From the Massachusetts Institute of Technology , another “carbon as planet killer” scenario.
MIT researchers find that the end-Permian extinction happened in 60,000 years — much faster than earlier estimates
The largest mass extinction in the history of animal life occurred some 252 million years ago, wiping out more than 96 percent of marine species and 70 percent of life on land — including the largest insects known to have inhabited the Earth. Multiple theories have aimed to explain the cause of what’s now known as the end-Permian extinction, including an asteroid impact, massive volcanic eruptions, or a cataclysmic cascade of environmental events. But pinpointing the cause of the extinction requires better measurements of how long the extinction period lasted.
Now researchers at MIT have determined that the end-Permian extinction occurred over 60,000 years, give or take 48,000 years — practically instantaneous, from a geologic perspective. The new timescale is based on more precise dating techniques, and indicates that the most severe extinction in history may have happened more than 10 times faster than scientists had previously thought.
“We’ve got the extinction nailed in absolute time and duration,” says Sam Bowring, the Robert R. Shrock Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences at MIT. “How do you kill 96 percent of everything that lived in the oceans in tens of thousands of years? It could be that an exceptional extinction requires an exceptional explanation.”
In addition to establishing the extinction’s duration, Bowring, graduate student Seth Burgess, and a colleague from the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology also found that, 10,000 years before the die-off, the oceans experienced a pulse of light carbon, which likely reflects a massive addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. This dramatic change may have led to widespread ocean acidification and increased sea temperatures by 10 degrees Celsius or more, killing the majority of sea life.
But what originally triggered the spike in carbon dioxide? The leading theory among geologists and paleontologists has to do with widespread, long-lasting volcanic eruptions from the Siberian Traps, a region of Russia whose steplike hills are a result of repeated eruptions of magma. To determine whether eruptions from the Siberian Traps triggered a massive increase in oceanic carbon dioxide, Burgess and Bowring are using similar dating techniques to establish a timescale for the Permian period’s volcanic eruptions that are estimated to have covered over five million cubic kilometers.
“It is clear that whatever triggered extinction must have acted very quickly,” says Burgess, the lead author of a paper that reports the results in this week’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, “fast enough to destabilize the biosphere before the majority of plant and animal life had time to adapt in an effort to survive.”
Pinning dates on an extinction
In 2006, Bowring and his students made a trip to Meishan, China, a region whose rock formations bear evidence of the end-Permian extinction; geochronologists and paleontologists have flocked to the area to look for clues in its layers of sedimentary rock. In particular, scientists have focused on a section of rock that is thought to delineate the end of the Permian, and the beginning of the Triassic, based on evidence such as the number of fossils found in surrounding rock layers.
Bowring sampled rocks from this area, as well as from nearby alternating layers of volcanic ash beds and fossil-bearing rocks. After analyzing the rocks in the lab, his team reported in 2011 that the end-Permian likely lasted less than 200,000 years. However, this timeframe still wasn’t precise enough to draw any conclusions about what caused the extinction.
Now, the team has revised its estimates using more accurate dating techniques based on a better understanding of uncertainties in timescale measurements.
With this knowledge, Bowring and his colleagues reanalyzed rock samples collected from five volcanic ash beds at the Permian-Triassic boundary. The researchers pulverized rocks and separated out tiny zircon crystals containing a mix of uranium and lead. They then isolated uranium from lead, and measured the ratios of both isotopes to determine the age of each rock sample.
From their measurements, the researchers determined a much more precise “age model” for the end-Permian extinction, which now appears to have lasted about 60,000 years — with an uncertainty of 48,000 years — and was immediately preceded by a sharp increase in carbon dioxide in the oceans.
‘Spiraling toward the truth’
The new timeline adds weight to the theory that the extinction was triggered by massive volcanic eruptions from the Siberian Traps that released volatile chemicals, including carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere and oceans. With such a short extinction timeline, Bowring says it is possible that a single, catastrophic pulse of magmatic activity triggered an almost instantaneous collapse of all global ecosystems.
To confirm whether the Siberian Traps are indeed the extinction’s smoking gun, Burgess and Bowring plan to determine an equally precise timeline for the Siberian Traps eruptions, and will compare it to the new extinction timeline to see where the two events overlap. The researchers will investigate additional areas in China to see if the duration of the extinction can be even more precisely determined.
“We’ve refined our approach, and now we have higher accuracy and precision,” Bowring says. “You can think of it as slowly spiraling in toward the truth.”
Pamela, I think I am in love with you. Always clear, precise and accurate in your responses.
Surprised not to see any reference to India’s Deccan Traps, extended and very massive “magmatic episodes” (1,200-feet deep) coterminous with the Chicxulub cometary/meteorite strike that defines the Cretaceous/Tertiary (K/T) Boundary some 65-million years-before-present (YBP).
Driven –among other influences– by India’s continental plate-tectonic disposition directly opposite the Yucatan, Earth’s oxygen-heavy atmosphere ignited globally, extinguishing not only ornithiscian and sauriscian dinosaurs but whole orders of marine species as Nuclear Winter induced worldwide ocean acidification.
Impacts and volcanism aside, our current 2.6-million year Pleistocene Era has another twelve – fourteen million years to run before “continental drift” separates North from South American landmasses, allowing global atmospheric/oceanic circulation patterns to meliorate geophysical climate effects. Until then Milankovich cycles, total solar irradiance (TSI), any superficial Coriolus or other affects beloved of academic researchers, are entirely beside the point.
urederra says:
February 11, 2014 at 7:28 am
And mkelly, you are wrong.
=====================
Only CO2 was addressed. I don’t think HCl was mentioned. So how could I or Chiefo have been wrong?
Plant Food equals more wildlife creepy crawlies and cuddly furry animals
higley7 says:
February 11, 2014 at 5:21 am
——–
Most of the warmists that I have talked with seem to be convinced that nature is a fragile thing, and that the even tiniest of changes could result in the total collapse of the system.
Volatile chemists, anyway.
KevinM says:
February 11, 2014 at 5:55 am
——
The mission of the carrier group was accomplished.
US Geological Survey provides technical information about volcanic emissions:
http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/climate.php
Sulfur dioxide is the principal emission affecting climate. For carbon dioxide, volcanoes do not emit more than human emissions:
“Do the Earth’s volcanoes emit more CO2 than human activities? Research findings indicate that the answer to this frequently asked question is a clear and unequivocal, “No.” Human activities, responsible for a projected 35 billion metric tons (gigatons) of CO2 emissions in 2010 (Friedlingstein et al., 2010), release an amount of CO2 that dwarfs the annual CO2 emissions of all the world’s degassing subaerial and submarine volcanoes (Gerlach, 2011).”
Incidentally, USGS introduces an “anthropogenic CO2 multiplier” that equates days of anthropogenic CO2 with years of global volcanism.
Lots of CO2 is good for plants.
Lloyd Martin Hendaye says:
February 11, 2014 at 7:39 am
Not all the saurischians. Birds survived.
It’s likely that the Deccan Traps were erupting before the Yucatan impact, as the Indian Plate passed over the Reunion Island hotspot.
Since I was at best dubious of the astronomical Dr. Sagan’s ideologically motivated nuclear winter hypothesis, I´m also not so sure about the global conflagration hypothesis, although it is possible & might even have some supporting physical evidence.
For a mass extinction correlated with volcanism, consider the Triassic-Jurassic event, associated with the CAMP, rifting among Africa, Europe & the Americas as Pangaea began to break up. That’s the one that wiped out the dinosaurs’ competition.
milodonharlani says:
February 11, 2014 at 6:47 am
—-
A large impact would cause massive fracturing of the crust on the opposite side of the earth.
mkelly:
“This is because the net reaction produces the same number of equivalents of positively contributing species (H+) as negative contributing species (HCO₃- and/or CO₃²-).”
urederra already answered, but I’ll add this:
It is measurably untrue that adding CO2 to an alkaline solution does not change its alkalinity. In many freshman chem labs, students titrate solutions of unknown acids using solutions of sodium hydroxide whose concentration is precisely known. These solutions have to be freshly prepared from extremely concentrated sodium hydroxide (about 50%). Why?
Because dilute (say one molar) sodium hydroxide solution absorbs enough carbon dioxide on standing under air for some hours to make a measurable dent in its base strength: the carbonate you get as a result is a weaker base than the hydroxide you started with. Very concentrated sodium hydroxide absorbs CO2 as well, but the resulting sodium carbonate is insoluble in the solution – so you take the supernatant, dilute it, measure its concentration and use it promptly, before atmospheric CO2 can neutralize it.
Does this validate everything the “chicken littles” say about ocean acidification? Of course not. But I’d advise against arguing that something can’t happen when it can be shown to do so, reproducibly, in simple demonstrations.
But, I did like the part of the article in reference, comparing the CO2 level then, to now, and calling then as starvation, that puts variability in location to starvation. As Measured at local was put at starvation range, during Feburary, Seasonal Change anyone? How were they able to measure Feb. back then? With 12K year differential? Illogical.
mkelly:
“Only CO2 was addressed. I don’t think HCl was mentioned. So how could I or Chiefo have been wrong?”
Because by the logic of you and Chiefo, bubbling HCl into water shouldn’t change the pH, because the overall charge of the solution hasn’t changed.
Sorry mods – jest obviously isn’t a word in your vocabulary?
Remove as necessary 🙂
[no idea what you are talking about -mod]
I agree with Hoser’s post
http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/969/piecing-together-a-permian-impact
The extinction happened immediately, with that impact.
As for that CO2 increase, it would have happened naturally with a large plant dieoff .
Yeah, Chiefo is wrong. Adding CO2 changes the pH of a solution. How much does it change depends on the solution. Graeme no. 3 explains it perfectly at chiefio’s.
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2014/02/09/co2-makes-the-ocean-more-alkaline/#comment-56956
Yes, I know that he says that “Basically, you are quite right; rising carbon dioxide is never going to make the oceans acid.” But it does reduce the pH of the ocean, not enough to make it acidic, though.
Back when leadership was hereditary a kingdom might be occasionally ruled by an heir to the throne who was a complete moron. Everyone knew the king was a moron, and the kingdom was run by more able people, however they still would genuflect when they saw the king, out of respect to their current social order, which was something they did not want to disrupt by causing any sort of revolution or civil war.
The paper seems like a solid chunk of research. I imagine those words, “including Carbon Dioxide,” were put in as a genuflection to a moronic king.
Jim says:
February 11, 2014 at 7:55 am
—–
I suspect they were assuming that there would be a seasonal variation in CO2, just as there is today, with February being the low.
Alan McIntire says:
February 11, 2014 at 8:05 am
Bedout as the Permian extinction culprit was promptly debunked in 2004 & 2005. It may still have some adherents, but nowadays it’s not even the most popular choice for a P/Tr killer crater.
“Solomon Green says:
February 11, 2014 at 5:24 am
If volcanic eruptions can be strong enough to eliminate 96% of marine species and 70% of life on land, why do climate models place so little emphasis on them?”
################
huh? of the 40 or so models used for Ar5, all but a handful represent volcanic forcing..
Further, they OVEREMPHASIZE the importance of the emissions from volcanos: In the models the cooling that results from volcanos is too large and the rebound to “normality” happens too quickly.
This is well known and reported in the science.
“Jack Maloney says:
February 11, 2014 at 6:23 am
“…will compare it to the new extinction timeline to see where the two events overlap. ”
Correlation does not imply causation.
#############################
huh. they are not establishing causation. If there is no overlap they have evidence AGAINST their explanation. This is called checking evidence to see if it confirms or disconfirms your theory.
“rockdoc says:
February 11, 2014 at 7:33 am
Zircon U-Pb geochronology has resulted in many conflicting analyses and interpretations. There are a number of reasons for errors not the least of which is inheritance which might be a problem when using zircons from ash beds (zircons are quite resiliant so actually may be older than the ash bed itself). Largely the results come down to an interpretation of the amount of scatter of individual measures and decisions made on inclusion or exclusion of data.”
################
good comment.
urederra says:
February 11, 2014 at 8:08 am
Yes, I know that he says that “Basically, you are quite right; rising carbon dioxide is never going to make the oceans acid.” But it does reduce the pH of the ocean, not enough to make it acidic, though.
===========
So the point of the post was to show that CO2 may have not been the culprit in the extinction. You and JPS argue over acids which were not mentioned in the post and in the end you agree that CO2 will not make it acidic.
Is there any research out there that analyzes whether major evolutionary leaps may explain these extinction events? All we ever hear about is environmental factors. What about evolution? Perhaps some new bacteria or fungi or whatever evolved and few species could handle it, for example. Or some other new innovation takes the world by storm and affects everything else along its way. I’m just wondering if this sort of thing has been convincingly ruled out.