Where's Lewandowsky and Cook when they are needed to look at REAL 'conspiracy ideation', like murder plots from 'big oil'?

Wow, this is just bonkers.

climate-scientist-fears-murder-by-hitman
From the Saturday Times, big hat tip to Barry Woods

Lewandowsky and Cook would have a field day with this one, except, Dr. Wadhams is on their team (the warmist team) and thus would never think about accusing the good doctor of such psychological aberrations.

It’s a Big Oil conspiracy! The possible murder of three fellow warmists may be connected, says Cambridge University Dr. Peter Wadhams according to this story in the Telegraph:

Professor Peter Wadhams said he feared being labelled a “looney” over his suspicion that the deaths of the scientists were more than just an ‘extraordinary’ coincidence.

But he insisted the trio could have been murdered and hinted that the oil industry or else sinister government forces might be implicated.

Asked who might have wanted them out the way, he replied: “I can only think of the oil lobby but I don’t think the oil lobby goes around killing people.”

Big Oil must be omnipotent, as the evil oily elite were apparently able to arrange a targeted lightning strike:

The three scientists he identified – Seymour Laxon and Katherine Giles, both climate change scientists at University College London, and Tim Boyd of the Scottish Association for marine Science – all died within the space of a few months in early 2013.

Professor laxon fell down a flight of stairs at a New year’s Eve party at a house in Essex while Dr Giles died when she was in collision with a lorry when cycling to work in London. Dr Boyd is thought to have been struck by lightning while walking in Scotland.

Apparently, it gets worse:

Prof Wadhams added: “I thought if it was somebody assassinating them could it be one of our people doing it and that would be even more frightening. I thought it would be better not to touch this with a barge pole.”

His suspicions drew outrage on Saturday from Prof Laxon’s partner, who was also a close friend of Dr Giles. When told what Prof Wadhams had said, Fiona Strawbridge, head of e-Learning at UCL, replied: “Good god. All of this is completely outrageous and very distressing.”

Why yes, yes it is. And here Lewandowsky and Cook have a peer reviewed paper telling the world that its’s the climate skeptics that are the conspiracy nuts to be feared. I guess they forgot to look within their own peer group.

When you believe stuff like that, it’s easy to believe your own theories of climate catastrophe. Such as Wadhams big Arctic collapse prediction in 2012:

wadhams-collapse

One of the world’s leading ice experts has predicted the final collapse of Arctic sea ice in summer months within four years…

Prof Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University calls for “urgent” consideration of new ideas to reduce global temperatures…

“This collapse, I predicted would occur in 2015-16 at which time the summer Arctic (August to September) would become ice-free. The final collapse towards that state is now happening and will probably be complete by those dates”.

Still there:

N_bm_extent[1]

Readers may recall we noted Dr. Wadhams forecast was about to be falsified, so he moved the goalposts:

Over the past few years the Arctic expert, Professor Peter Wadhams, has strongly predicted an ‘ice-free’ Arctic no later than 2016. Late this year he changed it to 2020 without apparently giving an explanation.

You can watch his latest set of wacky Wadham predictions below.

NOTE: This post was updated about 30 minutes after publication to include the scan from the Saturday Times, rather that the satirical news channel image featuring professor Wadhams.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

159 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael 2
July 27, 2015 9:19 pm

Peter Wadhams is also a scholar of psi-ology
http://www.spiritoday.com/cambridge-professor-peter-wadhams-on-matters-of-life-and-death-and-higher-consciousness/
“Peter: Yes, I have always been interested in psychical research”
Consider the implications here:
“Impossibility of getting even conclusively positive results published in a mainstream journal. Results is a Catch 22 – this research can’t be anything but fraudulent because it isn’t published in a mainstream journal; because it can’t be published it must be fraudulent”.
Same with skeptical climate science.
“Peter: Yes, I have precognitive dreams occasionally, and in one case a very vivid one that preceded an unusual event by 10 days. This was published in “Paranormal Review” (newsletter of the SPR), and it was such a clear case that I feel we have to really rethink our concepts of time and causality, if an event can be foreseen in detail 10 days ahead.”
The problem of course is not knowing which dreams are going to come true in 10 days (or ever) from those that don’t. It is like a climate model — one of them might be somewhat correct but there’s no way to know which one until after the event forecast has happened (or not).

Ed Zuiderwijk
July 28, 2015 10:47 am

The learned professsor also thinks that there’s still an outside chance that the Arctic will be icefree this summer and so fulfill his own outlandish predictions. I guess that the stress caused by the uncooperativeness of the sea ice has left its marks on his mind.
Bizarre.

angech2014
July 28, 2015 8:53 pm

At Real Climate Comment by Jim Hunt — 19 Jul 2015 4:12 PM
“I’ve arrived here somewhat late in the day via a link from the Arctic Sea Ice Forum. In all the circumstances perhaps I might repeat here what I recently said over there.
In a personal communication Prof. Wadhams informs me that:
“My SIPN prediction is an outlier but it is in fact what is predicted by the 5-year trend in ice volume in September. In 2013 and 2014 the volume in summer came in above this trend, but since then we have started a new El Nino which tends to increase air temperatures more. I am just staking this area out as a marker, and expect to be shot down in flames”.
[Response: Of course he will be. This is posturing, not science. – gavin]”
So there you go?

July 29, 2015 11:02 am

Peter Wadham makes a rather serious accusation regarding this article. According to him, not only does he not believe what this article claims he believe, the author of the article, Ben Webster, violated a promise of confidentiality in writing the piece. If that’s true, Webster acted in an incredibly unethical manner unbefitting any journalist.
Basically, what Wadham claims is Webster contacted him, and they had a discussion about the Arctic. During it, Webster asked if there were any other people he should talk to. In response to that, Wadham told him about the coincidental deaths of the three scientists. In doing so, he admitted he had initially thought they weren’t just accidents due to a near-death experience of his own around the same time, but, and this is a key point, he changed his mind when their deaths were investigated.
If Wadham had a near death experience around the same time three people in a relatively small died, it’s understandable he’d worry there was some connection. Having a bit of an irrational reaction to nearly dying is understandable, and recognizing it was all just coincidence due to investigations showing it was is a sign of a healthy attitude. If he told Webster all this, Webster should have never ran this story.
Especially since according to Wadham, he told all this to Webster off the record, and Webster agreed he wouldn’t use any of it in a story without talking to Wadham about it first. If that’s true, Webster flat out lied, broke confidentiality and ran a story he knew to be false. And because of that, Wadham’s reputation got trashed, and this site helped inadvertantly play a role in trashing it.
Now, maybe Wadham’s complaint isn’t true, but… maybe it is. If so, he’s owed a huge apology.

hunter
Reply to  Brandon Shollenberger
August 1, 2015 6:46 pm

Poor Brandon- always the first to parse against skeptics, and even quicker to defend climate kooks.

hunter
August 1, 2015 6:44 pm

They did not die of mysterious causes at all. Nor were they murdered.
The accuser is a loon. Wacked enough to believe end of the world apocalyptic claptrap… Oh wait, he *makes* end of the world apocalyptic clap trap….