Experience 18 minutes of world history, as if you were there, landing on the moon

I still get chills and misty eyes watching this. For those of us that watched the Apollo 11 moon landing live on TV, we had to be content with the voices of Walter Cronkite and Wally Schirra along with simulated models and radio traffic. Here, thanks to this award winning new website, we can experience the landing as if we are in the cockpit of the LEM and listening in the live communications loop (both Air-to-Ground and Flight Director’s audio loop) from the beginning of the descent, to the touchdown, and the STAY/NO STAY decision making afterwards.

This website even keeps track of the pitch angle of the LEM from telemetry data, and tracks what console at Houston Mission Control is speaking. You can even watch the heart rate of Neil Armstrong.

firstmenonmoon_panel

Trust me, this will be the best 18 minutes you ever spend online. It makes me proud to watch.

From the About page at the website:

This project is an online interactive featuring the Eagle lunar landing. The presentation includes original Apollo 11 spaceflight video footage, communication audio, mission control room conversations, text transcripts, and telemetry data, all synchronized into an integrated audio-visual experience.

Until today, it has been impossible to comprehensively experience mankind’s shining exploratory accomplishment in a singular experience. We have compiled hours of content available from public domain sources and various NASA websites. Thamtech staff and volunteers generously devoted their time to transcribe hours of speech to text. By using simultaneous space and land based audio and video, transcripts, images, spacecraft telemetry, and biomedical data—this synchronized presentation reveals the Moon Shot as experienced by the astronauts and flight controllers.

Our goal is to capture a moment in history so that generations may now relive the events with this interactive educational resource. The world remembers the moon landing as a major historical event but often fails to recognize the scale of the mission. This interactive resource aims to educate visitors while engaging them with the excitement of manned-spaceflight to build a passion for scientific exploration.

Visitors begin the experience by hearing the words of Buzz Aldrin while simultaneously viewing the moon through the lunar module window. Moments later, the audience hears capsule communicator Charlie Duke inform flight director Gene Kranz that the astronauts are on schedule to start the descent engine. Throughout the presentation, visitors are able to customize their experience by jumping to key moments in the timeline. The timeline guides visitors to the crucial moments in the mission, including: program alarms (computer alerts), famous Go No-Go polls in the control room, low level fuel milestones, and landing.

“The Eagle has Landed.” Neil Armstrong’s words signal a technical milestone and successful execution of John F. Kennedy’s vision to land a man on the moon safely. Prior to these famous words, visitors see the synchronized audio communications, transcripts, video of the lunar module’s casting a shadow on the lunar surface, and biomedical telemetry of Armstrong’s heart rate surpassing 150 beats per minute!

The footprints from Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong on July 20, 1969 paved the way for five additional successful trips to the lunar surface over the following years. Thamtech takes pride in providing visitors with a glimpse into this and mankind’s enduring spirit for exploration.

===============================================================

Click the image below to watch, listen, and experience the moon landing like you have never seen it before. – Anthony

firstmenonmonn_go

P.S. For you Lewandowsky types, if you happen to run into Buzz Aldrin at a climate conference where he talks about his climate skepticism, it is probably best that you don’t call him a “denier” (moon landing or otherwise) to his face.

Here’s video of Buzz landing the punch heard round the world.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

107 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Crispin in Waterloo
May 2, 2013 10:46 am

I was watching on a small B&W TV brought to work for the occasion. The parallel chatting was great – the excitement of the Go/NoGo calls, the moment of greatest stress filled with alarms and people knowing whether or not they could safely be ignored….absolutely amazing. Brought back all those memories and imprinted a, ‘where were you when…’ moment on us all.
@Clay
Thanks for your story and the hints of many great things happening behind the scenes. There are many more heroes behind stories like this and the SR-71 which was still secret at the time.

Editor
May 2, 2013 10:52 am

Clay Marley says:
May 1, 2013 at 7:29 pm

Back in the early 90’s I worked at JSC on a small robotic Lunar Lander called Artemis. …
First time I got it working in the simulator I plotted out the trajectory. It wasn’t what I had imagined. The vehicle comes screaming in almost horizontal, parallel with the Moon’s surface for almost the entire flight, until the very end when the pitch to vertical maneuver begins.

I assume not too far removed from a parabola. At least that’s what you’d get for a constant pitch and thrust. For a practical landing, especially if the landing zone is rockier than expected, the vertical pitch and fly-around is rather important. 🙂
There was a PDP-11 program for GT40 and VT11 displays that was a passable lunar lander simulator for the day. I landed safely on my first try after watching someone else a few times. The best landing was next to McDonalds where an astronaut would get out, walk to the restaurant and order a Big Mac and fries to go.
I did pretty well trying to keep the velocity vector at about 1/10 the position, both X & Y. At the start, it was pretty much 100% retro thrust until it slowed down enough that I could start using the 1/10 target.
http://technologizer.com/2009/07/19/lunar-lander/2/ has some of the story behind it.

Editor
May 2, 2013 10:58 am

Clay Marley says:
May 1, 2013 at 7:29 pm

It was a hoot to think that back then I was probably the only person at NASA who knew how to land on the moon.

Wow. Or dreadfully depressing. 🙂
After the last launch of the Space Shuttle, even before it reached the ISS, I was telling anyone who would listen that America no longer had the ability to launch someone into Low Earth Orbit.
After it landed, I mentioned that was okay because we couldn’t bring anyone back, either.

May 2, 2013 11:16 am

dbstealey says May 2, 2013 at 12:34 am
..And only using vacuum tube computers!

Uh – uh.
A lot of the support equipment was tubed and partially tubed (Oscilloscopes and other test equipment), and the high-powered transmitters, but, little else was ….
.

Janice Moore
May 2, 2013 11:17 am

“Buzz Aldrin giving Buzz Lightyear space travel tips. How cool is that.” [P. Tigre 0043, 5/2/13]
SUPER cool. “To infinity… AND BEYOND!”
Yes, Science Heroes of the World Day at Disneyworld or land would be GREAT.
**********************************
Stephen Rasey [re: 0041, 5/2/13] — Thank you for your correction and fine amplification re: computer programmer heroes.
Thank you to you, and CodeTech and A LOT OF OTHER POSTERS, for all the GREAT videos, books, and other resources to learn more about this topic.
**************************************************************************
Dear Mr. Huffman, M. Painter, et. al. — take heart! The music has not “died.” [See, e.g., W. S. Briggs k 0738, 5/2/13] It is still playing brilliantly and beautifully, but it gets drowned out a great deal of the time by a lot of NOISE…. ‘”…saaaaave the plaaaaanet….. saaaaaaaaaaaaaaave the planet!!!!!…. Muslim self-esteem……………………. orgaaaaaaaaaaaaanic………….. America is arrogant…not special………. you drink too much soda pop……………… cars are evil!!!!!!!!!!!!!…………… consssssssssssssssensusssssss…. ” — by those ANNOYING announcers (yeah, CodeTech, they never change, do they)
Truth stands the test of ———— time.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Mr. Butts, you might want to take a tip from “A Boy Named Sue” and be extra sweet.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Mycroft
May 2, 2013 12:24 pm

Amazing Armstrongs heart rate at 150bpm and he’s reclined in a seat!!! glory days for NASA, OH how we wish for the old NASA to come back

Alex
May 2, 2013 12:55 pm

If an alien landed and asked why mankind deserves to live I would mention the first moonlanding and nothing else.

May 2, 2013 1:22 pm

Streetcred says:
May 1, 2013 at 6:43 pm
The sequence brought a tear to my eyes … and I’m not even an American ! That was such a great day, what an achievement for those dedicated patriots and smart people at NASA … can’t say much for NASA today except that they aren’t a shadow of the past.

No need to be an American. If you’ll remember their words from the lunar surface, it was “one giant leap for all mankind.”
I agree that I’d wish we were doing much more aggressive space exploration, but I think that’s an unfair knock on some of NASA’s accomplishments. The asteroid rendezvous with the controlled crash landing at the end was remarkable. The Curiosity landing was another incredible feat. Oh, and btw, NASA and partners have had a continuous human presence in space on the ISS for over a decade.

richardM
May 2, 2013 1:26 pm

My dad worked on the Apollo program and we lived near Cape Canaveral. I remember watching the launch and for a change, my mom let us stay up late when they landed. I was only 7, but still understood the significance of the event. Of course i wanted to be an astronaut. This is an excellent video, and shows how a complex task was broken down into manageable components and people. Amazing what we were able to do with what were fairly primitive hardware in comparison to today’s capabilities.

Dan in California
May 2, 2013 1:46 pm

I recently had the great good fortune to talk to Buzz one-on-one for about an hour. Wonderful person and extremely sharp. And, no, I did not bring up AGW as a topic.

EW3
May 2, 2013 1:56 pm

Having grown up with the space program, it really saddens me when I look at the latest rover on Mars.
For whatever reason NASA / JPL managed to put only 1 US flag on the rover and they put it in a location which never shows in the images we get from it during normal operation. Best I can tell from the one or two images I saw that had the flag on it, looks like it’s on the underside of the rover.
It’s almost like we do not want to offend the rest of the world with our success. Very sad.

May 2, 2013 1:57 pm

This may get lost in the multi-tude of comments but I am currently listening to an interview with the Canadian Astronauts who have been to space. One of them (I think it was Chris Hadfield but not sure) mentioned they have oxygen sensors on the exterior of the space station. He commented on how powerful the relationship between the earth and the sun is as the O2 level goes up when the station is on the sun side, and goes down when they go into the dark side. He also noted that when the sun was more active, the oxygen levels went up. I was hoping they might comment on solar wind and atmospheric shedding but they didn’t. Nevertheless, the oxygen variation from night side to day side was extremely interesting.

papiertigre
May 2, 2013 2:07 pm

Dan in California says:
May 2, 2013 at 1:46 pm
There is the beauty of it. You don’t have to bring it up. Doesn’t even have to be an add-on in the parade. With Buzz Aldrin there’s so much to cover that his views about the AGW scam are incidental. Well covered and on record. No need to tub thump.

May 2, 2013 2:36 pm

Ric Werme says:
May 2, 2013 at 10:52 am
Lunar Lander
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
There are still PDP 11/70’s running. Amazing longevity. (of course I still have a VIC20 and a Commodore 64 in the basement and I just threw out a bunch of punch cards for some IBM 360 engineering programs last year.) I remember “flying” the Lunar Lander with the PDP 11/70 and the old textual dungeons and dragons and the first versions of CAD with Intergraph as well as the first generation of geographic information systems. Then came VAXes and then Victor’s and Trash 80’s and then PC’s and Mac’s. (and a host of others – remember the Osborne?). Computer systems have flourished but sadly it seems the Space program has not. Once proud NASA seems unable to even do good programming these days, but then I have become biased.

May 2, 2013 2:52 pm

What a fantastic link, thanks Anthony. I can heartily recommend the book How Apollo Flew to the Moon by David Woods to everyone. It very clearly explains what the engineering and navigation challenges were and how they were overcome; a fascinating read for any engineer or science buff. Having read it, I could follow most of the jargon in the link.

Gary Hladik
May 2, 2013 3:46 pm

Wow. Thanks, Anthony. Thanks, http://www.firstmenonthemoon.com.

MarkG
May 2, 2013 7:24 pm

“I started my career in programming back in the era of 4k RAM on a Z80 in 1979, and at that those were powerful machines compared to what NASA was using.”
Actually, the Apollo Guidance Computer would have had similar capabilities, executing about 100,000 16-bit instructions per second but with 64k of memory. If I remember correctly, it also had some sophisticated capabilities the Z80 lacked, such as updating counters on an interrupt without having to run a full interrupt routine.
Go here if you want to play with one: http://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/
There’s a great video on youtube showing how it was built: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIBhPsyYCiM

May 2, 2013 9:00 pm

just superb thanks anthony

May 2, 2013 9:45 pm

And another thought. I recall a few years ago, the MSM saying the Chinese will catch up to us and send a man to the moon. Uhm… wait, using stolen technology and the blue prints from 1969, they will be where we were over 4 decades ago? That’s caught up? Ugggh.

CodeTech
May 2, 2013 10:23 pm

MarkG, that seems a bit too advanced… the Apollo 11 AGC appears to have the following specs:
2K RAM (an upgrade from the original 1K version)
32K ROM (upgrade from the original 24K version)
1MHz
1KHz external signalling
4 x 16bit registers (plus some special purpose registers)
It would appear this same AGC was used on all Apollo 7 – 17 missions and some afterward.
An interesting article about it: http://downloadsquad.switched.com/2009/07/20/how-powerful-was-the-apollo-11-computer/
Not arguing or fighting or anything, to be honest I would have been surprised and VERY impressed to find the specs you quoted… but I’m pretty sure that 64K of RAM in 1969 would have been prohibitively large (of course, cost was not really a factor when it came to Apollo)

Jack Simmons
May 2, 2013 10:54 pm

As usual, wonderful material here on Anthony’s site.
Some might enjoy this very informative video:

Silicon Valley could have been called Microwave Valley.
Time capsule story: http://www.digitaltrends.com/web/amazon-ceo-and-his-expedition-team-recover-apollo-f-1-engines-from-ocean-floor/

MarkG
May 2, 2013 11:01 pm

“I’m pretty sure that 64K of RAM in 1969 would have been prohibitively large”
I believe those numbers are _words_, so presumably 4k bytes of RAM and 64k bytes of ROM. And yes, the computer was a pretty sizeable box.
From what I remember, a typical instruction took about 10 clock cycles at 1MHz, vs around 8 on the Z80 at 3-4MHz. But many of the Z80 instructions were only 8-bit so there’s probably less difference than that implies.

Steve Jones
May 3, 2013 1:17 am

I wish I had been present when that scumbag reporter was annoying one of the greatest human beings that has ever lived. I would gladly have punched him on behalf of Buzz and all decent people.

Michael Schaefer
May 3, 2013 1:28 am

Jim Butts says:
May 1, 2013 at 8:33 pm
I can’t believe that an otherwise intelligent website would champion the placement of men on the moon as a worthwhile accomplishment. This was nothing more than a political stunt to show that we had rocket technology and could threaten the Soviet Union. I ask, what was learned that could not have been learned with robots at much reduced expense? As we are doing regarding Mars. There is no good reason to send men to Mars as there was no good reason to send men to the moon.
————————————————————————————————————————
Back in the 17th Century, there wasn’t any good reason for the Brits to send ships to northern America to set up permanent settlements there, either.
But there you are.

Lew Skannen
May 3, 2013 2:50 am

I was five and I still remember those days. Fantastic.
Interesting to see from this app that they had twitter back then as well.
😉