Blockheaded thinking on well known weather patterns and 'extreme weather'

I had to laugh at this statement from the press release below:

“What we found is that during several recent extreme weather events these planetary waves almost freeze in their tracks for weeks.”

Gosh,”frozen patterns” like Rex blocks have been known for decades.Wikipedia has a good summary:

Blocks in meteorology are large-scale patterns in the atmospheric pressure field that are nearly stationary, effectively “blocking” or redirecting migratory cyclones. They are also known as blocking highs or blocking anticyclones. These blocks can remain in place for several days or even weeks, causing the areas affected by them to have the same kind of weather for an extended period of time (e.g. precipitation for some areas, clear skies for others).[2] In the Northern Hemisphere, extended blocking occurs most frequently in the spring over the eastern Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.

NCAR also has a good explanation of it here. An example: – NOAA on the Russian heat wave of 2010:

The heat wave was due primarily to a natural phenomenon called an atmospheric “blocking pattern”, in which a strong high pressure system developed and remained stationary over western Russia…”

One of the hottest summers the USA ever experienced in 1936 was due to a blocking high:

The 1936 blocking ridge happened several times in that year & had occurred in 1934, as well.  By comparison, record-breaking warmth occurred in March 1986, only to return in mid April with 88-93 setting records. – See more at: http://blogs.wlfi.com/2012/03/20/55894/#sthash.7p8c5pWX.dpuf

Now, according to PIK, suddenly such atmospheric blocks are caused by “climate change”. What a load of tosh. Thank our old alarmist buddy Hans Joachim Schellnhuber for turning mundane meteorology into something sinister.

Weather extremes provoked by trapping of giant waves in the atmosphere

02/2572013 – The world has suffered from severe regional weather extremes in recent years, such as the heat wave in the United States in 2011 or the one in Russia 2010 coinciding with the unprecedented Pakistan flood. Behind these devastating individual events there is a common physical cause, propose scientists of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK). The study will be published this week in the US Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and suggests that man-made climate change repeatedly disturbs the patterns of atmospheric flow around the globe’s Northern hemisphere through a subtle resonance mechanism.

Potsdam_wave_image
Meridional windfield over four different timespans. Image: PIK

“An important part of the global air motion in the mid-latitudes of the Earth normally takes the form of waves wandering around the planet, oscillating between the tropical and the Arctic regions. So when they swing up, these waves suck warm air from the tropics to Europe, Russia, or the US, and when they swing down, they do the same thing with cold air from the Arctic,” explains lead author Vladimir Petoukhov.

“What we found is that during several recent extreme weather events these planetary waves almost freeze in their tracks for weeks. So instead of bringing in cool air after having brought warm air in before, the heat just stays. In fact, we observe a strong amplification of the usually weak, slowly moving component of these waves,” says Petoukhov. Time is critical here: two or three days of 30 degrees Celsius are no problem, but twenty or more days lead to extreme heat stress. Since many ecosystems and cities are not adapted to this, prolonged hot periods can result in a high death toll, forest fires, and dramatic harvest losses.

Anomalous surface temperatures are disturbing the air flows

Climate change caused by greenhouse-gas emissions from fossil-fuel burning does not mean uniform global warming – in the Arctic, the relative increase of temperatures, amplified by the loss of snow and ice, is higher than on average. This in turn reduces the temperature difference between the Arctic and, for example, Europe, yet temperature differences are a main driver of air flow. Additionally, continents generally warm and cool more readily than the oceans. “These two factors are crucial for the mechanism we detected,” says Petoukhov. “They result in an unnatural pattern of the mid-latitude air flow, so that for extended periods the slow synoptic waves get trapped.”

The authors of the study developed equations that describe the wave motions in the extra-tropical atmosphere and show under what conditions those waves can grind to a halt and get amplified. They tested their assumptions using standard daily weather data from the US National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). During recent periods in which several major weather extremes occurred, the trapping and strong amplification of particular waves – like “wave seven” (which has seven troughs and crests spanning the globe) – was indeed observed. The data show an increase in the occurrence of these specific atmospheric patterns, which is statistically significant at the 90 percent confidence level.

The probability of extremes increases – but other factors come in as well

“Our dynamical analysis helps to explain the increasing number of novel weather extremes. It complements previous research that already linked such phenomena to climate change, but did not yet identify a mechanism behind it,” says Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, director of PIK and co-author of the study. “This is quite a breakthrough, even though things are not at all simple – the suggested physical process increases the probability of weather extremes, but additional factors certainly play a role as well, including natural variability.” Also, the 32-year period studied in the project provides a good indication of the mechanism involved, yet is too short for definite conclusions.

Nevertheless, the study significantly advances the understanding of the relation between weather extremes and man-made climate change. Scientists were surprised by how far outside past experience some of the recent extremes have been. The new data show that the emergence of extraordinary weather is not just a linear response to the mean warming trend, and the proposed mechanism could explain that.

Article: Petoukhov, V., Rahmstorf, S., Petri, S., Schellnhuber, H. J. (2013): Quasi-resonant amplification of planetary waves and recent Northern Hemisphere weather extremes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Early Edition) [doi:10.1073/pnas.1222000110]

Weblink to the article (once it is published): www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1222000110

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
57 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TomRude
February 28, 2013 12:17 pm

What else to expect from the author Petoukov who claimed warm air pushes denser, colder air?
“Climate change caused by greenhouse-gas emissions from fossil-fuel burning does not mean uniform global warming – in the Arctic, the relative increase of temperatures, amplified by the loss of snow and ice, is higher than on average. This in turn reduces the temperature difference between the Arctic and, for example, Europe, yet temperature differences are a main driver of air flow. Additionally, continents generally warm and cool more readily than the oceans. “These two factors are crucial for the mechanism we detected,” says Petoukhov. “They result in an unnatural pattern of the mid-latitude air flow, so that for extended periods the slow synoptic waves get trapped.”
2013? We waited that long for these clowns to realize that and yet in their illusionist novelty act of arm (Rossby) waving demonstrate their lack of knowledge about atmospheric circulation patterns and the lower troposphere. The Late Marcel Leroux must have a good laugh at these contortionists worthy of Barnum and all those who are still use erroneous concepts such as Polar Front etc…

tom
February 28, 2013 1:48 pm

As a meteorologist now for 25yrs, all’s I can say is and roll my eyes. Sickening.

Luther Wu
February 28, 2013 4:26 pm

At last! We can identify the exact person responsible for the beginning of the great disaster known as AGW and even identify the approximate date when it all started. These metachronal event wave patterns in the atmosphere can all be laid at the feet of Krazy George.
It’s no longer all our fault, it’s all his fault.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krazy_George_Henderson

Bruce of Newcastle
February 28, 2013 6:49 pm

Extreme weather events (EWEs) is the latest from the team which brought you CAGW climate change global climate disruption weather on steroids.
Which is only apt since stampeding sheep is what they’re about. If you don’t succeed etc.

Bruce of Newcastle
February 28, 2013 6:59 pm

To be slightly more serious I note that jet stream blocking has been shown by Mike Lockwood to be due to low solar activity. We are presently in the weakest solar cycle for a couple centuries. Prof Lockwood is not a climate sceptic as far as I know.
This looks a whole lot more likely to me than Herr Schellnhuber’s ‘explanation’ that CO2 suddenly locked the Rossby waves after some magic pCO2 threshold was passed.

John F. Hultquist
February 28, 2013 7:54 pm

After a busy day I’ve found an entertaining way of relaxing is to read a few blogs to see who among our leaders has made the most outrageous statement, or what person Anthony Watts, Jo Nova, and others have irritated beyond the pale, thus, eliciting a response tending toward conniption.
Rep. Maxine Waters provided a nice start with the observation that 170 million jobs would be lost with the sequester.
http://michellemalkin.com/2013/02/28/maxine-waters-jobs/comment-page-1/
Tim Folkerts 11:13 am gets the nod here at WUWT. The issue of CAGW has, until recently, been focused in the distant future. The models “tell us” that we are going to be in deep dodo after 60 or 70 or 80 years. According to the CAGW metric (average atmosphere temperature) not much has happened, nothing is happening, and there is little reason to suspect anything will. Now the story is “ that man-made climate change repeatedly disturbs the patterns of atmospheric flow.” That is fantasy. Something that has yet to occur cannot “repeatedly” do anything.
I do agree some of the comments are informative. I always find tonyb’s work to be helpful – so thanks, tonyb. Thus, I’m off to read his report on Judith’s site, the nypost story of the 1896 heat in NYC, and Tim Ball’s article on the john-daly site. Thanks to Maxine and Tim F., and to mods, Anthony and all the rest of you that comment. Now it is food time.

WJohn
March 1, 2013 1:52 am

Any relevance to Saturn’s Red Spot? – existing for centuries. Causing, or caused by Saturnalian climate chaos?