Obama's climate plan 'absolutely crazy'

Boehner hits the nail on the head

President Obama’s soon-to-be-revealed second-term climate change proposal is “absolutely crazy,” Speaker John Boehner said Thursday.

The Ohio Republican was incredulous when asked to react to reports that the White House plans to regulate carbon emissions from power plants as part of its climate change strategy.

“I think this is absolutely crazy,” Boehner said at his weekly press conference. “Why would you want to increase the cost of energy and kill more American jobs at a time when American people are asking, ‘Where are the jobs.’ “

From:The Hill’s E2-Wire

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

230 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Just Steve
June 20, 2013 12:56 pm

George Smith; carbon credits are like synthetic derivitives, fashioned out of thin air.

DirkH
June 20, 2013 12:59 pm

jai mitchell says:
June 20, 2013 at 12:44 pm
“While this is an extreme report, it outlines the reality that is the body of evidence and projections of what will be happening in the world over the next century if we don’t change the course of our direction. ”
It’s funny that the warmist alarmist Met Office predicted hot summers and a mediterranean climate for the UK; the alarmist warmist GBN predicts an ice age for the UK; and you still believe a word alarmist warmists say.
Quit the glue.

Chris R.
June 20, 2013 1:03 pm

To Jai mitchell:
Uh–about those “green jobs and lots of them”–see the following:
http://news.thomasnet.com/green_clean/2011/06/24/an-inquisition-into-the-spanish-green-jobs-study/
A highlight or two:

In 2009, Madrid’s Universidad Rey Juan Carlos published a paper titled “Study of the effects on employment of public aid to renewable energy sources,” prepared under research director Dr. Gabriel Calzada Álvarez. It’s from as academically respected a source as you’re likely to get for this sort of thing, and presents chart after table after graph of numbers and official statistics, footnoting everything in sight — in other words, probably as reliable as we’ll get.
…..
The fundamental economic reality the paper discovered, after exhaustive analysis and research, was that for every green job created by the Spanish government, the private sector lost 2.2 jobs. And even at that cannibalistic rate, the green jobs program “created a surprisingly low number of jobs,” about 60 percent of which were temporary construction jobs, others in administration and such, and only ten percent of which were actual permanent jobs operating renewable sources of electricity.
The study found that since 2000, Spain spent €571,138 to create each “green job,” including subsidies of more than €1 million per wind industry job.

Maybe you should lie down, because it seems you have a bit of a fever and are
experiencing hallucinations. Best wishes for a speedy recovery!

June 20, 2013 1:04 pm

Jai…Thanks to CO2 the planet is thriving as crop lands are yielding more per acre than anytime in our history. I might add with less water and fertilizer. And if the temperature goes up a degree or so the planet will welcome it with open arms. As George Carlin stated so eloquently in his “Save the Planet” piece the planet is fine it`s the people that is out of whack. I presume he meant you Jai.

Mardler
June 20, 2013 1:10 pm

Er, no, Jai, the UK is not experiencing abnormally low temperatures.
There is nothing happening to UK weather that is not within the bounds of normal variability but most people in the MetOffice & media (esp. the Grauniad & BBC) are wanting confirmation bias and are too young to remember e.g. snow in June many, many, years ago.
Before posting, please check the facts first.

Gail Combs
June 20, 2013 1:13 pm

jai mitchell
…. Green energy doesn’t kill jobs, just ask Texas. Green energy creates jobs, and lots of them. What green energy DOES do is help to prevent the loss of life that is detailed in this report.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So I asked Texas.

ERCOT: EPA Rule Threatens to Turn Out the Lights in Texas
Texas’ Electric Reliability Coalition of Texas — ERCOT — is firing up the warning flare that if the EPA’s new cross-state rules go into effect on January 1, 2012, parts of Texas may well go dark.
This is one of those cases where we believe it is our role to voice our concern that Texas could face a shortage of generation necessary to keep the lights on in Texas within a few years, if the EPA’s Cross-State Rule is implemented as written.
ERCOT’s May11 report to the Public Utility Commission on the impact of the proposed environmental regulations did not address the impact of SO2 restrictions on coal plants in ERCOT because these restrictions on Texas were not included as part of the EPA’s earlier rule proposal. We have not had time to fully analyze the entire 1,323-page Cross-State Rule released July 7 or to communicate with the generation owners regarding what their intentions will be. However, initial implications are that the SO2 requirements for Texas added at the last stage of the rule development will have a significant impact on coal generation, which provided 40 percent of the electricity consumed in ERCOT in 2010….

But that’s OK because ERCOT has a PLAN.

Energy InSight FAQs
….Rolling outages are systematic, temporary interruptions of electrical service. They are the last step in a progressive series of emergency procedures that ERCOT follows when it detects that there is a shortage of power generation within the Texas electric grid. ERCOT will direct electric transmission and distribution utilities, such as CenterPoint Energy, to begin controlled, rolling outages to bring the supply and demand for electricity back into balance.They generally last 15-45 minutes before being rotated to a different neighborhood to spread the effect of the outage among consumers, which would be the case whether outages are coordinated at the circuit level or individual meter level. Without this safety valve, power generating units could overload and begin shutting down and risk causing a domino effect of a statewide, lengthy outage. With smart meters, CenterPoint Energy is proposing to add a process prior to shutting down whole circuits to conduct a mass turn off of individual meters with 200 amps or less (i.e. residential and small commercial consumers) for 15 or 30 minutes, rotating consumers impacted during that outage as well as possible future outages.
There are several benefits to consumers of this proposed process. By isolating non-critical service accounts (“critical” accounts include hospitals, police stations, water treatment facilities etc.) and spreading “load shed” to a wider distribution, critical accounts that happen to share the same circuit with non-critical accounts will be less affected in the event of an emergency. Curtailment of other important public safety devices and services such as traffic signals, police and fire stations, and water pumps and sewer lifts may also be avoided.

As problems with an unstable grid due to Solar/wind becomes worst expect Smart Meters to become mandatory so CORPORATIONS can keep running.

Don’t want smart meter? Power shut off
The rollout of smart electric meters across the country has run into a few snags: one woman doesn’t want one, and ended up in the dark as a result.
You might not think that would be an issue. But it is, because Duke Energy is now beginning to disconnect any homeowner who refuses a new electric meter.
Other electric companies are not pulling the plug…yet…..

As Obama Promised: Energy Prices to Soon Skyrocket

Obama’s war on coal hits your electric bill
The market-clearing price for new 2015 capacity – almost all natural gas – was $136 per megawatt. That’s eight times higher than the price for 2012, which was just $16 per megawatt. In the mid-Atlantic area covering New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and DC the new price is $167 per megawatt. For the northern Ohio territory served by FirstEnergy, the price is a shocking $357 per megawatt…. These are not computer models or projections or estimates. These are the actual prices that electric distributors have agreed to pay for new capacity. The costs will be passed on to consumers at the retail level.

So the cost of energy in the USA will sky rocket. In the UK ‘Fuel Poverty’ is killing 65 people per day in the winter. Article: Fuel poverty deaths three times higher than government estimates and science paper: Fuel poverty and human health A review of recent evidence
The EPA and Department of Energy drastically underestimated the effects of the new EPA rulings. Many more plants are closing than anticipated. This means electricity prices will sky rocket and the electric grid could become unstable New Regulations to Take 34 GW of Electricity Generation Offline and the Plant Closing Announcements Keep Coming… According to EPA, …. these regulations will only shutter 9.5 GW of electricity generation capacity. OOPS, I guess the government miscalculated.
So what about the “Green Energy” companies funded with tax payer dollars that are supposed to replace these coal fired plants? They are going bankrupt at an alarming rate So far, [thats] 34 companies OOPS, I guess the government miscalculated.
What the politicians neglect to say is their plan for making this work is to install Smart Meters, an attractive opportunity for Investors This theoretically allows residential electricity to be turned off so the system can be balanced as wind and solar power surges and declines. Of course with renewables bankrupting, smart meters not installed and coal plants closing at three time the rate expected, this put a real big kink in that plan. OOPS, I guess the government miscalculated AGAIN so we are looking at rolling blackouts.

June 20, 2013 1:13 pm

For whatever the reasons, leading skeptics and you can include Anthony have steadfastly refused to be identified (directly) with the conservative mainstream meme that AGW was always politically left-wing in motivations.
The losses are huge over time. In the name of being “about science” the public is largely dis-informed as the core AGW value sets. Some level of the non-technical community in particular is forced into a distorted and cherry picked analytical debate which they can’t confidently dissent on those grounds while the essential AGW political motivations are obfuscated with the assistance of apathetic and conflicted skeptics. Now it hits the fan and the skeptics are the ones to made to look “political” due to their congenial posturing.

June 20, 2013 1:16 pm

jai mitchell says:
June 20, 2013 at 12:44 pm
“These are real things that are starting to happen already.”
—————————————————————————————–
You have proven nothing. Demonstrate to me that these events have anything to do with “climate change” then demonstrate to me any change in climate is from man made CO2.
To speed this up for you, if you look at the data, you will see recent weather events are nothing unusual , from a historical (climatological) perspective.
I believe was W.E. Deming who said ” In God we trust, all others must bring data”. Jai, please bring us some data (and analysis) to prove your point if you want to get any traction on this blog.
To quote John Boehner ( but in reference to your post) : “I think this is absolutely crazy,”

David L.
June 20, 2013 1:18 pm

James Padgett says:
June 20, 2013 at 11:00 am
Obama is looking for his legacy.
That rarely turns out well.
________________________
I thought his legacy was Obamacare.

June 20, 2013 1:24 pm

David L. says:
June 20, 2013 at 1:18 pm
“I thought his legacy was Obamacare.”
That will be repealed as well.

Bruce Cobb
June 20, 2013 1:33 pm

The word “crazy” doesn’t even begin to describe it. Diabolical comes closer. One can only conclude that Obama hates America, and the question is why. He knows it will force energy costs up, and the consequences of doing that: “Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” (January 2008)

Our enemies can only dream of doing the damage to the US that Obama seems intent on doing.

jai mitchell
June 20, 2013 1:45 pm

Gail Combs
This is what I was talking about (Re: texas jobs)
Houston Chronicle
http://www.chron.com/jobs/article/Wind-energy-drives-more-than-just-turbines-4355259.php
Wind energy drives more than just turbines
By Rebecca Maitland, jobs correspondent | March 14, 2013
“Ten years ago, there were less than 2,000 turbines, and today there are over 20,000. These are not your father’s turbines. These are efficient and are driving down the cost of electricity,” Guyette said.
The wind industry also is good for Texas, good for Houston.
“Wind farms are usually in rural, open land, and are private leases from land owners. We lease the land, and property owners receive annual lease payments, and property taxes also flow into these areas. Also, the land the turbines are on can continue to be used as they were prior to the turbines being installed. Another important point is because the parts for wind turbines are large and heavy, construction usually goes to local companies, so there is a ripple down affect which draws manufacturing to the area, which creates jobs in these areas,” Salerno said.
However, Houston also is a main hub for manufacturing, with more than 30 manufacturing companies involved in wind energy.
A study released by the Waco-based Perryman Group in May 2010 estimates the wind industry is responsible for nearly 10,000 manufacturing, headquarters, construction, and maintenance and support jobs in Texas annually. The American Wind Energy Association places Texas first among states in wind industry employment, which includes manufacturing, installation and maintenance jobs.
————————
10,000 NEW jobs in texas as well as a significant source of revenue for the farmers who have the turbines on their land.
I, for one, do not see a problem with that. do you?

chris y
June 20, 2013 1:46 pm

Jai Mitchell-
“isn’t it interesting that the report of 8 years ago…”
Umm, the report was revealed on Feb. 21, 2004 by the news article you provided. In the article they disclosed that the evvilllll BUSH administration tried to ‘sequester’ the report for 4 months. That puts the report’s completion date back in 2003. Most people consider that to be 10 years ago.
But thanks again! These predictions are a gold mine!

Bob Diaz
June 20, 2013 1:47 pm

It’s all about getting more control & more taxes.

Snotrocket
June 20, 2013 1:48 pm

Jai Mitchell comes along and drops his little comment-bomb on the thread and the whole thread falls to pieces beating him up (thoroughly deserved, in my book). As a result the thread gets diverted and Jai achieves a small win in the (to him) war.
We have to understand that people like Jai are as much use as a chocolate fire-guard, and should be ignored as such. For sure, enjoy the laughter at such a risible comment, but concentrate on what the POTUS is trying to do to a great country – when people like Jai will be worth less than the crap that people like BHO scrape off their shoes after walking through a cow pasture.

GlynnMhor
June 20, 2013 1:51 pm

And where Obama and the US go, we in Canada get dragged along.
I can only hope that reality sinks in before too much damage is done to our tightly linked economies.

Gail Combs
June 20, 2013 1:52 pm

jai mitchell
…. Green energy doesn’t kill jobs, just ask Texas. Green energy creates jobs, and lots of them. What green energy DOES do is help to prevent the loss of life that is detailed in this report.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>..
Now about those ‘Jobs’
Despite Clinton’s messing with the statistics on unemployment*** The true unemployment rate is available and it is ~ 23%. Thanks to NAFTA and especially WTO American workers are competing world wide for jobs and it is not just the salaries of the workers but the cost of energy and regulations too that have most big corporations moving overseas.

It is worth considering a recent Australian Financial Review article that published a comparison of the cost of employing skilled people. That is the total cost not just wage. In Australia it is over $600/day, in the US $400/day and third world under $200/day. As manufacturing industry, and even clerical positions, are transferred to lower cost countries obviously the middle class in first world countries must shrink and the lower level will increase in numbers… link

This was seconded by a comment by a contributor at Forbes

…I work with a lot of these people who have, supposedly quit looking for work. Most of them are older and have worked for 30 years or more and are in their 50′s or 60′s and they cannot find what they want which is a high paying job that pays them what they used to earn. Those jobs since the crash of 2007 and 2008 are gone. CEO’s are saving and hoarding cash by not bringing these types of people back to the work force. So, many of these people are now forced to retire early. That is what is happening to a lot of these folks and we have at least three dozen who fall into this category so it is not uncommon at all. They fall into this category of having given up looking when what they are doing is being forced to retire early…
It is sad but the IT manager or VP who was making $250K in 2006 is not going to find a job like that ever again. So he or she is forced to take a lesser paying job or they retire early or they dip into their IRA or their 401k a bit early before they tap into Social Security. That is a what is happening. Blame it on the CEO’s who are hoarding cash and who only want to focus on one thing, the bottom line.

According to the IMF the elite are not ‘hoarding cash ‘ they are pocketing it.

IMF: Convergence, Interdependence, and Divergence
Since roughly 1990 the pace of per capita income growth in emerging and developing economies has accelerated in a sustainable manner and is substantially above that in advanced economies….
In many countries the distribution of income has become more unequal, and the top earners’ share of income in particular has risen dramatically. In the United States the share of the top 1 percent has close to tripled over the past three decades, now accounting for about 20 percent of total U.S. income (Alvaredo and others, 2012). At the same time, while the new convergence mentioned above has reduced the distance between advanced and developing economies when they are taken as two aggregates, there are still millions of people in some of the poorest countries whose incomes have remained almost stagnant for more than a century… These two facts have resulted in increased divergence between the richest people in the world and the very poorest, despite the broad convergence of average incomes….

Another words the rich are getting richer but the middle class is more closely approaching the income of the poor as the ordinary worker is forced to compete with workers not just in his area but world wide.
Huffington Post: U.S. Median Annual Wage Falls To $26,364 As Pessimism Reaches 10-Year High

The Uncomfortable Truth About American Wages
….This finding of stagnant wages is unsettling, but also quite misleading. For one thing, this statistic includes only men who have jobs. In 1970, 94 percent of prime-age men worked, but by 2010, that number was only 81 percent. The decline in employment has been accompanied by increases in incarceration rates, higher rates of enrollment in the Social Security Disability Insurance program and more Americans struggling to find work. Because those without jobs are excluded from conventional analyses of Americans’ earnings, the statistics we most commonly see — those that illustrate a trend of wage stagnation — present an overly optimistic picture of the middle class.
When we consider all working-age men, including those who are not working, the real earnings of the median male have actually declined by 19 percent since 1970… Men with less education face an even bleaker picture; earnings for the median man with a high school diploma and no further schooling fell by 41 percent from 1970 to 2010….

So what you actually have is a drive towards a world wide two class system, the working poor and the elite. Environmentalism, CAGW, and lots of other propaganda are the weapons used by the wealthy and powerful who control our news media and our governments.
Top Senate Democrat: bankers “own” the U.S. Congress: Dick Durbin’s confession ought to be major news, yet it won’t be. Why not?

*** link …Up until the Clinton administration, a discouraged worker was one who was willing, able and ready to work but had given up looking because there were no jobs to be had. The Clinton administration dismissed to the non-reporting netherworld about five million discouraged workers who had been so categorized for more than a year….

Editor
June 20, 2013 1:53 pm

I just got a google ad from barackobama.com which said:
“Climate change is real. Join OFA & hold climate deniers accountable.‎”
Classy.

Kev-in-Uk
June 20, 2013 1:56 pm

I wish I could understand American politics! but then again, I can’t even understand the UK political BS, and I guess we are as bad!
Seriously though, mixing politics and uncertain/unproven science is a no-go area for me. All the politicos do is take whatever ‘snippets’ they can from whatever ‘source’ they choose to score political ‘points’ – how anybody can consider that an effective dissemination of information, is a mystery to me. Bottom line – never listen to a politician!

jai mitchell
June 20, 2013 1:57 pm

George e Smith,
you said,
Tesla Motors, the darling of the green energy set, recently announced a profit. The only reason they made a profit, was because tax paying real workers paid a bundle for each of those 416 horsepower race cars, I heard the figure was $7500 for each Model S car sold. And they also made a profit selling “carbon credits” to other companies.
————-
well, If you want to take away tax credits for tesla then I suppose you think it is ok to take away tax credits for oil, gas and coal developers in the U.S. as well. . .
In the United States, credible estimates of annual fossil fuel subsidies range from $10 billion to $52 billion annually, while even efforts to remove small portions of those subsidies have been defeated in Congress, as shown in the graphic below.
http://priceofoil.org/fossil-fuel-subsidies/
————–
at least these tax credits are given to consumers to spark the economy and provide a real incentive for future economic growth and development instead of being passed to internationally based corporations that will simply shell their profits into offshore holding accounts.
————-
Tesla is building beautiful and effective cars, they are changing the face of this country. I just saw one for the first time last weekend. I have never seen a more attractive car, must be the carbon fiber hood.

June 20, 2013 2:06 pm

Obama’s Legacy – something no one will want to remember – George Wallace has a better legacy than Obama. George Wallace who only promoted segregation after discovering it was the way to get elected after losing to a candidate who ran with the support of the Ku Klux Klan. Seems many politicians simply do what they think will get them elected or make them remembered. I suppose bankrupting the US financially and morally would make your presidency memorable.😞

Gail Combs
June 20, 2013 2:09 pm

klem says:
June 20, 2013 at 11:58 am
I’m glad Anthony posted that drivell from Jai Mitchell. It demonstrates that the eco zealots are still living in la la land….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Klem and others. Jai Mitchell at least has come here and engaged with us. Hopefully he, and the others who are silent but reading the debate, will actually look at what is being posted and think about what has been said and pointed to.
There are several who have come here who were believers in CAGW or on the fence and learned a lot, me included.
So I am also glad Anthony does not run a blog that is just singing to the choir.

June 20, 2013 2:09 pm

Isn’t it wonderful how an unthinking comment from the US Fed can sink stock markets around the world. Great deep thinking administration. Obama will have quite a legacy alright. Bread lines?

DDP
June 20, 2013 2:12 pm

As a general policy as Chicago Bear fan, I don’t criticise fellow Bearfans. It just feels like punching a brother in the nuts, I even forgive Ashton Kutcher for ‘Dude Where’s My Car’, and boning Mila Kunis (Bruce Willis forgives him for Demi, Bearfans you see). But Obama is just a complete tool. He is the Dave Wannstedt of American politics. In fact he’s like Jerry Angelo and Wanny all rolled into one giant ball of painful ineptitude.
Every day is like a strange plot twist to an episode of Homeland where the chief protagonist comes up with another policy to destroy the nation from within. Sad thing is, it’s re-run from four years ago. Congress needs to take his car keys off him before he does some real damage, ‘cos he’s hammered on all the drinks given to him by lobbyists and doesn’t care about hitting anything and everything in his path as long as he gets home.

Verified by MonsterInsights