OCO: I can see your house emitting CO2 from here

From NASA JPL and the department of future CO2 emissions ticketing:

OCO-2 Data to Lead Scientists Forward into the Past

NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2, which launched on July 2, will soon be providing about 100,000 high-quality measurements each day of carbon dioxide concentrations from around the globe. Atmospheric scientists are excited about that. But to understand the processes that control the amount of the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, they need to know more than just where carbon dioxide is now. They need to know where it has been. It takes more than great data to figure that out. 

“In a sense, you’re trying to go backward in time and space,” said David Baker, a scientist at Colorado State University in Fort Collins. “You’re reversing the flow of the winds to determine when and where the input of carbon at the Earth’s surface had to be to give you the measurements you see now.”

Harry Potter used a magical time turner to travel to the past. Atmospheric scientists use a type of computer model called a chemical transport model. It combines the atmospheric processes found in a climate model with additional information on important chemical compounds, including their reactions, their sources on Earth’s surface and the processes that remove them from the air, known as sinks.

Baker used the example of a forest fire to explain how a chemical transport model works. “Where the fire is, at that point in time, you get a pulse of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from the burning carbon in wood. The model’s winds blow it along, and mixing processes dilute it through the atmosphere. It gradually gets mixed into a wider and wider plume that eventually gets blown around the world.”

Some models can be run backward in time — from a point in the plume back to the fire, in other words — to search for the sources of airborne carbon dioxide. The reactions and processes that must be modeled are so complex that researchers often cycle their chemical transport models backward and forward through the same time period dozens of times, adjusting the model as each set of results reveals new clues. “You basically start crawling toward a solution,” Baker said. “You may not be crawling straight toward the best answer, but you course-correct along the way.”

Lesley Ott, a climate modeler at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, noted that simulating carbon dioxide’s atmospheric transport correctly is a prerequisite for improving the way global climate models simulate the carbon cycle and how it will change with our changing climate. “If you get the transport piece right, then you can understand the piece about sources and sinks,” she said. “More and better-quality data from OCO-2 are going to create better characterization of global carbon.”

Baker noted that the volume of data provided by OCO-2 will improve knowledge of carbon processes on a finer scale than is currently possible. “With all that coverage, we’ll be able to resolve what’s going on at the regional scale,” Baker said, referring to areas the size of Texas or France. “That will help us understand better how the forests and oceans take up carbon. There are various competing processes, and right now we’re not sure which ones are most important.”

Ott pointed out that improving the way global climate models represent carbon dioxide provides benefits far beyond the scientific research community. “Trying to figure out what national and international responses to climate change should be is really hard,” she said. “Politicians need answers quickly. Right now we have to trust a very small number of carbon dioxide observations. We’re going to have a lot better coverage because so much more data is coming, and we may be able to see in better detail features of the carbon cycle that were missed before.” Taking those OCO-2 data backward in time may be the next step forward on the road to understanding and adapting to climate change.

To learn more about the OCO-2 mission, visit these websites:

http://www.nasa.gov/oco2

http://oco.jpl.nasa.gov

NASA monitors Earth’s vital signs from land, air and space with a fleet of satellites and ambitious airborne and ground-based observation campaigns. NASA develops new ways to observe and study Earth’s interconnected natural systems with long-term data records and computer analysis tools to better see how our planet is changing. The agency shares this unique knowledge with the global community and works with institutions in the United States and around the world that contribute to understanding and protecting our home planet.

For more information about NASA’s Earth science activities in 2014, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/earthrightnow

OCO-2 is managed by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

60 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 23, 2014 11:59 am

more soylent green! says:
July 23, 2014 at 10:44 am
I wonder if we could surveil the official CO2 measurement sites (http://co2now.org/Know-CO2/CO2-Monitoring/co2-measuring-stations.html) and the surrounding areas and determine how well-mixed CO2 really is in those areas.
Quite good, as the raw measurements show.
The hourly averaged raw data from 4 stations could be downloaded from NOAA, but the location recently changed.
Anyway here a plot of the raw data at Mauna Loa and the South Pole for 2008, together with the “selected” daily and monthly averages:
http://www.ferdinand-engelbeen.be/klimaat/klim_img/co2_mlo_spo_raw_select_2008.jpg
The outliers caused by volcanic vents and upwind conditions from the valleys (Mauna Loa) or mechanical problems (South Pole) are not used for averages.

July 23, 2014 1:06 pm


JohnWho says:
July 23, 2014 at 6:04 am
I agree, especially if they provide the “un-fooled around with” data.
Phil. says:
July 23, 2014 at 8:19 am
Well the “un-fooled around with” data is the absorption spectral bands at 0.76, 1.61 and 2.06 microns, would you know what to do with that data if they gave it to you?

Yes.
Provide it to people who do.
“Adjusted” data, when the adjustments aren’t fully revealed, often appears suspect, does it not?

Duster
July 23, 2014 2:58 pm

Crispin in Waterloo says:
July 23, 2014 at 4:45 am
. . .
Conclusion: CO2 is not well mixed in major urban areas.

Cool, that implies an “Urban Carbon Island” effect. Anthony’s next project.

catweazle666
July 23, 2014 5:09 pm

Ah, more computer games…
YAWN

Chuck Bradley
July 23, 2014 6:28 pm

I don’t understand all the doubt expressed in the comments. This is just the everyday egg unscrambling operation.

David Walton
July 23, 2014 6:40 pm

What, they didn’t include any methane detection diagnostics?

Down to Earth
July 23, 2014 9:49 pm

I invite criticism to this statement : “The OCO-2 readings will be flawed because of air traffic exhaust emissions.”
After the Malaysian jet disaster a air traffic pattern map was shown on TV. It showed heavy traffic around Ukraine(lots of concentrated jet exhaust), and a big open air space over Ukraine(no flights at all). Seems this would skew the CO2 emissions of the surrounding area vs. Ukraine. So by extension, it seems CO2 readings could be skewed by traffic patterns around the world. Comments or thoughts ?

Claude Harvey
July 23, 2014 9:53 pm

Re: Ric Werme says:
July 23, 2014 at 5:44 am
Claude Harvey says:
July 23, 2014 at 5:13 am
> With Goddard Space Flight Center doing the calculating, the answers are preordained.
“Please explain…”
I apologize for tarring other NASA agencies with the GISS brush. I should have said “With the Goddard Institute of Space Studies doing the calculating….”
CH

July 24, 2014 2:32 am

What will hourly monitoring help better understand phenomena that take centuries to evolve in a significant way as eg. liite ice age or medieval warming ?

Samuel C Cogar
July 25, 2014 4:25 am

Claude Harvey says:
July 23, 2014 at 9:53 pm
With Goddard Space Flight Center doing the calculating, the answers are preordained.
—————–
Averages are like row boats.
They rise and fall relative to the tidal forcing by the “ebb & flow” of either the newly recorded temperatures or “adjustments” to the historical temperature records.