A new Vinerism has emerged:
“Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”.
No word on whether Harold Camping has approved the date yet…
From the University of Hawaii at Manoa
Study in Nature reveals urgent new time frame for climate change
Ecological and societal disruptions by modern climate change are critically determined by the time frame over which climates shift. Camilo Mora and colleagues in the College of Social Sciences’ Department of Geography at the University of Hawaii, Manoa have developed one such time frame. The study, entitled “The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability,” will be published in the October 10 issue of Nature and provides an index of the year when the mean climate of any given location on Earth will shift continuously outside the most extreme records experienced in the past 150 years.
The new index shows a surprising result. Areas in the tropics are projected to experience unprecedented climates first – within the next decade. Under a business-as-usual scenario, the index shows the average location on Earth will experience a radically different climate by 2047. Under an alternate scenario with greenhouse gas emissions stabilization, the global mean climate departure will be 2069.
“The results shocked us. Regardless of the scenario, changes will be coming soon,” said lead author Camilo Mora. “Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”
The scientists calculated the index for additional variables including evaporation, precipitation, and ocean surface temperature and pH. When looking at sea surface pH, the index indicates that we surpassed the limits of historical extremes in 2008. This is consistent with other recent studies, and is explained by the fact that ocean pH has a narrow range of historical variability and because the ocean has absorbed a considerable fraction of human-caused CO2 emissions.
The study found that the overarching global effect of climate change on biodiversity will occur not only as a result of the largest absolute changes at the poles, but also, perhaps more urgently, from small but rapid changes in the tropics.
Tropical species are unaccustomed to climate variability and are therefore more vulnerable to relatively small changes. The tropics hold the world’s greatest diversity of marine and terrestrial species and will experience unprecedented climates some 10 years earlier than anywhere else on Earth. Previous studies have already shown that corals and other tropical species are currently living in areas near their physiological limits. The study suggests that conservation planning could be undermined as protected areas will face unprecedented climates just as early and because most centers of high species diversity are located in developing countries
Rapid change will tamper with the functioning of Earth’s biological systems, forcing species to either move in an attempt to track suitable climates, stay and try to adapt to the new climate, or go extinct. “This work demonstrates that we are pushing the ecosystems of the world out of the environment in which they evolved into wholly new conditions that they may not be able to cope with. Extinctions are likely to result,” said Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science’s Department of Global Ecology, and who was not involved in this study. “Some ecosystems may be able to adapt, but for others, such as coral reefs, complete loss of not only individual species but their entire integrity is likely.”
These changes will affect our social systems as well. The impacts on the tropics have implications globally as they are home to most of the world’s population, contribute significantly to total food supplies, and house much of the world’s biodiversity.
In predominately developing countries, over one billion people under an optimistic scenario, and five billion under a business-as-usual-scenario, live in areas that will experience extreme climates before 2050. This raises concerns for changes in the supply of food and water, human health, wider spread of infectious diseases, heat stress, conflicts, and challenges to economies. “Our results suggest that countries first impacted by unprecedented climates are the ones with the least capacity to respond,” said coauthor Ryan Longman. “Ironically, these are the countries that are least responsible for climate change in the first place.”
“This paper is unusually important. It builds on earlier work but brings the biological and human consequences into sharper focus,” said Jane Lubchenco, former Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and now of Oregon State University, who was not involved in this study. “It connects the dots between climate models and impacts to biodiversity in a stunningly fresh way, and it has sobering ramifications for species and people.”
While the study describes global averages, the authors have visualized their data on an interactive map displaying when climate will exceed historical precedents for locations around the world. “We hope that with this map people can see and understand the progression of climate change in time where they live, hopefully connecting people more closely to the issue and increasing awareness about the urgency to act,” said coauthor Abby Frazier.
The index used the minimum and maximum temperatures from 1860-2005 to define the bounds of historical climate variability at any given location. The scientists then took projections for the next 100 years to identify the year in which the future temperature at any given location on Earth will shift completely outside the limits of historical precedents, defining that year as the year of climate departure.
The data came from 39 Earth System Models developed independently by 21 climate centers in 12 different countries. The models have been effective at reproducing current climate conditions and varied in their projected departure times by no more than five years.
The study suggests that any progress to slow ongoing climate change will require a larger commitment from developed countries to reduce emissions, but also more extensive funding of social and conservation programs in developing countries to minimize climate change impacts. The longer we wait, the more difficult remediation will be.
“Scientists have repeatedly warned about climate change and its likely effects on biodiversity and people,” said Mora. “Our study shows that such changes are already upon us. These results should not be reason to give up. Rather, they should encourage us to reduce emissions and slow the rate of climate change. This can buy time for species, ecosystems, and ourselves to adapt to the coming changes.”
This paper is funded by a grant/cooperative agreement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Project R/IR-25PD, which is sponsored by the University of Hawaii Sea Grant College Program, SOEST, under Institutional Grant No. NA09OAR4170060 from NOAA Office of Sea Grant, Department of Commerce. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its subagencies.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
They have connected the dots, and the fix is in. All bets are off now, and our climate goose is cooked unless we do as they say. I guess we’d better, because they have used top-notch models which are never wrong.
Except when they are.
I guess the only question is, how much climate science fiction can they manage to cram into one study?
@Will N. (glad SOMEONE is in an office that still has capital, heh) — It’s from “The Man Who Knew Too Much” (lol).
Actually, I think those bozos actually think that the higher you pile the pieces of junk, the more impressive it looks (and the better to hide behind).
To real scientists, it just looks like a big pile of junk.
“The models have been effective at reproducing current climate conditions and varied in their projected departure times by no more than five years.”
Remarkable models indeed!. They cannot be included within the CMIP5 ensemble used by the IPCC as Von Storch 7Zorita (2013) has told us that those models have only a 2% chance of reproducing current climate conditions. And then Fyfe Gillet Zwiers (2013) found that both CMIP5 and CMIP3 have been 100% out for 20 years and 300% out for 15 years.
Perhaps this study was being undertaken before the models were discredited?
A prediction I can safely make is that I will be 90 years old in 2047. What I want to know is can I make french fries by putting them out on a rock in the sun.
“Areas in the tropics are projected to experience unprecedented climates first – within the next decade.” Ok. I won’t be here in 2047 but might be still around in 2023. I expect the next decade here to be like the last – climate sameness. If I’m right and still coherent, I’ll make a point of tracking ’em down. (Or maybe scratch the coherence requirement?)
This mob remind me of kids trying to spook each other at night with scary stuff.
What’s with the “film at 11” ? Do I need to get my hiding cushion ready ?
“The data came from 39 Earth System Models.”
—
Are these the same models that couldn’t forecast the current pause?
“Under an alternate scenario with greenhouse gas emissions stabilization, the global mean climate departure will be 2069”
So even if we do what the alarmists want us to do and succeed in stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions, we can only buy 22 more years before we’re all doomed. Do they think that’s enough to convince us to grant them emergency dictatorial powers to destroy civilization as we know it? Personally, I would rather take my chances with 2047 than allow the alarmists to doom us today.
“Within my generation, whatever climate we were used to will be a thing of the past.”
Axiomatically true, since the climate “of the past” belongs to, well, the past. The climate of the present may closely resemble the climate of the past in all measured parameters, but it’s the climate of the present, not the climate of the past.
I think what Mora meant to say is that within her generation the climate will change considerably from what it is now.
For what it’s worth, I say the Earth’s climate system in 2047 will be pretty close to what it is now, and my model (“No major changes in anything.”) has outperformed her models for the last 17 years. 🙂
All you have to do is keep making predictions for the end of the world …. ONE DAY YOU WILL GET IT RIGHT …. the trick then is to find someone to brag to.
Robert of Ottawa says:
October 9, 2013 at 4:25 pm
OK (throws hands up in air) is immediate death imminent or simply just about to happen? It was supposed to be 2013 now it’s 2047? I’m confused.
*
I totally agree with you. I thought the tipping point was supposed to be 2008. Then again, didn’t Pachauri announce that by 2012, it would be too late to do anything?
None of these claimants care about being right, they just want more time to gather the money. They are heavily into postponement. Come 2047, they’ll shrug it off and claim that they NOW have “data” that says it’ll be 2068.
Why 2047, I wonder, because it sounds closer than 2050? A bit like $1.99 sounds a lot cheaper than $2.00? I reckon!
We should start demanding accountability, with heavy penalties for lying. They are doing this because there is no incentive not to.
“The results really shocked us, I mean, we told the models to tell us something really bad was going to happen within just enough time for us to retire but not soon enough for an incorrect prediction to affect our careers… and do you know what… they did! The models told us that we should get much more funding because something bad will happen after we retire and are no longer accountable.”
Paywalled of course, but here is the abstract……
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v502/n7470/full/nature12540.html#figures
“Some ecosystems may be able to adapt, but for others, such as coral reefs, complete loss of not only individual species but their entire integrity is likely.”
On the other hand, every living thing on earth today is a direct result of adaptation. It seems to me that nature is rather adept at adaptation.
I’m a lot more worried about the impending extinction of “Nature”.
By the year 2047,
The 0-2000 metre ocean will have warmed from +0.065C to +0.14C (the deep sea fishes will of course notice this 0.075C increase in temperatures even though most of them only live several years).
The 0-700 metre ocean will have warmed from +0.11C to +0.21C (nothing will have happened here of course).
The surface ocean will have warmed from +0.29C to +0.58C (and everything will die here since the 0.3C temperature increase is so much more than the average change in the seasons of about 10.0C)
http://s21.postimg.org/6h0l0crzr/IPCC_Prediction_and_Ocean_Temps_L_2100.png
So this is an example of a climate science paper that we are just supposed to “believe” (in reference to the previous article on WUWT).
Paywalled of course, but here is the abstract……
“Unprecedented climates will occur earliest in the tropics and among low-income countries”
There’s going to be extreme weather in Cancun and Detroit……………
2047? I will most likely be dead (law of averages). If not, I can use the extra heat.
Two words: Utter Bullshit
Well, that’s a relief. We are doomed after all.
I was starting to get worried there, with all the talk of the IPCC downplaying the dangers of climate change and the admission that Global Warming has stopped. It’s good to know we are still on track for DOOM.
Janice Moore
October 9, 2013 at 4:28 pm
National Obama Agenda Administration
Where’s Big Jim Slade when you need him?
“The data came from 39 Earth System Models ”
Enough said. Translation: pure biased speculation aka utter garbage.
What! The alarmists have given up all hope on the Arctic and now it’s the tropics? Wow one little cold snap up north and the tropics are all the rage – climate models you know, 39 in all, and quite good I’m told.
Although the ice-free in 2013 Arctic didn’t happen; somehow these omniscient 39 models won’t miss in 2047.
Says who?
This is getting very widespread traction in the media around the world because it makes specific predictions about specific cities making it news in those places. No matter that the predictions are complete rubbish.
It is being widely reported as the year when the average weather will be exceptional. In many cases reporters are interpreting this as saying that after this point every day will have exceptional weather (OMG we are all going to fry!). But the paper discusses yearly averages not daily weather. The yearly average can be above normal at the same time that every day in that year falls well within the normal range. Indeed the size of the predicted rise is tiny compared to the daily variation.
Trying to use models which are all but invalidated by current temperatures to make such a prediction is merely silly. The reporting escalates the silliness into a complete train wreck.
My local newspaper reporting this carries this:
‘Study author Camilo Mora and his colleagues said they hope this new way of looking at climate change will spur governments to do something before it is too late.’
Clearly dispassionate, objective scientists, with not a hint of a political agenda!
All that’s left for these poor schlubs is a milk crate, a Bible-looking book titled “The Science is Settled” to wave around and a nice busy street corner on which to proclaim “We’re Dooooomed!”.
The end (theirs) is truly nigh.
I just had the pleasure (privilege?) of traveling in the Pacific northwest along the Columbia and Snake Rivers and saw the geologic legacy of Lake Missoula and the bursting (?) of the Missoula ice dam many thousands of years ago. I have a hard time with the idea that climatic history began 150-170 years ago. These climate models that can’t model recent history surely can’t accurately account for the climate of the distant past. Color me unimpressed. There is nothing new under the sun and there is nothing humans can do about it.