Ocean warming – it's the aerosols

706644main_705852main_GEOS5_full_full[1]
This portrait of global aerosols was produced by a GEOS-5 simulation at a 10-kilometer resolution. Dust (red) is lifted from the surface, sea salt (blue) swirls inside cyclones, smoke (green) rises from fires, and sulfate particles (white) stream from volcanoes and fossil fuel emissions. Image credit: William Putman, NASA/Goddard Note this image is just for visualization, and independent of the CSIRO press release.
From CSIRO, but sadly just with modeling, not empirical analysis:

Rapid upper ocean warming linked to declining aerosols

Australian scientists have identified causes of a rapid warming in the upper subtropical oceans of the Southern Hemisphere.

They partly attribute the observed warming, and preceding cooling trends to ocean circulation changes induced by global greenhouse gas emissions and aerosols predominantly generated in the Northern Hemisphere from human activity.

The research, by scientists from CSIRO and the University of NSW, was published today in Scientific Reports.

Mr Tim Cowan, lead author of the study, says his group was initially interested in the three decade long cooling below the surface of the Southern Hemisphere subtropical oceans from the 1960s and 1990s. “But what really caught our eye was a rapid warming of these subtropical oceans from the mid-1990s, most noticeably in the Indian Ocean between 300 m to 1000 m depth,” said Mr Cowan.

This had the research team asking whether this rapid warming was partly a response to greenhouse gases overcoming the cooling effect of aerosols that peaked globally in the 1980s due to the introduction of clean air legislation across United States and Europe.

To test this, the researchers examined more than 40 state-of-the-art climate simulations that included historical changes to greenhouse gases and aerosols over the twentieth century. “What we found was that the models do a good job at simulating the late twentieth century cooling and rapid warming in the subtropical southern Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, however they show an around 30-year delay in the warming in the Indian Ocean” said Mr Cowan.

“This delay in the modelled Indian Ocean warming is likely due to the presence of atmospheric aerosols, generated through transport emissions, biomass burning, and industrial smog, together with natural emissions of sea salt and dust – these were also the main cause of the late twentieth century subtropical Indian Ocean below-surface cooling” said Mr Cowan.

“What makes this work fascinating is the fact that human-emitted aerosols have such a large impact on remote ocean temperatures.”

Mr Tim Cowan, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research

The researchers found that models with a delayed peak in Northern Hemisphere aerosol levels after the 1980s had a tendency to simulate a delayed rapid Indian Ocean warming until well after 2020, and that the rate of warming related to how quickly the aerosol levels declined after their peak.

“We know that aerosols in the atmosphere generally cool the Northern Hemisphere by scattering incoming sunlight. This, in turn, increases the movement of heat from the Southern Hemisphere oceans to the Northern Hemisphere oceans via a global oceanic conveyor belt, travelling south from the subtropical Indian Ocean, passing the southern tip of Africa into the south Atlantic and then north along the Gulf Stream” said co-author Dr Wenju Cai.

“Together with a greenhouse gas-induced southward shift the Indian subtropical ocean gyres towards the Antarctic, these processes delay the Indian Ocean warming in the models,” Dr Cai said.

“What makes this work fascinating is the fact that human-emitted aerosols have such a large impact on remote ocean temperatures” says Mr Cowan. “For many years aerosols have masked the direct surface warming induced by greenhouse gases in many Northern Hemisphere regions, however in the Southern subtropical Indian Ocean both aerosols and greenhouse gases have historically conspired to produce a net oceanic cooling, and now the reverse of some of these processes is occurring.”

Mr Cowan said that despite the observed rapid ocean warming, quantifying exactly how much is due to declining aerosols or increasing greenhouse gases remains difficult, but as human-generated air pollution is all-together phased out, this will undoubtedly reveal the full impact of greenhouse gases.

The research has been supported by the CSIRO Wealth from Oceans National Research Flagship, The Australian Climate Change Science Program and the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Climate System Science.

Read more media releases in our Media section.

Cowan T, Cai W, Purich A, Rotstayn L, England MH. 2013. Forcing of anthropogenic aerosols on temperature trends of the subthermocline southern Indian Ocean. Scientific Reports.

============================================================

Strangely, when I went to get some background for this essay, I went to NASA’s

Global Aerosol Climatology Project: Glory Science

but got this: Access denied.

Here it is in Google Cache:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:LUi3pEfq84oJ:gacp.giss.nasa.gov/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

What’s so secret there?

UPDATE: (~ 6hrs later) Either my complaint cleared the way, or it was a technical issue. Either way http://gacp.giss.nasa.gov/ is working now.  -Anthony

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

57 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Leo G
July 23, 2013 5:24 pm

What I find intriguing are the assertions of ocean warming based on shifts in the temperature versus depth profiles on the order of less than a 1/100 part of a degree Celsius per year from instruments (like those on the ARGO buoys) that have a depth resolution of metres and where the depth measurements are subject to drift (causing false indications of temperature increase even on non-faulty units).

Anymoose
July 23, 2013 6:40 pm

Simulation? Model? How about some actual measured data, just like a scientist might provide?

Janice Moore
July 23, 2013 8:54 pm

Re: “I miss a lot of posts these days. Has someone effectively trounced the claim that the deep ocean is sequestering a lot of ‘extra’ heat?” [Mr. Lynn at 8:54AM 7/23/13]
Yes!
J. Friday (above at 3:12PM) does some nice trouncing.
For the SLAM-DUNK — Ocean Heat Myth Smashed to Smithereens Arguments see the following:
1. Bob Tisdale has some EXCELLENT articles both on his own website and on WUWT. Here are two for your convenience (type “ocean heat” into the search box of WUWT, BTW, and you’ll get lots of good threads) — the comments are usually full of great information, too:
(1) Bob Tisdale
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/is-ocean-heat-content-data-all-its-stacked-up-to-be/
(2) Bob Tisdale
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/03/ocean-heat-content-0-to-2000-meters-why-arent-northern-hemisphere-oceans-warming-during-the-argo-era/
2. [Read this next one mainly for the comments which are EXCELLENT]
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/24/updated-climate-sensitivity-estimates-using-aerosol-adjusted-forcings-and-various-ocean-heat-uptake-estimates/

BezorgdeBurger
July 23, 2013 10:20 pm

We Europeans are happy with the Gulf-stream but I hope that you US guys stop exporting those sulfates for free with it 🙂

tango
July 24, 2013 3:39 am

in Australia the CSIRO HAS LOST ITS WAY we do not believe in anything they say about the global warming scam

Bill Illis
July 24, 2013 5:58 am

The Oceans are absorbing far less heat than the climate models estimate. The “lack-of-warming-excusers” have a good misdirection going right now with the ocean heat uptake rationalization but the numbers are much smaller than the theory builds in and they are far off what the climate models assume (while the models are still getting 0.23C per decade warming at the surface).
Here are the actual Ocean Heat Content uptake numbers from the NODC. In the Argo era,
–> 0-700 metre ocean –> 0.12 W/m2
–> 0-2000 metre ocean –> 0.49 W/m2
http://s10.postimg.org/ndav3htqx/OHC_700_2000_M_Q1_2013.png
I don’t see any acceleration in those numbers that would explain the current warming hiatus either.
What do the climate models have for Ocean Heat Content accumulation:
0-700(750) metre ocean (source) [3 to 4 times higher]:
–> GISS Model ER (RealClimate)–> 0.88 W/m2
–> CCSM4 (Trenberth) –> 0.78 W/m2
–> All models (Meehl 11 2 scenarios) –> 0.75 W/m2
0-2000 (bottom) metre ocean [2 to 3 times higher]:
–> GISS Model ER (RealClimate)–> 1.07 W/m2
–> CCSM4 (Trenberth) –> 1.4 W/m2
–> All models (Meehl 11 2 scenarios) –> 1.32 W/m2
So, it is just fake misdirection to keep the followers following. The scientists themselves know what the numbers are supposed to be. [Now I admit, you have to work with this data for some time before you can get your head around it because it is 10^22 joules and 10^23 joules/decade and W/m2 etc but the above are the numbers].
http://www.realclimate.org/images/ohc11.jpg
http://s16.postimg.org/ryzem5kh1/CCSM4_OHC_Rise.png
http://sustainabilitymonitor.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/hiatus-copy.png
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Staff/Fasullo/my_pubs/Meehl2011etalNCC.pdf
Then we could compare the Ocean, Land-Ice- Atmosphere heat accumulation to what the net human-made forcing is supposed to be right now (they keep trying to compare it to the top-of-the-atmosphere energy imbalance but the oceans and atmosphere are supposed to be responding to the lower atmosphere forcing). We don’t get to 3.0C per doubling without +3.7 W/m2 of CO2 forcing in the lower atmosphere. Ocean Heat Accumulation does not explain why most of the GHG-less-offsets forcing is missing and is heating/accumulating at a tiny rate.
http://s12.postimg.org/urxw7cq71/OHC_Accum_vs_Forcing_1955_2013_Q1.png

richard verney
July 24, 2013 7:00 am

Tom J says:
July 23, 2013 at 10:58 am
/////////////////////
But it is very green so could be something for the government to push. Does not use much petrol between fill ups and therefore does not needlessly deplete a limited and valuable resource, no nasty polluting emissions (so great for major cities such as LA and beijing) and no nasty noise. No delete the latter observation, a growling V8 is music to one’s ears. At any rate, all but those who are atuned to the symphony of the V12 of the GTO.