From the Georgia Institute of Technology
Scientists studying the atmosphere above Barrow, Alaska, have discovered unprecedented levels of molecular chlorine in the air, a new study reports.
Molecular chlorine, from sea salt released by melting sea ice, reacts with sunlight to produce chlorine atoms. These chlorine atoms are highly reactive and can oxidize many constituents of the atmosphere including methane and elemental mercury, as well activate bromine chemistry, which is an even stronger oxidant of elemental mercury. Oxidized mercury is more reactive and can be deposited to the Arctic ecosystem.
The study is the first time that molecular chlorine has been measured in the Arctic, and the first time that scientists have documented such high levels of molecular chlorine in the atmosphere.
“No one expected there to be this level of chlorine in Barrow or in polar regions,” said Greg Huey, a professor in the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta.
The study was published January 12 in the journal Nature Geoscience and was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), part of the international multidisciplinary OASIS program.
The researchers directly measured molecular chlorine levels in the Arctic in the spring of 2009 over a six-week period using chemical ionization mass spectrometry. At first the scientists were skeptical of their data, so they spent several years running other experiments to ensure their findings were accurate.
The level of molecular chlorine above Barrow was measured as high as 400 parts per trillion, which is a high concentration considering that chlorine atoms are short –lived in the atmosphere because they are strong oxidants and are highly reactive with other atmospheric chemicals.
Molecular chlorine concentrations peaked in the early morning and late afternoon, and fell to near-zero levels at night. Average daytime molecular chlorine levels were correlated with ozone concentrations, suggesting that sunlight and ozone may be required for molecular chlorine formation.
Previous Arctic studies have documented high levels of oxidized mercury in Barrow and other polar regions. The major source of elemental mercury in the Arctic regions is coal-burning plants around the world. In the spring in Barrow, ozone and elemental mercury are often depleted from the atmosphere when halogens — chlorine and bromine — are released into the air from melting sea ice.
“Molecular chlorine is so reactive that it’s going to have a very strong influence on atmospheric chemistry,” Huey said.
Chlorine atoms are the dominant oxidant in Barrow, the study found. The area is part of a region with otherwise low levels of oxidants in the atmosphere, due to the lack of water vapor and ozone, which are the major precursors to making oxidants in many urban areas.
In Barrow, snow-covered ice pack extends in every directly except inland. The ultimate source of the molecular chlorine is the sodium chloride in sea salt, Huey said, most likely from the snow-covered ice pack. How the sea salt is transformed into molecular chlorine is unknown.
“We don’t really know the mechanism. It’s a mystery to us right now,” Huey said. “But the sea ice is changing dramatically, so we’re in a time where we have absolutely no predictive power over what’s going to happen to this chemistry. We’re really in the dark about the chlorine.”
Scientists do know that sea ice is rapidly changing, Huey said. The sea ice that lasts from one winter to the next winter is decreasing. This has created a larger area of melted ice, and more ice that comes and goes with the seasons. This seasonal variation in ice could release more molecular chlorine into the atmosphere.
“There is definite climate change happening in the Arctic,” Huey said. “That’s changing the nature of the ice, changing the volume of the ice, changing the surface
###
High levels of molecular chlorine in the Arctic atmosphere
Liao et al, Nature Geoscience (2014) doi:10.1038/ngeo2046
Abstract
Chlorine radicals can function as a strong atmospheric oxidant1, 2, 3, particularly in polar regions, where levels of hydroxyl radicals are low. In the atmosphere, chlorine radicals expedite the degradation of methane4, 5, 6 and tropospheric ozone4, 7, and the oxidation of mercury to more toxic forms3. Here we present direct measurements of molecular chlorine levels in the Arctic marine boundary layer in Barrow, Alaska, collected in the spring of 2009 over a six-week period using chemical ionization mass spectrometry. We report high levels of molecular chlorine, of up to 400 pptv. Concentrations peaked in the early morning and late afternoon, and fell to near-zero levels at night. Average daytime molecular chlorine levels were correlated with ozone concentrations, suggesting that sunlight and ozone are required for molecular chlorine formation. Using a time-dependent box model, we estimate that the chlorine radicals produced from the photolysis of molecular chlorine oxidized more methane than hydroxyl radicals, on average, and enhanced the abundance of short-lived peroxy radicals. Elevated hydroperoxyl radical levels, in turn, promoted the formation of hypobromous acid, which catalyses mercury oxidation and the breakdown of tropospheric ozone. We therefore suggest that molecular chlorine exerts a significant effect on the atmospheric chemistry of the Arctic.
“How the sea salt is transformed into molecular chlorine is unknown.”
But I am sure they will find a way to make it our fault, create an expensive government program to mitigate it, and in the process shovel billions of dollars to political supporters who get into the “whatever is causing the chlorine” business.
How did this pass peer-review when the abstract mixes the terms chlorine radicals and molecular chlorine? I assume they mean atomic chlorine when they they chlorine radicals which is more reactive Molecular chlorine away from water is pretty chemically stable. Metals don’t react with it. I doubt organic material would either at any appreciable rate.
They already did make it our fault. It was the chlorine in the polar regions which was caused by CFCs in refrigerants which caused the ozone hole. Then we phased out CFCs years ago, so there might be some explaining to do about the new chlorine.
But, but, there shouldn’t be any chlorine up there because we banned chlorofluorocarbons to save the ozone hole. Or something like that.
When they did up the feel-good Montreal Protocol, did they consider the contribution of sea salt to atmospheric chlorine? Don’t know, but kinda doubt it.
“We don’t really know the mechanism. It’s a mystery to us right now,”
Molecular chlorine, from sea salt released by melting sea ice…
_________________
Beg your pardon- sea salt released from MELTing ice?
You should have stuck with the “we’re clueless” part.
You guys must have been listening to the “scientists” abourd the Akademik Shokalsiy, because one of them said that melting ice caused salt release which caused the ice to freeze and trap them in place and turn them into buffoons.
Oh, Nevermind. I get it. You’re making your bid to be buffoons, too.
“The study is the first time that molecular chlorine has been measured in the Arctic, and the first time that scientists have documented such high levels of molecular chlorine in the atmosphere.”
Its the first time its been measured and its the first time such high levels have been measured…
Just a thought: if its the ‘first time’ they have been measured how in the world can you say ‘such high levels’???
I guess its good enough for climate science
Why would salt trapped in the ice go into the atmosphere as it melts instead of the water?
Huh! “No one expected there to be this level of chlorine in Barrow or in polar regions,” About 4 years ago, when I began to look into CAGW and the Antarctic Ozone Depletion Area, I recalled sailing in the lower parts of the Roaring Forties and the accumulation of salt salt spray high up on the ships. I also noticed a correlation between the circumpolar lows and the Antarctic Ozone Depletion Area. I expressed views that there could be a connection on a facebook site
, but was ridiculed……
Molecular chlorine, from sea salt released by melting sea ice, reacts with sunlight to produce chlorine atoms”
Er, I’m not sure if they know that sea salt in salty water (of which there is quite a lot in the ocean anyway, without having to invoke melting sea ice) does not spontaneously yield molecular chlorine.
Climate science: they make it up as they go along.
400 parts per trillion is not high. I am presuming that trillion means 10^12 so 4 CL atoms to 10^10 other atoms and molecules. Nope not high at all.
How much of this is a result of recent volcanic eruptions?
Steve (Paris) says atJanuary 15, 2014 at 12:42 am…
Well, that could mean that molecular chlorine has been measured in the atmosphere in places other than the Arctic.
In which case the study could be finding that cold places – with little sunlight – are less efficient at breaking up molecular chlorine.
That would be a helpful and believable observation. Indeed it is not unexpected
.
L’ha ribloggato su planetvoicee ha commentato:
A very interesting article on a anomalous levels of molecular chlorine in the atmosphere in Alaska.
Take a look !!!
““No one expected there to be this level of chlorine in Barrow or in polar regions,” said Greg Huey, a professor in the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta.”
So, something never directly measured before was measured and the result exceeded expectations of this professor? Clearly the scientific method was AWAL during this study.
Molecular chlorine released by melting sea ice? Sea ice melts from below sea level, no? How does that chlorine get released into the atmosphere considering it would exist as hypochlorite in ice and seawater?
So all this was found in 2009 and has been analyzed for the past four years, You’d think these folks would e interested enough to return to see what’s going on now, four years later. They
don’t seem to be very inquisitive about something they .say surprised them. Also lots and lots of “we don’t knows” and, in the end, a lack of words about what, if anything, this all means, if it
means anything.
The sea ice is changing dramatically they opine, there is less of it every year they say. Except that it has been increasing every year. They are pretending they are in the arctic, they best be careful one of those southern polar bears may get them.
They do not know what is causing it but it only happens during the day, it must be the penguins.
Simple lab experiment using the different frequencies of the electro magnetic spectrum would most likely give them a clue. They seem to be about as clued up as the ship of fools.
As for the traces of mercury down there, no one eats penguins except sea lions. Given enough time it may be a mineable resource.
The major source of elemental mercury in the Arctic regions is coal-burning plants around the world.
Yeah? How can they be so sure of that? What’s their basis for this claim? How about all the naturally burning coal seams?
I remember that in the early days of atomic absorption spectroscopy someone published a list of metals found in a potato. The list included numerous highly toxic heavy metals and the story made headlines in the press. The quantities involved were negligible so in a way it was a story about (almost literally) nothing.
This story sounds fairly similar.
At high school in Tønsberg (Norway) in 1962, in the chemistry course, we titrated for free chlorine in sea water samples from different places in the Oslo fjord. At that time, we were taught that free chlorine was generated by the action of UV light on sea water.
I have tried to trace this information at some occasions (being once responsible for the follow-up of dioxins in the environment of interest to the Norwegian dairy industry), but failed to find any hard facts. Are there better chemists than myself reading this, so please come forward!
I guess this means we’re safe to return back to inexpensive CFCs from current expensive technology?
Would this be a significant amount?
Be afraid, be very afraid. The arctic has been doing this for millions of years. Be afraid. Oh and send us some money so we can find out how this might happen.
“Molecular chlorine, from sea salt released by melting sea ice” Did they really say this?
When water freezes it excludes solute (salts) from its crystal matrix. The surrounding seawater gets more salty and denser an so sinks- which drives the thermoHALINE circulation.
And these bozos got published in Nature??
One has measured a lot of chlorine (under form of chloride) at a lot of places, usually higher with winds from the seaside than from land side.
The main background indeed is caused by the oceans: not the melting sea ice, which is largely salt/chlorine free, but the open oceans which present a larger surface if the ice melts. Sea salt spray may be one source, but the Na-Cl bond is hard to split, as it needs a lot of energy. Alternative is HCl (hydrochloric acid) which evaporates from the ocean surface, even if the ocean waters are slightly alkaline, because it is a volatile molecule. The global emissions from that source are estimated at 300,000 tons per year:
http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/education/gases/man.html
Human and volcanic contributions completely dwarfed by the ocean releases…
HCl may rain out, but if precipitation is low, as is the case at Barrow, it remains longer in the atmosphere. It is easier to split in the atmosphere by UV sunlight than NaCl (common salt).
Another, much larger source is CH3Cl, methylchloride or chloromethane, also 99% natural, made by fungi in their chemical pathway to make strong chemicals that are capable of cracking lignin, the chaotic structures that make the glue which binds cellulose together in all plants. Fungi need the cellulose as energy food, but lignin stands in the way.
While most algue are minor sources, some of the main species found in the Arctic (including red algue in snow) are interesting sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methyl_chloride
An extensive study of 30 species of polar macroalgae revealed the release of significant amounts of CH3Cl in only Gigartina skottsbergii and Gymnogongrus antarcticus.[
But the main source is the production of methylchloride by fungi:
http://aem.asm.org/content/64/8/2831.full
Most of the methylchloride is split up in the troposphere under UV light and the free chlorine radicals help to destroy a lot of organics in the troposphere, together with OH radicals, also made by UV light from water molecules. But because of the quantities involved, some may even reach the stratosphere, adding to ozone depletion, in this case an all natural cause…
So, in my opinion, the origin of the free chlorine is largely known, and probably more from the increased metabolism via the methylchloride route than from the salt/HCl route…