A new Vinerism has emerged:
“Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”.
No word on whether Harold Camping has approved the date yet…
From the University of Hawaii at Manoa
Study in Nature reveals urgent new time frame for climate change
Ecological and societal disruptions by modern climate change are critically determined by the time frame over which climates shift. Camilo Mora and colleagues in the College of Social Sciences’ Department of Geography at the University of Hawaii, Manoa have developed one such time frame. The study, entitled “The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability,” will be published in the October 10 issue of Nature and provides an index of the year when the mean climate of any given location on Earth will shift continuously outside the most extreme records experienced in the past 150 years.
The new index shows a surprising result. Areas in the tropics are projected to experience unprecedented climates first – within the next decade. Under a business-as-usual scenario, the index shows the average location on Earth will experience a radically different climate by 2047. Under an alternate scenario with greenhouse gas emissions stabilization, the global mean climate departure will be 2069.
“The results shocked us. Regardless of the scenario, changes will be coming soon,” said lead author Camilo Mora. “Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”
The scientists calculated the index for additional variables including evaporation, precipitation, and ocean surface temperature and pH. When looking at sea surface pH, the index indicates that we surpassed the limits of historical extremes in 2008. This is consistent with other recent studies, and is explained by the fact that ocean pH has a narrow range of historical variability and because the ocean has absorbed a considerable fraction of human-caused CO2 emissions.
The study found that the overarching global effect of climate change on biodiversity will occur not only as a result of the largest absolute changes at the poles, but also, perhaps more urgently, from small but rapid changes in the tropics.
Tropical species are unaccustomed to climate variability and are therefore more vulnerable to relatively small changes. The tropics hold the world’s greatest diversity of marine and terrestrial species and will experience unprecedented climates some 10 years earlier than anywhere else on Earth. Previous studies have already shown that corals and other tropical species are currently living in areas near their physiological limits. The study suggests that conservation planning could be undermined as protected areas will face unprecedented climates just as early and because most centers of high species diversity are located in developing countries
Rapid change will tamper with the functioning of Earth’s biological systems, forcing species to either move in an attempt to track suitable climates, stay and try to adapt to the new climate, or go extinct. “This work demonstrates that we are pushing the ecosystems of the world out of the environment in which they evolved into wholly new conditions that they may not be able to cope with. Extinctions are likely to result,” said Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science’s Department of Global Ecology, and who was not involved in this study. “Some ecosystems may be able to adapt, but for others, such as coral reefs, complete loss of not only individual species but their entire integrity is likely.”
These changes will affect our social systems as well. The impacts on the tropics have implications globally as they are home to most of the world’s population, contribute significantly to total food supplies, and house much of the world’s biodiversity.
In predominately developing countries, over one billion people under an optimistic scenario, and five billion under a business-as-usual-scenario, live in areas that will experience extreme climates before 2050. This raises concerns for changes in the supply of food and water, human health, wider spread of infectious diseases, heat stress, conflicts, and challenges to economies. “Our results suggest that countries first impacted by unprecedented climates are the ones with the least capacity to respond,” said coauthor Ryan Longman. “Ironically, these are the countries that are least responsible for climate change in the first place.”
“This paper is unusually important. It builds on earlier work but brings the biological and human consequences into sharper focus,” said Jane Lubchenco, former Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and now of Oregon State University, who was not involved in this study. “It connects the dots between climate models and impacts to biodiversity in a stunningly fresh way, and it has sobering ramifications for species and people.”
While the study describes global averages, the authors have visualized their data on an interactive map displaying when climate will exceed historical precedents for locations around the world. “We hope that with this map people can see and understand the progression of climate change in time where they live, hopefully connecting people more closely to the issue and increasing awareness about the urgency to act,” said coauthor Abby Frazier.
The index used the minimum and maximum temperatures from 1860-2005 to define the bounds of historical climate variability at any given location. The scientists then took projections for the next 100 years to identify the year in which the future temperature at any given location on Earth will shift completely outside the limits of historical precedents, defining that year as the year of climate departure.
The data came from 39 Earth System Models developed independently by 21 climate centers in 12 different countries. The models have been effective at reproducing current climate conditions and varied in their projected departure times by no more than five years.
The study suggests that any progress to slow ongoing climate change will require a larger commitment from developed countries to reduce emissions, but also more extensive funding of social and conservation programs in developing countries to minimize climate change impacts. The longer we wait, the more difficult remediation will be.
“Scientists have repeatedly warned about climate change and its likely effects on biodiversity and people,” said Mora. “Our study shows that such changes are already upon us. These results should not be reason to give up. Rather, they should encourage us to reduce emissions and slow the rate of climate change. This can buy time for species, ecosystems, and ourselves to adapt to the coming changes.”
This paper is funded by a grant/cooperative agreement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Project R/IR-25PD, which is sponsored by the University of Hawaii Sea Grant College Program, SOEST, under Institutional Grant No. NA09OAR4170060 from NOAA Office of Sea Grant, Department of Commerce. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its subagencies.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
CodeTech says:
“Taphonomic… you mean Roger Waters….”
Nope, Sir Bob played Pink in the movie (Pink Floyd The Wall) and did a danged fine job of becoming comfortably numb, even if he didn’t like Mondays.
Briggs has an excellent post on this paper.
http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=9443
excerpt-
“I mean, anybody who can speak of Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) in equations as precise as “historical climate variability” = 1.2773 ln * “historical time bins” + 2063.2 should be heeded. I mean, 2063.2—point 2! That kind of confidence can’t be ignored.”
The great black king will save us all….no worries
I’ll be 100 in 2039. I had hoped that by my 100th birthday the consensus would be that the whole AGW thing was the greatest and most pointlessly expensive scientific hoax in all of human history. Now it looks like I’ll have to live to be 108. This 2047 date is so stupid that plenty of people will believe it and plenty will get rich and famous pushing the idea. The same fools who think Obamacare is a good idea will believe the nonsense. We never run out of gullible useful idiots.
Jimbo says:
October 10, 2013 at 5:31 am
“Didn’t corals become more widespread during the high co2 world of the Ordovician?”
Given that they are carbon based life forms with photosynthesizing symbionts, an abundance of carbon should be rather good for them, one would assume. Maybe it’s the HCl that the “scientists” use in their acidification experiments that harms them, after all.
Now that it has been clearly shown during the last 16.8 years that rising levels co2 do not raise global temperatures, there remain three major climate forcing factors that may shape our climate for the next 2-3 decades, namely a much less active sun, a changing global ocean SST cycle which is headed for cooler ocean surface temperatures and a cooling Arctic due to changing deep ocean currents. Volcanic eruptions can also alter global weather but their effect only lasts for a few years and their timing is unpredictable. However whether you accept that the sun or the oceans or both as the prime climate drivers, both factors seem to point to possible 30-35 years of cooler weather rather than unprecedented warming. If we are also entering the start of the trough period of a longer 110+ year climate cycle as a result of three low solar cycles which occur every 100 years or so, then we may have even colder weather than the typical ocean driven 60 -70 year climate. . This was the case during, 1790-1820 and again 1880-1910 troughs which were colder than 1945-1975 trough. In either case the winters may be getting progressively colder for the next several decades. Winters during the next few years may get colder and most likely by 2018/2020 will be much colder than today. The winters could stay cold for the next several decades. This colder period can be moderated by warmer El Nino periods which typically occur every 3-7 years, however, there are also fewer strong climate alerting El Nino’s during cooler periods [only one per decade]. Land locked areas like Central US, Central Canada (especially the Prairies), Central Europe and Asia which do not get the moderating effect of the oceans could have colder winters than the coastal areas. Given this possible scenario , it hard to imagine how the unusual warming talked about by the authors of this article will occur by 2047.
This is a remarkable paper.
They claim to be able to predict temperatures decades into the future in specific locations, each representing less than 0.2 ppm of the globe’s surface area.
The paper should have a caveat (like that found with the newspaper’s horoscope) added at the beginning of the abstract-
“This paper is for entertainment purposes only.”
Next stop — Hollywood special effects with movie and plot.
@frank Lee MeiDere –
You left out “carbon pollution” in your catalog of noms du jour.
good day to all.
Quick question…
Why aren’t these climate scientists working towards solutions or alternatives? If they are so certain, wouldn’t a funding boost to alternative means of energy production be the prudent move? Also, there is a lot of talk about climate change affecting ocean temperature yet very little talk is directed towards the polluting of the ocean with hazardous chemical waste and plastics. Shouldn’t that be a priority above and beyond stoking the fires of doom?
It’s all very confusing for a young person like myself. Taking on the climate debate is like denying the existence of god in medieval times… it’s heretical.
have a lovely day.
Wait, we’ll be able to check this before the geldofocalypse: they claim it will start in Kingston in a decade! The tropics, which have barely warmed through the entire satellite era, need to get cooking soon!
Meanwhile, winter started 2 months early with snow in Germany…
And a friend of mine who lives west of the Black Hills got 55 inches of snow…..in the first week of October?? Again I ask, what is so inherently BAD about warming??
BULLSHIT. Why are people allowed to get away with making stuff up? There is now evidence that “Tropical species are unaccustomed to climate variability and are therefore more vulnerable to relatively small changes”. What a load of sh!t.
Correction:
“There is no evidence that…..”
It’s worse than I thought.
We know that tropical species HAVE experienced NATURAL climate variability and have either survived, evolved or gone extinct. As for small changes, they happen every year, every 30 years, every 60 years and so on (large and small). This paper is toilet paper.
cupid says:
October 10, 2013 at 9:55 am
“Consensus, settled” climate scientists have already achieved their goals, ie an endless stream of funding.
RE: herkimer says:
October 10, 2013 at 8:18 am
At best the world could be recovering from the likely cold period that seems increasingly likely to span between 2015 and 2040.
Jimbo says:
October 10, 2013 at 6:20 pm
Tropical species migrate for a variety of reasons besides climatic changes:
http://www.pnas.org/content/71/2/339.full.pdf
Armadillos & ground sloths were among the many tropical South American groups which happily spread to North America when the Isthmus of Panama formed, venturing into subtropical, temperate & even Arctic regions.
2047? Didn’t somebody say back in 1988 that we’d all be dead by now? Now we have about another 25 years? In 2047 will have until about 2075?
I wonder if they picked 2047 rather than a round number like 2050 to give the illusion of precision? Or maybe it was just to catch people’s eye. I read somewhere years ago that there were fewer speeders in a particular construction zone after they changed the sign from “Speed Limit 35” to “Speed Limit 33”.
Well let’s see:
These Hawaii folks say it will soon get much hotter.
I say it will soon get colder, perhaps significantly colder.
Using the irrefutable logic of the IPCC, lets average the output of our models.
… Turns out we’ll be just fine.
[I suppose I have to say “sarc off”]
Now is the winter of our discontent
Made glorious summer by this son of York;
And all the clouds that low’r’d upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.
– Richard III
Yet more computer generated drivel awaiting a good slapdown.
“unusually important”? In her dreams. Just more Alarmist trivia.
Um, 47-13 = 34.
This is not a chawade. 😉