Quotes of the Week: Some early comments on the National Climate Assesment report

I had to laugh at this one, because well, it is soooo typical of Joe Romm and the Center for American Progress, which subsists on a daily diet of gloom and doom:

NCA_wreaking_havoc

Countering that, Dr. Roy Spencer has what I think is the best take on it: 

The report is gripping the nation like a global warming polar vortex trapped in place by the swirling toxic vapors emitted by a swarm of possessed SUVs.

The report contains claims of U.S. floods, droughts, severe weather, and heat waves, all of which are not unprecedented compared to centuries past, but are nevertheless known to be the fault of humans.

Ronald Wobbles, the report’s lead author, was quoted as saying (I am not making this up), “We’re already seeing extreme weather and it’s happening now”. This finding stands in stark contrast to 100 years ago, when ‘we saw extreme weather that was happening then’.

More here: Climate Change Mass Hysteria Grips the U.S.

Founder of the Weather Channel, John Coleman says:

So today to launch his new campaign the President has invited a group of television Meteorologist to the White House to interview him on the topic.  The barrage of publicity will be deafening.  I deeply regret that the global warming/climate change thing has become a partisan political issue.  Al Gore made global warming a Platform issue for the Democrat Party and it is now accepted without serious study or scientific consideration by a vast majority of liberals in this country.  And, as politics goes, the Republican Party denies global warming because it is a key issue of the other party without even studying the science.

There are thousands and thousands of scientists who know without a doubt that the entire matter is based on bad science. We fight with everything we have to inform the public of the truth, but the dominate liberal media shuns us and the global warming team calls us names and insults us.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

60 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shawn
May 6, 2014 8:56 am

The intensity of the rhetoric of the warmist cult seems to be ramping up! The more the theory of global warming seems to fall apart,the louder the screams get. There is a lot of money riding on the “green economy”, those involved are petrified they will lose their meal ticket.

pottereaton
May 6, 2014 8:58 am

From the WP article:
“By the end of the century, temperatures could be up to 5 degrees higher if the nation acts aggressively to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from industry, or up to 10 degrees if emissions are high.”
The taxpayer is now funding climatastrology. I predict we will soon be experiencing the “Jeane Dixon effect”, which refers to a tendency to promote a few correct predictions while ignoring a larger number of incorrect predictions.

May 6, 2014 9:00 am

During the draft phase of this report, I sent in comments, mostly related to the section on hurricanes. I pointed out the graph of Atlantic hurricane numbers from the nadir of the early 1970s to present was misleading. The graph is still there, now with a ‘helpful’ trend line which doesn’t account for a recent downturn in hurricane numbers. At least they have a second graph showing
the downward trend in East Pacific hurricanes, but don’t bother to mention any reason for this in the text.
I’m so glad I bothered. /sarc

May 6, 2014 9:00 am

I have never seen the leadership of the United States so completely and thoroughly self destructive. The coverage from the MSM is nothing short of breathless panic.
There was a poll a while back about forming a lobby group. I voted no because I think the opportunity for it to become derailed from its initial intent is massive. But ANYTHING is better than this. Change my vote to yes.

Billy Liar
May 6, 2014 9:08 am

So, coming up on 10 years since a major hurricane landfall in the US; tornado numbers at an all-time low – I know! Joe Romm must be talking about the historic cold wreaking havoc across the Great Lakes and NE this year.

UK Sceptic
May 6, 2014 9:08 am

Wobbles wibbles. Was he wearing his underpants on his head when he wrote this tripe?

Tom Anderson
May 6, 2014 9:15 am

That’s what you get when, as James Delingpole pointed out, you let a bunch of Chicago pols run the country.
Mayor Daley, we know you’re in there. Come out with your hands up!

harkin
May 6, 2014 9:43 am

The satellite shots released this week comparing “snowpack” of the Sierras after a giant snowstorm years ago with a shot after weeks of dry weather in ’14 convinced me that the alarmists have absolutely no respect for their target audience (some of whom post here).
Because science!

Dave L.
May 6, 2014 9:52 am

Coming from the Liar in Chief — you would expect everything but the truth.

Frank K.
May 6, 2014 9:55 am

davidmhoffer says:
May 6, 2014 at 9:00 am
“I have never seen the leadership of the United States so completely and thoroughly self destructive.”
We in the U.S. have an opportunity in November to change course and take political power from the extreme left wing eco-progressives who are destroying our country. Current polling indicates that a massive change is indeed coming…

May 6, 2014 10:05 am

Hierarchy of the incorrect theory of significant AGW from fossil fuel in the USA:
Ground Floor (1st flr): Pagan Gaia Fundamentalism of the 1970s
2nd Floor: NASA’s Hansen establishes ‘climate-cargo’ cult science in a major government science institution
3rd Floor: Authoritarianism emasculates science with the birth of the IPCC
4th Floor: Mythology of the CG1 ‘team’ endorsed by irrepressibly gullible Obama
5th Floor: . . . . . . unwritten
John

May 6, 2014 10:14 am

Frank K.
We in the U.S. have an opportunity in November to change course and take political power from the extreme left wing eco-progressives who are destroying our country.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Not being an American, I don’t mix into issues of Democrats vs Republicans. But the issue goes far beyond the eco-lunacy. The Obama Doctrine is making the world a very dangerous place. Obama has been outmaneuvered to the point of absurdity on everything from relations with Russia, the crisis in the Ukraine, the crisis in Syria, the Iranian threat, China carving off chunks of territory for themselves from the Philippines and Japan. The only thing that the Israelis and Palestinians can agree on is that Obama’s administration hasn’t got a clue. In the absence of strong leadership from the United States, the power vacuum in the world is being filled by the most odious regimes on the planet. While Obama was busy studying the practice of law in a civilized country, Putin, Kim, Assad, the Ayatollah’s and China’s leadership were studying Machiavelli and Art of War. They are conducting themselves on the basis of rules Obama seems oblivious to the existence of, and hence finds himself out foxed at every turn.
Obama has chosen in climate, an opponent he believes cannot fight back. One he can beat. On this to he is a fool. The climate will do whatever it does quite independently of Obama’s policies. He’s hung his last vestige of hope for a positive legacy on an issue that will ultimately make his idiocy plain. The legacy he will leave behind will attest to the damage he has done on the world stage as well as to the country he supposedly serves.

Resourceguy
May 6, 2014 10:21 am

I don’t see this as a new deduction on my paycheck stub but I’m sure it will be added soon enough. As in the case of California high speed rail funding from Cap and Trade, just call this Shovel Ready 2. If you deny the tax policy change, then you are just a Holocaust denier. After the tax policy change you will be called a tax dodger and a felon.

Larry Ledwick
May 6, 2014 10:28 am

National Climate Assessment Report 2014
(this message approved by Bernie Madoff, Soapy Smith, Frank Abagnale, Charles Ponzi, Michael Moore, Al Gore, Baghdad Bob and the Four Horses of the Apocalypse)

Frank K.
May 6, 2014 10:35 am


In the U.S. there is but one politically party whose majority is controlled by left wing progressives, and who have, through regulation, taxation, and bully tactics, led us down the path towards economic and social destruction…

May 6, 2014 10:40 am

I wrote up my reaction to the draft of the NCA here http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/hyping-catastrophe-to-eliminate-the-supposed-mismatch-between-human-minds-and-the-world-we-inhabit/ and will be looking for comparable language to what I found there and in the recent IPCC report. The insistence on personal and societal transformations in advance of any actual proof of the model that take us in a decidedly Marxist Human Development Society direction.
The IPCC tucked it into its peculiar definition of adaptation and the idea of the necessity of Climate-Resilient Pathways.

Bill Jamison
May 6, 2014 10:53 am

Ronald Wobbles, the report’s lead author, was quoted as saying (I am not making this up), “We’re already seeing extreme weather and it’s happening now”. This finding stands in stark contrast to 100 years ago, when ‘we saw extreme weather that was happening then’.
If I had been drinking anything when I read that it would be all over my keyboard right now. Hilarious and right on the money!
WE’RE DOOMED!!!

Bigtroutz
May 6, 2014 11:15 am

Sadly, look at how we have come full circle.
The American marxists have recapitulated the Soviet Union’s marxist AGW, Thermageddon, Climate Change, “climate disruption” Lysenkoism. We truly live in a repressive state when our president spouts such tripe and his thugs & cronies croon the same music and enforce meme compliance.

John Slayton
May 6, 2014 11:30 am

re: Larry Ledwick
Larry, you forgot Joe Isuzu.

Tom J
May 6, 2014 11:34 am

Ah, John Podesta, founder, Center for American Progress.
According to the May 5, Washington Examiner our dear John Podesta had this to say:
‘And the senior White House official (Podesta) criticized those who deny the effects of climate change.
“I’d say that probably look out your window,” he said to critics.
“If you want to try to side with the polluters and argue to the American public that climate change is not happening, today, tomorrow and certainly in the future, that’s going to be a losing argument,” he added.
Now I’d like to ask this cofounder of the powerhouse Washington lobbying firm, the Podesta Group, what window he, when he’s over at the home of his other cofounder, his brother, Tony, that he looks out of? And which home; the one in Washington? Or the one in Virginia? Or, for a Southern Pacific romp; the one in Australia? Or, for a place truly romantic; the home in Italy?
Now, I suspect that our dear John would be on board with reducing his own carbon footprint, not so much as to show solidarity with the little people that he expects to do so, but, if for nothing else, than to protect the climate he so dearly loves. So I wouldn’t expect Johnny (is it ok to call you that, Johnny?) to wave from one of his co lobbyists, and brother Tony’s homes in Australia or Italy: All that carbon spewing jet mileage. But the least you could do, Johnny, is wag your boney finger at your younger brother Tony for all those frequent flier, carbon spewing jet flights to that Italian getaway. My understanding is that Tony Podesta, and wife Heather (also a lobbyist) traveled there several times a year. Oh, the climate horror! But, then, the planet can acquire comfort knowing that that has only been going on for 10 years, and at least it was a colorful 10 years. According to the January 15, Washington Post, Heather and Tony, ‘Wed in 2003 (her third marriage, his second), the popular twosome cut an unusually colorful swath through Washington’s political scene — she in cutting-edge designer clothes and heels, he in graphic ties and trademark red Prada loafers.’ Ah, but maybe we can accept the carbon footprints of those frequent flier flights after all. Perhaps those Prada loafers are cheaper in Italy. Moreover, we can draw comfort in the fact that those multi-yearly Italian honeymoon anniversary destinations have come to an end. Maybe John Podesta’s concern for the climate modified their behavior after all. Or, maybe it’s because John’s brother Tony and sister in law Heather are untying the knot. Of course it’s a contentious divorce; all that artwork (they both were art collectors, you know) to split up. And, who gets what mansions?
Now, President Barack Obama, never one to overlook the potential political benefits a contentious divorce, or marital infidelity can provide, seems to be (as he is often called) aloof. But, then again, who knows: According to the January 15, Washington Post, ‘During the 2008 Democratic convention, Heather wore a large L-shaped pin — for “Lobbyist” — in mock defiance of then-candidate Barack Obama’s anti-lobbyist rhetoric.’ But I really shouldn’t insinuate that, after enlisting John Podesta’s aid in December, the POTUS had a vested interest in tamping down John’s, Podesta Group’s cofounder and lobbyist brother, Tony’s, lobbyist wife’s, Heather’s (complicated, eh?) lobbyist braggadocio. After all, that was so 2008 and Obama’s clearly moved on.
Hm, these people expect the rest of us to live in a world of want and austerity? I like Glenn Reynold’s typical response:
Tar. Feathers.

mellyrn
May 6, 2014 11:47 am

Frank K., who says,
“We in the U.S. have an opportunity in November to change course and take political power from…”
We do?
https://www.princeton.edu/~mgilens/Gilens%20homepage%20materials/Gilens%20and%20Page/Gilens%20and%20Page%202014-Testing%20Theories%203-7-14.pdf
“Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism.”

May 6, 2014 12:17 pm

Watching the WH live feed on the NCA release. I never realized how much Kathryn Sullivan looks like John Kerry in a blonde wig. *smirk*

James Ard
May 6, 2014 12:34 pm

John Podesta has to ramp up the rhetoric. His Center for American Progress gets it’s funds from matching up tax seeking green energy companies with those in the highest positions of power. His golden goose has been getting cooked and today’s media hypefest is his latest attempt at staying above water.

Cheshirered
May 6, 2014 1:05 pm

It has come to a pretty pass when governments lie so blatantly. They offer up terrifying ‘scenarios’ to grab equally lurid headlines.
‘Up to 5 degrees of warming and a 4 foot sea level rise’ in the next 86 years? Pure unadulterated bullshit. Absurd claims that are so off the wall deliberately misleading that they’re tantamount to fraud.
Meanwhile, bugger all ‘warming’ for the thick end of 2 decades…

Bill Parsons
May 6, 2014 1:33 pm

Report: Climate Change is Already Wreaking Havoc
Report: Climate Change Science is Already Wreaking Havoc
Fixed.