenlanders started to establish their new farmsteads, the Norwegians were going through a transition period from the old Nordic religion to Christianity. Christianity prevailed in time. As Greenland grew in population, the Church took notice and the Diocese of Gardar was established in AD 1124 with its headquarters established in the Eastern settlement. This Diocese maintained a bishop until AD 1378 – a period of 255 years. Priests were sent from Norway to manage the 18 to 19 parish churches established at the various settlements, and a relatively large cathedral was built at Gardar. So too, a Convent and a Monastery were built in the Eastern settlement to draw from the local population.
I have noticed that there has lately been a trend to downplay the population size of the Greenland settlements. The current trend is to estimate that there were no more than 2,500 Norse people in the Greenland settlements at their height. Estimates previously ranged from 5,000 to 10,000. If one simply looks at the statistics for the Christian Church alone and its involvement within the Greenland communities, with a bishop, probably 18 priests and churches, a Convent, a Monastery, a Cathedral, not to mention all of the other religious overhead personnel involved, why would the Church go through all this effort for just a few thousand people?
So far, there have been excavated about 620 Norse farms in the Greenland settlements. The structure of the farm culture in Greenland more than likely followed the traditional Norse setup – a longhouse being the central residence of the farm dwellers with two to three families occupying the house. Some of the adult members of the families may have been related by blood. It is estimated that each farm longhouse would house from 10 to 20 people who worked the farm. By taking just the lower estimate of 10 persons per farm, we have at the height of the Greenland settlements at least 6,000 people. Norse farm families had on average, seven children – three and a half of which survived to adulthood. I do believe that at the height of the Norse Greenland settlements, choosing the higher end of population size is probably closer to the reality that was. I would be inclined to put the estimate closer to a population size from 8,000 to 9,000.
The Phases of Greenland Norse History
I divide the 500-year span of the Greenland Norse settlements into two basic phases. The first phase was from AD 1000 to AD 1300 – the warm time wherein the settlements thrived under a relatively pleasant climate conducive to farming, trade and exploration. The second phase commenced after AD 1300 and ended in the early 1500’s. It comprised a steadily deteriorating and cooling climate wherein the independent spirit of the Greenlanders was just not enough to beat the cold.
I find it amusing to read the many articles written about the “mystery” as to why the Norse Greenland settlements disappeared. A medieval society cannot farm land in a polar climate that Greenland attained over a period of a century or more. To have expected them to adapt to the Inuit way of life, that some have suggested, is rather silly, when they did have an alternative – leave.
What the Western Settlement Reveals about the Changing Climate
The Western settlement was smaller than the Eastern settlement and resided on the west coast of Greenland, 300 miles north of the Eastern settlement. Three churches, one large estate and 95 farms have been excavated in this location. Most of these sites that have been discovered lay under permafrost. A bishop of Greenland travelled there in the mid-14th century and recorded that the settlement was completely abandoned. Therefore, by AD 1350, the Western settlement was gone. That is exactly what one would expect considering that in a cooling climate, the northern community would have been the first one to become no longer viable for farming, and thus, abandoned.
Given the current climate found in where the Western settlement laid, this gives us a clue as to how much warmer this area of Greenland must have been 1,000 years ago. The centre of this Western settlement lies about 40 miles inland, east of the Greenland capital city of Nuuk. We do have a climate scheme for Nuuk:
Table 1. Average Monthly Temperatures in Celsius, 1961-1990, for Nuuk
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year |
| -7.4 | -7.8 | -8.0 | -3.8 | 0.6 | 3.9 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 3.3 | -0.7 | -3.7 | -6.2 | -1.4 |
This is a classic polar tundra climate, with maritime moderation. Over this 30-year period for which we have this record, it does snow all months of the year even though it may be in just trace amounts in the summer months. One cannot farm in such a climate, although a greenhouse might come in handy. As an aside, the climate in Nuuk for the past 15 years has been getting cooler than what the table above reflects.
What would it take to make Nuuk (the Western Norse settlement on Greenland) have a suitable climate in which to farm? I found that a minimum rise of 5 degrees C would do the trick:
Table 2. Average Monthly Temperatures in Celsius, increased by 5 degrees C for Nuuk
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year |
| -2.4 | -2.8 | -3.0 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 8.9 | 11.5 | 11.1 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 1.3 | -1.2 | 3.6 |
This is true “climate change.” A 5 degree Celsius rise in temperature would bring Nuuk from a polar tundra climate into a subpolar oceanic category, capable of growing trees, and the planting of crops and raising livestock in an agricultural setting. The subpolar oceanic climate is defined as having the coldest month average temperature not falling below the -3 degrees C mark, and having from one to three months with an average temperature of 10 degrees C or more.
Table 2 gives the temperature scheme as to what I contend the Greenland Western settlement must have had in temperatures, as a minimum, in order to support the large farming community just east of Nuuk for the three centuries it existed. It more than likely was even warmer. Just a rise of 7 degrees C would place Nuuk into an even warmer oceanic climate classification. As for the Greenland Eastern settlement that was 300 miles further south, I believe that it must have been warmer still than the Western settlement.
How could such warmth be possible? More than likely the North Atlantic Drift was strong enough that a part of it drove through the Labrador Sea, the Davis Strait and Baffin Bay, hugging the western coastline of Greenland. The era was part of the Medieval Warm Period, was it not? This map illustrates the scenario.

It worries me that there are people living today, and allegedly well-educated and intelligent people, who claim that Greenland was as cold if not colder 1,000 years ago, than it is today. I should like to show them the 95 excavated farms at the Western settlement site, many being dug out from under permafrost, and ask for an explanation as to how this could be? Now, how does one cultivate crops in a land of permafrost? Were the Norsemen farmers in the Western settlement growing ice to feed their livestock?
Greenland Hype
There are claims made today by some people giving the impression that one can do anything in Greenland today that the Vikings of old did.
For instance, some have claimed that the “barley is back.” If you look into this matter, you will find that someone claimed they are experimenting with growing barley in Greenland, and that is about it. The growing season is just not long enough still for that kind of crop to grow. It is relatively well established now that the Greenland Norse farmers did grow barley.
Some will point out that hay is now grown in Greenland. Yes, that is true, for it is. In the far south of Greenland, they do grow hay. Hay has a very short growing season and currently in Greenland, the cut hay must be wrapped in plastic right in the fields to keep it from spoiling. That was hardly a technique available for use by Medieval Norsemen. Regardless, most of the feed for Greenland livestock of today has to be shipped in from afar.
So yes, Greenland does have sheep, and so do the polar climates on the Falklands and Grand Terre of the Kerguelen Islands. The Norse settlements of Greenland had horses, cattle, pigs, sheep and goats and they had to be self-sufficient in growing the crops to feed them. There is a big difference here as to the extent and magnitude of Norse Greenlander farming that was done 1,000 years ago as compared to what is being done now, or can be done now for farming.
But does not Greenland have a forest of native trees? Oh yes it does. It is called the Qinngua Valley with native willow, birch, alder and mountain ash trees. The trees can grow to… now hold your breath… to heights of 25 feet. They are probably some of the most scraggly looking trees I have ever seen that could easily be mistaken for simply overgrown bushes. It is still too cold to grow a real tree in Greenland, one that could soar to a “robust” height of 60 feet or more with a trunk around which could not be contained by the hug of one’s arms. It was essential that the Norse Greenlanders had access to an immediate supply of wood to have commenced and maintained their farming settlements for the centuries they lived on the island.
The Demise of the Greenland Norsemen
There is no mystery in the abandonment of Greenland by the Norwegians. No, it was not the Thule attacking them or various pirate raids. However, such events could have taken place, but there is no archaeological evidence to support them. The Black Plague could not have been the culprit either. The Plague hit Iceland in AD 402 and killed at least one-third of its population. By that time, the Greenlanders had been almost completely cut off from any communication with the European world, including Iceland. The Church abandoned Greenland in 1378 out of practicality for no ships could get through the sea ice between Iceland and Greenland safely. The Little Ice Age had no mercy. In essence, Greenland was forgotten, and the remnant simply left whenever they could, or, remained to die from an increasingly hostile climate.
As for the die-hard Greenlanders refusing to leave, their fate was sealed, and unfortunately, the last one did not turn out the lights, but rather, there was no one left to bury him:
“One such stoic was found lying face down on the beach of a fjord in the 1540s by a party of Icelandic seafarers, who like so many sailors before them had been blown off course on their passage to Iceland and wound up in Greenland. The only Norseman they would come across during their stay, he died where he had fallen, dressed in a hood, homespun woolens and seal skins. Nearby lay his knife, ‘bent and much worn and eaten away.’ Moved by their find, the men took it as a memento and carried it with them to show when at last they reached home.”
From Archaeology Online, last paragraph.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
There is a saying in present day Iceland: “If you get lost in the forest in Iceland, stand up and look around.” Trees struggle to grow there.
Thanks F.j. Your story sounds like a real life saga.
While reading it, I thought; here again is what people are willing to subject themselves to in the pursuit of freedom.
The Iceland to Greenland journey was clearly no piece of cake. Well the naysayers would have to claim it was simply not doable to support their view of the then Greenland climate.
I’ve never thought of Denmark as being a bastion of oppression, yet clearly some ventured into the unthinkable in search of a freer way of life.
Thanks.
G
And by the way; hang In there Svend ! (Real live Greenlander ex pat)
G
george e.smith wrote:
>I’ve never thought of Denmark as being a bastion of oppression, yet clearly some ventured into the >unthinkable in search of a freer way of life.
No Actually the Land-Takers in Iceland an later Greenland were refugees from this guy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harald_Fairhair
King Harald united most of Norway into one country and a lot of local chieftains had no chiefdom’s left.
So they took land in Iceland as a replacement
//Lars
Well, actually Norway was in a union with Denmark from about 1400 to 1800 trough royal wedding. We call it the four hundred year night due to the systematic oppression. After the Napoleon war we were entered into a “union” with Sweden as war tribute, it was an improvement. It took us another hundred years to maneuver out of that.
The Norvejun
I lived in the Seattle area many years ago, and recall a guy in a t-shirt that read “Half Swede, Half Norwegian…doesn’t get better than that”.
Gummy ! Did I get my Danes And Norvejuns scrambled there. Well all you blue eyed chaps look the same to me anyhow. Sorry about the snafu.
But I do think Svend works for the Danish Department of everything icy. He’s studying glaciers and other ice, in Greenland or even in Antarctica. (from Greenland).
Satellites can go anywhere these days. Svend gets pictures from all over.
I’ll take 5 demerits for today.
g
OAS. So where exactly does the “Edda” originate from ??
Yes I really want to know.
g
Stand up carefully, you’ve probably been drinking.
Yes, indeed, you must have!
Olafur Einarsson (1573 – 1659), who lived in Greenland settlements not long before they were completely abandoned, wrote:
A first hand writing is considered to be the most reliable historical account. Alas, the alarmists will call him a liar, no doubt.
What a well written article.
Thanks for the time and effort.
And thanks for the first person account.
Such a hearty fellow … 86 years.
A good gene pool.
Yes, Knutsesea, a really excellent article. I’m going to refer my sister to it. She can send it to her warmist ‘expert’ tutor at the Open University who tells all his students that Greenland was never very warm
The truth spreads slowly as the lie spreads like fire.
Eventually the fire has no more easy minds to consume and
the truth catches up to replace the emptiness of the lie.
I remember an old Norwegian man whom I had met back in the 1970s up in Siskiyou County California. He was 96 years old at the time. He had given up smoking around his mid 80s. He lived alone in a cabin in the forest around 10 miles outside of town. Friends and family would check up on him, bring him supplies, and make sure that he had no whiskey bottles hidden anywhere. He could drink a quart easily. Some friends would occasionally bring him a bottle. He was a big man, and still mostly fit to where he could split firewood or hike several miles. He was quite a character.
Well obviously, Olafur Einarsson (1573 – 1659), is a climate change DENIER !! LOL
Obviously, Olafur Einarsson (1573 – 1659)..was a Climate Change Deni*r !!..LOL
Cows! It’s said that the dairy industry consisted of a whopping 22 COWS in 2013! They should have had much more since it’s much hotter today than during the Medieval time. Or maybe it’s too hot now for the cattle! But articles say cattle will soon boom due to a warming climate! I’m getting a headache.
This did not happen. Avert your eyes.
How come barley is not widely grown in Greenland, but was back in the Medieval time? Why would you attempt to grow barley if you knew it was too cold and your life depended on you getting it right?
I’m stumped! It was colder in Greenland back in the Medieval Cold Period. Now back to reality.
Let me re-post that again WITH bolding, coz it’s important to note. Mods, you can remove my earlier version if you like.
Thanks, Jimbo, very interesting.
Do you have all these references neatly filed away, or did you search for them just now? If you have a well-organized collection at the ready, have you considered putting it online?
This is an extract found after a short internet research re Icelandic agricultural history. I am a sheep and cattle farmer and can assure you sheep are tougher in cold conditions than cattle
http://axelkrist.com/CAHD/adjproject.html
“The first volume traces the development of Icelandic farming from its origin in the Norwegian agricultural system and Norwegian viking age society, through to the 18th century. The continuity between the Norwegian system, which itself was a result of 5000 years of development, and the Icelandic agricultural system all the way until 1400 BC is remarkable. Grain production, cattle, iron making and fishing all played a role in Icelandic agriculture just like in Norway. There was a break in the period 1400-1600 as grain growing disappeared along with indigenous iron making, and the proportion of sheep rose precipitiously compared to cattle”
Just a coincidence?
Obviously he was a liar in the pay of the Koch Brothers
No doubt. The Kochvenard brothers at the time, LoL!
The other big deal is the discovery of L’Anse aux Meadows in Newfoundland. It corroborates The Saga of the Greenlanders.
Lots of folks with PhDs are basically illiterate when it comes to anything beyond their narrow fields. Anyone who knows about the Greenland settlement would surely think twice before trying to erase the MWP and LIA. The fact that we apparently have a crop of illiterate PhDs is a strong argument that we should bring back liberal education.
Thanks for the link, CB. I wrote and published an op ed article on the Viking settlements in Greenland. My conclusions aligned closely with F.J.’s There are too many lines of evidence based on first hand historical account, trade logs (the Norse kept good records) and archeology to lend any support to this paper. We saw with the Marcott et. al. study that paleo-proxies (what this paper is based upon) can be over 2,000 years off when the authors decide they need to be to support their conclusion.
“… bring back liberal education.”
What is now done is still called liberal education while including much indoctrination of socialism and progressivism.
Perhaps a new name is called for.
Many years ago when one of my sisters lived in Canada she gave me Farley Mowat’s book “West Viking” telling the story of the Norse push west all the way the America.
Not having looked at the book in years I thought I’d see if it was still available and had a look on Amazon only to find this in part of the description……..
Interestingly, their conquests are pertinent to present discussions on supposed human induced global warming. When Erik the Red went to southern Greenland, it was a green land. The Scandinavians could raise sheep and cattle on the grassy pastures. These pastures are now covered by ice. It is colder now than one thousand years ago. Al Gore–the man who discovered the internet–just might have it wrong.
James Bull
I totally agree. We have got to a sad place.
Magnus Magnusson, the Icelandic scholar and broadcaster, co-authored a translation many years ago ( the ’80 I think ) of the Icelandic “Vinland Saga”. The saga is an account of how Viking explorers found North America. The introduction to this book gave a lengthy, and well cited history of the waxing and waning of the Norse Greenland colony. It was well cited as it often referred to original contemporary documents.
It is well worth a read.
The abandonment of Greenland seems to have been complete before 1573.
But Michael Mann has a direct line to revealed TRUTH. Isnt’t that so?
But, without any ability, or is it ‘willingness’ (to debate that is), we will never have a chance to cross examine that ‘trvth’ …
The ‘truth’ was revealed to Michael Mann, according to Michael Mann.
Europe was freezing during the Medieval summers. The following is a load of old garbage. Avert your eyes ladies and gentlemen.
The cold years around 1234 AD are easy to see on the JG/U sub arctic tree ring study. It looks like the cold wave, likely a gm, started around 1195 AD then lasted for around 60 years before ending. There is a sharp drop at the beginning of that time after which temps recover to average around 15 years later. Then there is renewed cold around 1230 AD which becomes the coldest portion of that cold trend. with around 10 years in a row of below average cold. Then around 1255 AD temps have once again returned to average or above with a strong warm spike showing up around 1275 AD …http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/07/120709092606.htm
goldminor
Which comes back to showing that the Medieval Warming Period was a long, broad peak of a 1000 year “long cycle” of about 1.15 degrees that CONTINUED to show signs of the 60-70 year short cycle of about .75 degrees amplitude. Across that broad peak of several hundred years, you WILL see local periods of short temperature drops where temps are below their long-term average..
Typo alert: The Plague hit Iceland in AD 402….
Good eye. It should read “1402”.
When I read the sagas in my youth, there was not much doubt from historians or researchers about a MWP favourable to Greenland settlement and expeditions westward.
Quite suddenly, just a few years back, there emerged all kinds of doubt.
What changed? (Rhetorical, definitely!)
Someone should have explained the satellite drift to the Greenlanders, that would have reassured them there wasn’t a pause in the warming.
Nice work.
I’ve always thought that Kirsten Seaver’s “Frozen Echo” is required reading on the subject:
http://www.amazon.com/Frozen-Echo-Greenland-Exploration-D/dp/0804731616/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1453239053&sr=8-1&keywords=frozen+echo
What good are eyewitness accounts in the face of infrequent outlying glacial proxy reconstructions?
Those who left Greenland could have gone west to Vinland.
In the 1100 it was well known that there was land to the west of Greenland.
Superb post. Archeology trumps dendroclimatology and warmunist mythology every time.
There is more evidence than noted. Wood remains from trees, cattle bones, church churchyard burials in ground that is now permafrost…
We need a Greenland barley archeology soundbite to counter the warmunist myths. They will counter it was only local. To which a riposte is, what happened to your polar amplification?
+1 — what an excellent post.
An afterthought. The post’s pictured church had a roof. That roof had to have supporting log beams that spanned its length. You can still see where they would have been emplaced. No such trees grow in Greenland today. A potent visual sound bite.
You only need one tree, though.
Didn’t they import timber from Labrador?
@dearime -a reference would be good. Vinland was settled for only a brief period and it is recorded that Leif Eriksson did bring back grapes and timber from Vinland, about 14 years after the first settlement. Timber from Greenland itself would have been the only source for quite a while. Really good timber from Markland or Vinland would have been extremely expensive and supplied intermittently.
Great post. Many thanks.
+1
They managed to grow grain case closed. They should stop stop arguing. They won’t obviously. But that really should be the end of the matter….
This all amounts to fly over country for the DiCaprios and the Gore.Such misery and truth has no place in the modern world of award winning perception artists.
There is a real good solution to the argument of Greenland temp. Take all of those who feel it was as warm or colder, outfit them with everything a Norse colony ship would carry ,, and drop them off near one of the old settlements. No modern devices. Put military units around them to prevent interference. ( And keep them in.)
Come back in one year later with crates of champagne to ether celebrate their success or mourn their demise.
Oh and no T.A.s or students . Just PHDs Such great minds should have no problem adapting
michael
Yes Mike, that could be a new Survivor episode – trying to survive in a polar climate with only medieval technology available. They would freeze to death before they would starve.
That would be a Survivor show worth watching. I never found the show appealing to my tastes.
Actually, Mark Burnett, produce of Survivor, has said that they couldn’t risk people’s lives in cold, which is why every show is in the tropics…perhaps the warmunists should think about that for a minute.
(Although he also produced a much better show called “Eco Challenge”, which was fairly decent considering the “Eco” part…)
Would make a great followup to “Alone”.
Please make them tenured PhDs who are currently warmists.
the fact they dig it out of permafrost says it all
greenland was definitely warmer during the viking settlements. anyone who does try to say otherwise will fail….
those who say it was not that way needs to learn some basic history from first grade school….
According to the Team, the Vikings were master farmers able to grow barley on glaciers and permafrost and that is why the MWP never existed, as His Manniness will doubtless confirm.
Sadly, this splendid technology has been lost in the mists of time and is no longer available.
Just another fairy tale from today’s purveyors of climate science.
More articles about the Vikings in Greenland:-
Garden under Sandet – a Greenland farm rising from 670 years permafrost
By Inger E, Johansson
Abandoned Colony in Greenland: Archaeologists Find Clues to Viking Mystery
By Günther Stockinger
The Fate of Greenland’s Vikings
By Dale Mackenzie Brown
Vikings grew barley in Greenland
By: Sybille Hildebrandt
Great links. Thanks.
Here’s another link to the Garden Under Sandet paper, which is a wonderful Thesis. Among other things it suggests it was much easier to raise sheep and goats than cattle, and that the Vikings at their peak had herds of around 100,000 on Greenland.
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp04/mq22551.pdf
And here’s a link to a paper on Viking remains found way up on Ellesmere Island
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic33-3-454.pdf
Good lord, I used to banter with Inger back on UseNet way back in the early 90s…then again, William Connollly was also there, denying the MWP even back then…
The only thing that bothers me is, why didn’t the Norse Greenlanders head south?
They already knew of Vineland, present day Newfoundland, surely they could have figured out over 500 years that conditions were much better the more south you go.
Perhaps it was the Indians.
That question is a most interesting one, for the Greenlanders knew that Vinland existed and that it was quite warm there. There are stories about the Western settlement of Greenland, which seemed to vacate very abruptly, did in fact head to Vinland. It is probably more a fantasy than anything else, and yet, there are stories about the Beothuk first nations of Newfoundland who are now extinct – they were described as a tall people, some who had fair skin and hair. This should be more the area of the novelist to deal with, but surely it is so rich in speculation and romance.
A hearty group like that who got there by vessel surely produced a rebellious lad or two who ventured further west. Perhaps he ran off with Helga. Ah, the history of peoples. We are a saucy lot.
Again, please see Kirsten Seaver’s “Frozen Echo”, highly recommended for the subject.
This is a pretty good precis:
http://illadvised.blogspot.ca/2005/09/book-kirsten-seaver-frozen-echo_24.html
This link http://www3.gettysburg.edu/~tshannon/hist106web/site9/Jeff/vikings_homeland_is_scandinavian.htm
claims that they didn’t want to settle there because of the natives.
I suspect that the Norse liked to raid (although settling in the British Isles by the 9th C) from there homes in colder regions. The cold could put raiders off from invading while most of the men went on a raid.
I dare say they very likely did head south. We are talking a period of 400 years, after all.
The only verifiable settlement is one that only lasted a decade in Newfoundland, before being abandoned due to attacks from natives. Likely there were others, (for butternuts from far further south were found at the Newfoundland site), and likely there were also wandering traders who never settled. The Vikings were not all farmers, after all. One interesting bit of trivia about Greenland is that there were two male graves for every one female grave, suggesting a lot of fellows were “just passing through”, but from where to where?
400 years is a long time, especially when the history of that time was so badly documented, especially concerning the tribes of northeast Canada and New England. A horrible pandemic wiped out something like 95% of the Massachusetts Tribe, and we hardly know anything about their long history beyond bits gleaned from Dutch and French sources, and some lore mentioned by Puritans. However one bit of Puritan lore is very interesting.
There was a clan of the Micmac tribe that my Puritan ancestors feared right along with Pirates, and called the “Red Vikings”, because they raided by sea. The first mention of them is from before the Pilgrims even settled, when they raided the Massachusetts Tribe. Apparently they valued sailing ships to such a degree that, when the French wanted to trade for furs, they wanted French ships in trade.
I have always found it suspicious that a tribe of Native Americans would have such a hunger for sailing vessels, without some reference to an earlier history, perhaps involving Vikings.
There is an early mention in English records that on May 14, 1602 Bartholomew Gosnold’s crew landed in Maine after two months at sea, and were met by “a Biscay shallop with saile and oars” manned by Micmacs desiring to trade. (It is also stated that the Micmac leader, Messamouet, had been to France, where he was a houseguest of the mayor of Bayonne).
There are also old reports of large dugouts made from trunks of huge white pines, used by the Indians of Cape Cod who whaled off the coast of New England, and towed the whales ashore, using all parts of the whale, including using the bones for rafters on seaside wigwams. What is really odd is that seemingly similar structures are mentioned as being across the Atlantic, by the Arab geographer Nuzhet al-Mushtaq, way back around the year 1150, (as being discovered by adventurers who explored “beyond the fogs”, west of Lisbon, Portugal.)
But now we see what happens when you adventure into the world of lore. You can get lost in strange lands and wonderful adventures. When it comes down to the facts, facts, facts that true archaeologists stick to, (bits of actual cloth and bone they can handle), there is no proof anyone ever actually did anything much but stay at home, and that includes the Vikings of Greenland, for 400 years. Hmm.
Note: The Micmac leader Messamouet was not aboard the boat that met the English ship, though bad writing on my part makes it sound that way. I was referring to a separate incident.
Not in facetious way, do you have some links? It seems more plausible than they went home because the Natives were restless.
Very nice post. It is a common sense post for which there can be no honest refutation. I’ve argued for more historic information, histories, chronicles, papers, literature and paintings in climate science. Why on earth would there be a painting by a British artists depicting children jumping from ice ledges a yard thick from the bank of the Thames onto ice floes in spring breakup? Why have advertisements for the ”Frost Faires” been preserved in museums? Why would Scotland have a thriving wine production? Why is it necessary to ask these questions?
I have noticed that there has lately been a trend to downplay
the population size of the Greenland settlements.
This off topic, but earlier today, I ran into what I suspect is a similar downplaying of actual fact.
Do you remember the Deep Water Horizon oil spill? Of course you do. Do you remember the IXTOC 1 oil spill of 1979? My guess is you don’t. They are very similar and if you Google them you will find that IXTOC 1 spewed oil into the Gulf of Mexico from early June 1979 to late March 1980, nearly ten months, at a rate of, according to Wikipedia, 10 to 30 thousand barrels a day which would average out to 6.0 mm bbls by the time it was finally capped. Deep Water Horizon from April 20th to July 15th 2010 spewed oil at a rate of 62,000 barrels per day and totals to about 5.3 mm bbls. Yet we are told that Deep water Horizon was the largest accidental oil spill ever.
I don’t believe anything a left-wing environmentalist says until I check it out.
Thank you for an interesting essay article. I am ever proud of my Icelander neighbors here on Washington Island in Lake Michigan. Icelanders are our largest ethnic community, but Scandinavians abound. They came from the sea and the lakes, while the Irish came up the Door County peninsula, the Niagara Escarpment.
Midwestflyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/stavkirke-Washington-island.jpg
I lived for two years in Iceland. It is a strangely exhilarating experience to “live” history not just study it in a book. I stopped by, and photographed at a distance, the farm Drangur (east from Stykkisholmur made famous in the movie “Walter Mitty”) where in the year 950 Eirik Rauthi (Eric the Red) killed someone and fleeing retribution or justice discovered Greenland, then came for settlers. Iceland had intense civil wars; small scale but very intense, for hundreds of years until they exhausted themselves and created a peace that has lasted nearly a thousand years. The last of the Berserks killed each other at a place west from Stykkisholmur, a place called Berserkahraun, in memory of that event. Berserks were the ultimate weapon in clan warfare.
Snorri Sturluson wrote the sagas in and around the year 1132. I have visited his sod home and hot spring, Snorralaug, north of Reykjavik. While there I checked the temperature of the water, 140 degrees F. Some children asked me, “Hvath heiti?” which is “how hot?” and I said, “hundreth fjortiu” and their eyes got real big, they were thinking 140 C. That pool has been there nearly 900 years and is getting slightly hotter. A few miles away existed a steam vent, a pipe pushed into the ground. The steam was completely invisible (maybe not “steam”) and only became visible some distance above the pipe. I put the bulb of a thermometer over the pipe and the temperature went up so fast it blew the top right off the thermometer (I had two thermometers lucky for me since it was after this I went to Snorralaug).
The Little Ice Age was devastating to Iceland. Entire fjords froze over making it impossible to go fishing.
Trees were cut not just for construction but for heating. When it ran out the farm houses were made two stories high with the animals on the first story and their body heat helping to heat the second story.
For those interested in some of the gritty details from that era, here’s a small book from an Icelandic blogger (the Iceland Weather Report) and journalist: http://www.amazon.com/The-Little-Book-Icelanders-miniature-ebook/dp/B00PEXI6YU
I have this book as well which seems to be a definitive presentation with some emphasis on geography:
http://www.midwaybook.com/pages/books/38435/hjalmar-r-bardarson/iceland-a-portrait-of-its-land-and-people
http://www.amazon.com/Island-Iceland-BARDARSON/dp/B000V5YG9U
Super link to that old history book.
Those are my favorite.
Thanks for sharing.
Thanks, F.J. Shepherd. This is a magnificent article, so vivid!
When learning geography in secondary school everyone was confronted by the name “Greenland” and the reality of an enormous, practically uninhabited, frozen white island (“80% is ice capped”).
I think that the Greenlanders left when it became too cold, or died there.
I have a Danish friend who was born in Greenland, spent his early years there and has since worked there. He also has a degree in archaeology. I asked him about the farms that are in areas now in permafrost, and to him it is uncontroversial. It is just a fact.
Climate scientists do not care one iota about the real history of anything.
They only care about their CO2 global warming theory.
We should quit trying to debunk these climate scientist history re-writes. Just call what they are and keep repeating that everywhere
Global warming theologist re-writes of history.
They should, in fact, get new names. Theologists.