In Which We Kidnap Reagan, And He Wins Anyway!

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

After I got out of the Army, I became involved in the anti-war movement as well as the other main causes of the time, women’s rights and racial equality. We’d go out and do street theater, we’d march, we printed broadsides that I cringe to remember and thankfully have no copy of, we spoke before groups, we did whatever we thought might help. We would go out to protest the war and agitate for a wide range of ideals at any opportunity. During one of these protests back in 1968 some friends and I kidnapped Ronald Reagan at UCSC and held him captive for about two hours.

ucsc outdoor amphitheaterOutdoor amphitheater, University of California, Santa Cruz

Man, we were idiots. Our hearts were in the right place, but man, we were idiots, so let me be clear about this story. I would never do this again. It was disrespectful to Governor Reagan, big time stupid, criminal, and wrong. Hey, I was so dumb back then, I actually thought that Karl Marx was one of the good guys, and you can’t get much dumber than that. Today I hold that by way of Lenin and Stalin and Mao and Ho and Castro and a host of franchised Mini-Marx wholesale and retail killing enterprises around the world, Karl Marx is the one man in modern history whose ideas caused the most human death and suffering … so as you see, today I’m not the same dumb young man in my story. Still a fool, to be sure … but an old fool, not the young fool I was then.

Anyhow, that precis doesn’t mention a few things, actually more than a few, so let me add to the history of the time. This is a story about a young man who was outsmarted by Ronald Reagan.

Ronald Reagan at that time was the Governor of California. The Governor also sits on the Board of Regents of the University of California, with dozens of campuses. The newest of these at the time was UCSC, the University of California at Santa Cruz. And he’d come to UCSC for the annual meeting of the Board.

I tried to go to college at UCSC, I really did. I registered and paid my fees. I was commercial fishing at the time, lampara netting with an old Sicilian fisherman in a lovely old 27′ (5m) wooden Monterrey boat, for pompano and other fish. I loved the work, the fishing, the sea life, and I wanted more than just that. I wanted to study marine biology, I was fascinated by the strange creatures we’d catch at times, moonfish and ocean sturgeon and threshers sharks with huge long tails. I wanted to learn more about them, so I applied and got accepted at UCSC, and waited for the schedule of classes.

The news was nothing but bad. The Intro to Marine Biology 101 class, along with a couple of other marine classes that would have interested me, were at 8 AM. Not a problem normally … but lampara netting is done only in the darkness. So my normal schedule was, I went to work at dusk, and got off work around four or five in the morning, sometimes six, collapsed into bed exhausted, and slept ’til around noon … I could have handled a class at eleven, but eight was out of the question. I’d figured there’d be one afternoon marine biology class, but no.

So I continued to fishing until the end of the season. By then it was halfway through the semester, so after the season when I had time I went back up the hill to the lovely campus, and I officially dropped out of school, and mentally said goodbye to my dreams of hanging out on the campus with the college babes … ah, well.

Of course, I still needed money. With no fishing, I went down and I signed up with the Laborers and Hod Carriers Union. I found out that a hod was what a young strong guy uses to carry mortar to the guys laying bricks. But I never did that work. They called us up by number, you had to be in the hiring hall, longest in the hall hired first. So I sat in the hall every morning for an hour or so for about three days, and then my number was called … and they sent me right back up the hill to UCSC, to work for the crew constructing the gorgeous outdoor amphitheater built into the hillside. I was put to work digging the ditches into the hillside for logs that form the amphitheater bench seats you see in the picture above.

So there I was, laboring away on the Amphitheater, practicing my shovel moves in the hot sun on the first day, and I thought “Man, I dropped out of college three days ago, and here I am digging ditches. My beloved Dad warned me that would happen … but dang, I had no idea it would happen so fast!”

Anyhow, I still got to see the college babes on my lunch hour. And even better, now I wasn’t some immature college kid. Despite being only three days older than before, suddenly in their eyes I was mysteriously transmuted into the noble full-grown Union workingman, what better? … hey, like I said, I was young and dumb.

I do find it humorous, though, that despite the fact I never did get to attend UCSC … I helped build it.

Anyhow, I started to tell the story of when Ronald Reagan came to Santa Cruz for the meeting of the Board of Regents, and somehow I always end up on some other trail in the forest of life’s stories, there’s more forks than there are roads and I get lost easily—but regarding Reagan, there were lots of contentious issues in front of the Board of Regents at that meeting: free speech, who could speak when and where, what facilities could be used for whose meetings, would the University boycott grapes, a whole host of stuff.

A newspaper article from around then refreshes my memory of the events.

Wednesday’s protests echoed a 1968 visit to the campus by then- governor Ronald Reagan, who came to meet with UC regents. For three days, university students blocked buses, heckled speakers and held rallies to protest a decision to restrict Black Panther Eldridge Cleaver from speaking on university campuses. Protesters also demanded that the new College 7 be named in honor of Malcolm X, and that the United Farm Workers-sponsored grape boycott be respected in university dining halls.

After the Regents had met, Reagan came out from the meeting room and strode to the podium to address the assembled students, teachers, and general public. Some friends and I were sitting in the front row. I was maybe ten feet from Reagan. I remember being amazed at the amount of makeup he was wearing, although I shouldn’t have been. He’d been an actor, he knew the importance of appearances when making public appearances.

He started in speaking, and there wasn’t a sliver of good news in it as far as his listeners were concerned. As he announced decision after decision, every single one of them went against what the students wanted. And finally, at some point, he announced some really unpopular decision of the Board, I can’t remember what, but people were furious. The front couple of rows, sadly including myself, stood up and started yelling and screaming at him.

Looking back on it, I suspect that everything would have been fine if he had just stood his ground. My guess is we would have yelled, but you can only yell for so long. But he didn’t stand there. I think he was shocked when the front couple rows erupted in screams right in his face, he realized that despite the presence of some media he was unprotected and only ten feet from an outraged crowd … and he turned and ran.

He was scared, and I don’t blame him for that, in his shoes I’d likely have made the same mistake and run myself. But running from a crowd in that mood, well, that’s a tactical error. And when he turned and ran, what happened is just what you’d expect—stupidly and inexcusably, a dozen or so of us vaulted to the stage and took off in pursuit, right at his heels. We chased him down a corridor, prevented him from getting out by a side door, pressed him around into another corridor, and he went into the first open room he could find. We barricaded the door. It was the only door. We had him trapped, imprisoned, no way out. Of course, he’d locked the door as well, so we’d have to break it down, but we had no plan to do that.

In fact we had no plan at all, we were surprised as he was at this unexpected turn of events. We had the Governor of California trapped in a room, unable to get out, and we had no idea at all what to do with him or how to do it if we could figure it out.

We held him prisoner in that room at UCSC for a couple of hours, with some of my friends and I in the forefront … and here’s the crazy part. I think in a legal sense that those occurrences would absolutely qualify as the kidnapping (forcing someone to go somewhere against their will) and false imprisonment of a sitting California Governor … like I said, young and stupid.

How curious. Here, where I least expect it, I’m in a quandary. See, the Statute of Limitations ran out long, long ago on any illegal stuff I might have done as a young man. So I figured, I can talk about anything, ’cause nothing I did was serious, and you can’t be charged for stuff that long ago. But here, I’m saying that I was one of the “ringleaders” if you will in the commission of two serious felonies, the kidnapping and temporary imprisonment of the Governor of California. If guys with guns had done it, they’d have been thrown in the slammer immediately. Is there a statute of limitation on kidnapping, whether of the Governor or someone else?

But of course in reality, it wasn’t kidnapping, it was college students and other young eedjits making fools of ourselves, so after a couple hours the cops showed up. We were surprised they arrived that fast, the Santa Cruz cops weren’t usually that quick off the mark. They came in a flying wedge and drove us away from the door. They formed a corridor, shoulder to shoulder. Then, when all was ready, the Chancellor of UCSC walked slowly up the corridor of armed men, and knocked on the door of the room Reagan was in.

Knocked. That should have given us a clue.

After a few seconds, Reagan answered the door warmly. He looked immaculate, every hair in place. He came out, waved and smiled to the cameras. He was still wearing the thick makeup he’d put on for the speech, I was still close, I could see it. We were shouting a variety of inane contemporary slogans. He shook hands with the Chancellor solemnly, showed no surprise at the lines of police, it was as if Reagan and the Chancellor had just signed a momentous agreement and were memorializing for the photographers. He walked sedately and proudly between the walls of cops to a limousine and disappeared.

We thought we had won. We patted each other on the backs and congratulated ourselves on our dash and brilliance. But  when we got home and talked to our friends, we found out that the old man had outfoxed us completely, that instead of fame we reaped ignominy … appropriate, I suppose. Here was our mistake.

We were so busy congratulating ourselves that we forgot that there was a phone in the prisoners cell …

And seeing that phone, Ronald Reagan, the Great Communicator, the ex-radio announcer, didn’t hesitate. He picked up the phone and called up the cops, explained the situation, got them moving. Then came his first master stroke … he called up the local radio station.

He knew they’d put him on the air live, he was the Governor after all, and they did, and he put his golden tones to work. Oh, to hear his story, he was reporting from the front lines in the culture wars, he was the beleaguered hero of the common man, fighting against the crazed communist hordes besieging his door like some movie plot he’d acted in. He mixed in the War, the domino theory, the yellow peril, folksy tales, from what I heard it was a masterpiece.

Not only that, but you remember the knock on the door when they took him out?

His idea … he was in communication by phone with the leader of the cops making the assault, his master’s touch was everywhere evident in how the situation ended. He arranged to be greeted by the Chancellor’s knock, he waited a few seconds before answering the door even though I’m sure he was already standing right there when the knock came, he’d staged and scripted the handshake and every part of the departure scene for maximum effect. Brilliant, I can only bow my head in admiration. Well played, that man.

But I didn’t hear his radio talk, of course, because I was on guard in front of his cell door, lost I’m sure in monstrously self-righteous satisfaction. His audience loved it, though, that became one more part of the official Reagan legend, he turned defeat into victory. He walked out of his temporary cell like a warrior monk leaving his place of meditation before battle, perfectly coiffed, polishing his halo and buffing his nails.

And good on him, I say at this advanced stage of my youth. Although I’m not a huge fan of Reagan’s, I’ve ended up liking and respecting many things about him, and I can laugh at a masterful trick like his even when it’s played on me.

In any case, when I got concerned, I looked up the law. I found out that as I had feared, in California there’s no Statute of Limitations on kidnapping the Governor or anyone else. Kidnapping is punishable by life imprisonment, and the relevant statute reads:

799.  Prosecution for an offense punishable by death or by imprisonment in the state prison for life or for life without the possibility of parole, or for the embezzlement of public money, may be commenced at any time.

So in theory, I could still be indicted. Ah, well. I started out to tell the truth, can’t stop now, and I doubt greatly if I’ll be charged for kidnapping Reagan at this late date. And regarding the dangers, I can’t live like that. I won’t base my life on fear. The world is a wild and crazy and dangerous place, it’s true. And as I have more reason than most to know, some of the good folks out there are more than a few bubbles out of plumb. But I can’t live my life based on being scared that someone is going to come after me, official or unofficial.

I studied the martial art called Aikido off and on for some years, under a number of teachers. It’s an amazing path, after years of training I’m only a beginner. Ai-Ki-Do means the martial path (do) of harmony (ai) with “ki”, the essential energy of life.

In martial arts like Aikido, a teacher is called a “sensei”, a Japanese word meaning roughly “master”. When I studied Aikido at the Honolulu dojo, one of my senseis was an old Japanese man, in his seventies, a wonderful teacher. He said something like:

You think that because you know Aikido and your ki [energy] is strong, you can win the fight. This is wrong understanding. What if you are walking across the Golden Gate Bridge and it collapses?

What good is your ki then?

I will tell you how the Aikido master wins the fight. When the fight breaks out on Second Street, the master is walking down Ninth Street. When the Golden Gate Bridge collapses, the master is watching from the shore.

So me, I don’t hide my identity when I write, I talk about what I’ve done and the stupid mistakes I’ve made. I make no effort to conceal myself. If Old Nick wants to find me, he knows where I am. I just keep walking out in the sunshine, in plain view, with a tremendous amount of likely foolish and ultimately unjustifiable faith that I’m walking down Ninth Street …

My regards to all, and truly, kids, don’t try this at home. My best advice is never kidnap a sitting Governor of California, or any other state for that matter, it doesn’t look good on your resume … especially a Governor who is as handsome, media-savvy, persuasive, and inventive as Ronald Reagan was in his prime. Big mistake. I take my hat off to the man, I disagreed with him on many things, but he was an American through and through. And he sure bested me in Santa Cruz, where the final score was Reagan 1, … and Willis lost.

w.

5 5 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

100 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
pottereaton
March 11, 2013 11:47 am

Marx was a false prophet and fanatical revolutionist. Revolution invariably means killing of some kind. Marx knew that revolution would mean the death of untold thousands, if not millions.
Christ did not preach violent revolution or favor war. The church became powerful down through history and evolved into a form of authoritarian government with all that entails, including defense and conquest. The church moved into power vacuums created by the collapse of corrupt, incompetent or murderous rulers, since it was the only institution that people trusted when all else failed. None of that had anything to do with Christ’s message.
Killing has everything to do with Marx’s message. Lenin, Stalin and Mao simply adapted Marx’s message to conditions on the ground and killed millions as a result. Even Hitler considered himself a Marxian socialist. Marx’s message was every bit as militaristic as Mohammad’s in that it implied–and eventually was used for– conquest and domination.

Toto
March 11, 2013 11:48 am

After I got out of the Army, I became involved in the anti-war movement as well as the other main causes of the time, women’s rights and racial equality.

I would like to know more about how people pick their noble causes. The Vietnam war is obvious, but what caused the other “main causes of the time”? Baby boomer reaction to their parents, TV, sixties music, The Bomb, Bambi, Doctor Spock? Maybe Willis would like to explain why he joined the cause? Willis didn’t mention the environment, but that cause started then too and we see now what that has become.

pottereaton
March 11, 2013 11:55 am

Agreed, Willis. In their comments, people need to be more precise.

RockyRoad
March 11, 2013 11:56 am

I’m betting, Willis, that Reagan actually appreciated the situation you and your cohorts put him in. As any master thespian would know, having a chance to capitalize on the drama of a situation is a rare opportunity. Had you not provided the drama, Reagan would have nothing to call the radio station about; nothing to call the police about; nothing to have the Chancellor rescue him from. You did him a service and he enjoyed playing the part.
Great story, by the way.

March 11, 2013 12:00 pm

Toto says:
March 11, 2013 at 11:48 am
W: “After I got out of the Army, I became involved in the anti-war movement as well as the other main causes of the time, women’s rights and racial equality.”
I would like to know more about how people pick their noble causes. …

A Clue: If it involves girls it’s automatically going to be an odds-on *favorite* regardless of the platform or cause …
.

March 11, 2013 12:18 pm

CON-SPIR-ACY debunking, Willis, con-spir-acy debunking; … just a post or two addressing that you have an objection to? My policy: I try to keep it to a minimum, if you notice in other threads … (PS: Note: I’m NOT really discussing banking … It’s just that some days I get the feeling that even LESS is known about ‘banking’ than **climate science** by your avg. Joe SIxpack given the pap that is sometimes allowed to be posted, but, I know, it’s not my site <grin>)
Entertaining story, BTW, and upon which I have no comment at present, but, a good story I do love …
.

March 11, 2013 12:43 pm

Willis says:
“They required the study of Marx in the schools, they quoted his sayings … how on earth are they not Marxists?”
That, and other remarks in the same vein, really got me laughing. Some people have firm opinions, indeedm without having a slightest idea, what they are talking about.
Every Chavez of this world is a Marxist just because he uses Marxist rhetoric while making endless speeches? What old Karl has to do with all those big and little military gangster-dictators?
Read some factual history books — hundreds of good, unbiased books have been written on this subject — start with biographies of Stalin and Mao, for example. I would assume that today an adult person, having unlimited access to information, would understand at least some basics of Stalinism, Maoism, Chavismo, etc. My mistake.

pottereaton
March 11, 2013 12:46 pm

Willis: sorry to bother you, and I’m way off topic, but I’m getting a screwed up version of ClimateAudit when I go there. The homepage is way off center to the left. The right column with recent posts and comments is missing. Can you confirm? No other webpage I go to has the same problem, so I don’t think it’s my computer.

Dick of Utah
March 11, 2013 1:00 pm

pottereaton 11:47
Very nicely stated.
Willis: “Hey, I was so dumb back then, I actually thought that Karl Marx was one of the good guys, and you can’t get much dumber than that.”
Welcome to the club. I was one of those against the war who ended up in Vietnam. I was well into Army OCS when I decided to make my stand. I walked into the CO’s office and announced that I was dropping out of OCS because I was against the war.
Me: “Send me to Vietnam, but I refuse to be in a command position.”
CO: “Candidate, do you believe the spread of communism is a threat to the United States?”
Me: “No Sir.”
Two months later I was in Quang Tri Province. I still think the war was bungled and wonder if we should have gotten involved. I don’t regret going but I still get slightly nauseous when I think about that conversation.

March 11, 2013 1:06 pm

Anyone who applies a term “Marxist” to countries like Stalin’s Russia, Mao’s China, Chavez’ Venezuela, etc., should check the fundamentals first.
What is the most fundamental, defining principle of Marxism? It is that all means of production (tools, factories, etc.), as well as all results of production, must belong to those who produce — that is, to workers themselves. Now, name a single so called “socialist,” “communist,” or “Marxist” country where this was true. Can’t? Case closed.
Why, oh why do I still believe that it is possible to appeal to reason?

March 11, 2013 1:20 pm

Photos of Reagan runing as stated, press rel. or newpaper citation, TV news link. facts on Reagan running seems to me needed.
Why only one hero in these stories?
That and so what that he ran as many of the anti war types were dangerous terrorist, just like William Ayers known bomber and domestic terrorist.
When the real hero guys, in the Marines drafted and doing their duty as American, were in the I-Corps of South Vietnam getting shot at day after day, helping the South Viet people try and avoid the terror of the commies, drilling water wells, helping with crops, helping set up hospitals, all the stuff the anti war left lied about for the last 50 years.
Sad what is going on on watts up with that in my not so humble opinion.

Roberto
March 11, 2013 1:42 pm

Toto says:
March 11, 2013 at 11:48 am
I would like to know more about how people pick their noble causes.
I can’t speak for Willis. Partially because I am still cleaning up the snorted drinks. Indeed. Who caught whom? It sounds like our cat when she actually caught that darn squirrel.
But I did know some folks who were just into rebellion in those days. Never mind the cause. “Everything is so messed up that the only thing to do is tear it all down. Every bit of it. Whatever happens next has got to be better.” They couldn’t defend that statement, but who cares, it sounded great. Yes, especially if you bought Marx.

david elder, australia
March 11, 2013 2:22 pm

Willis, I’m half-dead laughing, it evokes such memories of Australia early 1970s (allowing the usual 5 year lag here before our deep thinkers catch up with yours). My take on Reagan is exactly the same as yours.

March 11, 2013 2:37 pm

Jim and the “conspiracy” aversion
I was a junior engineer in the 80’s boom in Houston, working for ‘developers’ who later openly admitted to ‘creative bankruptcy’ playing with OPM, other peoples money. In 1984, one developer spent $250 large on a full page re-elect Reagan-Bush advert in the Wall Street Journal and an additional million to the campaign. Soon bankruptcy hit and this developer walked with fourty mill in the bank and over 400 judgements in civil court. I later designed a functional rail system, got lots of local news coverage and private interviews. In one interview, a future mayor disclosed the self-described ‘elites’ plan to bilk the taxpayers of $200 million in a billion dollar rail program. Disclosing insider secrets destroyed my defective marriage and i met author Pete Brewton, selling copies of his S & L book in front of the court house. I personally knew a dozen of the actors and 50 of the projects described in the Brewton book. My nom de plume is my website address where the “author bio” tab gives far more info on this Reagan era engineered looting of the treasury.
Carbon climate forcing, unsustainable ‘green’ energy and non-finite ‘fossil’ fuel are all defective science symptoms of a defective monetary system. We can argue forever about the symptoms and ways to hide them, but treating the financial DISEASE is the only real cure. Humanity has wasted over a trillion dollars on this lunacy…ignoring elite motivies is not advisable. Rivero’s movie is a good summary of world history that i have studied extensively….and not an endorsement of all of his site content.
Sorry Willis, but if CCX, et al wasn’t bankrolling this fraud….we wouldn’t be talking about it at ALL.

Joseph Murphy
March 11, 2013 2:47 pm

Willis Eschenbach says:
March 11, 2013 at 12:03 pm
“Hey, it’s not a disputable fact. It’s my OPINION, and it’s stated as such. My opinion is that all those guys didn’t call themselves “Marxists” by accident, and that they followed Marx’s ideas as faithfully as they could given they were humans.”
I’m going to bite on this ‘off topic’ since I so rarely get to comment Here on something I feel I have a slight education on.
And to you W. I say nonsense! With all do respect. Marx put forth an idea based on what he thought was a very scientific understanding of history. He made a prediction on the progression of human society, a very precise one. It did not come true and if Marx were around today he would say he was wrong.
One of the reasons Marxism never came to pass is because for it to work it requires that everyone agree with it and follow it. A tall order indeed. If this is not the case Marxism requires something else to bring it about, Tyranny. Which destroys the original principals. Rather simply, for everyone to be equal (monetarily) they need to choose to be so and work at it. If they don’t some people naturally get more and others less. In order to bring about Marxism one needs to a) make everyone equal to start and b) keep everyone equal over time. This requires Tyranny (mostly the taking away part). And this is exactly what those you mention were interested in. They wanted to gain and maintain power. Using something like Marxism is a fantastic tool to do this, and masses voluntarily enslave themselves! At least a good portion of them do.
But, as I said at the beginning, Marx was wrong, without question. This was well known at one point and that is why some of these leaders you mention actually went through the trouble of rewriting Marxism to explain why he was wrong and why now was the right time for the communist revolution. They wanted their Tyranny on a firm footing! It is strange that today’s “Marxist” don’t even bother to explain why Marx was wrong, why his predictions never came to pass.

AndMyOpinionIs
March 11, 2013 4:08 pm

I think that one should consider the social conditions during Marx’s time (mid 1800’s) to understand his concerns: http://www.localhistories.org/19thcent.html
This was a time before many unions existed/political intervention was rare and when there was much worker & child abuse and the variation between the haves/have nots was extreme. Many of these conditions existed even in the U.S. up until the child labor laws came into being:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_labor_laws_in_the_United_States
Based on this history is why I will never believe in the conservative attitude of assumed moral standards applied to corporations. I personally think that if industry were allowed, without regulation & laws, would degrade back into these conditions with profit the sole criteria. Ironically, Marxism as applied to the previous Russian oligarchy might be considered a variant of extreme capitalism where the monopolistic Communist Party controls all manufacture, labor and wealth.
Now since few of those conditions existed in the mid twentieth century, it is difficult to rationalize Marxist concepts, especially since they are obviously unworkable in a realistic society.

c1ue
March 11, 2013 4:34 pm

It is amusing how so many Americans still confuse Marx with Lenin.

Eric H.
March 11, 2013 4:59 pm

Good story Willis, I always enjoy reading your posts. The comments seem to have gotten bogged down in politics and religion. although how can you tell where one ends and the other begins? I started “The Fountainhead” by Ayn Rand last night, just in case anybody needs some ammo.

Verified by MonsterInsights