Claim: Sierra Nevada snowpack lowest in five centuries

From the UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Snowpack in California’s Sierra Nevada in 2015 was at the lowest level in the past 500 years, according to a new report led by University of Arizona researchers.

These two natural-color satellite images of the snow cover in the Sierra Nevada in California and Nevada show the last year with average winter snowfall, 2010, compared with 2015 -- a year that had the lowest snowpack in 500 years. The images were taken by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer on NASA's Aqua satellite. CREDIT NASA/MODIS
These two natural-color satellite images of the snow cover in the Sierra Nevada in California and Nevada show the last year with average winter snowfall, 2010, compared with 2015 — a year that had the lowest snowpack in 500 years. The images were taken by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer on NASA’s Aqua satellite.
CREDIT NASA/MODIS

The team’s research is the first to show how the 2015 snowpack compares with snowpack levels for the previous five centuries.

“Our study really points to the extreme character of the 2014-15 winter. This is not just unprecedented over 80 years — it’s unprecedented over 500 years,” said Valerie Trouet, an associate professor of dendrochronology at the UA Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research.

“We should be prepared for this type of snow drought to occur much more frequently because of rising temperatures,” Trouet said. “Anthropogenic warming is making the drought more severe.”

California’s current record-setting drought began in 2012, the researchers note in their report.

On April 1 of this year, California Gov. Jerry Brown declared the first-ever mandatory water restrictions throughout the state while standing on dry ground at 6,800-foot elevation in the Sierra Nevada. The historical average snowpack on that site is more than five feet, according to the California Department of Water Resources.

The lack of snow in 2015 stems from extremely low winter precipitation combined with record high temperatures in California in January, February and March, Trouet said. About 80 percent of California’s precipitation occurs in the winter months, she said. Snowpack level is generally measured on April 1 each year, a time when the snowpack is at its peak.

“Snow is a natural storage system,” she said. “In a summer-dry climate such as California, it’s important that you can store water and access it in the summer when there’s no precipitation.”

In past years the snows of the Sierra Nevada slowly melted during the warmer months of the year, and the meltwater replenished streams, lakes, groundwater and reservoirs. In a winter with less snow or with winter precipitation coming as rain rather than snow, there is less water to use during California’s dry summers.

First author Soumaya Belmecheri said of the extremely low snowpack in 2015, “This has implications not only for urban water use, but also for wildfires.”

Belmecheri is a postdoctoral research associate at the UA Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research.

To figure out snowpack levels for the past 500 years, Trouet and her colleagues used previously published tree-ring data that reflects annual winter precipitation in central California from 1405 to 2005 and annual snowpack measurements since the 1930s. The team also used a previously published reconstruction of winter temperatures in southern and central California that spanned the years 1500 to 1980.

Trouet, Belmecheri and their colleagues’ report, “Multi-century evaluation of Sierra Nevada snowpack,” is scheduled for online publication in Nature Climate Change on Sept. 14, 2015.

Co-authors are Flurin Babst of the UA Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, Eugene R. Wahl of the NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Information in Boulder, Colorado, and David W. Stahle of the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville.

The National Science Foundation, the U.S. Geological Survey and the Swiss National Science Foundation funded the research.

Trouet said, “There have been reconstructions of the drought conditions in California but no one’s looked at the snowpack in particular.”

After the extremely low snowpack levels in the Sierra Nevada were revealed in April, co-author Wahl wondered if it was possible to reconstruct the paleohistory of snowpack for those mountains.

Trouet thought the necessary data were available — so the team set to work.

Other researchers had already measured the width of tree rings for 1,505 blue oaks in California’s Central Valley from 33 different sites. Belmecheri and her colleagues put those measurements together as one long chronology, meaning the scientists had a blue oak tree-ring record that reached back reliably to the year 1405.

For those particular oaks (Quercus douglasii), the width of their annual rings reflects the winter precipitation they receive. Because the same storms that water the oaks also dump snow in the Sierra Nevada just to the west, the width of the blue oaks’ rings is a good proxy for snowpack in the Sierras, Trouet said.

Wahl had already published a reconstruction of central and southern California February-March temperatures from 1500 to 1980 that is independent of the blue oak tree-ring records.

Snowpack in the Sierras has been measured approximately since the 1930s, so the researchers checked their snowpack estimates from tree rings and the temperature reconstruction against actual snowpack measurements for 1930 to 1980.

The different measurements all lined up – when winter precipitation was lower and temperature was higher, snowpack was lower.

Peak snowpack is the measurement that hydrologists use to predict the amount of runoff that will occur in the summer, Trouet said.

The team’s next step, she said, is investigating and reconstructing the atmospheric circulation patterns that contribute to the California drought and the Sierra Nevada snowpack.

###

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
141 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Juan Slayton
September 14, 2015 10:37 pm

Not sure I can distinguish clouds from snow over Nevada in the 2015 photo. What I see suggests that there may be an increase in a snowpack, say, around the White Mtns. Is there numerical data for this area?

JohnKnight
Reply to  Juan Slayton
September 14, 2015 11:23 pm

I live in the northern central valley, and I watched them “chem-trail” all the storms (after December), and chase down any remaining potential rain cloud patches. I could watch the clouds disintegrate, like part went up sometimes, and part went down, till there was no part left with enough water to make rain.
I realize I’m not supposed to believe my own eyes, but I’m not into idiocy, so I go ahead and believe them. Been watching these sky’s since I was a kid, and it’s really rather obvious the “powers that be” have been messing with “my” atmosphere big time, for about ten years.
(Just thought I’d mention reality-land . . don’t let me interrupt your fantasies ; )

phodges
Reply to  Juan Slayton
September 15, 2015 12:17 pm

Good eye,the Whites indeed had plenty of snow. The few storms we got were passing south of the Sierra, putting the whites in the storm paths rather than in the shadow of the Sierra. Then w3 got more snow in apr-may than the whole rest of winter.

Jeff
September 14, 2015 10:59 pm
September 14, 2015 11:31 pm

Here are the results from the Blue Oak tree ring precipitation data. Assuming precipitation is a good proxy for snow, this announcement is just more climate fear mongering
http://landscapesandcycles.net/image/103367298.jpg

Mike
Reply to  jim Steele
September 15, 2015 5:30 am

Thanks Jim,
do you have a src for the graph , or better the data?
How about this precipitation being tied to wind speed and direction ?

Mike
Reply to  Mike
September 15, 2015 5:34 am

.

The team’s next step, she said, is investigating and reconstructing the atmospheric circulation patterns that contribute to the California drought and the Sierra Nevada snowpack.

I would have thought that would be the place to start, with a mountain range just inland from the largest ocean on Earth.

Reply to  Mike
September 15, 2015 7:31 am

The Blue Oak study came from Griffin, D., and K. J. Anchukaitis (2014), How unusual is the 2012–2014
California drought?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 9017–9023, doi:10.1002/2014GL062433
Regards wind speed and directions California’s precipitation more than elsewhere are driven by “atmopheric rivers”(ARs). Studies suggest globally that “at any given time, an average of more than 90% of the total poleward atmospheric water vapor transport through the middle latitudes is concentrated in four to five narrow regions that total less than 10% of the circumference of the Earth at that latitude.” from Eos 2011 Storms, Floods, and the Science of Atmospheric Rivers
California is especially sensitive to ARs (ie PIneapple Express) How much snow falls is determined by the path of those ARs and at what angle they hit the Sierra Nevada. Depending on ENSO’s affect on sea surface temperatures and how the resulting pressure systems guide the ARs snow fall will undergo extreme variations. That can be seen in studies of river flow and this Blue Oak study. As the Blue Oaks show the variations happen on ENSO and PDO timescales, and the current lack of precipitation is definitely extreme but not unusual. When California was getting floods there were papers arguing global warming will increase ARs hitting California Dettinger 2011). I have not yet read this new paper but I suspect now that we have a drought, opportunistic climate researchers will suggest AGW is causing the lack of snow. Some act researchers act like clueless day traders seeking headlines. When ENSO change the strength of the trade winds the headlines were global warming increased or decreased trade winds, depending on which way the winds blow

Jimbo
Reply to  Mike
September 15, 2015 8:31 am

It’s all hot air to me.

Abstract – 1998
Relationships between winter atmospheric circulation patterns and extreme tree growth anomalies in the Sierra Nevada
Tree-ring data from mid-elevation (2000 m) giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) and high elevation (3500 m) pines (Pinus balfouriana, Pinus albicaulis) were used to select extreme growth years from which temperature, precipitation and large-scale winter (November-March, NM) 500 mb circulation patterns associated with the extreme tree growth anomalies were examined.Winters preceding extreme high growth in both giant sequoia and pines are warm and wet and are characterized by anomalous low pressure in the northeastern Pacific Ocean and a tendency for southwesterly flow and advection of warm maritime air into California. For the pines, such winters exhibit a pattern of anomalous low pressure in the northern Pacific, anomalous high pressure over northwestern Canada and anomalous low pressure across the southern US. NM 500 mb heights suggest more meridional circulation during the warm and dry winters preceding extreme low growth in giant sequoia. Atmospheric circulation during these winters exhibits a persistent trough/ridge pattern between the central Pacific and the western US. Storms are deflected away from California during these winters. NM atmospheric circulation patterns associated with extreme low growth in the pines exhibit maximum westerlies north of their mean position and the tendency for enhanced ridging in the northeast Pacific, which advects cool dry air into the Sierra Nevada. As dendroclimatic reconstructions are more frequently employed in order to better understand past variability of temperature and precipitation, synoptic dendroclimatological studies such as this one provide useful insights about atmospheric circulation.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998IJCli..18..725G

Resourceguy
Reply to  jim Steele
September 15, 2015 6:53 am

Thank you!

Bill Parsons
Reply to  jim Steele
September 15, 2015 9:52 pm

“Our study really points to the extreme character of the 2014-15 winter. This is not just unprecedented over 80 years — it’s unprecedented over 500 years,” said Valerie Trouet, an associate professor of dendrochronology at the UA Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research.
Ms. Trouet’s claim for decadal or centennial drought being “unprecedented” is overshadowed by the ranking of precipitation years by NOAA (Co-author Wahl’s employer). Their 120-year precipitation graph shows a continental U.S. with western regions with “much below average” precipitation, but certainly not “record driest”, in fact far from it. The years 2014-15 ranked as only California’s 28th driest.
It bears repeating (as Jim Steele has noted) that wind currents carry Pacific moisture hither and yon in any given El Nino, and in the last year or two many states in the center of the continent received record levels of precipitation. Out of 120 years on the NOAA record, 2014-15 were Wyoming’s 113th driest (only 7 years wetter), Colorado’s 112th driest, Texas’ 114th driest. In all, 20 states had “much-above-average” precipitation, and Oklahoma experience its wettest year on record.
The clustering of states with high precipitation is significant, in my opinion. Whatever the mechanism that deprived California and the Northwest of precipitation, the western and central plains got it in spades.
Drs. Wahl and Trouet would no doubt like to try to re-write some of that history. They’ll have to unless they can reconcile their own data with it. It was not California’s driest year by a long shot.
Current Colorado Reservoir levels:
ftp://ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/states/co/resv/state/monthly/resmap.pdf
NOAA Statewide Precipitation Ranks, 120-year period
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/national/statewidepcpnrank/201409-201508.gif

SkepticGoneWild
September 15, 2015 12:12 am

Trouet said. “Anthropogenic warming is making the drought more severe.”
Per AR5, Technical Summary, TS.4.7:
“Although the AR4 concluded that it is more likely than not that anthropogenic influence has contributed to an increased risk of drought in the second half of the 20th century, an updated assessment of the observational evidence indicates that the AR4 conclusions regarding global increasing trends in hydrological droughts since the 1970s are no longer supported. Owing to the low confidence in observed large-scale trends in dryness combined with difficulties in distinguishing decadal-scale variability in drought from long-term climate change, there is now low confidence in the attribution of changes in drought over global land since the mid-20th century to human influence.“

Jimbo
Reply to  SkepticGoneWild
September 15, 2015 8:06 am

And there’s this too.

Letter To Nature – 11 September 2012
Justin Sheffield et al
Little change in global drought over the past 60 years
…….Previous assessments of historic changes in drought over the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries indicate that this may already be happening globally. In particular, calculations of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) show a decrease in moisture globally since the 1970s with a commensurate increase in the area in drought that is attributed, in part, to global warming4, 5……..Here we show that the previously reported increase in global drought is overestimated because the PDSI uses a simplified model of potential evaporation7 that responds only to changes in temperature and thus responds incorrectly to global warming in recent decades. More realistic calculations, based on the underlying physical principles8 that take into account changes in available energy, humidity and wind speed, suggest that there has been little change in drought over the past 60 years. The results have implications for how we interpret the impact of global warming on the hydrological cycle and its extremes, and may help to explain why palaeoclimate drought reconstructions based on tree-ring data diverge from the PDSI-based drought record in recent years9, 10.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v491/n7424/full/nature11575.html

September 15, 2015 12:18 am

Amazing the wide variety of unrelated data they can extra from freshly killed trees.
Reminiscent of what the chicken-guts readers can do.

Michael H
Reply to  Larry
September 15, 2015 12:57 am

Are the trees felled or just a core taken with an auger?

mairon62
September 15, 2015 1:01 am

Why use obscure methods of measurement like thermometers and yardsticks when dendrochronology is so much more straight forward?

Keith Willshaw
September 15, 2015 2:21 am

Would these be Mann Made tree ring measurements perchance, we know they have magical powers.

richard
September 15, 2015 2:32 am

As the mountains supply california with water I wonder what the snow pack was like back in 1948-
Californian Drought
Kills Bird Life
SAN FRANCISCO, March 6.—
In the longest drought Califor
nia has known, quail and duck are
dying of thirst, fish are dying in
drled-up rivers, deer ai’e invading
residential areas In search of food.
Migrating ducks have no water
on which to alight, and thousands
of them have died of thirst in the
San Joaqnlm grasslands.
Hatcheries have record num
bers of fish, but lack running
streams In which to put them.
Coastal rivers also are too shal
low to permit nrger fish reaching
their spawning mounds.
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/171267338?searchTerm=californian%20drought&searchLimits=

knr
September 15, 2015 3:07 am

Once again the ‘better than nothing ‘ approach is seen in action , I wonder if the day will come when they decide how much ‘better ‘ these proxies actually are compared to nothing.
The real trouble comes when this ‘better than nothing ‘ is treated , has in this ‘research ‘, as unquestionable gold standard upon which great claims can be made. Now normally that is something you avoid in science becasue it hardly ever stands review and leads to poor pratice.
But then this is climate ‘science’ where reviews has little to do with the quality of your work and much to do with the ‘impact of its message ‘ , has for poor pratice , well time and again its has show there is no such concpet of poor pratice in climate science, ‘anything’ is acceptable and even honoured up to and including outright lying has long as it produces the ‘right results ‘

M Seward
September 15, 2015 4:45 am

“We should be prepared for this type of snow drought to occur much more frequently because of rising temperatures,” Trouet said. “Anthropogenic warming is making the drought more severe.”
We had similar schtuff being said not that long ago her in Oz, endless drought, fams would never fill nyaa nyaa nyaa. And the it RAINED and RAINED and RAINED when the El Nino went ( we have the opposite to California, El Nino means dry and hot for us). Now the big environmental issues are the consequences of floods and of course who is to blame for houses being destroyed and the loss of life.
Same old same old. As that great American once said, there is a sucker born every day. Shamans, priests, climate scientist and other fear mondgers have been making a buck out of the fright bat scam for millenia. CAGW sells for the same reason murder thrillers and horror films sell. If you can sell the Dome, Independence Day or War of the Worlds to the viewing public, you can sell anything.

Charlie
September 15, 2015 5:17 am

it will be fun to see what those mountains look like this coming March.

Leonard Weinstein
September 15, 2015 5:23 am

Gosh, trees are a thermometer, and trees are water level indicators. I bet they are also CO2 indicators. I bet separating these and many other effects is easy, since the claims are made with such certainty (sarc).

H.R.
September 15, 2015 5:40 am

Idle question, and I really have no clue as to the answer, but can the water content between snowpacks be compared year to year?
The water content in snow depends on the temperature at which the snow fell. Anyone who has ever shoveled snow off a driveway knows this all too well. But in a given area where the snow does build up through the season, does it all compact to a point where the water content of 2 meters of snow in 1988 is the same as the water content of 2 meters of snow in 2008? If there can be a difference of a liter or two of water content over a square meter of area between years with identical snowpack height, that would be a significant difference in water over an area the size of the Sierras.
Of course significant differences in snowpack area and depth from year to year would make a huge difference in the amount of water locked up in the snow compared to the possibly paltry difference in water content of snowpack deposited at different temperatures, but when looking at tree rings year-to-year, any particular tree might have seen quite different amounts of snowpack, yet received the same amount of water.
So… I suppose a given snowpack depth and extent probably will have much the same water content compared to the same depth and extent in another year, but I’m not certain about that. I don’t have that knowledge.
The other factor I saw pointed out earlier in comments is the timing of the melt as it affects tree ring growth. A fast melt early that runs off like crazy will affect tree ring growth differently than a late slow melt that allows a lot of water to be absorbed by the ground around a tree. And runoff can also be affected by the location of the tree. How were the trees selected? Were the only suitable trees found to be in Yamal County, California? Was it a truly random sample of trees throughout the Sierras?

edwardt
September 15, 2015 6:11 am

If you look at the annual cycle in reservoir storage, which includes precipitation and snowmelt, we haven’t touched 1976/1977. Zero annual cycle two years in a row with half the population of today.Ask Gerry, he was governor then too, he’s just smarter this time around.

McComberBoy
September 15, 2015 6:18 am

So which are they? Are they thermometers or are they rain gauges? These Quercus douglasii are not growing in snow country at all. They grow at lower elevations and prefer dryer conditions. If they do react favorably to more rain, we have to ask, rain at what temperature. Some of the worst floods ever seen in California have come when cold early storms dumped feet of snow in the Sierra Nevada’s and then the ‘Pineapple Express’ rained it all off. It is very possible to end up with mega amounts of precipitation and no snow pack at 6,800′ elevation. According to the Quercus douglasii rain gauge thermometers every storm must produce snow pack? These folks wouldn’t understand the concept of a smell test if they were standing knee deep in bovine excrement.
And while were at it, how about if they might contact someone like Jim Steele to see if someone who actually lives in the area, who has studied water, habitat and the impact of droughts, might possibly have some insight that would add to their work before they publish utter nonsense. Maybe they could actually look at snowfall v. rainfall records to see what the actual correlation might be. Maybe they could look at cumulative rainfall totals from last year and see that we had less moisture last year than we have this year. But no. We already have oak trees from the valley to look at, so why bother with weather records. pffft!!!

LeeHarvey
September 15, 2015 6:20 am

I can rewrite UA’s press release in two sentences:
“These tea leaves say what we want them to say. Now shut up and send us more grant money.”

MarkW
September 15, 2015 6:49 am

The lowest in 5 centuries, and we have the satellite photographs to prove it.

Resourceguy
September 15, 2015 6:51 am

This is an improvement over garbage-ology from UA researchers.

Neil Jordan
September 15, 2015 6:59 am

This is the direct link to the 2012 San Francisco Chronicle article using Dr. Christie’s snowfall data, actual DATA going back to 1878.
http://www.sfgate.com/science/article/Study-Sierra-snowfall-consistent-over-130-years-3331631.php
Remember that the Sierra region has hosted railroad, logging, hydroelectric, and water supply agencies since before that time, all of which had an acute interest in snow depth and water supply. Railroad interest began at least a decade earlier for how much snow they had to plow to keep the tracks clear.
http://railroad.lindahall.org/essays/innovations.html
I trust that the U of A research included the 1846-1847 water year high snowfall measurement provided by Mr. Donner.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donner_Party
Just barely \sarc

TRM
September 15, 2015 7:11 am

I wonder what would happen if you went back more than 500 years? Hmmm, I think I see why they stopped at 500. 🙂
http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site568/2014/0127/20140127_031535_ssjm0126megadry90_500.jpg

James at 48
September 15, 2015 8:23 am

Warm periods tend to bring more not less precip to California.

TRM
Reply to  James at 48
September 15, 2015 8:44 am

The above graph is of droughts not warmth.

James at 48
Reply to  TRM
September 16, 2015 1:34 pm

Precisely my point. The graph is not aligned at all with temperatures.

Caligula Jones
September 15, 2015 9:51 am

My method of reading the press releases passing as journalism these days:
1) start skimming when you see the term “tree rings:
2) stop reading when you see the word “model”

September 15, 2015 9:57 am

This weekend I was on trip from San Francisco Bay area through 120 in Yosemite, Sierra to White Mountains. Last 4 years I was around this time on Tioga Pass, Ellery Lake too. I remember we played in snow there in August, September. There was a lot of snow under peaks. I fell to some hole up to my waist into snow once. This year there is simply no snow. Not a patch.
Yes this year was warmer in California no doubt.
But it is local. Permanent high pressure system in Pacific is causing west US coast to be warmer and east part colder.
Just compare snow cover for some years on:
http://www.nohrsc.noaa.gov/nsa/index.html
And it is evident that there is more snow in 2015 in USA and Canada than in 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010.
Btw. it was raining around SF Bay Area yesterday. Very rare this time of year. All smoke in air is bringing precipitation.

Bob Burban
September 15, 2015 10:38 am

Scattered summer snow showed up on radar this morning in California, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Alaska, as well as Canada’s British Colombia and Alberta.

skeohane
Reply to  Bob Burban
September 15, 2015 2:19 pm

We had it here in west central Colorado too, above 9K feet.

September 15, 2015 10:59 am

“We should be prepared for this type of snow drought to occur much more frequently because of rising temperatures,” Trouet said. “Anthropogenic warming is making the drought more severe.”
I am going to put this beside Wadhams Arctic ice death spiral and the (Met Iffice ?) “children won’t know what snow is quotes.
I am betting on another poor snow this year followed by huge snow in 2017/2018 just looking at the ocean circulation off the west coast.
How’s that for a various levels prediction? In the other hand, according to Joe Bastardi, Taos, New Mexico should be a skiers paradise this winter. 😎😎😎😗