
From the Massachusetts Institute of Technology , a fairly important discovery, one that will help us understand the role clouds play in the Earth’s energy balance. The fact that mineral dust and metallic aerosols are identified would suggest that as mining, smelting, and industrialization have increased, so would cirrus cloud formation, though it may be more complex than that. Even so, I suspect somebody will use this new finding to suggest yet another geoengineering scheme to cool the planet by creating more cirrus clouds. – Anthony
Dust in the clouds
Cirrus clouds form around mineral dust and metallic particles, study finds
CAMBRIDGE, MA — At any given time, cirrus clouds — the thin wisps of vapor that trail across the sky — cover nearly one-third of the globe. These clouds coalesce in the upper layers of the troposphere, often more than 10 miles above the Earth’s surface.
Cirrus clouds influence global climate, cooling the planet by reflecting incoming solar radiation and warming it by trapping outgoing heat. Understanding the mechanisms by which these clouds form may help scientists better predict future climate patterns.
Now an interdisciplinary team from MIT, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and elsewhere has identified the major seeds on which cirrus clouds form. The team sampled cirrus clouds using instruments aboard high-altitude research aircraft, analyzing particles collected during multiple flights over a nine-year period. They found that the majority of cloud particles freeze, or nucleate, around two types of seeds: mineral dust and metallic aerosols.
The absence of certain particles in the clouds also proved interesting. While scientists have observed that substances like black carbon and fungal spores readily form cloud particles in the lab, the team detected barely a trace of these particles in the upper atmosphere.
“We think we’re really looking at the seed, the nucleus of these ice crystals,” says Dan Cziczo, an associate professor of atmospheric chemistry at MIT. “These results are going to allow us to better understand the climatic implications of these clouds in the future.”
Cziczo and his colleagues have published their results this week in Science.
Up in the air
Cirrus clouds typically form at altitudes higher than most commercial planes fly. To sample at such heights, the team enlisted three high-altitude research aircraft from NASA and the National Science Foundation (NSF): a B-57 bomber, a DC-8 passenger jet, and a G-V business jet, all of which were repurposed to carry scientific instruments.
From 2002 to 2011, the team conducted four flight missions in regions of North America and Central America where cirrus clouds often form. Before takeoff, the team received weather forecasts, including information on where and when clouds might be found.
“More often than not, the forecast is solid, and it’s up to the pilot to hit a cloud,” Cziczo says. “If they find a good spot, they can call back on a satellite phone and tell us if they’re inside a cloud, and how thick it is.”
For each mission, Cziczo and Karl Froyd, of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory, mounted one or two instruments to the nose of each plane: a single particle mass spectrometer and a particle collector.
Each flight followed essentially the same protocol: As a plane flew through a cloud, ice particles flowed through a specialized inlet into the nose of the plane. As they flowed in, the particles thawed, evaporating most of the surrounding ice. What’s left was a tiny kernel, or seed, which was then analyzed in real time by the onboard mass spectrometer for size and composition. The particle collector stored the seeds for further analysis in the lab.
A human effect on cloud formation
After each flight, Cziczo and his colleagues analyzed the collected particles in the lab using high-resolution electron microscopy. They compared their results with analyses from the onboard mass spectrometer and found the two datasets revealed very similar cloud profiles: More than 60 percent of cloud particles consisted of mineral dust blown into the atmosphere, as well as metallic aerosols.
Cziczo notes that while mineral dust is generally regarded as a natural substance originating from dry or barren regions of the Earth, agriculture, transportation and industrial processes also release dust into the atmosphere.
“Mineral dust is changing because of human activities,” Cziczo says. “You may think of dust as a natural particle, but some percentage of it is manmade, and it really points to a human ability to change these clouds.”
He adds that some global-modeling studies predict higher dust concentrations in the future due to desertification, land-use change and changing rainfall patterns due to human-induced climate effects.
Cziczo’s team also identified a “menagerie of metal compounds,” including lead, zinc and copper, that may point to a further human effect on cloud formation. “These things are very strange metal particles that are almost certainly from industrial activities, such as smelting and open-pit burning of electronics,” Cziczo adds. Lead is also emitted in the exhaust of small planes.
Contrary to what many lab experiments have found, the team observed very little evidence of biological particles, such as bacteria or fungi, or black carbon emitted from automobiles and smokestacks. Froyd says knowing what particles are absent in clouds is just as important as knowing what’s present: Such information, he says, can be crucial in developing accurate models for climate change.
During the study, led by scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the researchers conducted flight missions from 2002 to 2011 over North America and Central America at 20,000 to 50,000 feet elevation, where cirrus clouds often form. As their planes flew through the clouds, researchers captured and heated the ice crystals, which then evaporated, leaving behind a tiny kernel that they analyzed using an onboard mass spectrometer.
“Cirrus clouds are complicated but the important message is that dust and certain metals provide the seeds for a majority of the ice crystals that form the clouds,” said Cynthia Twohy, an Oregon State University atmospheric scientist and co-author on the study. “Other particle types – including bacteria and soot from human-produced combustion or natural sources – don’t seem to contribute much to the nuclei of cirrus crystals.
“These biological particles may be important in the formation of lower altitude clouds,” added Twohy, who is a professor in OSU’s College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences. “But they were surprisingly absent from the particles we sampled from cirrus clouds.”
Despite the length of the study and its different geographic locations, the researchers found similar outcomes: About 60 percent of the cloud particles they analyzed could be traced to mineral dust blown into the atmosphere, or to metallic aerosols.
“Mineral dust can occur naturally,” Twohy said, “or it can be influenced by human activities. Certainly the major deserts like the Sahara and Gobi are enormous sources of mineral dust. But agriculture, over-grazing and climate and land-use changes can also contribute.”
Twohy said the scientists have not yet traced the origin of the dust to see how much of it came from natural versus anthropogenic causes. The metallic aerosols, she added, are unusual and may be easier to trace to specific sources. Containing elements like lead, zinc, tin and copper, they appear to be from industrial activities, according to other scientists in the study.
“There’s been a lot of research efforts spent on looking at how these particle types freeze under various conditions,” Froyd says. “Our message is that you can ignore those, and can instead look at mineral dust as the dominant driving force for the formation of this type of cloud.”
This research was funded by NASA and the NSF.
The paper:
Daniel J. Cziczo, Karl D. Froyd, Corinna Hoose, Eric J. Jensen, Minghui Diao, Mark A. Zondlo, Jessica B. Smith, Cynthia H. Twohy, and Daniel M. Murphy. Clarifying the Dominant Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation. Science, 9 May 2013 DOI: 10.1126/science.1234145
Abstract:
Formation of cirrus clouds depends upon the availability of ice nuclei to begin condensation of atmospheric water vapor. While it is known that only a small fraction of atmospheric aerosols are efficient ice nuclei, the critical ingredients that make those aerosols so effective has not been established. We have determined in situ the composition of the residual particles within cirrus crystals after the ice was sublimated. Our results demonstrate that mineral dust and metallic particles are the dominant source of residual particles, while sulfate/organic particles are underrepresented and elemental carbon and biological material are essentially absent. Further, composition analysis combined with relative humidity measurements suggest heterogeneous freezing was the dominant formation mechanism of these clouds.
What proportion of the condensation nuclei were of cosmic origin?
Micrometeorites have a significant flux into the atmosphere:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micrometeoroid
‘Mineral dust and metallic aerosols’ are vague terms. Either could refer to micrometeorite debris.
Cziczo’s team also identified a “menagerie of metal compounds,” including lead, zinc and copper, that may point to a further human effect on cloud formation. “These things are very strange metal particles that are almost certainly from industrial activities, such as smelting and open-pit burning of electronics,” Cziczo adds. Lead is also emitted in the exhaust of small planes.
Cziczo talks like a man on an environmental mission – hardly very scientific.
The seeding by metallic compounds is unexpected. Although the emphasis on anthropogenic sources is somewhat misplaced. Dust suppression systems are now standard in developed world mine sites for H&S reasons. So the trend of atmospheric particles from mining is almost certainly down over the last 20 years. The same for smelting in the developed world.
Assuming Dr Spencer is correct and cirrus clouds have a net cooling effect, then industrial activities are unlikely to be the cause of the recent flat global temperatures. If anything, the opposite should be true – less cirrus clouds and some warming.
Perhaps they are correct that open pit burning of electronics in the developing world is an important source. There are vastly more electronic devices in the developing world, than there were even 10 years ago.
Hi Anthony You may need these links to answer some of your questions raised
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel
http://www.epa.gov/hpv/pubs/summaries/kerjetfc/c15020rs.pdf
http://www.csgnetwork.com/jetfuel.html
http://web.anl.gov/PCS/acsfuel/preprint%20archive/Files/49_2_Philadelphia_10-04_1143.pdf
Anthony I remember back in the 90’s before 911 there was a climate scientist in the US tring to collect data to prove his theory about the shaddowing effect created by air traffic. The one block to his research was he could not get a window were all trafic could be stop at the same time so he could get a good reading. Then came 911 and all air traffic over American skys was stop for 2 day’s and he got he’s window. If my memory serves me right he proved the shaddowing effect from air traffic is a reality . The concord was pulled not because of it crash but because of the it’s Ozone destruction. So did Obama pull the shuttle for the same reasons ?
This dust is important in terms of oceanic fertilizer. Its best production occures with dry wind over dry land. If anything, we humans have decreased dust production. The use of cover crops to keep fallow ground from being blown away is a common practice. However keeping the dust on the ground may not be in our best interests. Hows that for human-caused negative impact on the Earth!!!! In our overzealous desire to not leave our footprint, we are starving the food chain.
Oops, there goes Richard Courtney’s claim it is sulfur dioxide-based aerosols e.g. from combustion of aviation jetfuel, which can commonly nucleate cirrus.
I know that theory states that cirrus clouds contribute to surface warming but these clouds have an albedo so must reflect energy from their levels back to space thus reducing available energy to heat the surface. The only difference between cirrus and say stratus is cirrus is composed of ice crystals ans stratus from water particles.
Well John (Marshall) it’s supposed to be like this: if there’s more light reflected away of all colors, as in daylight hours, then those cirrus are warming.
If there’s more light coming from inside, as at night, and they’re blocking light getting out, (infrared light in earth generated frequencies) then that’s warming.
And since there’s several times as much light blocked, coming in, that’s more warming the clouds contribute to.
And, of course, since there’s only a small amount blocked when they are not there, that’s warming.
So if they are there, that’s more warming.
If they aren’t there, that’s more warming.
If it’s daylight then, that’s more warming,
and if it’s night then that’s more warming.
—
“Thank you for that spectactular analysis Perfesser Bore Hole.”
—
That was Perfesser B.H. Backerd, Perfesser of Bore Hole Hockey Stick -a-Lookin’, Radiation-Energy Expert, Train Driving Engineer, and also, author of the scintillating true life novel, “Why You Should Sleep With Me Because I’m Impervious To The Normal Constraints of All Law,”
as well as, economic forecaster using detailed models of Al Gore’s Alternative Energy Portfolio depicting the Earth as flat, using fire as sin, and sunlight devoid of any heat content at all.
His most recent forecasts involve the end of the world as we know it if we don’t buy Al Gore’s Alternative Energy Products,
and that the oceans are boiling, but disbelief is causing it to go unnoticed by instruments and disbelievers.
Steve Short says:
May 10, 2013 at 10:33 pm
Oops, there goes Richard Courtney’s claim it is sulfur dioxide-based aerosols e.g. from combustion of aviation jetfuel, which can commonly nucleate cirrus.
I’m afraid not. The team only collected particles:
The team sampled cirrus clouds using instruments aboard high-altitude research aircraft, analyzing particles collected during multiple flights over a nine-year period.
Well I for one hope that this does have some implications for geoengineering or even some control over the weather.
To be totally honest, I don’t care what they found.
What amazes me is that it took a 50 year old (64 if you count it’s teenage years) to find it.
http://www.nasa.gov/missions/research/b-57_feature.html
http://jsc-aircraft-ops.jsc.nasa.gov/wb57/index.html
What exactly is a metallic aerosol? Are they talking vaporized elemental metals and these comprised nearly 40% of the nuclei?
Hard to believe such a mass of metals could remain elemental very long.
I suspect they are really talking about metallic silicates that have weathered from rocks representing the chemical composition of the planet into the desert basins where dust is predominantly raised.