Claim: Sierra Nevada snowpack lowest in five centuries

From the UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Snowpack in California’s Sierra Nevada in 2015 was at the lowest level in the past 500 years, according to a new report led by University of Arizona researchers.

These two natural-color satellite images of the snow cover in the Sierra Nevada in California and Nevada show the last year with average winter snowfall, 2010, compared with 2015 -- a year that had the lowest snowpack in 500 years. The images were taken by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer on NASA's Aqua satellite. CREDIT NASA/MODIS
These two natural-color satellite images of the snow cover in the Sierra Nevada in California and Nevada show the last year with average winter snowfall, 2010, compared with 2015 — a year that had the lowest snowpack in 500 years. The images were taken by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer on NASA’s Aqua satellite.
CREDIT NASA/MODIS

The team’s research is the first to show how the 2015 snowpack compares with snowpack levels for the previous five centuries.

“Our study really points to the extreme character of the 2014-15 winter. This is not just unprecedented over 80 years — it’s unprecedented over 500 years,” said Valerie Trouet, an associate professor of dendrochronology at the UA Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research.

“We should be prepared for this type of snow drought to occur much more frequently because of rising temperatures,” Trouet said. “Anthropogenic warming is making the drought more severe.”

California’s current record-setting drought began in 2012, the researchers note in their report.

On April 1 of this year, California Gov. Jerry Brown declared the first-ever mandatory water restrictions throughout the state while standing on dry ground at 6,800-foot elevation in the Sierra Nevada. The historical average snowpack on that site is more than five feet, according to the California Department of Water Resources.

The lack of snow in 2015 stems from extremely low winter precipitation combined with record high temperatures in California in January, February and March, Trouet said. About 80 percent of California’s precipitation occurs in the winter months, she said. Snowpack level is generally measured on April 1 each year, a time when the snowpack is at its peak.

“Snow is a natural storage system,” she said. “In a summer-dry climate such as California, it’s important that you can store water and access it in the summer when there’s no precipitation.”

In past years the snows of the Sierra Nevada slowly melted during the warmer months of the year, and the meltwater replenished streams, lakes, groundwater and reservoirs. In a winter with less snow or with winter precipitation coming as rain rather than snow, there is less water to use during California’s dry summers.

First author Soumaya Belmecheri said of the extremely low snowpack in 2015, “This has implications not only for urban water use, but also for wildfires.”

Belmecheri is a postdoctoral research associate at the UA Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research.

To figure out snowpack levels for the past 500 years, Trouet and her colleagues used previously published tree-ring data that reflects annual winter precipitation in central California from 1405 to 2005 and annual snowpack measurements since the 1930s. The team also used a previously published reconstruction of winter temperatures in southern and central California that spanned the years 1500 to 1980.

Trouet, Belmecheri and their colleagues’ report, “Multi-century evaluation of Sierra Nevada snowpack,” is scheduled for online publication in Nature Climate Change on Sept. 14, 2015.

Co-authors are Flurin Babst of the UA Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, Eugene R. Wahl of the NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Information in Boulder, Colorado, and David W. Stahle of the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville.

The National Science Foundation, the U.S. Geological Survey and the Swiss National Science Foundation funded the research.

Trouet said, “There have been reconstructions of the drought conditions in California but no one’s looked at the snowpack in particular.”

After the extremely low snowpack levels in the Sierra Nevada were revealed in April, co-author Wahl wondered if it was possible to reconstruct the paleohistory of snowpack for those mountains.

Trouet thought the necessary data were available — so the team set to work.

Other researchers had already measured the width of tree rings for 1,505 blue oaks in California’s Central Valley from 33 different sites. Belmecheri and her colleagues put those measurements together as one long chronology, meaning the scientists had a blue oak tree-ring record that reached back reliably to the year 1405.

For those particular oaks (Quercus douglasii), the width of their annual rings reflects the winter precipitation they receive. Because the same storms that water the oaks also dump snow in the Sierra Nevada just to the west, the width of the blue oaks’ rings is a good proxy for snowpack in the Sierras, Trouet said.

Wahl had already published a reconstruction of central and southern California February-March temperatures from 1500 to 1980 that is independent of the blue oak tree-ring records.

Snowpack in the Sierras has been measured approximately since the 1930s, so the researchers checked their snowpack estimates from tree rings and the temperature reconstruction against actual snowpack measurements for 1930 to 1980.

The different measurements all lined up – when winter precipitation was lower and temperature was higher, snowpack was lower.

Peak snowpack is the measurement that hydrologists use to predict the amount of runoff that will occur in the summer, Trouet said.

The team’s next step, she said, is investigating and reconstructing the atmospheric circulation patterns that contribute to the California drought and the Sierra Nevada snowpack.

###

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

141 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ben
September 15, 2015 11:02 am

Past 500 years in California has likely been the wettest period of the entire Holocene.
https://mobile.twitter.com/VictorB123/status/643817048896700416/photo/1

Reg Nelson
September 15, 2015 11:42 am

“Snowpack in the Sierras has been measured approximately since the 1930s, so the researchers checked their snowpack estimates from tree rings and the temperature reconstruction against actual snowpack measurements for 1930 to 1980.”
Funny that they use satellite images in the press release but ignore all the satellite data from 1980 to 2015.
Maybe it’s time for a new documentary: The Inconvenient Data.

Mike
September 15, 2015 12:03 pm

unprecedented except for when it happened before
California’s Sierra Nevada snowpack estimated at 500-year low
Reuters Alister Doyle
http://news.yahoo.com/californias-sierra-nevada-snowpack-estimated-500-low-155549419.html?bcmt=comments-postbox
” the findings indicated “the 2015 low is unprecedented in the context of the past 500 years.”
“The scientists also said the uncertainties in Monday’s tree ring data indicated that a few years, mainly in the 16th century, might have had snowpack lows even lower than the 2015 numbers”

rtj1211
September 16, 2015 2:51 am

In late January 1990, you could have said that the winter snowpack over Europe was the lowest in living memory, possibly longer.
It did not presage a new regime of snowless winters in Alpine ski resorts. Far from it.
Let’s see what the big el Nino brings California this winter – history would suggest some epic snowfalls and a huge snowpack.
We’ll find out in the next 6 months……

September 16, 2015 8:56 am

Sorry, but when scientists make so many unsupportable, biased statements to matters outside of the actual anomaly studied (e.g., the study gives no evidence of the cause of reduced snowfall, but they assign blame to AGW with no other science supporting that contention), then I have no faith in the validity of any of their data. Consciously or not, there is a high possibilty of their not recording the data correctly.
Measuring ring widths and counting the rings must be very tedious undertakings. I suspect if a data point did not meet their expectations, they re-examined it to the nth degree to find an error or a reason to adjust (ahem) it to a better value (and they may even keep a detailed explanation giving a very good reason for said adjustment). When a data point met their expectations, it was never looked at again.
I’ve seen this happen in the lab far too many times. It is the methodology of confirmation bias.

James at 48
September 16, 2015 11:33 am

The Bay Area media quickly moved on from this one. Today they are harping about sea level rise. I’ve been personally observing the Bay shoreline for nearly 50 years. The profile is exceedingly shallow … there are mostly marshes and mudflats on these shores. Even a few inches of rise would be noticed. Thus far, after half a century … nothing. Of course, we do have a tectonic advantage over places like the US East Coast of coasts in many parts of Western Europe:
[IMG]http://geologycafe.com/california/pp1515/chapter8/fig8-4a.jpg[/IMG]

dmacleo
September 16, 2015 2:25 pm

tree rings again.
width affected by more than just precipitation.
but thats never considered.

Mary Brown
September 16, 2015 8:25 pm

If a person is a “one in a million” then there are 7300 of them on earth. If there are 500 places on earth, then on average, one of them will be having a “once in 500 year” low snowpack. Or hot summer. Or heavy rains. Etc. Take enough places and enough variables and “once in 500 year” things happen every day.
This is why the global warming focus has turned from temperature (barely rising) to “extreme weather”. It is so easy to hype because of the convenience of numbers mentioned above.