Announcing Obama's new 'Carbon Pollution' plan

I got this email this morning direct to my private email, and not part of an email list. I suppose the White House thinks the reach and impact we have at WUWT have is important enough to merit a direct email to me of this press release. So, I’ll play the game, publish this PR, and we’ll watch with disdain as our energy infrastructure is dismantled over an overblown climate threat that has become little more than a political tool. As Willis Eschenbach noted in a recent guest post, “Obama May Finally Succeed!”

White-House_Logo

FACT SHEET: PRESIDENT OBAMA TO ANNOUNCE HISTORIC CARBON POLLUTION STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS

PRESIDENT OBAMA TO ANNOUNCE HISTORIC

CARBON POLLUTION STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS

 

The Clean Power Plan is a Landmark Action to Protect Public Health, Reduce Energy Bills for Households and Businesses, Create American Jobs, and Bring

Clean Power to Communities across the Country

 

Today at the White House, President Obama and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy will release the final Clean Power Plan, a historic step in the Obama Administration’s fight against climate change.  

 

We have a moral obligation to leave our children a planet that’s not polluted or damaged. The effects of climate change are already being felt across the nation. In the past three decades, the percentage of Americans with asthma has more than doubled, and climate change is putting those Americans at greater risk of landing in the hospital. Extreme weather events – from more severe droughts and wildfires in the West to record heat waves – and sea level rise are hitting communities across the country. In fact, 14 of the 15 warmest years on record have all occurred in the first 15 years of this century and last year was the warmest year ever. The most vulnerable among us – including children, older adults, people with heart or lung disease, and people living in poverty – are most at risk from the impacts of climate change. Taking action now is critical.

 

The Clean Power Plan establishes the first-ever national standards to limit carbon pollution from power plants. We already set limits that protect public health by reducing soot and other toxic emissions, but until now, existing power plants, the largest source of carbon emissions in the United States, could release as much carbon pollution as they wanted.

 

The final Clean Power Plan sets flexible and achievable standards to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 32 percent from 2005 levels by 2030, 9 percent more ambitious than the proposal. By setting carbon pollution reduction goals for power plants and enabling states to develop tailored implementation plans to meet those goals, the Clean Power Plan is a strong, flexible framework that will:

 – Provide significant public health benefits – The Clean Power Plan, and other policies put in place to drive a cleaner energy sector, will reduce premature deaths from power plant emissions by nearly 90 percent in 2030 compared to 2005 and decrease the pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog and can lead to more asthma attacks in kids by more than 70 percent. The Clean Power Plan will also avoid up to 3,600 premature deaths, lead to 90,000 fewer asthma attacks in children, and prevent 300,000 missed work and school days.

 

– Create tens of thousands of jobs while ensuring grid reliability;

 

– Drive more aggressive investment in clean energy technologies than the proposed rule, resulting in 30 percent more renewable energy generation in 2030 and continuing to lower the costs of renewable energy.

 

– Save the average American family nearly $85 on their annual energy bill in 2030, reducing enough energy to power 30 million homes, and save consumers a total of $155 billion from 2020-2030; 

 

– Give a head start to wind and solar deployment and prioritize the deployment of energy efficiency improvements in low-income communities that need it most early in the program through a Clean Energy Incentive Program; and

 

– Continue American leadership on climate change by keeping us on track to meet the economy-wide emissions targets we have set, including the goal of reducing emissions to 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and to 26-28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025.

 

KEY FEATURES OF THE CLEAN POWER PLAN

 

The final Clean Power Plan takes into account the unprecedented input EPA received through extensive outreach, including the 4 million comments that were submitted to the agency during the public comment period. The result is a fair, flexible program that will strengthen the fast-growing trend toward cleaner and lower-polluting American energy. The Clean Power Plan significantly reduces carbon pollution from the electric power sector while advancing clean energy innovation, development, and deployment. It ensures the U.S. will stay on a path of long-term clean energy investments that will maintain the reliability of our electric grid, promote affordable and clean energy for all Americans, and continue United States leadership on climate action. The Clean Power Plan:  

 

Provides Flexibility to States to Choose How to Meet Carbon Standards: EPA’s Clean Power Plan establishes carbon pollution standards for power plants, called carbon dioxide (CO2) emission performance rates. States develop and implement tailored plans to ensure that the power plants in their state meet these standards– either individually, together, or in combination with other measures like improvements in renewable energy and energy efficiency. The final rule provides more flexibility in how state plans can be designed and implemented, including: streamlined opportunities for states to include proven strategies like trading and demand-side energy efficiency in their plans, and allows states to develop “trading ready” plans to participate in “opt in” to an emission credit trading market with other states taking parallel approaches without the need for interstate agreements. All low-carbon electricity generation technologies, including renewables, energy efficiency, natural gas, nuclear and carbon capture and storage, can play a role in state plans.

 

– More Time for States Paired With Strong Incentives for Early Deployment of Clean Energy: State plans are due in September of 2016, but states that need more time can make an initial submission and request extensions of up to two years for final plan submission.  The compliance averaging period begins in 2022 instead of 2020, and emission reductions are phased in on a gradual “glide path” to 2030. These provisions to give states and companies more time to prepare for compliance are paired with a new Clean Energy Incentive Program to drive deployment of renewable energy and low-income energy efficiency before 2022.

 

Creates Jobs and Saves Money for Families and Businesses: The Clean Power Plan builds on the progress states, cities, and businesses and have been making for years. Since the beginning of 2010, the average cost of a solar electric system has dropped by half and wind is increasingly competitive nationwide. The Clean Power Plan will drive significant new investment in cleaner, more modern and more efficient technologies, creating tens of thousands of jobs. Under the Clean Power Plan, by 2030, renewables will account for 28 percent of our capacity, up from 22 percent in the proposed rule. Due to these improvements, the Clean Power Plan will save the average American nearly $85 on their energy bill in 2030, and save consumers a total of $155 billion through 2020-2030, reducing enough energy to power 30 million homes.

 

–  Rewards States for Early Investment in Clean Energy, Focusing on Low-Income Communities: The Clean Power Plan establishes a Clean Energy Incentive Program that will drive additional early deployment of renewable energy and low-income energy efficiency. Under the program, credits for electricity generated from renewables in 2020 and 2021 will be awarded to projects that begin construction after participating states submit their final implementation plans. The program also prioritizes early investment in energy efficiency projects in low-income communities by the Federal government awarding these projects double the number of credits in 2020 and 2021. Taken together, these incentives will drive faster renewable energy deployment, further reduce technology costs, and lay the foundation for deep long-term cuts in carbon pollution. In addition, the Clean Energy Incentive Plan provides additional flexibility for states, and will increase the overall net benefits of the Clean Power Plan.

 

Ensures Grid Reliability: The Clean Power Plan contains several important features to ensure grid reliability as we move to cleaner sources of power. In addition to giving states more time to develop implementation plans, starting compliance in 2022, and phasing in the targets over the decade, the rule requires states to address reliability in their state plans. The final rule also provides a “reliability safety valve” to address any reliability challenges that arise on a case-by-case basis. These measures are built on a framework that is inherently flexible in that it does not impose plant-specific requirements and provides states flexibility to smooth out their emission reductions over the period of the plan and across sources.

 

Continues U.S. Leadership on Climate Change: The Clean Power Plan continues United States leadership on climate change. By driving emission reductions from power plants, the largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, the Clean Power Plan builds on prior Administration steps to reduce emissions, including historic investments to deploy clean energy technologies, standards to double the fuel economy of our cars and light trucks, and steps to reduce methane pollution. Taken together these measures put the United States on track to achieve the President’s near-term target to reduce emissions in the range of 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and lay a strong foundation to deliver against our long-term target to reduce emissions 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. The release of the Clean Power Plan continues momentum towards international climate talks in Paris in December, building on announcements to-date of post-2020 targets by countries representing 70 percent of global energy based carbon emissions.  

 

Sets State Targets in a Way That Is Fair and Is Directly Responsive to Input from States, Utilities, and Stakeholders: In response to input from stakeholders, the final Clean Power Plan modifies the way that state targets are set by using an approach that better reflects the way the electricity grid operates, using updated information about the cost and availability of clean generation technologies, and establishing separate emission performance rates for all coal plants and all gas plants. .

 

Maintains Energy Efficiency as Key Compliance Tool: In addition to on-site efficiency and greater are reliance on low and zero carbon generation, the Clean Power Plan provides states with broad flexibility to design carbon reduction plans that include energy efficiency and other emission reduction strategies.  EPA’s analysis shows that energy efficiency is expected to play a major role in meeting the state targets as a cost-effective and widely-available carbon reduction tool, saving enough energy to power 30 million homes and putting money back in ratepayers’ pockets.

 

Requires States to Engage with Vulnerable Populations:The Clean Power Plan includes provisions that require states to meaningfully engage with low-income, minority, and tribal communities, as the states develop their plans. EPA also encourages states to engage with workers and their representatives in the utility and related sectors in developing their state plans.

 

Includes a Proposed Federal Implementation Plan: EPA is also releasing a proposed federal plan today. This proposed plan will provide a model states can use in designing their plans, and when finalized, will be a backstop to ensure that the Clean Power Plan standards are met in every state.

 

Since the Clean Air Act became law more than 45 years ago with bipartisan support, the EPA has continued to protect the health of communities, in particular those vulnerable to the impacts of harmful air pollution, while the economy has continued to grow. In fact, since 1970, air pollution has decreased by nearly 70 percent while the economy has tripled in size. The Clean Power Plan builds on this progress, while providing states the flexibility and tools to transition to clean, reliable, and affordable electricity. 

 

BUILDING ON PROGRESS

 

The Clean Power Plan builds on steps taken by the Administration, states, cities, and companies to move to cleaner sources of energy. Solar electricity generation has increased more than 20-fold since 2008, and electricity from wind has more than tripled.  Efforts such as the following give us a strong head start in meeting the Clean Power Plan’s goals:

– 50 states with demand-side energy efficiency programs

– 37 states with renewable portfolio standards or goals

– 10 states with market-based greenhouse gas reduction programs

– 25 states with energy efficiency standards or goals 

 

Today’s actions also build on a series of actions the Administration is taking through the President’s Climate Action Plan to reduce the dangerous levels of carbon pollution that are contributing to climate change, including:

 

Standards for Light and Heavy-Duty Vehicles: Earlier this summer, the EPA and the Department of Transportation proposed the second phase of fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, which if finalized as proposed will reduce 1 billion tons of carbon pollution. The proposed standards build on the first phase of heavy-duty vehicle requirements and standards for light-duty vehicles issued during the President’s first term that will save Americans $1.7 trillion, reduce oil consumption by 2.2 million barrels per day by 2025, and slash greenhouse gas emissions by 6 billion metric tons through the lifetime of the program. 

 

Low Income Solar: Last month, the White House announced a new initiative to increase access to solar energy for all Americans, in particular low-and moderate income communities, and build a more inclusive workforce. The initiative will help families and businesses cut their energy bills through launching a National Community Solar Partnership to unlock access to solar for the nearly 50 percent of households and business that are renters or do not have adequate roof space to install solar systems and sets a goal to install 300 megawatts (MW) of renewable energy in federally subsidized housing by 2020. Through this initiative housing authorities, rural electric co-ops, power companies, and organizations in more than 20 states across the country committed to put in place more than 260 solar energy projects and philanthropic and impact investors, states, and cities are committed to invest $520 million to advance community solar and scale up solar and energy efficiency for low- and moderate- income households. The initiative also includes AmeriCorps funding to deploy solar and create jobs in underserved communities and a commitment from the solar industry to become the most diverse sector of the U.S. energy industry.

 

Economy-Wide Measures to Reduce other Greenhouse Gases: EPA and other agencies are taking actions to cut methane emissions from oil and gas systems, landfills, coal mining, and agriculture through cost-effective voluntary actions and common-sense standards. At the same time, the U.S. Department of State is working to slash global emissions of potent industrial greenhouse gases, called hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), through an amendment to the Montreal Protocol; EPA is cutting domestic HFC emissions through its Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program; and, the private sector has stepped up with commitments to cut global HFC emissions equivalent to 700 million metric tons of carbon pollution through 2025.

 

Investing in Coal Communities, Workers, and Communities:  In February, as part of the President’s FY 2016 budget, the Administration released the POWER+ Plan to invest in workers and jobs, address important legacy costs in coal country, and drive the development of coal technology. The Plan provides dedicated new resources for economic diversification, job creation, job training, and other employment services for workers and communities impacted by layoffs at coal mines and coal-fired power plants; includes unprecedented investments in the health and retirement security of mineworkers and their families and the accelerated clean-up of hazardous coal abandoned mine lands; and provides new tax incentives to support continued technology development and deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration technologies. 

 

Energy Efficiency Standards: DOE set a goal of reducing carbon pollution by 3 billion metric tons cumulatively by 2030 through energy conservation standards issued during this Administration. DOE has already finalized energy conservation standards for 29 categories of appliances and equipment, as well as a building code determination for commercial buildings. These measures will also cut consumers’ annual electricity bills by billions of dollars. 

 

Investing in Clean Energy: In June the White House announced more than $4 billion in private-sector commitments and executive actions to scale up investment in clean energy innovation, including launching a new Clean Energy Impact Investment Center at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to make information about energy and climate programs at DOE and other government agencies accessible and more understandable to the public, including to mission-driven investors.

 

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
324 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Law
August 3, 2015 9:13 am

On the bright side, when the USA is enfeebled by this idiotic nonsense, it will be easily reclaimed for the Crown.

jim south london
Reply to  John Law
August 3, 2015 10:39 am

or brought out by China.

John Law
Reply to  jim south london
August 3, 2015 10:52 am

Do the natives still accept beads in exchange for large parcels of land?

dp
Reply to  jim south london
August 3, 2015 3:05 pm

The US is well on coarse to become the 32nd state of Mexico.

Mike the Morlock
Reply to  John Law
August 3, 2015 11:42 am

John Law My Nephew works for S.A.C (USAF) Can I have your coordinates please?
michael

Steve P
Reply to  John Law
August 3, 2015 1:39 pm

Ironic comment of the day.

August 3, 2015 9:18 am

I’d like to see the Plant Food Plan.

sciguy54
August 3, 2015 9:23 am

O: “We have a moral obligation to leave our children a planet that’s not polluted or damaged.”
Meaning: We will scar every ridge line with noisy, rumbling, industrial machinery and you will think it its beautiful.
O: “Create tens of thousands of jobs while ensuring grid reliability.”
Meaning: Today the PV industry produces about 1/100th as much power as the coal power industry, yet employs just as many workers. We shall increase the PV output 30-fold and thus increase employment through vastly lower worker productivity. Of course any new PV capacity will also require backup with coal, gas, or hydro in order to maintain grid reliability.
O: “Save the average American family nearly $85 on their annual energy bill in 2030”
Meaning: Refer to past claims that the AHA will save your family $2400 per year. Aren’t these words pretty? Don’t they seem equally sincere and believable?
O: since 1970, air pollution has decreased by nearly 70 percent while the economy has tripled in size…
In the past three decades, the percentage of Americans with asthma has more than doubled…
The Clean Power Plan…. will…. decrease the pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog and can lead to more asthma attacks in kids by more than 70 percent… [and] lead to 90,000 fewer asthma attacks in children.
Meaning: Air pollution has already been decreased by 70% since 1970 yet asthma rates have tripled. Our goal is to reduce air pollution by another 21% [ (100%-70%) x 0.7 ] which should magically reduce the incidence of asthma for some reason. It is my belief that the voter is too stupid and/or ignorant to understand arithmetic so I will throw out these nonsensical numbers just for effect. I further believe that the press is such a confederacy of lazy dunces that no-one in the mainstream will call me on it. If anyone does, though, I will simply call them a r*cist flat-earther.

PiperPaul
Reply to  sciguy54
August 3, 2015 6:45 pm

How were you able to capture the closed captioning “scrolling” text from the TV broadcast? I’ve been looking fir ways to do that. (Actually, maybe Anthony knows this due to his hearing disability)

Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 9:25 am

Quote:
We have a moral obligation to leave our children a planet that’s not polluted or damaged by the effects of climate.
___________________________________
And we have an even greater duty not to sell (or give) nuclear technology to nations who have sworn to use nuclear weapons in a Middle Eastern war, and have sworn their hatred of America.
How about that, Obama – you know – for our children’s sake…?
Ralph

Reply to  Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 12:28 pm

If Obama and congress let Iran get nukes, it sure would be ironic and sad if they turned around and nuked Wash DC.

Silver ralph
Reply to  Dahlquist
August 3, 2015 1:11 pm

According to this NY Post story, they have already done just that. Not sure about the NY Post, are they a reliable news source??
http://nypost.com/2015/08/01/iran-publishes-book-on-how-to-outwit-us-and-destroy-israel/
R

August 3, 2015 9:26 am

All of it is about power, power over each of U S.
All of it lies and fraud by evil intent.
All of it evil by evil people lusting for power.
Lies supported by the MSM/msm/blog media and the public school liars who have your children in lock down in the use of reason.

Resourceguy
August 3, 2015 9:27 am

Since asthma is the catch all linchpin of EPA justifications, do any asthma doctors prescribe cool, CO2-free breathing rooms for patients or are asthma researchers wasting time and money on real factors in asthma?

JPeden
Reply to  Resourceguy
August 3, 2015 10:27 pm

CO2 concentration of exhaled air is already 40,000 ppm. There’s no mechanism I know of for heated air greater than 98.6 F to allegedly cause the long term cellular change of cells lining the small airways seen in Asthma, along with the increased mucus production and availability of cellular agents that cause the small airways to constrict when an allergen touches them off.

August 3, 2015 9:29 am

Testing, Testing, I 2 3

Non Nomen
August 3, 2015 9:30 am

Alan Robertson
August 3, 2015 at 8:13 am

Obama’s grandparents were Communists, his parents were Communists, his principal mentor was a radical Communist, the people that brought him to power in Chicago politics were radical and historically violent Communists.

Communism is contagious but not, afaik, congenital.

August 3, 2015 9:32 am

Obama Test, We Fail
Obama Test, We Fail,
Who is the more to blame?

Harry Passfield
August 3, 2015 9:34 am

I mentioned earlier that it’s Obama’s 54th birthday tomorrow – the 4th (curiously he shared the late Queen Mother’s birthday). Anyway, I wondered, what would WUWTers like to get him for it? (It GWS, he needs some sense and perspective about AGW),

adrian_o
Reply to  Harry Passfield
August 3, 2015 10:13 am

Wisdom.

August 3, 2015 9:40 am

Obama said it himself in his own sinister way after the last Pres. election.
“I hear the non voters too.”
What he is saying in his own smirk’ing way is that if you do not care enough for your freedom, liberty, Constitution to vote against my evil ways, then you will get the full deal of evil I have for you all.
His hate is strong, he aims it at all of U S.

Resourceguy
Reply to  fobdangerclose
August 3, 2015 10:28 am

I think he is referring to illegals who account for a majority of the drivers license issuance in Calif. and felons.

Resourceguy
Reply to  Resourceguy
August 3, 2015 10:29 am

Both are high priorities for him.

Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 9:47 am

Just a thought, but the following might save a great deal more CO2 than anything in this action plan, and cost a great deal less (if Co2 is considered a problem, of course).
a. Force all shops to close their front doors, when the temperature is below 100c.
b. Encourage all US homes to be double glazed and insulated. I was amazed to see how many homes in the US were wooden clapperboard shacks with single glazing. Anyone invented the brick yet?
c. Encourage US motor manufacturers to licence-build European engines for their cars. I was severely unimpressed with the mpg on my hire-car Ford. I can do about 50% more than that with my large Euro twin-turbo diesel (an ordinary cheap saloon).
d. Encourage people to use cars for personal trasport, instead of pseudo-HGVs. Why do you need an eight liter petrol engine, to go to the shops.
If anyone is concerned with enegy usage, you could trim the US per capita energy usage rather quickly. As an aside, I could not find a per-captita energy consumption comparison. Anyone seen one?
R

Silver ralph
Reply to  Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 9:56 am

Ha, and if I use the right search term, I find one.
According to this comparison, the US uses twice the energy per capita as Europe, without any percieved increase in prosperity. So any required reductions in energy consumption and emissions could be achieved solely from energy savings, rather than increasing renewables or any of the other changes to energy supply.comment image
It is not exactly rocket science, but well above the capabilities of the Obama regime.
R

Harry Passfield
Reply to  Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 10:19 am

D’ya wanna run those numbers against GDP?

Catcracking
Reply to  Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 10:20 am

Why don’t you plot the President’s, and Kerry’s energy use and demonstrate what hypocrites they are on the subject. Time for them to lead and not just penalize the peons who pay their bill. Kerry’s state Dept made about 100 plane trips to Europe to forge a horrible deal with Iran. What a waste of energy and resources that could feed and heat the poor.

Harry Passfield
Reply to  Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 11:03 am

And another thing, Silver Ralph, I don’t see it as unreasonable the the US uses 10 times the energy/capita than Nigeria, say. What I do find sad is that Nigeria is trying to develop on a tenth of the US’s energy. That’s not the fault of the USA.

Silver ralph
Reply to  Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 12:55 pm

GDP is a measure of wealth.. As I said, the US is not measurably wealthier than Europe, no matter what the GDP figures might say. Some of the poorest regions and people I have ever seen, have been in the US.
This suggests that the US’s energy usage is not simply productive, but wasteful. If the goal of the Greens is to reduce emissions (and emissions reductions in general are a laudable aim), then all of the US’s required emissions saving could be acomplished with energy savings, with no changes to the ower supply system whatsoever.
What this means, is that all of Obama’s expenditure on Renewables, to reduce emissions, is a complete waste of time and money. That amount of money spent on efficiency could have achieved those reductions several times over, with no threat to energy security or stability.

sciguy54
Reply to  Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 11:14 am

“Encourage all US homes to be double glazed and insulated. I was amazed to see how many homes in the US were wooden clapperboard shacks with single glazing. Anyone invented the brick yet?”
Most US localities use something like the 2006 International Building Code and the 2006 International Residential Code with slight local variations. Brick is attractive and durable. It also has a high carbon content and very low R factor. Wood actually stores carbon while is remains in place.

Silver ralph
Reply to  sciguy54
August 3, 2015 1:04 pm

2006, eh? The UK has been putting in double glazing since the 70s. And this does not alter the fact that there is a lot of old housing stock in the US, especially in the more rural regions, that are still using single glazing and precious little insulation. While in Europe, the vast majority of old housing stock has been upgraded.
In fact, the majority of early window conversions have already been upgraded twice, from alluminium frame double glzing to UPVC double glazing. While the majority of flats in Russia have been triple glazed since the 1950s (although their poorly organised area heating system negates any gains in window insulation. I am not sure if this stupid system has been changed in the last 14 years since I was there last.)
R

Michael C. Roberts
Reply to  sciguy54
August 3, 2015 3:42 pm

Remember a few yaers back (2009 or so – Waxman-Markey?), and the first writing of the “Cap & Trade’ regulations for that ‘carbon pollution’? IIRC, they included a mandate (subsidized by the $$ generated through the taxing of that ‘carbon’) for all new homes, also any home that would be placed on the market for sale, to meet energy standards that, for the older home amounted to tens of thousands of dollars of retrofit in order to be deemed fit for resale by the proposed rules (see:http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/detail/cap-and-trade-implications-for-the-housing-industry)
Look for something similar to an older (or even newer) domicile near you!
MCR .

Reply to  Silver ralph
August 3, 2015 5:51 pm

a) says it all.
Who is gonna force ALL SHOPS?
How big is the fine ,when 3 customers file in?
Power to the correct people, Eh?

ralfellis
Reply to  john robertson
August 3, 2015 11:30 pm

I am sure there is a simple method, even if only through persuasion, ridicule and corporate embarrassment.
Corporations and businesses do not have a right to waste the nation’s resourses, just like you don’t have the right to run a red traffic-light. These are called rules and laws. I presume you have them in the US, or is it simply anarchy over there?
R

Stephen Heins
August 3, 2015 9:52 am

Then, there is the whole matter of the Clean Power Plan’s constitutionality and I think that Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe will have much more to say about that in front of the Supreme Court.

Brian
August 3, 2015 10:06 am

What can we do about this? Seriously, so many people are outraged about the lies, we need to get organised while we still have time, what can we do?

john
August 3, 2015 10:06 am

http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/03/obama-will-jetset-to-the-arctic-to-warn-about-global-warming/
The Obama administration will kick off a massive campaign Monday to push the president’s agenda to cut carbon dioxide emissions just months ahead of the United Nation’s global warming summit in Paris.
This climate campaign, oddly enough, includes a trip to the Alaskan Arctic by President Barack Obama to “call attention to the effects of global warming,” according to The Washington Post — which was briefed on the administration’s new campaign by an unnamed source prior to its unveiling to the public.
http://www.icenews.is/2015/07/31/climate-change-documentary-seeks-icelandic-footage/
A documentary project that highlights the love people have for their environment and their concerns about how seriously climate change could affect Europe is hoping to receive more video entrants from Iceland.
The film, which is being made for the French-German public TV channel ARTE and will be broadcast during the Paris Climate Summit, aims to inspire people to speak up on the issue and fight to ensure the environment is not altered to the detriment of the earth.
The producers explain that the aim is to make a 52-minute movie using one-to-three-minute short videos filmed by citizens from 51 countries from Greenland to Kazakhstan.

August 3, 2015 10:10 am

Ted Cruz just fired bolts of high powered truth at the Climate Change Lie.

adrian_o
August 3, 2015 10:10 am

Anthony,
One thing insufficiently explained to the public is the magnitude of the effects of the new regulations.
A climate difference of 1C is the climate difference between two places 40 miles apart, N-S.
http://www.backyardgardener.com/bulb/climatezone.html
(50F/1000mi = 1F/20mi = 1C/40 mi)
So the total 0.01C in climate difference to be achieved by these regulations is the difference in climate between the ends of two street blocks.
Every billion dollars spent on this plan results in the climate difference between the big toe and the little toe of one of your feet, if your little toe is to the north.
That, or putting 10,000 kids through college. Whichever you find more important for our future.

harrywr2
August 3, 2015 10:10 am

The big build-out of coal fired generating capacity in the US occurred between 1960 and 1980.
That puts normal replacement starting in 2020 and ending in 2040.
Coal fired plants with ‘real pollution’ controls are quite pricey.
Obama just left out the reality that we are going to need to build something besides windmills and solar panels(like nuclear power) announcement for the next guy.

jim south london
August 3, 2015 10:34 am

When is Donald Trump or any other brave GOP candidates gonna come out and say Carbon Dioxide is plant food not a pollutant.

jim south london
Reply to  john
August 3, 2015 11:18 am

How about keeping Wind Farms away from his country and keep the Electricity that powers his Luxury Hotels Reliable and Cheap.

AleaJactaEst
Reply to  john
August 4, 2015 4:06 am

beating them with their own $h!tty stick……

jim south london
August 3, 2015 10:38 am

Solar Farms in the Mohave Desert and where exactly do you get the fresh water clean them.

RACookPE1978
Editor
Reply to  jim south london
August 3, 2015 10:45 am

Solar Farms in the Mohave Desert and where exactly do you get the fresh water clean them.

And, where do you get the water to build them? Where do you put the roads to maintain them and supply them? Where do you get the water – and the fuel and the houses and the towns to house and feed and “water” the people to maintain them and service them?

jim south london
Reply to  RACookPE1978
August 3, 2015 11:19 am

or the political will.

johann wundersamer
August 3, 2015 10:58 am

so the common man pays the carbon taxes – to enable the poorest to pay their carbon taxes via electricity bill too.
but first the privileged stakeholders of the 10 to 20 times subsided ruinous renewables get their share.
____
anyone here wishing for
‘more than 260 solar energy projects
and philanthropic and impact
investors,
states, and cities are
committed to invest $520 million to advance community solar and scale up solar and
energy efficiency
for low- and moderate-income households’?
Think that offer itself is a direct insult.
Hans

jim south london
August 3, 2015 11:09 am

Tackling so called Climate Change will cripple the U S Economy by denying access to cheap Fossil Fuels will create recession and put millions of Americans into unnecessary poverty.Succeed in doing what OPEC and Osama Bil Laden and so far what China have failed to do.
Where are the GOP candidates in the Climate Debate ?

Dawtgtomis
August 3, 2015 11:20 am

I do not understand the rush to mitigate climate when that is not even possible. The common sense approach is to do as our forefathers did and adapt!!!
In 100 years the present infrastructure will be largely in need of replacement anyway, so demolish it and build suitable infrastructure as it becomes needed and economically profitable.
What they are missing is that it is infinitely more critical to develop the third world and thereby reverse the population trend, so that in a century there will be less demand on the resources and the croplands. This will be bolstered by technology advances that lie ahead which further decrease the need for fossil fuels.
It is very foolish to artificially create a shift to energy sources which have not proven to be economically viable in the marketplace without public funding and have much ‘environmental baggage’ of their own.

Science or Fiction
August 3, 2015 11:31 am

This chart indicate the relative increase in energy costs The President of United states will force upon you:comment image
The poor will suffer the most.
And the arguments for doing it has nothing to do with real science – too much of it has been falsified.
Can you imagine that Obama got the Nobel peace prize?
I have really forgotten why he got it, and honestly – I have no idea why.

herkimer
Reply to  Science or Fiction
August 4, 2015 4:26 am

1. The latest EIA levelilized cost comparison for generating electricity for renewables and fossil fuels is incorrect as long as the cost comparison fails to account for the cost of building and operating 75 % back up power needed when there is no wind or sun. There have been recent comments by alarmists stating that we should aim for fossil free energy by the end of this century. How are they going to live when there is no more fossil fuel or nuclear plants ( nuclear plants are not being built either) for back up . The level of renewables should never exceed 20-25 % of the demand and is only suitable for certain regional applications . We need a stable and reliable grid system or we will have blackouts and brown outs constantly. Using renewables only for a major power grid would spell suicide for power availability . In GERMANY where there are 25000 wind turbines , there are nearly 3000 cases/year where they need to step in to stabilize the gird.
In addition the cost comparison does not reflect the fact wind turbines have a useful life of only 12-15 years in comparison to fossil fuel plants which last plus 30-40 years . The capital cost component for wind turbine should be doubled at least to reflect the need for at least one additional replacement turbine during a 30-40 year period ,or the life of the fossil fuel plant .
Reply

Harry Passfield
August 3, 2015 11:40 am

dawtgtomis:

I do not understand the rush to mitigate climate when that is not even possible.

Quite right! How long does it take people to realise the arrogance of their government which thinks it can control the darn climate?

Dawtgtomis
Reply to  Harry Passfield
August 3, 2015 1:29 pm

I talk this subject with my rural neighbors and that is the greatest agreement I experience. When you farm you realize how little influence our species has on this ball of rock. Religious folks around here tell me that only the devil can whisper in your ear and make you think you control nature. Most of us old farts remember experiences or accounts by elders of the same weather cycles we are now experiencing.
Obama may find plenty of folks in Chicago and other megalopolises who buy the meme, but here in conservative Petticoat Junction he will have a hard time making us abandon common sense.