Changes coming to WUWT

change

I figured that I should give people a heads-up, rather than just dump changes unannounced like wordpress.com did with their recent beep boop editor bomb.

Two changes – comment filtering and format. Two notes: editing for guest authors and a personal note about the future of WUWT.

1. Comment filtering has become stricter

This change is already in place this week and has been necessitated by the rising amount of spam comments not just at WUWT, but all blogs seem to be getting. Steve McIntyre laments his trouble with recent spam increases here.

WUWT gets about 3 times the amount of spam that Climate Audit does, most of it commercial link-back spam disguised as a comment. I too have seen the increase, and clearing out the spam filter has become quite a chore on some days. As a result, I’ve turned on this setting in my wordpress.com dashboard:

Strict: silently discard the worst and most pervasive spam.

What this means is that occasionally, some legitimate comments that meet this criteria might get thrown out with the bathwater. Some comments that are on the fence may also go to the spam holding que for review.

So, if you make a comment and it immediately disappears, it may go straight to either of these places. But, that doesn’t mean it is lost forever, it may be in the holding queue. Give it some time to see if it is retrieved by a moderator. For overnight, typically 11PM-6AM PDT, some comments may take awhile before they are rescued.

For a few people who have no manners and have been warned and finally banned (for example, Doug Cotton and his variety of shapeshifting sock puppets, and NASA GISS scientist Jan Perlwitz who made a death threat) those comments will straight to the bit bucket. Words with the usual variety of cuss words, profanity,  and banned topics, etc. will also go straight to the bit bucket.

If your comment doesn’t fit any of these categories, and you don’t see it rescued within a few hours, it may have been a victim of the new stricter spam policy. I wish this wasn’t the case, but the enormity of the spam increase requires it. There just isn’t enough time in the day as it is and we shouldn’t be wasting it wading through dreck comments to decide which require permanent deletion and which don’t. Due to WUWT being a high traffic blog and in the top 10 of wordpress.com blogs worldwide on a daily basis, it is a prime target for spammers.

Also, some comments may be held for moderation, as we’ve recently added some words to that filter. Some people who have been known to post wildly off-topic, long rants, hateful, or otherwise inappropriate comments will get the inspection of a moderator. Also, first time commenters will be held in moderation, and after the first comment is approved, you are whitelisted.

The vast majority of regular commenters are also whitelisted, but occasionally somebody may trigger moderation. One of the surest ways for your comment to be held is to put a whole bunch of links in it, which mimic commercial spam. Right now we have it set to 4 links as the maximum. If you have a comment that requires more than that, try to break it up into two comments, or just accept that your comment will be held for moderation.

Also, moderator, please step up in removing off topic comments, we have a handful of people who think that “anything goes” when it comes to posting these sorts of comments on threads. Likewise, feel free to snip and warn purveyors of abusive comments.

The WUWT comment policy page is here.


 

2. New format

One of the biggest problems that WUWT (and many blogs like it) is that given the linear scrolling format, stories often get shuttled to the bottom of the stack pretty quickly, especially on busy news days. This means that some topics die a premature discussion death.

WUWT readers may have noted that I’ve been trying some experiments to keep stories of interest at the top, trying for awhile a “top stories” sticky post for a few weeks. While it helped, the amount of work to keep up with it was large, and some people didn’t like it. Of course in any change, there will be those that don’t like it.

The last major format change I made to the WUWT format was in early 2010, a couple of months after Climategate broke. I found the old Freshy theme we were using then was too narrow, and restrictive (it didn’t support mobile devices well) so I opted for the new (at the time) 2010 theme, which has served us well for over 4 and half years. But, it too is now showing signs of age, especially with so many topics and so much traffic.

After months of trying out new ideas offline, I believe I’ve found a new theme that will solve the problems mentioned above, while still retaining much of the look and feel of WUWT along with being able to keep all posts in a linear scrolling format as we have before.

The new theme is called “Expound” and you can read about it here. WordPress describes it as:

Expound offers a fresh, clean magazine-styled look for any type of blog. With a responsive design that looks great on any device, its support of post formats and featured posts will help your content shine.

Here is what it will look like. I still have not included the header image. This is a scaled version to show what the scrolled areas below the main headlines look like. It will be full width on any browser, and will properly adapt to tablets and phones as well.

The five most recent stories are at the top, you can see other stories directly below by scrolling down.

WUWT_new_look

The only thing that will significantly change is the front page of WUWT and some sidebar elements will be removed that are no longer relevant. Posts themselves will pretty much look the same and commenting will work as before.

One big improvement to this theme is that it will allow bigger images, 720 pixels wide, up from the previous width of 640. We’ll be able to do HD! This is important for graphs with a lot of details and some videos in HD.

Here is a full-on view of the main page before scrolling:

WUWT_new_look2

The change will start on Monday morning, August 25th.

The good news is that if it doesn’t work for some reason, it can be changed back.

UPDATES

UPDATE: As you can see by now, the new format is live. Like with any new format, there may be some hiccups or some things that aren’t quite right. I’ve spent the evening doing some font tuning, and I hope the body font for posts is OK now for most people. If not, you can magnify/shrink in your browser using CTRL and + keys simultaneously as well as CTRL and – keys.  CTRL and 0 (zero) puts you back at default magnification.

There are a couple of missing elements, such as comment count, and “leave a comment” on main page entries, along with some other small tweaks that will be put back in over the coming days with the CSS editor. BTW, if anyone is a WordPress CSS specialist, and can help me with such tasks, please leave a note in comments – thanks, Anthony

UPDATE2: Some things that I expected to retain got broken, such as the mobile theme, which I believe is fixed now.  Some other things that we are used to got broken or removed because the default theme setting didn’t support them.

The good news is that most everything can be fixed with CSS tweaks over the next few days, though I have a bit of a learning curve on these items. Anybody out there a wordpress CSS specialist?

Some things already fixed are:

  • Mobile theme
  • Header font and body of story font sizes
  • Making body font more readable by making it sans serif
  • Put back “latest posts” on sidebar since some users still need it
  • Background image restored

Things I’m working on:

  • Putting back real time stamps
  • Putting back comment counts
  • Getting comment body fonts and comment name headers sized properly
  • Less white space
  • About a half dozen other small tweaks

Your patience is appreciated while these things are dealt with. – Anthony

 


 

Note: editing for guest authors.

For guest authors who can post on WUWT, to get an image to appear in the top five, you’ll have to select it as a “featured image” (on the lower right sidebar) during editing, otherwise it will appear as text only. Putting a short summary in the first sentence or two is more important now, since that is what readers will see at the top of the main page.

Also, to get around invoking the horrid beep boop editor that wordpress.com refuses to dump, here is a workaround. In the dashboard, simply click on the “Posts” item but NOT on the drop down menu where it says “Add New”:

editposts

To edit a post, click on “all posts”, select the post needed to edit, and edit from there.

Personal note:

After this change settles in, I will make the decision as to whether to stick with wordpress.com any longer. They assure me they are trying to polish this beep boop editor turd fix the beep boop editor, but I’m not sure they are going to be successful. They’ve pretty well ignored users concerns in this thread, and then decided to close it.

Closing threads where users are sounding off angrily sounds like the tactics some newspapers and magazines we know that simply choose to ignore overwhelming reader input when it comes to the many climate science faux pas that grace their pages.

Bad move, WordPress. I’m not sure your free hosting is worth the hassle anymore. Many other users feel the same with this “jumped the shark” moment with the “beep boop” editor debacle. Being able to control one’s own destiny has its advantages, and I’m beginning to feel abused by wordpress.com.

BTW, the video ads that appear at the bottoms of posts give the highest payback to WUWT, should you be inclined to watch them.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
351 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bob
August 24, 2014 7:10 pm

Anthony, I think you are doing the right thing by moving to the news format. It probably should have been done a while back. I, too, don’t like the beep-boop monster.
Congratulations on your great success.

August 24, 2014 7:20 pm

Anthony Watts says:
August 24, 2014 at 6:10 pm
Hi Anthony –
Everything I said earlier about my respect for you still holds true. . . my views have never wavered! But I also admit to, and sincerely apologize for being overwrought about the consecutive and lengthy moderation delays for my seemingly innocuous yet supportive posts. I double posted on N&C because, I had no idea when (if ever) my “Notes and Comments” submission would ever get a response, after it went into moderation
But in an effort to provide a meta-lesson (whatever that means) to this discourse; I truly believe that all WUWT’ers need to spend more time expanding climate knowledge, educating, and avoiding clever repartee and put-downs and instead help the rest of us better understand climate, it’s drivers, and associated false predictions of climate models.
Thanks again for all you do; and please my apologlies for causing you to respond to my rant/retreat. At the same time; if you can identify a mentor that might help pursue my N&C comments, I’d greatly appreciate it!
Best to you Anthony
Dan Backman

sinewave
August 24, 2014 7:26 pm

I’ll join the chorus of people thanking Anthony for all his hard work. That fact that he has been actively searching for a way to make this site better on top of everything else he does is really amazing.

dynam01
August 24, 2014 7:27 pm

I like the Expound format, a lot. More functional, and aesthetically pleasing to boot.

August 24, 2014 7:32 pm

Hi Moderator –
Please, I’m responding to a reply to me from Anthony. Can you please read and then accept the post. . . presuming that you see no problem ?
Thanks. . . if I’m overy impatient, my apologies.
Dan

Chris D.
August 24, 2014 7:36 pm

While on the topic of guest authors, I’d like to repeat the request to require all guest authors to provide a brief bio at the bottom of their posts similar to what Bob Tisdale does. This would be a tremendous courtesy to the readership. Thank you, Anthony. This blog is fabulous reading.

Keith
August 24, 2014 7:38 pm

Congratulations on the Success. With success comes hassles. Much like the blessing, may we live in interesting times. Key point, you and regular users are making a difference, the need for changes helps prove the success.

Chip Javert
August 24, 2014 7:45 pm

Anthony & all the elves who support this site:
I heartily echo compliments given in prior postings.
WUWT adds value by maintaining civility and intelligence when dealing with a critical issue that easily generates intense emotions.
The quality of your team’s effort is reflected in the growth of the site. As a frequent visitor, I’m pleased you’re taking the reasonable and necessary actions to maintain the record of success.
[The mods outrank mere elves. “WE” are at least equal to dwarfs. 8<) .mod]

August 24, 2014 7:51 pm

Hi Moderator –
Yes. . . my sincere apologies. . . the comment that I referred to at 7:32 PM has been posted.
Thanks for putting up with me! Let me know what I owe you 🙂
Dan

August 24, 2014 7:58 pm

I am sure you have considered it already, but I would also like to re-suggest the idea of an AWS (Amazon) hosted site with a self hosted wordpress instance. You get global cloud hosting, self managed wordpress install, scale-able servers, and complete control of the ad revenue. You can tune up or down CPU usage, and keep it inside of the ad revenue by design.

Venter
August 24, 2014 8:10 pm

Thanks for your hard work and being a wonderful host, Anthony. Hope you find a good solution to these issues.

Janice
August 24, 2014 8:11 pm

I would be quite willing to pay a small fee, in order to have the privilege of being “white-listed” on this site. I was thinking that $10 per month would be reasonable. I like being able to make an occasional comment, would promise to never post an advertisement, and usually keep my comments both clean and somewhat relevant.

Bill Jamison
August 24, 2014 8:34 pm

Now that I see it I really like it! Very clean and modern look.

Patrick
August 24, 2014 8:36 pm

Yes I see the new format now too. Looks good, well done and keep up the very good work you do.

August 24, 2014 8:58 pm

I like the ‘magazine’ theme, but I wish it weren’t using the light condensed san-serif font (not sure which it is) for body text. To my eye it’s less readable than many others, including the font in the former theme. YMMV, of course. /Mr Lynn

August 24, 2014 9:00 pm

Note: My comments are going to Moderation too, where they didn’t use to. Is it because I’m using a WP identity, like Mark Stoval? /Mr L

eyesonu
August 24, 2014 9:15 pm

For what it’s worth, I would like to see the number of comments on a particular article/post listed on the main page with a “comments” linking directly to the discussion. The new format reguires “opening” the article/post and scrolling to get to comments or to even see if there has been additional comments since last viewing.

Robert in Calgary
August 24, 2014 9:26 pm

First reactions
1 – yes, would love to see the number of comments per post on the main page.
2 – I quickly hit “Ctrl +” to make things larger and easier to read.

August 24, 2014 9:42 pm

I may be in the minority, but I do not prefer the Expound Theme over the 2010 Theme.
The body and comment text is slightly smaller in Expound than in 2010. It is also a change from a serif to a san-serif font. These are important difference for me and my eyes. 2010 is very readable at 150% browser zoom (1920×1080 15inch screen). But Expound is harder for me to read at 150% and I may need to go to 175%.
Expound has too much white space for me, particularly between body text, blockquote, and between comments.
I miss the next and previous article links at the top of the post. You now must scroll to the bottom of the post to find these.
Titles in Expound are several sizes too large.
The menu wraps onto two lines (Widget, WUWT Stuff)
I like the new banner picture, but the old one was good, too.
Some, or all, of the aspects I mention may be tweaked in the CSS.

Neil
August 24, 2014 9:49 pm

For those of us whose eyes are not what they once were, the move from a large, dark coloured font to a small, light coloured one is a step backwards.

August 24, 2014 9:58 pm

I use Internet Explorer (v.11).
I was playing around with the View == Text Size (Largest, Large, Medium, Small, Smallest). None of the settings made any difference I could see. It did not make any difference to the old format that I had on a stale tab either. Apparently the WordPress CSS uses fonts in fixed points or pixels. I think Ems or percent (of system defaut) font sizes is considered better practice by the web design community.

Jeff Alberts
August 24, 2014 10:21 pm

rogerknights says:
August 24, 2014 at 12:18 pm
I hope Pat will be whitelisted! I think most people like his stuff. It rarely distracts or derails.

You forgot your /sarc.

August 24, 2014 10:27 pm

This new format looks nice.

F. Ross
August 24, 2014 10:27 pm

Very nice – your new banner image.
Post text font seems a little smaller than before(?), may have to put on the bifocals.
The overall format is pleasing..
Thanks Anthony and/or wordpress

Richard G
August 24, 2014 10:29 pm

The script in this new format is hard to read.
When I refresh, it takes me to last comment posted instead of first new comment posted.
The comment number for each post on the main page was very useful.
Thank you for this great site and the work you put into it. I used to visit WU daily, until it became a CAGW propagandist playground. I noticed they would constantly dismiss WUWT, so I came here to what all the fuss was about.
I find this site a cornucopia of scientific discussion and a valuable peer review of any consensus that may develop within it.

1 3 4 5 6 7 13