
Above: Actual photo from Dr. Mann’s Facebook page courtesy Mark Steyn writing in: “The Mann I love”
LOL, gotta love the caveat “almost” anything. Redditers are welcome to ask Dr. Mann questions in this online forum today:
Science AMA Series: I’m Michael E. Mann, Distinguished Professor of Meteorology at Penn State, Ask Me Almost Anything! (self.science)
submitted 1 hour ago by MichaelEMann Distinguished Professor of Meteorology Penn State
I’m Michael E. Mann. I’m Distinguished Professor of Meteorology at Penn State University, with joint appointments in the Department of Geosciences and the Earth and Environmental Systems Institute (EESI). I am also director of the Penn State Earth System Science Center (ESSC). I received my undergraduate degrees in Physics and Applied Math from the University of California at Berkeley, an M.S. degree in Physics from Yale University, and a Ph.D. in Geology & Geophysics from Yale University. My research involves the use of theoretical models and observational data to better understand Earth’s climate system. I am author of more than 160 peer-reviewed and edited publications, and I have written two books including Dire Predictions: Understanding Global Warming, co-authored with my colleague Lee Kump, and more recently, “The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines”, recently released in paperback with a foreword by Bill Nye “The Science Guy” (www.thehockeystick.net).
“The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars” describes my experiences in the center of the climate change debate, as a result of a graph, known as the “Hockey Stick” that my co-authors and I published a decade and a half ago. The Hockey Stick was a simple, easy-to-understand graph my colleagues and I constructed that depicts changes in Earth’s temperature back to 1000 AD. It was featured in the high-profile “Summary for Policy Makers” of the 2001 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and it quickly became an icon in the climate change debate. It also become a central object of attack by those looking to discredit the case for concern over human-caused climate change. In many cases, the attacks have been directed at me personally, in the form of threats and intimidation efforts carried out by individuals, front groups, and politicians tied to fossil fuel interests. I use my personal story as a vehicle for exploring broader issues regarding the role of skepticism in science, the uneasy relationship between science and politics, and the dangers that arise when special economic interests and those who do their bidding attempt to skew the discourse over policy-relevant areas of science.
I look forward to answering your question about climate science, climate change, and the politics surrounding it today at 2 PM EST. Ask me almost anything!
==========================================================
Go here to ask “almost anything”: http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1yj3o7/science_ama_series_im_michael_e_mann/
h/t to WUWT reader “devijvers”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I already got banned from /r/science.
I am not going there. Let them talk to each other in their closed self-gratifying box.
The only thing that upticks more than Mann’s hockey stick is his ego.
Such self-promotion … guess he struck out on match.com …
What has he done? I can’t think of anything other than ignoring 20 tree ring data sets to cherry pick 2 data sets in order to fabricate a hockey stick graph. My garbage man does far more than that for me.
Too bad we cannot see the questions that were not allowed.
Sorry but I gotta re-post this!
From the site:
–]CashAndBuns 9 points 2 hours ago
“If a scientific hypothesis must include in its statement the possibility to prove it to be false, under what conditions would the global warming hypothesis be falsified?”
[–]ningrim 0 points 2 minutes ago
“more specifically, the anthropomorphic global warming hypothesis”
—-l
Can anyone predict Mann’s answer? ( CAGW might have been better, but I think this is a good start and won’t be answered.)
I wonder if he would admit reciept of the anonymous Fathers Day cards post marked from Yamal?
Why in heaven would any climate scientist have Bill Nye write even a scribbled note in a climate science book, let alone a forward???? He is on youtube demonstrating how the trade winds blow, except he has the fan blowing THE OTHER WAY!!!!!!!
So Michael, in case you or Bill Nye do not know this, the trade winds blow FROM THE EAST. Make a note of it. Stronger trade winds (again, from the EAST) blows warm surface water up against the Western Pacific. Weaker trade winds (again, from the EAST) allows that warm water to slosh back towards the Eastern Pacific. So next time, make sure the fan is pointed towards the WEST in video demonstrations. Got it? Once again, trade winds blow from EAST TO WEST. As in the following cartoon:
http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/mtr/eln/elyr.rxml
Idiots.
He could lose a few lbs.
Getting a little round in the face there Michael.
Just read that Mann lost his case against Dr. Ball in Canada. Counter suits to follow.
Reddit is very CAGW-friendly. Anyone posting anything but the most rabid support of CAGW gets viciously attacked. Even a neutral point of view is attacked. Mann will be happy there.
What was your work at The University of Virginia? Why is it not part of your profile?
Not submitted – I am not going there.
Fast forward to 7:12 for a lovely demonstration of trade winds courtesy of Bill Nye’s oh so intelligent understanding of all things sciency. Yeh. I want him writing my forward on climate science!
Perhaps someone with a Facebook page will ask: “Dr. Mann, does the phrase; ‘state pen, not Penn State‘, mean anything to you?
Pamela Gray says:
February 21, 2014 at 7:48 am
====
When you stop and think about all the people that had to be involved producing that…
….it really makes your head explode
[snip – garbage from the slayers – Anthony]
Does this article refute Steve McIntyre? http://deepclimate.org/2010/11/16/replication-and-due-diligence-wegman-style/
I show that film to my students all the time to help them understand what it looks like when you say something idiotic when preparing the required science projects in Oregon’s system of assessments and work samples.
mkelly says:
February 21, 2014 at 7:45 am
“Just read that Mann lost his case against Dr. Ball in Canada. Counter suits to follow.”
*****
This is huge news. Do you have a link for this? Will Anthony be posting the story?
The only questions worth asking derive from this statement: “In many cases, the attacks have been directed at me personally, in the form of threats and intimidation efforts carried out by individuals, front groups, and politicians tied to fossil fuel interests.”
Who are these individuals and front groups (we know the politicians)?
What evidence ties them to fossil fuel interests?
What do you mean by “ties” and “interests”?
What was the nature of the attacks?
Specifically, what did they say and what documentation do you have?
Let’s see some facts, not vague allegations.
Read through the questions posted….interestingly about 80% of them seem to be questioning uis methods/beliefs. Some good questions. SADLY, it appears that mods/other posters are answering some of the better, tougher questions for him. Do they think Mann cant handle them?
Some people are their own worst enemy…….
[snip – garbage from the slayers – Anthony]