However, satellite data don’t agree with that finding
People send me stuff.
Today I got an email with an advance link to the NOAA/NCDC “state of the climate” briefing- that monthly phone call where Tom Karl’s NCDC staff spoon feeds unquestioning newsies like AP’s Seth Borenstein the latest worry over climate. Unsurprisingly, May 2015 is now anointed as the “warmest May on record”, thanks in part to the new and “pause busting” improved sea surface temperature record, all highly adjusted based on a variety of rationalizations.
This is what is being sent out today:
NOAA to Announce Key Climate Findings: Learn more about the temperature, precipitation and weather events experienced around the world in 2014, tomorrow at 11 am EDT. Dial 1-888-989-9791 with the password “Climate” to join the call and view the slides here (available at 10:30 am EDT).
It seems the oceans are now all the “Red Sea of climate despair”, except for that stubborn patch of low percentile blue near Greenland:
Wow, lots of red in the oceans, all based on percentiles (a statistical tool). Scary looking huh? I’ll bet AP’s Seth Borenstein (and others) will eat that right up and that global image they are pushing will be seen in news world-wide.
Of course, we knew back on June 19th this would be coming. Bob Tisdale wrote then:
NOAA recently published their State of the Climate Report for May 2015. Under the heading of Global Summary Information, they note:
Note: With this report and data release, the National Centers for Environmental Information is transitioning to improved versions of its global land (GHCN-M version 3.3.0) and ocean (ERSST version 4.0.0) datasets. Please note that anomalies and ranks reflect the historical record according to these updated versions. Historical months and years may differ from what was reported in previous reports. For more, please visit the associated FAQ and supplemental information.
But of course we know the adjustments that led to the new NOAA ERSST.v4 sea surface temperature data (the biggest changes to the NOAA data took place in the ocean portion) are not supported during the global warming slowdown period by the night marine air temperature dataset (HadNMAT2 from the UKMO) that NOAA used for bias corrections. (See post here.) In other words, it appears NOAA overcooked their “improvements”. Oops!
On the NOAA Global Analysis – May 2015 webpage they state under the heading of Temperatures:
The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for May 2015 was the highest for May in the 136-year period of record, at 0.87°C (1.57°F) above the 20th century average of 14.8°C (58.6°F), surpassing the previous record set just one year ago by 0.08°C (0.14°F). This ties with February 1998 as the fourth highest monthly departure from average for any month on record. The two highest monthly departures from average occurred earlier this year in February and March, both at 0.89°C (1.60°F) above the 20th century average for their respective months.
Somehow I don’t think that will surprise anyone.
There’s another global graph that NCDC made, showing anomaly data rather than percentiles, but that didn’t quite make it into the press briefing, perhaps because there’s not as much red in it:
Aw, shucks, where did all the hot red go? Interestingly, there’s no link in the press briefing document that take you to the directly to the May 2015 SOTC page at NCDC that this is presented on, so folks like Seth won’t likely see this image unless they actually switch from regurgitator to reporter mode and spend some time to look for it.
If you want to look at both the press briefing and the SOTC page where that image exists, here are the links:
SOTC Press brief: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/briefings/201506.pdf
SOTC May 2015: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201505
But, never mind. Let’s look at the global temperature for May 2015 as seen by satellite data (click to enlarge):
And the graph (click to enlarge):
Looks to me like the pause is alive and well, and look at the rightmost datapoint, May 2015, nowehere near a record. Now to be fair, the satellite record is only from 1979, but, there’s certainly no indication of May 2015 being the hottest ever.
Or if you prefer numbers, here is what UAH said about May 2015:
Global Temperature Report: May 2015
Third warmest May in satellite record
Global climate trend since Nov. 16, 1978: +0.11 C per decade
May temperatures (preliminary)
Global composite temp.: +0.27 C (about 0.49 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for May.
Northern Hemisphere: +0.33 C (about 0.59 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for May.
Southern Hemisphere: +0.21 C (about 0.38 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for May.
Tropics: +0.27 C (about 0.49 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for May.
Source: http://www.nsstc.uah.edu/climate/
Compare that to what NOAA/NCDC is saying:
The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for May 2015 was the highest for May in the 136-year period of record, at 0.87°C (1.57°F) above the 20th century average of 14.8°C (58.6°F), surpassing the previous record set just one year ago by 0.08°C (0.14°F).
So for May 2015 NOAA says the globe is at 0.87°C above normal, and UAH says the globe is at 0.27°C above normal – a difference by a factor of three.
Who to believe?
UPDATE: In comments, there is this point about that dangerous climate change aka the 2°C limit that alarmists keep wailing about:
Well, it would seem so. But, 2F is not 2C. 2.30F works out to 1.27C. Close but no cigar. NOAA/NCDC could do a better job in their press briefing for the globe tomorrow by using both C and F, especially since many reporters can’t do this simple temperature conversion. Right now, they only have °F on their PowerPoint, which is curiously unscientific and Americanized.
Every month and every year is HOTTEST EVAH. This will go on and on until glaciers cover Canada.
“Thanks partly to NOAA’s new adjusted dataset, tommorrow they’ll claim to reporters that May was the ‘hottest ever’”
This is an odd post. If you follow the link in the NOAA message, you find this:
NOAA Monthly Climate Updates …
Latest Briefing: June 18, 2015 …
Next Briefing: Thursday, July 16, 2015 @ur momisugly 11:00 AM EDT
The briefing about May temp came out on June 18. This post quotes extensively from it. And yes, it did say, back then, “warmest month on record”.
Tomorrow’s report will be about June 2015. And yes, it may well be even warmer.
I agree it is odd, the Madison Avenue PR firm Climate NEXUS sent this out today, citing 2014 in their message.
“NOAA to Announce Key Climate Findings: Learn more about the temperature, precipitation and weather events experienced around the world in 2014, tomorrow at 11 am EDT. Dial 1-888-989-9791 FREE with the password “Climate” to join the call and view the slides here (available at 10:30 am EDT).”
I wanted to highlight ahead of time what I consider failings in the methodology, related to Karl et al (which you embrace, but then again that’s what you are paid to do). Tomorrow I’ll have another report covering June.
The story will very likely be the same as May, but I agree with the previous poster, the title needs clarifying.
“I wanted to highlight ahead of time what I consider failings in the methodology, related to Karl et al (which you embrace, but then again that’s what you are paid to do”
Is that why you highlight 2015 stuff when the press release is about 2014 stuff? Inquiring minds want to know.
Interesting how both poles are colder than average.
I could have sworn that all of the models claimed that the poles would warm the most.
You’re right. Cowtan and Way claimed that the poles were warming about 8 times faster than the rest of the planet. Of course, 8 X 0 = 0. But what happens if the planet cools? Will the poles cool 8 times faster? Maybe that’s what’s happening.
You guys are aware that the two datasets use different baselines to determine the anomaly, yes? No surprise the UAH anomaly is lower since it’s using a more recent, and thus warmer, baseline than NOAA.
***CAGW advocates, taxpayer-funded ABC in Australia is ready to call it:
15 July: ABC: Greg Jericho: The ‘war on wind’ is part of a much bigger fight over renewables
The Abbott Government may be many things, but a friend of renewable energy is clearly not one of them, and it will take more than Greg Hunt professing his love for it to convince anyone otherwise…
The first five months of this year has been the warmest start to any year on record. According to NASA, the average global air and sea temperature from January to May was 0.77C above the mean temperature from 1951 to 1980…
***If June to December temperatures just average what occurred over the past five years, then 2015 will break the record for the hottest year…
But if we take a longer-term view, the past 10 years, and the past 20 years to May were both the hottest on record…
If the earth was an athlete you’d be testing it for drugs, because it keeps breaking records so frequently, something unnatural must be affecting its performance…
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-15/jericho-the-war-on-wind-is-part-of-a-much-bigger-fight/6620394
it’s only weather, but…
15 July: Daily Mail: Emily Crane: And you thought the big chill was over! Australia is shivering through the COLDEST week in two decades as Antarctic blast re-freezes the country
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3161539/Parts-Australia-shiver-COLDEST-week-19-years-arctic-blast-freezes-country.html
“May 2015 is now anointed as the “warmest May on record”
Because we know that May’s temperature data will be adjusted again in the future, their proclamation means absolutely nothing. What good is today’s data when we already know that NOAA will, at some point, find errors in the data and adjust them again? The data is as useless as a house built on shifting sand.
Tony Heller, AKA Steve Goddard, Realclimatescience.com, has been demonstrating for a couple of years now the fraudulent adjustments and estimated data NOAA, NCDC and GISS have been fabricating and reporting. What do you people not get about that ??? All the rest of this climate debate is merely semantics. You should be debating the fraud being committed, not the so-called nuts/bolts of minuscule and irrelevant climate (weather) variations !
In Maine anecdotal evidence like lobsters shedding late puts a lie to the satellite data that purports that New England was warm. Even tonight the weather reports significantly lower than normal temperatures 50 F. Tough on tomatoes under the fruit setting temperature. Gee, wish the lobsters and tomatoes would get with the narrative. Dont have to look very far from the house to find water that freezes at 28 F. I heard that NOAA was coming up with thermometers that redefine the freezing point of fresh water to be 36 F. Salt water will now freeze at 32F a perfect example of climate change by index creep.
The real danger is that there are good scientists interspersed with those have no credibility any more as scientists. The good ones keep their heads down. Sigh.
It is quite shocking how the government agencies are wasting their time and public money on such reports — monthly data, few months data, year data. In fact these are not associated with global warming. They are associated with several factors over different parts of the globe along with natural cyclic variation, solar variations, etc. How, can they separate these two show how much is the global warming component. In India, the temperature difference between a wet year and dry year are even around 2 oC.
Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy
Talk out here in Commiefornia was that we had a reverse Spring. May was colder than March. Granted, during early March we had the second of two “False Springs” but nonetheless May out here was colder than normal.