Enormous Aquifer Discovered Under Greenland Ice Sheet

ice core segment
An ice core segment extracted from the aquifer by Koenig’s team, with trapped water collecting at the lower left of the core.Image Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/Ludovic Brucker

From NASA, I had to laugh at this statement:

The water in the aquifer has the potential to raise global sea level by 0.016 inches (0.4 mm).

That’s assuming it can get out sometime in the distant future. Greenland’s topography under the ice is bowl shaped.

===================================

Buried underneath compacted snow and ice in Greenland lies a large liquid water reservoir that has now been mapped by researchers using data from NASA’s Operation IceBridge airborne campaign.

A team of glaciologists serendipitously found the aquifer while drilling in southeast Greenland in 2011 to study snow accumulation. Two of their ice cores were dripping water when the scientists lifted them to the surface, despite air temperatures of minus 4 F (minus 20 C). The researchers later used NASA’s Operation Icebridge radar data to confine the limits of the water reservoir, which spreads over 27,000 square miles (69,930 square km) – an area larger than the state of West Virginia. The water in the aquifer has the potential to raise global sea level by 0.016 inches (0.4 mm).

“When I heard about the aquifer, I had almost the same reaction as when we discovered Lake Vostok [in Antarctica]: it blew my mind that something like that is possible,” said Michael Studinger, project scientist for Operation IceBridge, a NASA airborne campaign studying changes in ice at the poles. “It turned my view of the Greenland ice sheet upside down – I don’t think anyone had expected that this layer of liquid water could survive the cold winter temperatures without being refrozen.”

Southeast Greenland is a region of high snow accumulation. Researchers now believe that the thick snow cover insulates the aquifer from cold winter surface temperatures, allowing it to remain liquid throughout the year. The aquifer is fed by meltwater that percolates from the surface during the summer.

The new research is being presented in two papers: one led by University of Utah’s Rick Forster that was published on Dec. 22 in the journal Nature Geoscience and one led by NASA’s Lora Koenig that has been accepted for publication in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. The findings will significantly advance the understanding of how melt water flows through the ice sheet and contributes to sea level rise.

When a team led by Forster accidentally drilled into water in 2011, they weren’t able to continue studying the aquifer because their tools were not suited to work in an aquatic environment. Afterward, Forster’s team determined the extent of the aquifer by studying radar data from Operation IceBridge together with ground-based radar data. The top of the water layer clearly showed in the radar data as a return signal brighter than the ice layers.

Koenig, a glaciologist with NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., co-led another expedition to southeast Greenland with Forster in April 2013 specifically designed to study the physical characteristics of the newly discovered water reservoir. Koenig’s team extracted two cores of firn (aged snow) that were saturated with water. They used a water-resistant thermoelectric drill to study the density of the ice and lowered strings packed with temperature sensors down the holes, and found that the temperature of the aquifer hovers around 32 F (zero C), warmer than they had expected it to be.

Koenig and her team measured the top of the aquifer at around 39 feet (12 meters) under the surface. This was the depth at which the boreholes filled with water after extracting the ice cores. They then determined the amount of water in the water-saturated firn cores by comparing them to dry cores extracted nearby. The researchers determined the depth at which the pores in the firn close, trapping the water inside the bubbles – at this point, there is a change in the density of the ice that the scientists can measure. This depth is about 121 feet (37 meters) and corresponds to the bottom of the aquifer. Once Koenig’s team had the density, depth and spatial extent of the aquifer, they were able to come up with an estimated water volume of about 154 billion tons (140 metric gigatons). If this water was to suddenly discharge to the ocean, this would correspond to 0.016 inches (0.4 mm) of sea level rise.

Researchers think that the perennial aquifer is a heat reservoir for the ice sheet in two ways: melt water carries heat when it percolates from the surface down the ice to reach the aquifer. And if the trapped water were to refreeze, it would release latent heat. Altogether, this makes the ice in the vicinity of the aquifer warmer, and warmer ice flows faster toward the sea.

“Our next big task is to understand how this aquifer is filling and how it’s discharging,” said Koenig. “The aquifer could offset some sea level rise if it’s storing water for long periods of time. For example after the 2012 extreme surface melt across Greenland, it appears that the aquifer filled a little bit. The question now is how does that water leave the aquifer on its way to the ocean and whether it will leave this year or a hundred years from now.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

76 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alan Robertson
December 23, 2013 1:31 pm

Maybe they can run a pipe over to the Oglala aquifer, which is being rapidly depleted to water the corn, to make the ethanol…

December 23, 2013 1:36 pm

0.016 inches/0.4 mm?
– And the error margin is …?
How much does sea level varies around the world on daily basis, due to the moon?
– In several places that’s measured in meters with two digits …
.. and the wind?

Jimbo
December 23, 2013 1:38 pm

Has the aquifer always been there?
Could the melt have been caused by volcanic / geothermal activity?

Jimbo
December 23, 2013 1:50 pm

The water in the aquifer has the potential to raise global sea level by 0.016 inches (0.4 mm).

How long will this take?

“When I heard about the aquifer, I had almost the same reaction as when we discovered Lake Vostok [in Antarctica]:

Hmmmm. Isn’t it a bit nippy above lake Vostok. I vaguely recall a recent item about record cold in East Antarctica. I also vaguely recall extreme snow in East Antarctic too.
Abstract – 2 NOV 2012
Snowfall-driven mass change on the East Antarctic ice sheet
CBS News – December 10, 2013
Antarctic temperature hit record low

Bill Marsh
Editor
December 23, 2013 1:52 pm

” “The aquifer could offset some sea level rise if it’s storing water for long periods of time. ”
Ah, so the sea level rise is hiding in the deep of Greenland. I knew it.

Alan Bates
December 23, 2013 1:55 pm
tmitsss
December 23, 2013 1:55 pm

Would it be easier to get to this aquifer or the Moon?

Bill Illis
December 23, 2013 1:59 pm

The glacial ice on Greenland has a temperature of about -31C down to about 1500 metres so this water is not going anywhere. It is just flowing some distance until it refreezes.
The glacial ice starts to warm up below 1500 metres due to bedrock heating until it gets to -2.7C to -3.5C at bedrock which is just enough to melt the ice at the bottom given the higher pressures.
So the water is not going to flow for a 1000 kms to the coast through -31C ice or make it to the bottom 3 kms lower trough -31C ice at higher and higher pressure.
http://s12.postimg.org/d9wzihmil/Greenland_Ice_Sheet_Temps.png
http://i1340.photobucket.com/albums/o728/OlTom67/GreenlandBoreholeTemps.jpg

Teddi
December 23, 2013 1:59 pm

Does everything NASA publishes have to have a reference to global warming ?

December 23, 2013 2:00 pm

Why are we wasting time and money on a settled science? Okay, okay. I understand. This is a sign of man made global warming but without more research we won’t be able to blame the usual suspects.
The serious questions are so obvious. Drain the lake and the rebound is? How long would it take?
The one obvious assumption that needs to be addressed: “Altogether, this makes the ice in the vicinity of the aquifer warmer, and warmer ice flows faster toward the sea.” It’s a lake of slush in a bowl. Who is to say the system prevents glacial ice from advancing?

Reply to  Rob Dawg
December 23, 2013 2:12 pm

SasjaL these are climate scientists and therefore above such mundane things like measurement and estimation uncertainties.

Rhoda R
December 23, 2013 2:03 pm

I get the impression that researchers are desperate at this point.

December 23, 2013 2:03 pm

The line which puzzled me is the reference to permanent meltwater. Is it possible for meltwater to be permanent ? Isn’t that just called water?

Rhoda R
December 23, 2013 2:04 pm

Please insert the word “getting” between “are” and “desperate”. Thank you.

December 23, 2013 2:07 pm

Teddi says: December 23, 2013 at 1:59 pm
Yes, they will find a way to blame it on global warming, as soon as they find a new object in space … [/sarc]

catweazle666
December 23, 2013 2:11 pm

“the temperature of the aquifer hovers around 32 F (zero C), warmer than they had expected it to be”
Oops…

December 23, 2013 2:15 pm

Maybe this is where all the “missing heat” has gone.

David Oliver Smith
December 23, 2013 2:22 pm

If “water flows through the ice sheet,” does that mean that CO2 is not permanently trapped in contemporary ice and that measurement of CO2 content in ice cores does not represent the CO2 levels in the atmosphere from indicated time of the ice formation?

December 23, 2013 2:29 pm

I knew I remembered it:
http://www.livescience.com/2125-magma-melting-greenland-ice.html
” The newly discovered hotspot, an area where Earth’s crust is thinner, allowing hot magma from Earth’s mantle to come closer to the surface, is just below the ice sheet and could have caused it to form, von Frese and his team suggest.
“Where the crust is thicker, things are cooler, and where it’s thinner, things are warmer,” von Frese explained. “And under a big place like Greenland or Antarctica, natural variations in the crust will makes some parts of the ice sheet warmer than others.” “

Bryan A
December 23, 2013 2:30 pm

Gareth Phillips says:
December 23, 2013 at 2:03 pm
The line which puzzled me is the reference to permanent meltwater. Is it possible for meltwater to be permanent ? Isn’t that just called water?
So long as the meltwater isn’t mixed with other water, I would suppose that it could be refered to as “Permanent” so long as it doesn’t change state. Though refering to it as “Permanent Meltwater” is more dramatically climatic while “Water” is anticlimatic

bob alou
December 23, 2013 2:38 pm

“It turned my view of the Greenland ice sheet upside down – I don’t think anyone had expected that this layer of liquid water could survive the cold winter temperatures without being refrozen.”
Ok, I am just a Petroleum Engineer but having lived in North Dakota, Alaska, and Wyoming for many winters even I knew that water in the liquid state exists under ice, so why is this obviously over- grant- monied id-ten-t surprised that there is water under ice???
The moran must live in the tropics year round and the only ice he sees is in a margarita.
Good thing I live on a hill here in central Texas, man can you imagine what “0.016 inches/0.4 mm” of water would do to my insurance in the flood plain. Guess I need to put my house on stilts.
Why, we have had 28 inches of rain the last 3 months and so far except for the poor souls in the creek bottoms nobody has headed for the mountains.
0/016 inches is how much dew I have to wipe off my windshield when I go to work in the morning. I repeat, Moran! https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=VP75GURTTzmnjM&tbnid=Ujdd9BLKAdcd3M:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbrotherpeacemaker.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2F01%2F&ei=J7u4UtivI-Tg2gWfuoCYBw&bvm=bv.58187178,d.b2I&psig=AFQjCNGL3vOdREcLPZWv8KxNBTiPQg3Wjw&ust=1387924645910268

December 23, 2013 2:38 pm

That is geothermal energy melting that ice. That water isn’t going anywhere.

Mac the Knife
December 23, 2013 2:40 pm

From the Yahoo news ‘spin’ cycle:
http://news.yahoo.com/greenland-39-snow-hides-100-billion-tons-water-135645076.html?soc_src=copy
“The existence of this rather flavorless natural snow cone has many implications for the future of the ice sheet, some that may make the ice go away faster and others that help keep the ice a little longer,” said Richard Alley, a glaciologist at Pennsylvania State University, who was not involved in the study. “We would like to understand these implications better so we can help reduce the uncertainties about future changes.”
“Researchers estimate Greenland has lost more than 200 million tons of ice and snow each year since 2003. The ice sheet will completely disappear when the planet’s average temperature rises by 2 to 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit (1 to 4 degrees Celsius) above preindustrial temperatures, as predicted by the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, released in September.
Earth’s surface temperatures are already up 1.3 F (0.7 C) from preindustrial temperatures, with average temperatures rising faster in Greenland.
“This doesn’t change our knowledge that too much carbon dioxide in the air will melt Greenland’s ice, but it will help us make better estimates of how much and how fast,” Alley said.

bob alou
December 23, 2013 2:40 pm

sorry about the link, it did not work as planned. It was supposed to go to the Morans meme pic. If the mod will delete the link and this I would appreciate it. No way to preview a post. Mea culpa.

bobl
December 23, 2013 2:48 pm

David Oliver Smith,
Just what I was thinking… If meltwater flows down, through ice colder tham 0c, then CO2 in ice that melts even transitorially can’t be used to gauge CO2, major contamination there

Editor
December 23, 2013 2:49 pm

And this aquifer was not there before?

1 2 3