NASA to do summer aerial melt watch for Greenland

NASA Begins Airborne Campaign to Map Greenland Ice Sheet Summer Melt

For the first time, a NASA airborne campaign will measure changes in the height of the Greenland Ice Sheet and surrounding Arctic sea ice produced by a single season of summer melt.

NASA’s C-130 research aircraft flew from the Wallops Flight Facility in Wallops Island, Va., to Greenland on Wednesday (Oct 30th) where they will conduct survey flights to collect data that will improve our understanding of seasonal melt and provide baseline measurements for future satellite missions. Flights are scheduled to continue through Nov. 16.

The land and sea ice data gathered during this campaign will give researchers a more comprehensive view of seasonal changes and provide context for measurements that will be gathered during NASA’s ICESat-2 mission, which is scheduled for launch in 2016.

“The more ground we cover the more comparison points we’ll have for ICESat-2,” said Bryan Blair of Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., principal investigator for the Land, Vegetation and Ice Sensor, or LVIS.

A pond of melt water on the Greenland ice sheet seen in 2008.
A pond of melt water on the Greenland ice sheet seen in 2008.
Image Credit:
NASA / Michael Studinger

Warm summer temperatures lead to a decline in ice sheet elevation that often can be significant in low-lying areas along the Greenland coast. In past years, the Jakobshavn Glacier, located in the lower elevations of western Greenland, has experienced declines of nearly 100 feet in elevation over a single summer.  Higher elevations farther inland see less dramatic changes, usually only a few inches, caused by pockets of air in the snowpack that shrink as temperatures warm.

“Surface melt is more than half of the story for Greenland’s mass loss,” said Ben Smith, senior physicist at the University of Washington’s Advanced Physics Laboratory, Seattle, and member of the science team that selected flight lines for this campaign. The rest of Greenland’s mass loss comes from ice flowing downhill into the ocean, often breaking off to form icebergs, and from melting at the base of the ice sheet.

Researchers will measure ice elevation using the LVIS laser altimeter and the LVIS-GH, a new, smaller version designed to fly on NASA’s Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle.  LVIS and LVIS-GH will measure separate but overlapping swaths of the ice from an altitude of 28,000 feet.

The C-130 carrying both instruments will fly out of Thule and Kangerlussuaq, Greenland, allowing researchers to sample both high- and low-elevation ice and a variety of geographic areas.

The NASA C-130 on the ramp after first arriving at Wallops this summer.
The NASA C-130 on the ramp after first arriving at Wallops this summer.
Image Credit:
NASA / Patrick Black

“We plan to concentrate our flights on areas northwest, southeast and southwest Greenland and the Arctic Ocean,” said Michelle Hofton, LVIS mission scientist at Goddard and the University of Maryland, College Park. “The measurements we collect along lines sampled in IceBridge’s spring 2013 Arctic campaign will allow scientists to assess changes over the summer.”

Flying from Thule also will allow mission scientists to gather data on Arctic sea ice shortly after it reaches its annual minimum extent. This will help researchers get a clearer picture of what happens over the summer. It also will help researchers gather new data on snow covering sea ice when combined with information collected by the European Space Agency’s CryoSat-2 polar-monitoring satellite. LVIS detects the snow surface while CryoSat’s radar sees through snow to find the top of the ice. Researchers can combine these measurements to calculate snow depth.

“This will be crucial for assessing the snow cover on sea ice during a very different time of year,” said Nathan Kurtz, sea ice scientist at Goddard.

For more information about NASA’s IceSat-2 satellite, visit:

http://icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov/icesat2

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

67 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
cynical_scientist
November 4, 2013 7:43 pm

More data is always useful. I wish however that they’d also look at the gain over winter and run this for several seasons not just one. Knowing how much ice is lost over summer seems to me to be good for not much other than generating alarming headlines. Ice is lost over summer and gained over winter. What matters is the balance between loss and gain and the resulting year on year change.

Brian H
November 4, 2013 7:53 pm

And should it happen that ice is added over the course of the year?

Rob Dawg
November 4, 2013 8:05 pm

Of all the places one can visit over one season out of the year only and get an erroneous picture this would rank high.

Steve Oregon
November 4, 2013 8:05 pm

Oh yes this really matters. We can never have too much monitoring.
Looky here there’s stuff happening.
Imagine the good it will provide. I’m weeping with anticipatory gratitude.
And to think NASA used to waste their time going to the Moon. Idiots.
OK seriously now…Get real. More data is NOT always useful, That’s asinine.
There are countless heaps of useless data piled up in countless bureaucracies.
My great grandfather Al even had something to say about it.
Albert Einstein quote: “Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted.”

graphicconception
November 4, 2013 8:20 pm

I would put money on the fact that the next set of data will be “unprecedented” – and very probably the one after that as well!
Not to mention: “Worse than we thought”.

rogerknights
November 4, 2013 8:32 pm

Maybe a drone could do some of this work?
Say, how about a drone or two in Antarctica?

JimS
November 4, 2013 8:46 pm

I always found the story of the lost squadron buried under 260 feet of Greenland ice after 40 years, quite interesting:
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/08/04/us/world-war-ii-planes-found-in-greenland-in-ice-260-feet-deep.html

Bennett In Vermont
November 4, 2013 8:55 pm

Steve Oregon at 8:05 pm:
I agree. These folks have ” a nice cushy government job”, and the crap they churn out means there’s a McDonald’s somewhere missing a backup burger flipper.

Janice Moore
November 4, 2013 8:56 pm

Thanks for sharing that, Jim S (at 8:46pm today). Indeed, very interesting.
Hm. I just wonder how that ice got there? (eye roll)

Brian R
November 4, 2013 8:57 pm

I predict that after just a single season of measurements the reports will use words like “Unprecedented” and “Catastrophic”.

Cynical Scientst
November 4, 2013 9:00 pm

Another point of puzzlement: I can see how measurements like this might help calibrate and provide a baseline for an operational satellite; it is always useful to compare what the satellite sees with what things look like from lower down. But I can’t see how this is going to help provide a baseline for satellites that have yet to be launched.
Is the real purpose simply to generate headlines and demonstrate relevancy in the face of possible budget cutbacks?

Barbee
November 4, 2013 9:05 pm

NASA to dream up new and exciting ways to piss away your tax dollars.
And you had better LIKE it too! You racist, intolerant, anti-science neanderthal…..

dp
November 4, 2013 9:11 pm

It would be better if a non-biased non-CAGW advocacy agency did this data gathering but I can’t think of any within the government.

Hoser
November 4, 2013 9:26 pm

Ooh, they’ll shoot lots of new, even scarier, pictures for Uncle Al Gore. Now why doesn’t the former VP pay for that fuel or take it out of his stash at Occidental Petroleum? If he really believed in the dangers of carbon pollution, I would expect him to speak out against these flights. Fat chance.

Don
November 4, 2013 10:12 pm

Apologies in advance, as I am relatively new to all of the sea ice charts and so forth. But, I must ask, would it not have been more useful to have done this in mid-September? It appears the ice is rebuilding from late September onward.

wayne
November 4, 2013 10:23 pm

They are already too late for such a study looking for net melt and will only be wrong since they can report nothing truthful anymore.

philincalifornia
November 4, 2013 10:29 pm

I’m guessing that at least 1,000 people who read this site could write the Abstract, Introduction and Conclusion to this scientific “inquiry” already ….. and probably, ahem, excuse me, the errrrrmmmm “Experimental Section” too !!! Whoooo hoooo. Massive ice loss in Greenland ……..
Forget it frauds. Don’t even bother getting cold. No one, other than your fellow Thespians, believes you any more ……….

Richard111
November 4, 2013 10:40 pm

Oct 30 to Nov 16 ???? Ice melting???

markx
November 4, 2013 10:52 pm

It is interesting that published satellite measure of ice extent, ice loss and sea levels all supposedly have sub-millimeter resolution, but now we need some airborne radar to help calibrate it all?
Anyway, more data should be a good thing.

Mark and two Cats
November 4, 2013 11:06 pm

rogerknights said:
November 4, 2013 at 8:32 pm
Maybe a drone could do some of this work?
Say, how about a drone or two in Antarctica?
——————————————————
There’s lotsa drones in the obama administration, but I doubt they do much work.
Only a drone or two? I say we ship ’em ALL to Antarctica – obama too!

November 4, 2013 11:08 pm

I like the dates…
It is not at all a bad idea to gather data, even suspect data. Who knows, it might become routine and the we’ll know a little more than we do now. Always a good thing.

4TimesAYear
November 4, 2013 11:25 pm

“Warm summer temperatures lead to a decline in ice sheet elevation that often can be significant in low-lying areas along the Greenland coast. In past years, the Jakobshavn Glacier, located in the lower elevations of western Greenland, has experienced declines of nearly 100 feet in elevation over a single summer.”
Yeah, well while it’s melting in one place it’s being deposited in another. What goes up must come down. I suggest they check Antarctica for the balance of the equation.

Adam
November 4, 2013 11:27 pm

So long as they offset their carbon – otherwise they might *cause* the ice to melt!

tty
November 4, 2013 11:45 pm

If these guys think they can gather data on ice-melt on the Greenland ice-cap in November they are in for a surprise. The melt season is long over and fresh snow is accumulating all over the ice-cap.

KNR
November 4, 2013 11:48 pm

Interesting to see how they will cope with the constant changes in altitude the plane will experience on any ‘straight and level run’ which when your looking in details these runs are not.
Still I should image the modellers are all ready to carry-out any ‘ needed adjustments ‘

1 2 3