(WUWT readers, please excuse this distraction while I holler at WUWT’s hosting provider, wordpress.com. As Willis would say, “my blood is mightily angrified”.)
I have generally been supportive of most wordpress.com upgrades, for example the recent upgrade to allow the top editor bar to float with scrolling is a HUGE time saver.
Unfortunately, the new Beep Beep Boop “upgrade” is a crash-and-burn moment in user interface design.
Top 10 reasons the new WordPress Beep Boop Boob editor is a stunning failure.
1. It turns a process that used to take 1-2 seconds into something that takes several seconds, sometimes as long as 30 seconds. My timing this morning was 17 seconds to get the create a new post dialog. A second attempt took 32 seconds after I cleared the crash dialog (see below).
2. It is visually annoying. It makes me want to scream at the screen while it takes all those extra seconds to load, seen below.
The reason for the “beep beep boop” is that whoever programed it, realized it takes longer, and they needed something to let the end user know the program was doing something. Classic bloatware failure.
3. It makes wordpress.com seem juvenilized.
4. It is inconsistent with the rest of the wp.com user experience. For example, no “beep boop” appears when you try to create a new page.
5. It presents a smaller editor than we used to get, which isn’t fully representative of the CSS settings for width of your theme.
6. It was foisted on us with no warning. And this is the thing I hate the most, many of these “upgrades” just appear overnight. Microsoft learned this lesson of just foisting unwanted upgrades on end users without notice and allows you to opt-out. You should learn this lesson too. New is not always better.
7. It crashes:
8. The “Welcome to an easier way to create on WordPress.com! Missing the old editor? No worries, just switch to classic mode. “ feature doesn’t seem to “stick”.
9. It comes up in text editor mode, more work, more wait to switch to visual editor mode.
10. Whenever I accidentally stumble on it now, I realize my mistake and back out of it, and find the correct link to bring up the real editor. When users actively work to avoid using a new piece of software, because it wastes time, annoys them, and crashes, you know you have a MEGAFAIL on your hands.
Whoever came up with this idea, along with the person who approved implementing it deserves a virtual 2×4 upside the head to knock some sense into them.
For me, it may be the tipping point to abandon wordpress.com and go to a paid service where I at least can control my own user experience by choosing not to install inane upgrades.
UPDATE 8/27/14 :
WordPress seemed oblivious, but I and many others continued to bombard them with emails, posts, phone calls, and anything we could do to tell them how bad this change was.
Today, all of the sudden, things were back to normal, and this appeared above the editor page:
That “new and improved posting experience” aka the “beep boop” editor, is corp-speak for “we took this turkey out back and shot it in the head”.
Two thoughts:
1. Users win. Lesson to WordPress – trust your users.
2. Thank you WordPress for finally seeing the light
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



ATheoK, those were the days. Remember the no-graphics game installed on Wangs? The dungeon one? You can still play it. And it still recognizes when you swear at it for killing you the umpteenth time. Plus the floppies! Big square things that were truly floppies! And punch card chads. Gawd. Spent an entire week going through a 1000 piece stack of my data flicking off chads. And every screen had a burned in main menu you could see even when the thing was turned off. Portland, Oregon was a hotbed for Wang users. We all swore by them even though the server stacks regularly overheated unless the air conditioning units were aimed directly at the row of stacks. Still, I remember those days so fondly.
Actually it wasn’t a dungeon as much as a cave in a forest.
Speaking of old stuff, I sent messages via BBS (bulletin board system). A ubiquitous activity on black computer screens with gold font. And I recall it was all capital case in the beginning. Still, it was very popular among young researchers.
James the Elder says:
August 17, 2014 at 6:13 pm
Can’t you just change your dictionary these days?
I maintain that this is all just a simple spelling error. It is Wordmess.
WUWT says, “6. It was foisted on us with no warning. And this is the thing I hate the most, many of these “upgrades” just appear overnight. Microsoft learned this lesson of just foisting unwanted upgrades on end users without notice and allows you to opt-out. You should learn this lesson too. New is not always better.”
Well at least it makes a good analogy for daft, green, top-down reforms of energy and agriculture. (:
How about booting a PDP8 by flipping switches and pressing enter several times?
Looks to me like the old editor for this comment. Now let’s try some html tags
italic
strike<:no tag>
Now I’ll press the Enter keeryy./$f#
I’m convinced that Windows 8 – and to a lesser extent other software “upgrades” – are the root cause of the Western Economies decline in productivity over the last half decade.
M Courney: Wait till you see the subscription rate for Windows 9 and the fact that it won’t let you log in using a separate password for the microsoft store from your version of windows. All of office is not subscription and does non-stop end-run authentication authorization loops through your e-mail if you try to be productive from a mobile device. Its sickening.
Linux is a very decent salve for Windows-lamentations. If it’s not a perfect cure, it’s major fun – even after years of familiarity. In my Ubuntu library (Debian), there are emulators for all the pioneer systems mentioned here, and many more. (Zenith Z-150 (alas, not in Debian) was mine … a Mil-Surp castoff not even classy enough for the S-100 bus … but it was a dual-CPU, with Assembler, Disassembler, MS-DOS 2 for the 8088 and CPM for the 8085. It gave me a WAY better start than folks get today.)
To counteract the adversities of Social ‘potato-chip’ Media is much easier than mitigating MS-hegemony. No need to run the WordPress gauntlet, or climb the Drupal Matterhorn. There are many drastically-simpler, stable, mature CMS, blog-script and wikis that will do right by your content, export & migrate to your next step, and come for a vanishing sliver of the (often misplaced) intellectual outlay of WordPress & Co.
The root problem with WordPress & Matt Mullenweg these days is that they have their best attention fixed on Drupal & Dries Buytaert (and on Facebook & Twitter) – on their competition with them … and not on you & me.
More real websites owned by real people is the real cure for what’s wrong on the Internet today.
I had to have Windows 8 deleted from a new computer (to replace my literally defunct old one) after having a nightmare time trying to write a conference paper using my preferred Word Perfect. I lost vital days worth of time trying to master Windows 8, then realizing it was a lost cause because of incompatibility. My blood pressure went through the roof.
Our IT team doggedly continued to replace old computers with new ones with Windows 8, and my colleagues almost to a man returned them for reinstallation of Windows 7. There are a few, however, who feel the need to master the latest thing, and then spend the ensuing months complaining about how difficult things have become.
garymount says:
August 17, 2014 at 2:54 pm
Good news for Windows 8 haters, you’ll be able to try out Windows 9 next month or so : http://winsupersite.com/windows/coming-soon-threshold-public-preview
__
That’s cold. I guess the x8086 lineage had to eventually snuff it, but I would have had it put down rather than sadistically torture the user base like that.
Praise be to heaven for Classic Shell for Windows 8. I don’t use a single Windows 8-mode app. I’m also thankful we still have Windows 7 available.
I’m adding a reminder to send a donation for Classic Shell.
Pamela: The only part I remember fondly was how revered I was as an IT wizard. The Wangs were easy to run. I did cheat though. I’ve used ‘patchit’ a hexadecimal program for ‘correcting’ mistakes on the disk without intervening software, much like Norton’s original NU.
Adventur, (that non graphics game), was kinda fun for slow weekends; though I deleted it when my employees were devoting improper attention to it. IBM’s version is entering a sewer, but almost identical otherwise. It was fun just to throw curses or crazy solutions just to see the responses. That was around the same time we’d type in names or phrases into MS Word to see the ‘suggested correction’; definitely not politically correct suggestions.
IBM’s version was known as ‘advent’ and you can often still find it on mainframes. My understanding is that the original was written on a DEC machine which was popular at many colleges. I first learned antique COBOL on a DEC and punch cards. Later I took FORTRAN on a client to some distant IBM mainframe where we had to
a) write our programs
b) type the programs onto punch cards (that were punched, but not lettered)
c) then if you were wise, run the cards through a card reader to have the program punched lettered in to make them readable.
And it was the proverbial submit the job, come back tomorrow and receive the output along with account metrics for how much of my allotted CPU time was used.
Yeah, terminal 0 always had letters burned in as we always kept that one on all day to watch for messages (machine ones).
I forget how much those dang floppys cost; everything Wang was bloody expensive. I replaced all of the Wang terminals, (except terminal 0 of course) with IBM PCs running emulation software and easily based the ROI justification on paying reduced maintenance fees.
Our 288mb removable drives were something like $35K for the whole machine and $55K if we bought two.
I spent a weekend making a bootable 65mb removable drive for the system. Wangs had a bad habit of multiplying bad drives. When a drive went bad it was a mistake to just pop in a good drive as the drive box would immediately destroy the good removable. It was far cheaper to boot up on the 65mb and find out what was wrong first, clear buffers then install a good 288.
DEC, CP/M, Wang, IBM TSO/CMS, IBM PCs (original two box 8088 with one box holding the add on 10mb hard drive), Compaq clam shell portable, Osborne, Tandy, … It’s a very long list and I considered virtually all of it wonderful fun.
Even today I dabble and try t keep an eye on tech news. When the software beta teams have a lot of very angry beta testers (Win 8) it’s a good possibility that ordinary users will hate it even more upon release.
Apparently the whole Win 8 concept was rammed through by ‘executives’ and ‘marketing’ concept groups that firmly believed people would learn to cope. What the ‘executives’ ignore is that many people actually use the machines for very serious work, not play. Most of the Win 8 design centers on ‘social’ designs ignoring serious work. The MS ‘help’ forums are full of listed problems, most of which receive lip service, including the dreaded and utterly useless ‘reformat and reinstall’ suggestions or are ignored altogether. It seems very few help desk types are willing to tell certain executives just how dumb their approach is.
Excel is such fun under Win 8, (NOT!). Having a touch screen is just a tad easier than always using a mouse; but a mouse is required.
Microsoft was never any good at ‘first’ attempts at anything. Their second attempts were often just usable and it wouldn’t be until their third or later attempts that the software would be ‘good’. Shame they broke that approach with their operating system debacles.
This cleverness is a metaphor for climate science. Worpdress bebop, Windows 8, Ubuntu 12.10, all bad ideas, and horrible implementations, but … everybody’s doing it.
The consensus can’t ever be wrong, right?
One of several reasons why I don’t use Ubuntu any more, despite it’s huge repositories. 10 years ago, my pentium 600 mhz used to work great. Why is my 3.4 ghz so much slower these days? Any more ‘improvement’, and we’ll be back to using DOS.
I agree with you 100% on this – I run three blogs (one moderately active, two minor ones) and I hit switch to classic editor as soon as I can, every post.
I may have once used this new b-b-b-editor, but not twice. I use Dashbord-Posts-Add new. What is annoying to me is that new features jump on my face without that I have made any choice.
We don’t live in perfect world yet. To me WordPress.com is still good choice after all.
The place where it’s really inconvenient is when you want to correct or change something in a published post, clicking “edit” automatically opens that stupid editor. So to do anything in a published post, you have to backtrack to the list of posts, then edit it from there. SO annoying.
more soylent green! says:
August 18, 2014 at 8:14 am
“Praise be to heaven for Classic Shell …”
__
Amen! The first thing do is enable classic then force Windows explorer to work like an actual file manager, as it did 20 years ago in 16 bit Windows 3.1. The last thing I want is for an operating system to hold my hand or try to save me from myself.
I still pine for thee my XTree Gold v3, I’ve not forgotten thy functionality and the digital mischief we shared.
My old PC died a few weeks ago. I came with Windows Media Center Edition. I had to get a new one in a hurry for reasons I won’t get into. Fortunately I was able to find one off the shelf running Windows 7 Pro and not Windows 8. Unfortunately, I can’t get it to run my two favorite old games. (Some people mess around with solitaire. I messed around with these. Not often, once or twice every few months, but I found them to be a pleasant diversion.) One was a 25 year old DOS shareware game called Seabattle. (Not to be confused with a latter commercial game of the same name.) The other was a SSI Windows 95 game called Pacific General.
For some of us all these improvements are “one step forward, two steps back”. 😎
Ubuntu runs faster in less memory, if it’s not trying to be sexy enough to give you ideas. And in Linux, it’s straightforward & normal to dispense with the Seven Veils and 3D-shimmy.
Getting rid of the Unity UI is a good start, in Ubuntu. These days, it’s typical to start with “XFCE”, as the replacement environment. As a tool, it’s better than its unmnemonic, unpronounceable name.
I like the educational applications initiative in KDE. They’re no longer new-release but that’s not a problem in Linux. This ‘battleship’ GUI is also famous for its exceptional functional detail, athletic figure, and comely smile.
But there’s an awful subversion at the heart of recent KDE. It wants to index & cross-reference everything on your machine, presumably to make things easier for Ed Snowden’s former associates. And it adds insult to injury, by sucking up all the CPU cycles in the Universe.
The key words in KDE-sin are Akonadi and Nepomuk. At least they’re proper words (and eminently searchable).
Ubuntu on my old 2001 1.25 MHz (2-gig) box is almost like floppy-booting MS-DOS 5.0 onto the hot new 486 Windows machine. Then watching DOS-dogs go Mad Max. Of course, Linux has deep history, resuscitating & hot-rodding archaic hardware.
A 2 x 4 is only 1 5/8″ x 3 1/2″ and green fwiw. Anthony, you’ll need well-dried and close-grained timber.
Anthony, have you tried summoning your blog by typing
http://xxxx.wordpress.com/wp-login.php?action=auth&redirect_to=http://xxxx.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post-new.php
into your browser’s search bar?
When I use this, it takes me directly to the ‘old’ editor page. I guess you’d substitute xxxx.wordpress.com for http://wattsupwiththat.com
I find Firefox is better with WordPress than Internet Exploder. In fact I jettisoned Windows for Zorin and haven’t stopping smiling since.
http://zorin-os.com/tour.html
a Linux distribution that ‘looks and feels’ like Windows, with none of the grief… and it’s free!
I followed the Zorin Linux link, http://zorin-os.com/tour.html, provided above by Francis Grose. It is definitely an impressive run-down; hits all the high points … and better yet has the right attitude and none of the wrong attitudes. This from a long-time Linux fan/student, and solid Ubuntu-user … who laments the nasty personality disorders that traditionally afflict(ed) the scene (to which, credit where due, Ubuntu & Mark Shuttleworth first delivered the ultimately mortal blow).
Zorin does have “Premium” versions, for sale, while the “core” distro is free. They do invite folks to pay like €9.99 for a specially-decorated super-duper copy, or for one specially-enhanced for those intending to perform business operations. Mainly though, I think their premium packages offer access to their responsive “support”. With Linux distros, this is common & legit business – and a rather good deal.
You do generally have to watch out for/peer closely at ‘free’ software projects that offer premium versions, or that ‘sell the book’, since sometimes ‘free’ versions are flawed, intentionally to herd people to a cash-product. Jus’ sayin’ … no issues evident here – nor typically with Linux OS projects.
Ok … so what does the Linux community itself think of it? Nice surprise here; I had become a comfortable Ubuntu-user, and therefore didn’t haunt the Linux-distro scene like I used to. On the leading Linux site DistroWatch, http://distrowatch.com/, Zorin is currently pegged at #9 (out of (the top) 100). That is a very high rating. Several of the top distros are actually versions of the same thing (Debian – Ubuntu – Mint), others have large established cultural, commercial or institutional bases. To be at #9 means Zorin is breathing down the neck of the very best & most-popular. ‘whoa’.
Zorin provides access to the now-legendary Debian software repository. This is nowadays a virtual prerequisite of any ‘serious’ new Linux. Recently, the repository-count has been approaching 40,000 titles. Every one of them tested, vetted and proven. Several thousand leading OSS enthusiasts actively maintain the Debian project. It is “major cred”, to be a Debian contributor.
The Debian repository is so important and so central to Linux, that these days if a software title is NOT in Debian, there must be a very good reason. Otherwise, it will usually mean that there is something not-right, and you should stay far, far away from what is probably pariah-ware (or worse).
The rise of the Debian repository – that you can surf a vast software library and safely/easily install items at will – has highlighted a traditional weakness of Linux: It lacks a ‘good’ Start Menu system, like in Windows. “Wut?!” It’s crazy, stupid, really. Very aggravating & frustrating, for a person who wants to study & compare large numbers of software programs. The Menu is basically clunky crap; relatively nice versions (KDE) are well-done ‘kludges’ (don’t look ‘behind the curtain’ – omg!).
I will be test-driving Zorin this week – focusing on their Menu-facility. Ubuntu has been veering in directions that differ from my interests & objectives, and Zorin might be a better option than the usual ‘Ubuntu-replacements’ (which is a popular & well-defined category these days).
Thanks to Francis Grose!
Well, there was finally pushback on that. (Now he’ll only be able to disrupt the Clippers.)