Quote of the week: The link between 'defending Michael Mann is defending climate science' seems to have been broken

Mark Steyn writes:

[Tuesday] marked a not unimportant court deadline in the upcoming Mann vs Steyn trial of the century, and I wouldn’t want to let it pass without comment. Ever since this tedious suit was launched by Doctor Fraudpants in defense of his global-warming hockey stick, Michael Mann’s supporters have insisted that it’s not, as I and my fellow defendants have insisted, about free speech. Instead, as they see it, it’s about science finally fighting back against a sustained assault by Koch-funded “denialists”. This sub-headline encapsulates the general line:

Michael Mann is taking a stand for science.

Gotcha. Michael Mann is not doing this for Michael Mann, or even for Michael Mann’s science, or even for climate science. He’s doing it for science. Mann is science and science is Mann.

A few weeks ago, you’ll recall, the ACLU, The Washington Post, NBC News, The Los Angeles Times and various other notorious right-wing deniers all filed amici briefs opposed to Michael Mann and his assault on free speech. They did this not because they have any great love for me, but because their antipathy to wackjob foreign blowhards is outweighed by their appreciation of the First Amendment – and an understanding of the damage a Mann victory would inflict on it. After noting the upsurge of opposition to Mann, Reuters enquired of Catherine Reilly (one of his vast legal team) whether there would be any amici filing pro-Mann briefs:

I asked Reilly if the professor would have any supporting briefs next month when he responds to the defendants in the D.C. appeals court.

“At this point, we don’t know,” she said.

Ms Reilly was a pleasant sort when I met her in court over a year ago, but she struck me as a formidable opponent. So I naturally assumed that the above was what what the political types call “lowering expectations”. As I wrote:

I would be surprised if Mann didn’t have any supporting briefs. I was in court when Ms Reilly’s genial co-counsel made his argument for Mann, which was a straightforward appeal to authority: Why, all these eminent acronymic bodies, from the EPA and NSF and NOAA even unto HMG in London, have proved that all criticisms of Mann are false and without merit. So I would certainly expect them to file briefs – and, given that Mann sees this as part of a broader “war on science” by well-funded “deniers”, I would also expect briefs from the various professional bodies: the National Academy of Sciences, the American Physical Society, etc. As pleasant as it is to find my side of the court suddenly so crowded, I’m confident Mann will be able to even up the numbers.

Well, yesterday was the deadline, and not a single amicus brief was filed on behalf of Mann. Not one. So Michael Mann is taking a stand for science. But evidently science is disinclined to take a stand for Michael Mann. The self-appointed captain of the hockey team is playing solo. As Judith Curry wrote last month:

The link between ‘defending Michael Mann is defending climate science’ seems to have been broken.

As yesterday’s deafening silence confirms. If you’re defending Michael Mann, you’re not defending science, or defending climate science, or theories on global warming or anything else. Defending Michael Mann means defending Michael Mann – and it turns out not many people are willing to go there.

===========================================

More here: http://www.steynonline.com/6565/the-lonesomest-mann-in-town

This development is very telling, and is the moment that the tide of consensus receded and left Mann out standing in his field.

the-tide-has-turned

5 2 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

161 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CodeTech
September 17, 2014 1:33 pm

This makes me smile 🙂

John Francis
Reply to  CodeTech
September 17, 2014 7:08 pm

Mark Steyn is a truly brilliant man with a ferocious interest in truth and freedom. The world will owe him glory when this is over, although he is well-admired by many already.

Tom in Florida
September 17, 2014 1:37 pm

Even rats know when to jump off a sinking ship.

M Seward
Reply to  Tom in Florida
September 17, 2014 4:00 pm

That’s because rats are a higher order rodent compared to cagw alarmists. They are less of a pest generally and even likeable ( cunning as an outhouse rat etc). Hopefully the alarmists will all just go quietly and commit mass cultural suicide a la Disney Lemmings and just go get real jobs cleaning dishes and wiping geratiric arses in old folks homes or something closer to (but still way above) their true standing in the community. (apologies to dish washers and arse wipers everywhere).
I read a sci fi book recently which referred to a class of its characters as being educated above their IQ. Doesn’t that say it all about Dr Strangecurve and the rest of the alarmoswarm?

Reply to  M Seward
September 17, 2014 8:46 pm

Historically speaking, they don’t kill as many either.

westclintwood
Reply to  M Seward
September 18, 2014 2:30 am

Historically speaking, they don’t kill as many either.
Of course you forget about the plague then?

Reply to  M Seward
September 18, 2014 6:45 am

My dad used to refer to them as “educated fools”. My association with many PhDs in science (let alone in English departments) confirms his diagnosis. Some fellow JDs also qualify!

Reply to  Jim Brock
September 18, 2014 10:35 am

Would the EDs also qualify? But the “educated” part may not for them.

Reply to  M Seward
September 18, 2014 6:48 am

Nope. Just included charlatans of all stripes. They’re always the same type.

Twobob
Reply to  M Seward
September 18, 2014 2:46 pm

Every rat has its Fleas

jarthuroriginal
Reply to  M Seward
September 19, 2014 3:19 am

Observation from one who would know (not me):

Many wearers of Harvard MBA rings are stupid. Yet they have high paying jobs and continue to be obstacles to real managers.

CRISP
Reply to  M Seward
September 20, 2014 9:58 pm

Will everybody stop blaming the rats for the Black Death that killed untold millions in Europe and Asia. Firstly, the Black Death was not bubonic plague. This is a 20th century myth devised after an outbreak in Hong Kong circa 1900. The description bore a superficial similarity to those given by 14th century eyewitnesses. Other than that, the epidemiologies are totally different – the gestation periods, the fatality rate, the geographical distribution, the available vectors, etc. The Black death was a hemorrhagic virus that left its mark on our DNA. It was humans who spread it to each other, not rattus rattus.

old44
Reply to  Tom in Florida
September 17, 2014 4:15 pm

Especially rats know when to jump off a sinking ship.

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  Tom in Florida
September 17, 2014 4:59 pm

They get a tingly feeling in their tails.

Thai Rogue
Reply to  Evan Jones
September 18, 2014 1:35 am

That causes them to go hockey stick in structure.

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  Evan Jones
September 18, 2014 8:14 am

(Well that’s what the rat told Dr. Dolittle.)

thingadonta
Reply to  Tom in Florida
September 19, 2014 1:18 am

People talk about canaries in coal mines, but not many know that in underground mines, rats are the first to leave when the ground starts to become unstable, and moreover, miners are told to follow them because they always know the quickest way out.

Andyj
September 17, 2014 1:39 pm

Let us hope the judge is as intelligent as the defendant 🙂

September 17, 2014 1:40 pm

That is GREAT news!

earwig42
September 17, 2014 1:40 pm

Me too!

inMAGICn
September 17, 2014 1:40 pm

(To the tune of “Brother Can You Spare a Dime”)
They used to tell me I was building a dream
And so I followed the mob
When there were graphs to fake or bucks to take
I was always there, right on the job
They used to tell me I was building a dream
Saving the Earth just ahead
Why is everyone telling me
My theory is dead?
Once I built a model, ignored the sun
Showed heat was going to climb
It failed outside the computer run
Brother, can you paradigm?
Once I saw it coming all undone
Colleagues said it’s a crime
Since loss of funding is no fun
I need a new paradigm
Once before the cameras, we looked swell
Full of that AG Warming shtick
There wasn’t a thing we couldn’t sell
And I was the kid with the Stick
Say don’t you remember? They called me ‘Man’
It was ‘Man’ all the time
I’m a believer, I’m still a fan
Say Buddy, can you paradigm?

Reply to  inMAGICn
September 17, 2014 2:14 pm

Man oh man, inMAGICn what a quick study you are!! bravo!

noaaprogrammer
Reply to  inMAGICn
September 17, 2014 6:35 pm

The graft of grafting trees into graphs.

TRG
Reply to  inMAGICn
September 17, 2014 7:14 pm

inMagic, thanks for a moment of laughter. Way to go!

Reply to  inMAGICn
September 18, 2014 3:17 pm

For those unfamiliar with the original…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eih67rlGNhU

September 17, 2014 1:41 pm

popcorn anyone?

tz2026
September 17, 2014 1:41 pm

comes to mind.

ConfusedPhoton
September 17, 2014 1:47 pm

Although there appears to be no one willing to stand with Mann in this xase, there were so many climateers who were very quiet during the height of Mann’s version of science and through his smears. There were so many who sat back knowing what was going on and said nothing!
Thankfully, the internet has a long memory, despite attempts to change this.

Mr Bliss
Reply to  ConfusedPhoton
September 17, 2014 5:43 pm

“Thankfully, the internet has a long memory, despite attempts to change this.”
I wonder how many climate scientists will be making applications to Google, in order to have their climate histories removed?

H.R.
September 17, 2014 1:48 pm

Brings to mind the old saying, “To make a friend you have to be a friend.”
It seems suing the pants off anyone with the slightest of rise of an eyebrow at your work is not a successful strategy for making friends.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  H.R.
September 17, 2014 10:25 pm

I don’t recall McIntyre or McKitrick being sued.

H.R.
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 18, 2014 10:54 am

They might just be his buds, then.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 18, 2014 3:01 pm

But they spotted the cracks in the hockey stick before it became an established political lever, before Catastrophic Anthropomorphic Global WARMING was fully used used as a PR tool.
Now Mann and his lawsuits are cannon fodder used to silence the science.

September 17, 2014 1:50 pm

I do not recall who posted the link first – But whoever you are, thank you! It was well worth the read. (I read it earlier when someone posted a link in a comment).

pottereaton
September 17, 2014 1:52 pm

Later in the column Steyn notes:

We incline more to the Judith Curry way of doing things here, so I’m happy to post Mann’s latest feeble legal pleading at SteynOnline. There’s not much of interest in it, except in the section on page 21 headed “Jurisdiction”, where Dr Mann has withdrawn his objection that “an appeal of the denial of a motion to dismiss under the Act does not meet the stringent requirements of the collateral order doctrine”. If that makes your eyeballs bleed, it’s to do with the fact that, at the time the District of Columbia passed its anti-SLAPP law, it was not clear whether a ruling under the law was immediately appealable. If that still makes your eyeballs bleed, well, join the club: we’re essentially a test case for a new law whose full scope the DC Appeals Court has yet to pronounce on. But I read Mann’s reversal of his earlier position this way – that he’s desperately hoping the DC judges will rule that the anti-SLAPP is immediately appealable and then they’ll toss the whole case out, and get him off the hook of his own vanity before he has to spend any more time holed up with M J Murphy [Big City Lib] and David Appell.

He adds further that no matter what the outcome of the above legal argument, his countersuit will still be in effect.
Is Mann losing his resolve?

Tucci78
Reply to  pottereaton
September 17, 2014 3:16 pm

At 1:52 PM on 17 September, pottereaton had asked:

Is Mann losing his resolve?

Why not? And it’s about time he did. After all, it’s been more than seventeen years since he lost his scientific integrity.
Sold his birthright for a pot of “message.”

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  Tucci78
September 17, 2014 5:02 pm

Sold his birthright for a pot of “message.”
Har! Har!

September 17, 2014 1:54 pm

Perhaps his supporters forget to set their alarm clocks?
Or maybe all the other alarms they’ve got going drowned it out and that’s why he’s now adrift?

September 17, 2014 1:56 pm

In my best Don Rickles voice:
“First you destroyed the hockey stick and now you go after the hockey puck!”
____________________
Friends of Science are no friends of Mann.

hunter
September 17, 2014 1:56 pm

Bully for Mr. Steyn.
Mann has been conspicuous in the many tells of his behavior.
Winding his version of climate science-as-political hardball will be a tough. His suit should have been tossed from day one, and the fat lady has certainly not started singing. But maybe she is warming up.

Shawn from High River
September 17, 2014 1:58 pm

Here is a chance for all the do-gooder scientist types and organizations to finally come out and destroy all of us “d” words with their sciency stuff ! Bring it!!!!
(crickets)

Resourceguy
September 17, 2014 2:00 pm

When does he try on the bloody glove?

Reply to  Resourceguy
September 18, 2014 5:28 am

If Obama had a son, he would look like little man?

Jack
September 17, 2014 2:01 pm

But I thought there was a consensus. I wonder why Al Gore didn’t file an amicus brief.

Admad
September 17, 2014 2:06 pm

Pamela Gray
Reply to  Admad
September 17, 2014 6:12 pm

I sang along! Badly…but I did it. Graduated from HS in the early 70’s so you must be patient. It was hard not to say “sleepy Jean”. Don’t even try to write a song and replace the lyrics in “Yellow Submarine”.

Ben U.
Reply to  Pamela Gray
September 17, 2014 7:14 pm

In the town where I was born
Lived a Mann who wailed at seas
And he told us of his life
In the land of climate dreams
So we wailed for the UN
Till we swelled the ranks of Greens
And we lived above the plebes
With our green tambourines
Listen while we flay
Our green tambourines!
Climate change, song change, course change!
Whence this antarctic ice?
Where’s that confounded warmth?

Ben U.
Reply to  Admad
September 17, 2014 6:45 pm

Nice! But Mark Steyn rhymes with wine (as the WSJ informed an inquiring mind many years ago).

The Mighty Quinn
September 17, 2014 2:07 pm

Will no one stand with Piltdown Mann?

September 17, 2014 2:13 pm

I almost feel sorry for Mann.
Oh wait, he’s 100% responsible for bring this grief down upon himself. On reflection I don’t feel sorry for him at all.

Alx
Reply to  Mike Smith
September 18, 2014 3:52 am

For people as malicious, dishonest and self-serving as Mann is, it is impossible to feel sorry for. It would be like feeling sorry for rats that carried plague.

Reply to  Alx
September 18, 2014 5:32 am

In defense of the rats, it was not their intention to harm to the vast majority mankind.

Jon P
September 17, 2014 2:20 pm

Not even Nick Stokes?

mpainter
Reply to  Jon P
September 17, 2014 2:45 pm

Nope, not even Nick Stokes. Seems that our former poster-boy is a lost cause (which would not deter our good friend Nick but there are simply too many lost causes to pursue)

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  mpainter
September 17, 2014 5:03 pm

Hmm. He is no worse than most, and better than some.

schitzree
Reply to  mpainter
September 17, 2014 10:22 pm

He still post over at Climate Ect. Seems a lot more reasonable the he was a few years ago. More willing to hear other peoples arguments and better at making his own from scientific facts rather then appeals to authority. Certainly better then many of the ‘climate faithful’.

Admin
September 17, 2014 2:20 pm

There is plenty of data available to generate amicus briefs in support of Mann using RegEM.

September 17, 2014 2:22 pm

The fact that Mann is not in jail for the great harm to science and people that he has done makes me very sad and disappointed. But this suit gives me a little hope. (yes I know it is only a civil case — but still)
~Mark

marque2
Reply to  markstoval
September 17, 2014 3:29 pm

He should be in jail for misappropriation of public funds – for producing fraudulent science.

Richards in Vancouver
Reply to  marque2
September 18, 2014 2:13 am

You’d like to see him in Mannicles?

Leon Brozyna
September 17, 2014 2:23 pm

One day Dr. Mann will vanish into the obscurity he so richly deserves … meanwhile, we’re still stuck with his wit and wisdom …
http://rockyriver4.wikispaces.com/file/view/yawn.jpg/161548609/yawn.jpg

1 2 3 4