UPDATE: at ~ 11:14AM local time in Australia, it was repealed!
From ABC: Legislation to scrap the carbon tax has passed the Federal Parliament in a major win for the Abbott Government.
After a lengthy debate, the Senate voted to get rid of the price on carbon, with 39 senators voting for and 32 voting against.
This was the Government’s third attempt to scrap the tax since the election – the first two were rejected by the Senate.
The Australian reports:
THE carbon tax has been repealed, fulfilling Tony Abbott’s “pledge in blood” to abolish the landmark Gillard government scheme.
The Senate passed the government’s amended carbon tax repeal bills by a margin of 39 votes to 32 at 11.14am, with only the Labor Party and the Greens opposing their passage into law.
It was the Senate’s third attempt to pass the repeal legislation.
The vote was held as Bill Shorten gave a clear pledge to take a new carbon pricing mechanism to the next federal election, due in 2016, in the form of an emissions trading scheme.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/carbon-tax-repealed-by-senate-at-the-third-attempt/story-e6frg6xf-1226991963431
================================================================
An ill-fated foray that never made much sense
Guest opinion by Phillip Hutchings
With perhaps a few more grandstanding shenanigans in our Federal Senate this week, Australia’s two-year experiment with a Carbon Tax will soon end. Legislation to kill the tax, which was brought in by the left-leaning Labor-Greens coalition in mid-2012, is now being finalised by our one year-old conservative Government.
That carbon tax has cost three prime ministerships, confused the voting population, and achieved pretty much nothing. Other market dynamics have been far more important in changing Australia’s greenhouse emissions, yet it’s politically insensitive to mention them.
The sanctimoniousness of such a tax in Australia is breathtaking. We are an energy heavy-weight, the world’s largest exporter of coal. Soon we will also be the world’s largest exporter of liquefied natural gas. At the same time as our Labor prime ministers were being successively culled by infighting over the carbon tax, the world’s biggest oil & gas companies were directing more than two-thirds of global investment in LNG production into Australia, the biggest investment boom ever in this country.
We are an economy built on the world’s hunger for fossil fuels. Yet with our gas and coal sources being either offshore or in remote locations, these vital export industries are mostly hidden from Australian voters.
The carbon tax itself was a lightweight. The theory underlying a carbon tax is to provide a long term price signal to drive a change in the industrial and consumer behaviour. On this score, the Australian tax was doomed to failure. After all, politically it had to appeal to the latte-sipping lefties, but without affecting their wallets.
The outcome – a watered-down policy that was all noise and no effect.
To minimise the economic fall-out, the Labor-Green Government limited the carbon tax to large industrial emitters (more than 25,000 CO2e/yr). Road transport and agriculture was exempt. Put together, that meant only about 185 companies in Australia’s US$ 1.5 trillion economy had to comply. And even those few were only lightly touched.
Industries which are “trade exposed” such as cement or aluminium smelting were mostly excused. They got either 66% or 94.5% of their carbon cost covered by the award of free units.
Just over one-third of Australia’s carbon emissions come from coal-fired electricity generators. And the dirtiest electricity comes from the aging brown-coal plants in Victoria – with almost double the emissions of modern gas-fired plants. Yet being located in a Labor-voting union heartland, they too got off lightly with the first half of their emissions effectively carbon- tax free. Nice.
None of which gave much incentive at all for carbon reduction. It’s hard to see any evidence at all of industries making long term investments in lower carbon-emitting factories or generating plants.
The domestic airlines got slugged with an extra 6 c/litre fuel excise, surely as crude a carbon tax as you can get. How was that supposed to reduce emissions? Yep, sure, aircraft fleets get renewed over time, and you bet, fuel efficiency is a factor when selecting alternative aircraft. But a surcharge on fuel itself was not going to change Qantas’ emissions.
So as a policy instrument, Australia’s carbon tax was never going to change emissions itself. It was a neutered program, raising Government revenue but not effective in changing behaviour.

Source – Quarterly Update of Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: December 2013 Australia’s National Greenhouse Account
Yet, Australia’s greenhouse emissions have been declining for almost eight years. After decades of steady increase, that pause in carbon emissions since 2007 is striking. And it started six years before the carbon tax was implemented. It’s pretty easy to find the main reason for that – a steady fall in national electricity consumption. Latest figures show that Australia’s electricity use is at the lowest level since 2006. And with three-quarters of Australia’s electricity coming from carbon-intensive coal-fired sources, the fall in electricity use has led directly to a pause in carbon emissions.
But what caused Australian consumers to wind back their power use over the past eight years? Simple price elasticity, that’s what. There’s been huge investment in the network, the poles and wires to deliver (as opposed to generate) electricity. In most states, that led to a doubling of retail electricity prices. And yes, consumers did respond to that price signal, changing from electrical profligacy to parsimony. Nothing to do with the carbon tax, it was the regulated electricity supply industry recouping their capital investment.
What did we learn from this? The theory behind a carbon tax works fine – provide a price signal, and the consumer responds. It’s just that in this case, it was nothing to do with the carbon tax and all to do with regulated utilities doubling power prices as they caught up on network investment.
Here’s another little perverse change. Some years ago, I helped a fledgling gas producer negotiate a long term gas sales contract for electricity generation. The customer was a state Government-owned electricity generator, then setting up a new flagship and clean gas-fired generation plant. That helped shift the state’s generation sources ten years ago away from dirty coal, and into cleaner gas.
Yet earlier this year, that generator announced the closure of its gas generation in favour of dirtier coal generation. The reason? With three large export LNG plants now being commissioned for export, that gas is worth more for sale to China than for powering my fridge. In effect, a state Government snubbed its nose at the intent, let alone the price signal, from the Federal carbon tax.
So as a policy instrument, Australia’s carbon tax has been a failure. It never could have worked. And politically, it’s been a graveyard. Let’s hope politicians and bureaucrats from more enlightened jurisdictions study it and learn.
Australia’s carbon tax – no wonder it’s about to be buried.
===============================================================
17 July: ABC: Emma Griffiths: Live blog: Senate looks set to push through carbon tax repeal
Tony Abbott’s promise to “axe the tax” looks set to be fulfilled by the Senate in the next few hours…
Follow ABC News Online’s live blog for updates and commentary as they happen…
10.19: Simon Cullen: Earlier this morning, the Senate voted down a Labor amendment which would’ve converted the carbon tax to a floating carbon price…
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Reuters corrects a ranking, but not in the sub-heading! Lowy needs to withdraw the ridiculous poll, which no-one believed:
17 July: Reuters: Matt Siegel: CORRECTED-UPDATE 2-Australian parliament repeals carbon tax, emissions trading scheme
(Corrects ranking in paragraph two)
Australia axes world’s second biggest ETS before it starts
Embattled PM Abbott picks up a big political victory
Australia is one of the world’s biggest carbon emitters on a per capita basis and abandoning plans for the world’s third largest emissions trading scheme (ETS) after Europe and Guangdong, set to begin from 2015, is a major setback for global CO2 trading…
(LOL) Scrapping the carbon tax will be seized on by Abbott as a major political victory, at a time when support for his government has slumped following an unpopular budget in May, but the cost may be high.
Last month the Lowy Institute released a poll showing that concern about climate change amongst Australians was up nine points since 2012 and that 45 percent of adults think measures should be taken to prevent it “even if this involves significant costs”…
http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL4N0PS0D420140717
Meanwhile, the revenue neutral carbon tax in British Columbia continues to be a success:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/the-insidious-truth-about-bcs-carbon-tax-it-works/article19512237/
Mother Nature joins the sceptics’ party:
17 July: Bendigo Advertiser: Snow falls on central Victoria: Pictures, video
Snow could fall as low as 600 metres, possibly settling on the Dandenong and Macedon Ranges, Bureau of Meteorology senior forecaster Chris Godfred told The Age…
http://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/story/2423941/snow-falls-on-central-victoria-pictures-video/?cs=3372
17 July: Herald Sun: Snow falls on Yarra Ranges as wintry blast blankets Melbourne
And a winter wonderland was created at Savoia Restaurant Mont de Lancey in Wandin North, when heavy hail settled on the ground creating a picturesque sight this afternoon…
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/east/snow-falls-on-yarra-ranges-as-wintry-blast-blankets-melbourne/story-fngnvlxu-1226992403038?nk=dc1ff7aa21a6e8cdaa0169c797ca37aa
Lots of lefty teeth-gnashing over at the UK Guardian. Do they not like that.
A sure sign that common sense has prevailed. Well done Oz. When will our lot start to see some climate sense?
A million extra climate related deaths a week for 90 years? 4.7 billion extra deaths, *really* ???!!!
Who’s in charge of making this stuff up…
Australia, leading the world back to climate sanity!
(4 pages)17 July: Reuters: REFILE-Global carbon market hopes fade as Australia dumps CO2 trading
By Naomi Tajitsu and Nina Chestney
The goal of a global carbon market to tackle climate change, once touted to reach $2 trillion by 2020, received a major setback when Australia on Thursday scrapped its planned carbon trading scheme, which would have been the world’s third biggest…
“There’s a realisation that linking … is not going to happen within the 2020 timeframe,” said Andrei Marcu, head of the Carbon Market Forum at the Centre for European Studies in Brussels, referring to when a new global treaty on emissions reduction is expected to begin.
Another looming setback to connecting markets and eventually setting a global price on polluting carbon is the possibility that New Zealand’s ETS, small but one of the first to be established, will be scrapped after a September election…
Currently there is no universal carbon price, each ETS operates under different rules and sets individual prices, ranging from around 20 U.S. cents to $45 a tonne, yet a tonne of polluting carbon in each country is the same…
“Linking the Australian to the European ETS could have been a catalyst for linking systems together,” said Ingvild Sorhus, an Oslo-based senior analyst at Point Carbon, which is owned by Thomson Reuters. “The repeal of the Australian scheme has to be considered as being one step backwards in this regard.”…
“A new global (climate) agreement is highly unlikely to be reached any year in the future. I’d rather see more room for national or regional mechanisms spreading all around in the short-term,” said Matteo Mazzoni, carbon analyst at Italy’s Nomisma Energia…
Last month, China launched the seventh and final regional pilot carbon market, but plans to set up a national trading scheme remain fraught with uncertainty…
http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL4N0PK2I720140717
the major problem in Australia we now have a senate formed by a unruly bunch of people if they had two brains one would be lonely
Phillip, economic slowdown must also have had an effect on emissions, particularly low metal prices and the general softening of Chinese demand.
Great move Australia, kinda makes Obama look like a community organizer.
Abbott, and the left leaning MSM, have created such a state of fear (Budget “cuts”) that Abbott (If he is not ousted before and replaced by Turnbull) and the LNP will lose the next federal election. ALP and the Greens will win and Australia will have an ETS. What is needed is a direct rejection of the New Zealand ETS, elections soon (A possibility). And Obama to lose his administration in the next election in the US before c(r)ap and trade.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
I’m glad somebody gets it right.
Great stuff!
That should upset a few Watermelons.
There will be one million deaths per week for the next 90 years if it gets to 4 degrees.
============
then explain why people that live in the tropics are not dropping like flies. it is already 4 degrees hotter there than at the poles, and it the poles, not the equator that is predicted to warm up.
Meanwhile, the revenue neutral carbon tax in British Columbia continues to be a success:
==========
When BC’s tax was introduced it was nothing more than a scheme to take taxpayer money and funnel it to friends of the government. It took a HUGE amount of public effort, including a scathing report by BC’s Auditor General for the government to clean up its act. Along the way, Gordon Campbell, BC’s then Premier that introduced the tax, got booted out on his ass.
For this is really what the carbon tax is all about. Cleaning up government. BC already has a world class physical environment. It is the political environment that is polluted.
Meanwhile, the revenue neutral carbon tax in British Columbia continues to be a success:
==========
From 2008 through to 2011 (latest data), 8 provinces in Canada saw an increase in real, inflation-adjusted, wages and total income. Only two provinces saw decreases, Ontario and B.C.
Source: Statistics Canada CANSIM table 202-0407
The carbon tax in BC has certainly reduced gasoline sales in BC. The naive person will see this as success. But it ignores reality.
About 1/2 of the population of BC lives within 30 miles of the US border. It is a simple matter to cross over the border, fill your tank, and do your weekly grocery shopping. The prices in Washington State are much lower than in BC, so the trip quickly pays for itself.
As such, the true beneficiary of BC’s tax policy is the US. Which explains why US backers pour so much money into BC politics. Helping elect BC politicians that follow California’s disastrous policies.
First we got California Stucco, and as a result BC’s leaky condo scandal, with homeowners on the hook for billions in repairs. Now we are on the bleeding edge of California’s wacko environmental policies, with Vancouver BC transformed into 24×7 traffic gridlock to satisfy the environmental lobby.
Senator Boehner, take note of the following if you end up as the Senate Majority Leader in 2015: Australia was able to ashcan the carbon tax by a vote of 39-32. That’s 71 votes total. 39/71=55%.
If the Senate retains it’s insane 60% filibuster rule, you will be unable to effect the sort of change required to follow in Australia’s footsteps. The current occupant of the office understood that when he dropped the rule to enable him to approve President Obama’s appointments. Hopefully, you will learn from his example and drop it altogether.
@Rod Everson – Boehner is the house – Speaker of the House.
Senator McConnell is the minority leader in the senate.
So much for the 97 percent settled science consensus and its carbon tax policy.
Please inform the left-wing, progressives who support high taxes such as the “carbon tax” that they CAN, in fact, arrange to pay **as much as they want** to the government for global warming and anything else…
(Let’s see how many of them actually voluntarily pay for such as tax on their own…)
The money shell game just got busted.
Since the Greens and Labor senators are making lists of enemy names, where do plan to build the internment camps?
Hmmm… I thought our self flagellation, here in the U.S., was supposed to result in the rest of the world getting in-line to punish themselves. This whole Global Warming, Climate Change, or whatever we are calling it these days, just isn’t working.
Leo Geiger says:
July 17, 2014 at 3:25 am
Citing a bunch of lefties writing in The Globe&Mail is hardly persuasive.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/15/why-revenue-neutral-isnt-and-other-costs-of-the-bc-tax/
Well, this is great news – how can we get this Tony guy to run for Governor in California?
It confuses me that coal is regarded as “dirty” on the basis of its CO2 emissions when pretty much everyone on this side of the fence thinks human CO2 emissions have a trivial effect on the environment. When we use the language of the enemy (and they ARE the enemy, of all humanity) then we’ve already lost half the battle. Coal is not dirty and gas is not clean. They are simply fuels to be burnt.