
Above: Actual photo from Dr. Mann’s Facebook page courtesy Mark Steyn writing in: “The Mann I love”
LOL, gotta love the caveat “almost” anything. Redditers are welcome to ask Dr. Mann questions in this online forum today:
Science AMA Series: I’m Michael E. Mann, Distinguished Professor of Meteorology at Penn State, Ask Me Almost Anything! (self.science)
submitted 1 hour ago by MichaelEMann Distinguished Professor of Meteorology Penn State
I’m Michael E. Mann. I’m Distinguished Professor of Meteorology at Penn State University, with joint appointments in the Department of Geosciences and the Earth and Environmental Systems Institute (EESI). I am also director of the Penn State Earth System Science Center (ESSC). I received my undergraduate degrees in Physics and Applied Math from the University of California at Berkeley, an M.S. degree in Physics from Yale University, and a Ph.D. in Geology & Geophysics from Yale University. My research involves the use of theoretical models and observational data to better understand Earth’s climate system. I am author of more than 160 peer-reviewed and edited publications, and I have written two books including Dire Predictions: Understanding Global Warming, co-authored with my colleague Lee Kump, and more recently, “The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines”, recently released in paperback with a foreword by Bill Nye “The Science Guy” (www.thehockeystick.net).
“The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars” describes my experiences in the center of the climate change debate, as a result of a graph, known as the “Hockey Stick” that my co-authors and I published a decade and a half ago. The Hockey Stick was a simple, easy-to-understand graph my colleagues and I constructed that depicts changes in Earth’s temperature back to 1000 AD. It was featured in the high-profile “Summary for Policy Makers” of the 2001 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and it quickly became an icon in the climate change debate. It also become a central object of attack by those looking to discredit the case for concern over human-caused climate change. In many cases, the attacks have been directed at me personally, in the form of threats and intimidation efforts carried out by individuals, front groups, and politicians tied to fossil fuel interests. I use my personal story as a vehicle for exploring broader issues regarding the role of skepticism in science, the uneasy relationship between science and politics, and the dangers that arise when special economic interests and those who do their bidding attempt to skew the discourse over policy-relevant areas of science.
I look forward to answering your question about climate science, climate change, and the politics surrounding it today at 2 PM EST. Ask me almost anything!
==========================================================
Go here to ask “almost anything”: http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1yj3o7/science_ama_series_im_michael_e_mann/
h/t to WUWT reader “devijvers”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Blew a blockquote tag above:
< daveburton says:
February 21, 2014 at 4:48 pm
…
This was the reaction of a prominent longtime climate alarmist, physicist Richard Muller:
Etc
Blew it again! Sorry:
Etc
Brian H wrote, “that this was competing self-promoter Muller trying to diss his rival…”
Brian, regardless of what you think about Muller or his motivations, he did an excellent job of explaining Mann’s hide-the-decline Nature Trick fraud.
Firefox said, “I posted some proof of how the mods were covering for Mann… At 9:17pm ET there were 397 total comments and only 291 visible comments.”
Well, the reddit mods didn’t delete my question. Instead, the participants just down-voted it until it disappeared from view, and Mann ignored it.
BTW, I wouldn’t mind if someone here would up-vote it, so that it reappears! It’s currently at -6. I think it has to be -4 or higher to be visible. (I just went through the comments, ctrl-F searching for “comment score below threshold” and up-voting most of those comments.)
I was going to suggest this is proof of my article Women love ugly men. However google for the article I also found:
Daily mail Why we women love an ugly man
http://uk.askmen.com/dating/curtsmith/26_dating_advice.html
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060705103054AA7icge
So, this is more than just my observation. To summarize the article: it seems to be proof that women prefer a man “with character” (or it could be men of women). This strongly suggests that there is no “ideal” man or to go further: we actively seek partners who are not some ideal looking person. This is shown by the way the human race continues to have a huge diversity of faces even though we’ve had millions of years to breed out “ugly”.
So, “ugly” must have a genetic advantage over “barbie-clone” faces.
I asked a simple question of Mr Mann. Whether or not he was in discussion with UVA for a position there when the president was dumped by the board and later re-instated. If you remember there was that 2012 scandal. not only did I not get a response, but the question was disappeared and now I can’t log onto reddit. Looks like they silently disabled my account.
Shades of 1984, eh?