Newsbytes: "Dry Winter" Could the Met Office Have Been More Wrong?

Met Office Warning (2012): Climate Change Linked To Colder, Drier UK Winters

The Met Office’s ‘pitiful’ forecasts were under fire last night after it was revealed it told councils in November to expect ‘drier than usual’ conditions this winter. In the worst weather prediction since Michael Fish reassured the nation in October 1987 that there was no hurricane on the way, forecasters said the Somerset Levels – still under water after more than two months of flooding – and the rest of the West Country would be especially dry. Last night, it was confirmed the UK had instead suffered the wettest winter since records began. –Tamara Cohen, Daily Mail, 21 February 2014

DART - Digital Advanced Reckoning Technology
The Met Office DART – Digital Advanced Reckoning Technology

UPDATE: Verity Jones from “Digging in the Clay” has this hilarious game addition…

Slingo

See: http://diggingintheclay.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/place-your-bets/

 

MPs and environmental planners yesterday said the long-term forecast had been a ‘mistake which could have cost Britain dearly’ and questioned whether the forecasting methods were fit for purpose. The three-month forecasts are now sent only to contingency planners, such as councils, government departments, and insurance companies. Using the Met Office’s super-computer, which can perform 100trillion calculations a second, experts in November predicted there would be high-pressure weather systems across Britain ‘with a slight signal for below average precipitation’. –Tamara Cohen, Daily Mail, 21 February 2014

The reduction in Arctic sea ice caused by climate change is playing a role in the UK’s recent colder and drier winter weather, according to the Met Office. Speaking to MPs on the influential environmental audit committee about the state of the warming Arctic, Julia Slingo, the chief scientist at the Met Office, said that decreasing amounts of ice in the far north was contributing to colder winters in the UK and northern Europe as well as to drought. She added that more cold winters mean less water, and could exacerbate future droughts. –Adam Vaughan, The Guardian, 14 March 2012

Half of all UK households face the threat of drought restrictions in the new year if rainfall does not return to normal this winter. With temperatures in parts of England still exceptionally mild, there is now growing concern about what will happen if – as some forecasters expect – there is a second dry winter in a row. The latest drought scenarios follow some of the driest weather since the Met Office records began in 1910, with rainfall in much of central England below 60% of the average for the last year. Water companies and environment regulators are expecting the UK to have more frequent dry winters as a result of climate change. –Juliette Jowit, The Guardian, 17 November 2011

Half of all households in Britain could face water restrictions unless exceptionally heavy and prolonged rain falls by April, water companies and the environment agency have warned. The environment secretary, Caroline Spelman, will hold a crisis meeting next week after the Centre for Hydrology and Ecology (CEH) stated that the average rainfall so far this winter has been the lowest since 1972, and the English Midlands and Anglian regions have had their second driest years in nearly a century. Last year was the driest in south-east England in 90 years. One more dry winter could force then drier areas of the country will have to start looking at more drastic measures like desalination plants or transporting water from wetter areas in the north or west. –John Vidal, The Guardian, 14 February 2012

Graph showing rainfall against the average from April 2009 to March 2012

Surprised by how tough this winter has been? You’re in good company: Last fall the Climate Prediction Center of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicted that temperatures would be above normal from November through January across much of the Lower 48 states. –Peter Coy, Bloomberg, 18 February 2014

Meanwhile, the Met Office has continued to issue questionable long-term forecasts. In mid-November, two weeks before the first of the storms, it predicted persistent high pressure for the winter, which was ‘likely to lead to drier-than-normal conditions across the country’. Infamously, in April 2009, the Met Office promised a ‘barbecue summer’ – which then turned out to be a washout. It forecast the winter of 2010 to 2011 would be mild: it was the coldest for 120 years.  At the beginning of 13 of the past 14 years, the Met Office has predicted the following 12 months would be significantly warmer than they have been. This, says the sceptic think-tank the Global Warming Policy Foundation, indicates ‘systemic’ bias. –David Rose, Mail on Sunday, 16 February 2014

Lord Smith, the embattled Chairman of the Environment Agency (EA), ignored multiple warnings that his policies would lead to serious flooding in Berkshire. The warnings came in 2009 from then Lead Member for the Environment at Windsor Council, Cllr Colin Rayner, who spoke exclusively to Breitbart London about numerous meetings with Smith, who has presided over some of the worst flooding to hit Britain in many years. Rayner claims to have told Smith that unless the Environment Agency took urgent action, the villages around Wraysbury, in the Thames valley, would flood. But Smith appears to have ignored Rayner’s warning, preferring instead to blame climate change for any future floods. —Breitbart News, 18 February 2014

It will hardly come as a surprise to anyone mopping up after the floods, but this has been the UK’s wettest winter since records began in 1910, the Met Office said on Thursday. –Pilita Clark, Financial Times, 21 February 2014

Based on the Met Office’s provisional numbers, it is true that, for the UK as a whole, this has been the wettest Dec – Feb period on record since 1910. However, the Met Office’s claims only tell half the story. Unless there is a Noah like deluge in the next week, the 3-month periods of Oct – Dec, and Nov – Jan, during the winter of 1929/30 will remain as by far the wettest on record. -–Paul Homewood, Not A Lot Of People Know That, 21 February 2014

=============================================================

This Newsbytes Summary from Dr. Benny Peiser and The GWPF

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
70 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
john
February 21, 2014 11:17 pm

Okay….
In fairness, they did say 25% confidence, which is a cop out in its own right. 15% for above average.
Hardly a solid prediction.

February 21, 2014 11:26 pm

“Forecasting for a specific season from a trend”
that might be their problem. predicting from historical data ie always behind the curve like those playing the retail fx markets and who keep losing. Those who use sunspots/magnetism tend to be ahead of the curve?
Meto also have the co2=warming belief and as co2 has increased they reason ‘there must be warming so the odds are in our favour if we keep saying warmer/drier’. That seems to be the MetO bias in their forecasts? They put those assumptions in the supercomputer and whatever ‘wise owl’ or whatever name they have given it churns out then that is ‘the best possible prediction’.
If Meto removed the co2=warming bias then the IPCC would not be able to use MetO models to write co2 deathstar is coming reports?

February 22, 2014 1:34 am

Gunga Din says:
February 21, 2014 at 4:01 pm
The Bermuda Triangle. So that’s where the missing heat is hiding!
—————————————————————————————
It was so obvious, that even I could see it, along with my fellow cave men friends and cave women.

February 22, 2014 1:37 am

Cynical Scientst says:
February 21, 2014 at 4:29 pm
Correction: It appears that you CAN bet on the weather.
————————————————————————-
Thanks for sharing that. I have been known to make a wager once in awhile.

Stephen Richards
February 22, 2014 2:00 am

Joe Bastardi who was stolen from Accuweather when WeatherBell formed, I believe works mostly out of his basement with essentially nothing fancier than a laptop and old weather maps. TRuly hilarious
Joe has access to some massive computers and is very ably supported by Ryan Maue. They use the same computers that the governmental organisations use to make their forecasts.
It’s all done by pattern recognition and a massive passion for weather.

Stephen Richards
February 22, 2014 2:01 am

goldminor says:
February 22, 2014 at 1:37 am
Cynical Scientst says:
February 21, 2014 at 4:29 pm
Correction: It appears that you CAN bet on the weather.
————————————————————————-
Thanks for sharing that. I have been known to make a wager once in awhile
It was how Piers Corbyn of weather action funded his start-up.

euanmearns
February 22, 2014 2:08 am

UK storms and floods – a post-mortem
The main human impact on recent flooding is UK government incompetence.
So Foul a Day and the Jet Stream
Alastair Dawson’s book chronicles 300 years of climate hell in Scotland (1600 – 1900) most probably extending to the whole of the UK, that was followed by the quiescent 20th Century

richardscourtney
February 22, 2014 2:30 am

Euan Mearns:
As on the other WUWT thread where you posted it, I write to draw attention to the links in your post in this thread at February 22, 2014 at 2:08 am.
Your articles are good and the discussions in the threads – especially on the jet stream- are very good, so I am writing to commend them to others who otherwise may not have bothered to read them.
Richard

Joe
February 22, 2014 2:53 am

Matt G says:
February 21, 2014 at 3:14 pm
Joe says:
February 21, 2014 at 2:39 pm
—————————————————————————————————
Yeah, sorry Matt, maybe I should have used [sarc] tags 😉
Although, don’t be surprised if they coome up with that one when looking for excuses. Something like:
“The wet in UK and cold in US was caused by the jetstream reacting to the sudden and temporary increase in ice in 2013 due to natural variability. This validates our models of what changing ice does, so drought will return when the ice resumes its CO2 induced decline”

Joe
February 22, 2014 3:19 am

richardscourtney says:
February 22, 2014 at 2:30 am
Euan Mearns:
As on the other WUWT thread where you posted it, I write to draw attention to the links in your post in this thread at February 22, 2014 at 2:08 am.
Your articles are good and the discussions in the threads – especially on the jet stream- are very good, so I am writing to commend them to others who otherwise may not have bothered to read them.
—————————————————————————————————————
Thanks for that, Richard, I’m one of those who probably wouldn’t have found them otherwise. Which would mean that I would have missed a small, almost throwaway, comment in there that I think I may use from now on:
“[…] this has all happened before and does not require a super natural explanation.”
That pretty well puts the “science” where it belongs – super natural warming. A perfectly accurate description, obviously, simply meaning “above natural”, but “Climate scientists believe in supernatural warming” has a certain ring to it, no? 😀

February 22, 2014 4:08 am

jauntycyclist says:
“Meto also have the co2=warming belief and as co2 has increased they reason ‘there must be warming so the odds are in our favour if we keep saying warmer/drier’. That seems to be the MetO bias in their forecasts?”
If that case they would have forecast for wetter than normal this winter, and drier than normal last Summer.

davidsimm
February 22, 2014 4:35 am

The UK Met Office may not be able to forecast WEATHER, but they can definitely tell you what the CLIMATE will be like in 2100…

Clovis Marcus
February 22, 2014 9:26 am

In order to get anywhere in climate or environmental science you have to swim with the tide. The people who do that get to the top of the quangos and universities. They teach the next generation and the cycle continues. In fact with the influx of earnest and well meaning young people it intensifies.
It is depressing that the cycle cannot be broken except by tearing the system down, salting the earth and starting all over again. That is not going to happen soon.

John Law
February 22, 2014 9:40 am

There’s a new panic going on in UK defence circles re the dangers of rising sea levels and storms threatening facilities. Apparently navy chiefs are considering moving the Royal Navy away from the sea.
Where are Gilbert and Sullivan when you need them?
All together:
When I was a lad I served a term
As office boy to an Attorney’s firm.
I cleaned the windows and I swept the floor,
And I polished up the handle of the big front door.
Chorus.
He polished up the handle of the big front door.
Sir Joseph.
I polished up that handle so carefullee
That now I am the Ruler of the Queen’s Navee!
Chorus.
He polished up that handle so carefullee,
That now he is the ruler of the Queen’s Navee!
Rule Britannia???????????

John Law
February 22, 2014 9:47 am
Solomon Green
February 22, 2014 11:42 am

The Met Office was moved from Bracknell to Exeter in 2003. The move which was announced in 2001, and appears to have been made for purely political reasons, was much criticised at the time.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/4760362/The-forecast-is-bleak-for-Bracknells-Met-Office.html
According to a friend of mine who has reason to know, many of the most experienced employees, including senior meteorologists and other scientists, refused to relocate. Since then there has been a distinct lack of expertise within the Met Office and their medium range forecasts have become notoriously inaccurate. Whether they were ever accurate is another question.

February 22, 2014 3:18 pm

@euanmearns
February 22, 2014 at 2:08 am
Your wordpress blog seems have lost its post comment button.

euanmearns
February 23, 2014 2:36 am

Ulric, comments are set to be live for two weeks. So if it is an older post, that may be the explanation. Otherwise there has been problems in the past with the post comment button disappearing, but thought that had sorted itself.

February 23, 2014 2:08 pm

This describes the MetOffice years before it was invented:
“The weather is a thing that is beyond me altogether. I never can understand it. The barometer is useless; it is as misleading as the newspaper forecast.
“There was one hanging up in a hotel at Oxford at which I was staying last spring, and, when I got there, it was pointing to ‘set fair’. It was simply pouring with rain outside, and had been all day; and I couldn’t quite make matters out. I tapped the barometer, and it jumped up and pointed to ‘very dry’. The Boots stopped as he was passing and said he expected it meant to-morrow. I fancied that maybe it was thinking of the week before last, but Boots said, No, he thought not.
“I tapped it again the next morning, and it went up still higher, and the rain came down faster than ever. On Wednesday I went and hit it again, and the pointer went round towards ‘set fair’, ‘very dry’, and ‘much heat’, until it was stopped by the peg, and couldn’t go any further. It tried its best, but the instrument was built so that it couldn’t prophesy fine weather any harder than it did without breaking itself. It evidently wanted to go on, and prognosticate drought, and water famine, and sunstroke, and simooms, and such things, but the peg prevented it, and it had to be content with pointing to the mere commonplace ‘very dry’.
“Meanwhile, the rain came down in a steady torrent, and the lower part of the town was under water, owing to the river having overflowed.
“Boots said it was evident that we were going to have a prolonged spell of grand weather some time, and read out a poem which was printed over the top of the oracle, about
Long foretold, long past;
Short notice, soon past.
The fine weather never came that summer. I expect that machine must have been referring to the following spring.
‘Three Men in a Boat’, Jerome K Jerome (1889)

Brian H
February 27, 2014 2:29 am

When does systematic bias turn into systemic stupidity? When you dedicate yourself to justifying the bias?