I figured that I should give people a heads-up, rather than just dump changes unannounced like wordpress.com did with their recent beep boop editor bomb.
Two changes – comment filtering and format. Two notes: editing for guest authors and a personal note about the future of WUWT.
1. Comment filtering has become stricter
This change is already in place this week and has been necessitated by the rising amount of spam comments not just at WUWT, but all blogs seem to be getting. Steve McIntyre laments his trouble with recent spam increases here.
WUWT gets about 3 times the amount of spam that Climate Audit does, most of it commercial link-back spam disguised as a comment. I too have seen the increase, and clearing out the spam filter has become quite a chore on some days. As a result, I’ve turned on this setting in my wordpress.com dashboard:
Strict: silently discard the worst and most pervasive spam.
What this means is that occasionally, some legitimate comments that meet this criteria might get thrown out with the bathwater. Some comments that are on the fence may also go to the spam holding que for review.
So, if you make a comment and it immediately disappears, it may go straight to either of these places. But, that doesn’t mean it is lost forever, it may be in the holding queue. Give it some time to see if it is retrieved by a moderator. For overnight, typically 11PM-6AM PDT, some comments may take awhile before they are rescued.
For a few people who have no manners and have been warned and finally banned (for example, Doug Cotton and his variety of shapeshifting sock puppets, and NASA GISS scientist Jan Perlwitz who made a death threat) those comments will straight to the bit bucket. Words with the usual variety of cuss words, profanity, and banned topics, etc. will also go straight to the bit bucket.
If your comment doesn’t fit any of these categories, and you don’t see it rescued within a few hours, it may have been a victim of the new stricter spam policy. I wish this wasn’t the case, but the enormity of the spam increase requires it. There just isn’t enough time in the day as it is and we shouldn’t be wasting it wading through dreck comments to decide which require permanent deletion and which don’t. Due to WUWT being a high traffic blog and in the top 10 of wordpress.com blogs worldwide on a daily basis, it is a prime target for spammers.
Also, some comments may be held for moderation, as we’ve recently added some words to that filter. Some people who have been known to post wildly off-topic, long rants, hateful, or otherwise inappropriate comments will get the inspection of a moderator. Also, first time commenters will be held in moderation, and after the first comment is approved, you are whitelisted.
The vast majority of regular commenters are also whitelisted, but occasionally somebody may trigger moderation. One of the surest ways for your comment to be held is to put a whole bunch of links in it, which mimic commercial spam. Right now we have it set to 4 links as the maximum. If you have a comment that requires more than that, try to break it up into two comments, or just accept that your comment will be held for moderation.
Also, moderator, please step up in removing off topic comments, we have a handful of people who think that “anything goes” when it comes to posting these sorts of comments on threads. Likewise, feel free to snip and warn purveyors of abusive comments.
The WUWT comment policy page is here.
2. New format
One of the biggest problems that WUWT (and many blogs like it) is that given the linear scrolling format, stories often get shuttled to the bottom of the stack pretty quickly, especially on busy news days. This means that some topics die a premature discussion death.
WUWT readers may have noted that I’ve been trying some experiments to keep stories of interest at the top, trying for awhile a “top stories” sticky post for a few weeks. While it helped, the amount of work to keep up with it was large, and some people didn’t like it. Of course in any change, there will be those that don’t like it.
The last major format change I made to the WUWT format was in early 2010, a couple of months after Climategate broke. I found the old Freshy theme we were using then was too narrow, and restrictive (it didn’t support mobile devices well) so I opted for the new (at the time) 2010 theme, which has served us well for over 4 and half years. But, it too is now showing signs of age, especially with so many topics and so much traffic.
After months of trying out new ideas offline, I believe I’ve found a new theme that will solve the problems mentioned above, while still retaining much of the look and feel of WUWT along with being able to keep all posts in a linear scrolling format as we have before.
The new theme is called “Expound” and you can read about it here. WordPress describes it as:
Expound offers a fresh, clean magazine-styled look for any type of blog. With a responsive design that looks great on any device, its support of post formats and featured posts will help your content shine.
Here is what it will look like. I still have not included the header image. This is a scaled version to show what the scrolled areas below the main headlines look like. It will be full width on any browser, and will properly adapt to tablets and phones as well.
The five most recent stories are at the top, you can see other stories directly below by scrolling down.
The only thing that will significantly change is the front page of WUWT and some sidebar elements will be removed that are no longer relevant. Posts themselves will pretty much look the same and commenting will work as before.
One big improvement to this theme is that it will allow bigger images, 720 pixels wide, up from the previous width of 640. We’ll be able to do HD! This is important for graphs with a lot of details and some videos in HD.
Here is a full-on view of the main page before scrolling:
The change will start on Monday morning, August 25th.
The good news is that if it doesn’t work for some reason, it can be changed back.
UPDATES
UPDATE: As you can see by now, the new format is live. Like with any new format, there may be some hiccups or some things that aren’t quite right. I’ve spent the evening doing some font tuning, and I hope the body font for posts is OK now for most people. If not, you can magnify/shrink in your browser using CTRL and + keys simultaneously as well as CTRL and – keys. CTRL and 0 (zero) puts you back at default magnification.
There are a couple of missing elements, such as comment count, and “leave a comment” on main page entries, along with some other small tweaks that will be put back in over the coming days with the CSS editor. BTW, if anyone is a WordPress CSS specialist, and can help me with such tasks, please leave a note in comments – thanks, Anthony
UPDATE2: Some things that I expected to retain got broken, such as the mobile theme, which I believe is fixed now. Some other things that we are used to got broken or removed because the default theme setting didn’t support them.
The good news is that most everything can be fixed with CSS tweaks over the next few days, though I have a bit of a learning curve on these items. Anybody out there a wordpress CSS specialist?
Some things already fixed are:
- Mobile theme
- Header font and body of story font sizes
- Making body font more readable by making it sans serif
- Put back “latest posts” on sidebar since some users still need it
- Background image restored
Things I’m working on:
- Putting back real time stamps
- Putting back comment counts
- Getting comment body fonts and comment name headers sized properly
- Less white space
- About a half dozen other small tweaks
Your patience is appreciated while these things are dealt with. – Anthony
Note: editing for guest authors.
For guest authors who can post on WUWT, to get an image to appear in the top five, you’ll have to select it as a “featured image” (on the lower right sidebar) during editing, otherwise it will appear as text only. Putting a short summary in the first sentence or two is more important now, since that is what readers will see at the top of the main page.
Also, to get around invoking the horrid beep boop editor that wordpress.com refuses to dump, here is a workaround. In the dashboard, simply click on the “Posts” item but NOT on the drop down menu where it says “Add New”:
To edit a post, click on “all posts”, select the post needed to edit, and edit from there.
Personal note:
After this change settles in, I will make the decision as to whether to stick with wordpress.com any longer. They assure me they are trying to polish this beep boop editor turd fix the beep boop editor, but I’m not sure they are going to be successful. They’ve pretty well ignored users concerns in this thread, and then decided to close it.
Closing threads where users are sounding off angrily sounds like the tactics some newspapers and magazines we know that simply choose to ignore overwhelming reader input when it comes to the many climate science faux pas that grace their pages.
Bad move, WordPress. I’m not sure your free hosting is worth the hassle anymore. Many other users feel the same with this “jumped the shark” moment with the “beep boop” editor debacle. Being able to control one’s own destiny has its advantages, and I’m beginning to feel abused by wordpress.com.
BTW, the video ads that appear at the bottoms of posts give the highest payback to WUWT, should you be inclined to watch them.




Anthony,
The new format style looks more professional and is easier to see what the top stories are without scrolling too much. Thanks for your hard work.
Anthony said: “…CSS change to increase the body font size slightly and to make the font fully black instead of the dark gray. Please advise how this looks now to those that said the readability was low.”
Readability is a few things: contrast, font type and size, and spacing. I can give you a few options to consider. I definitely would change it from what’s here now.
Anthony,
While Jan Perlwitz always seemed to come across as somewhat of an arrogant jackoff, I can’t help but noting that the comment you linked to above hardly rises to the level of a “death threat”. It’s your site and I don’t want to be critical. You can do as you please. It is just that for me, it looks a lot like what “zero tolerance” policies get you. As far as I am concerned zero tolerance isn’t much different from intolerance.
Anthony
That darker text is better although it doesn’t show up in the leave a reply box, but the’font size is still small, but I am viewing this on a 7inch tablet
Tonyb
New font is an improvement I like a lot. Anyone know why can’t I make a comment on my phone and how I might fix that?
New font is much better.
A smaller font for commenter name would help when scanning comments. There’s something distracting to the eyes with the larger font in the name/tag. May be the peripheral vision can’t pick it up and the eyes must move and refocus or something like that.
timg56,
You don’t think “I shoot you” is a death threat??
Anyway, Perlwitz has a long and obnoxious history here. He wasn’t made persona non grata just because of one comment.
This comment is via my Android phone. I discovered the comments form is before all comments on my phone bu affter all comments on my PC.
Sent via Android
===========================================================================
This is not a reply to Elmer but just checking if blockquotes,italics and bold still work the same.
======================================================================
I guess so. My typos are even the same!
If I remember correctly, number of comments was going to be added back in later? With this WP format will be possible to display the date and time of the last comment also?
Very few times have I liked changes to a format that I’ve grown accustomed to. Change is bad and all that.
This, however, is an exception. Looks fantastic!
Looks great! 🙂
@ur momisugly John A
“Can I persuade you to start a campaign to get Steve McIntyre to change the theme of ClimateAudit? I mean, that theme is more than seven years old and now looks horribly dated…”
Steve really doesn’t care, for him it’s just an occasional entry a couple times a month. He’s repeatedly mentioned online that he has “energy issues”, so I can’t justify pushing him into something just for the sake of aesthetics.
I like it!
=================================================================
I might be wrong here, but didn’t the old format adjust to the times to the commenter’s local time zone? I made that comment at 5:01 pm EST. Again, I could be wrong.
On my phone the comment form displays PRIOR to all comments. On my PC it displays after all comments. In either case it posts after all other comments.
Anthony Watts
August 25, 2014 at 12:14 pm
…..Please advise how this looks now to those that said the readability was low.
I normally use Opera web browser (because it loads very fast), font has gone ’strange’ ( some letters are normal others bold), italics are difficult to read, see the screen shot link
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/ScSh.gif
This was case since the new format was introduced.
I will use Firefox it is a bit slower, but fonts are still OK.
Not a complaint. Thanks for the effort.
@ur momisugly Jim Reekes
Thanks for the offer. Please check the email you use to comment here.
If I could make a quick note to people submitting articles to punctuate the tag line and the author – when the intro paragraph gets placed below a title, the lack of punctuation makes it hard to separate tag lines, authors and text.
I expect this has been pointed out above, but just in case….
Otherwise, the new fonts take a bit of getting used to, but doesn’t everything? I use Opera mostly so I was finding the italic font more difficult to read, but if it is only in Opera then perhaps it is not a critical issue (not many of us left, I guess Vuk?).
I like the new look. It reflects a website that has grown and ‘matured’, unlike the screaming, fear mongering, climate warmists.! They, by the way, are getting pretty desperate in this time.
well, if nothing else….we finally got the “tips and notes” bin cleaned out
….LOL
Still hoping for a “Like” button for comments – the information presented in the comments section can be as valuable as that presented in the article – it would be nice to be able to express appreciation for it (the sense of humor that is shown much of the time is likewise appreciated 🙂 )
From tonyb on August 25, 2014 at 1:26 pm:
Can you set minimum font size on your browser? If so, then you can make it big enough.
From vukcevic on August 25, 2014 at 2:28 pm:
Can you find in your browser settings where to turn off letting the pages choose their own fonts? Then you can select fonts on your device that should display correctly.
Note to Mozilla Foundation and plug-in developers:
The Next Big Thing in browsers will be individualized site settings for fonts and colors, for different personalized looks between Twitter and Facebook and HuffPo for example.
Now go forth and Code The Future!
CrossBorder
August 25, 2014 at 6:45 am
I like the overall look, but like others I would prefer a slightly larger font.
For all who like a larger font, just press STRG-key, keep pressed and scroll with your mouse wheel.
Almost all browsers support this kind of font scaling.
Another method for FireFox (I only use this):
Open “Options” -> “Content”, there you can define a standard font for overriding the website’s font.
Click on “Extended…” beneath and disable the checkbox for taking over effect for all websites.
Maybe other browsers have a similar setting, but I don’t know.
HTH