Alarmist movie preview the 'Years of Living Dangerously'

Sandi says in Tips and Notes:

You Tube has the Show Time full Premiere episode of “Years of Living Dangerously” documentary.

(about an hour 59:08)

Also see the Years of Living Dangerously website:

http://yearsoflivingdangerously.com/

The first 10 minutes was about all I could watch for now, but really, I think all this will do is polarize the public more.

==============================================================

Readers are welcome to post notes about claims made that don’t hold up.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

90 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
pat
April 10, 2014 4:52 pm

10 April: Medill Northwester Uni: Elle Metz: Panel urges group viewing of SHOWTIME’s climate change series to mobilize action
A panel of medical professionals and climate-change experts, hosted by communications group Climate Nexus on Wednesday, urged viewers to watch the show with family and friends in hopes that the series will spur climate change conversations and action.
“The television can be very passive,” said panelist Dr. Catherine Thomasson, executive director of Physicians for Social Responsibility. “The goal is to have people talking” and for them to realize “they don’t have to do it all themselves.”…
Humans are “motivated to change by individual stories of loss,” said Dr. Lise Van Susteren, a board member for the Center for Health in a Global Environment at Harvard; more so than by science and statistics.
People are “knowing figures behind climate change but not quite feeling it,” said George Marshall, the co-founder of the Climate Outreach Information Network.
Physicist Joe Romm, one of the series’ two chief scientific advisors warned that, if action isn’t taken, the harsh narratives featured in the show “will be everyone’s stories.” Climate change is “the most important story for all of humanity,” he said…
“There’s a widespread social silence” when it comes to climate change, Marshall said – in individual interactions, in the media and in politics. Two-thirds of people rarely if ever discuss climate change, he said.
Marshall urged people to “break the silence” by attending a series watch party. Viewers can host their own party or search for one in their area at 350.org.
“We form our views through conversation with people who share our values,” he said. By watching “Years of Living Dangerously” with these people and discussing its content, viewers will open up a climate-change dialogue.
Better yet, they’ll band together to take action, such as calling up their local political representative, said Thomasson.
http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id=229657

MojoMojo
April 10, 2014 6:41 pm

James Cameron backed out of debating skeptics to avoid embarrassment.
Hes a weasle who chickens out of a fight ,only to then cold cock blindside his opponent.

ossqss
April 10, 2014 7:33 pm

Here is a parallel trailer to a new movie. The similarities are quite astonishing with respect to what is conveyed in this “Year of Living Danerously” series, no?
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lUcspS-PT7k&feature=youtu.be
Any body been keeping tabs on our USGS lately? ;-}

ossqss
April 10, 2014 7:36 pm

Dangit, I didn’t switch to non-mobile mode when I tried to embed the video……
Sorry for the extra click!

Louis
April 10, 2014 8:09 pm

“Imagine that Fargo, North Dakota is like Phoenix… 100 degrees. These are conservative projections by the world’s leading scientists.”
Which leading scientists have projected Fargo’s climate to become like that of Phoenix? I think there’s been a little too much “imagination” going on with these people. Besides, “temperatures of 100° or higher occur nearly every year somewhere in North Dakota. These temperatures of 100° F or more last only for a day or two.” But that’s not the same as having a climate like Phoenix. Phoenix doesn’t get an average 4.5 feet of frost penetration like Fargo does. So when do they imagine this miracle is going to take place? When does this transformation of climate even begin? They might want to start by breaking the old record high for North Dakota, which hasn’t been equaled once during the whole time man-made CO2 has been on the rise:
“The highest temperature ever recorded in North Dakota was 121° F at Steele on July 6, 1936, and the lowest temperature measured was -60° F at Parshall on February 15, 1936.”

April 10, 2014 9:08 pm

I like the one with Bryan Brown Sigourney Weaver and Linda Hunt much better.At least it was based on real historical events.<:o)

ralfellis
April 11, 2014 1:53 am

The film talks about Syrian farmers being displaced because a great drought, and therefore joining the rebellion. So I thought I would look at the Syrian rainfall data. The following charts are from 1900, in four blocks of data. Data from the World Bank.
http://sdwebx.worldbank.org/climateportal/index.cfm?page=country_historical_climate&ThisRegion=Middle%20East&ThisCCode=SYR
Notice any major change in rainfall?
http://oi58.tinypic.com/2mqohty.jpg
Methinks that someone here is using standard taqiyya when talking to unbelievers, and the Greens fell for it, hook line and sinker.
Ralph

April 11, 2014 5:51 am

Film industry notice regarding “Years of Living Dangerously”
Showtime Presents: Years of Living Dangerously
  Working Title: “The Sky is Falling” series
Disclaimer: This could be the scariest science fiction production of all time, created by Sci Fi masters James Cameron and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Docudrama style could be confusing to people unfamiliar with the scientific realities.
Warning: Some content is inappropriate for:
  Viewers with IQ over 85:
  People with any critical intelligence watching this stuff will have an unpleasant, possibly nauseating experience
  
  Viewers with IQ under 85:
  Impressionable people will be misled and should be protected by rational and calm adult supervision.
  
Addition: Beware of a thread bomber (pseudoname “Pat”) who is attracted to websites discussing this series.

ralfellis
April 11, 2014 9:06 am

Here is another view of Syrian weather, from Damascus airport. Unfortunately, the precipitation column has some significant gaps in it, which is unfortunate
But what we can see is that the number of foggy days, thunderstorm days, and rainy days has stayed remarkably the same. So if there was less precipitation in the last five years, as they claim, then this was due to lighter rainfall rather than a general drying out of the climate.
In addition, any drought was obviously not due to global warming / climate change, as two of the wettest years were in 2003 and 2004. Except, of course, that climate change can cause sudden wet-drys and flood-droughts, plus some hot-colds and windy-calms. Fickle thing, this climate change business:
http://www.tutiempo.net/en/Climate/Damascus_Int_Airport/400800.htm
And perhaps it should be pointed out that populated Syria lies on the edge of the Syrian Desert. Go a few kilometers east to Palmyra, and you are in real desert lands, and just 100mm of rain a year. This is pic of Palmyra, 120 km east of Homms. Notice much growing here? (Apart from the oasis palms, which is why Palmyra was built here.)
http://religion.utk.edu/travels/syria/Palmyra2.jpg
Ralph

April 12, 2014 8:55 am

They use a jet fighter to measure CO2? The irony is too much!

bonanzapilot
April 12, 2014 10:09 am

No afterburners though…

April 13, 2014 8:39 pm

This is on a par with TRU TV’s stealing the Great Lakes episode, where the apparent intent of the fiction is to get people to quit drinking bottled water:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fj7u9rh76qg
–AGF

Mervyn
April 18, 2014 6:16 am

A final act of desperation, trying to persuade people about a pending climate catastrophe. It makes “An Inconvenient Truth” look respectable… and we know that movie was a political movie and was littered with errors… the British High Court said so.

Mervyn
April 18, 2014 7:24 am

The only credible part of this movie is the real factual impacts caused by deforestation in Indonesia. But there is absolutely nothing in this movie that links droughts and other climatic events with human activity CO2 emissions.
The biggest failures of this movie are:-
– the failure to look at the historical record of droughts in Texas and Syria
– repeating Gore’s mistake, misinterpreting the ice core data relationship between CO2 and temperature
– talking about global warming but failing to recognise the 17 year pause in global warming
– linking the Syrian civil war with drought and man-made global warming
– trying to turn global warming into a religious thing.
My overall assessment? It is typical Hollywood crap trying to pass as credible evidence about climate change doom. All hype… no substance!