From the American Association for the Advancement of Science the winner and many worthy runners up in science for this year. No mention of Climate/AGW.

Science’s Breakthrough of the Year: Discovery of the Higgs boson
Long-sought particle completes physicists’ standard model of particle physics
The observation of an elusive sub-atomic particle, known as the Higgs boson, has been heralded by the journal Science as the most important scientific discovery of 2012. This particle, which was first hypothesized more than 40 years ago, holds the key to explaining how other elementary particles (those that aren’t made up of smaller particles), such as electrons and quarks, get their mass.
In addition to recognizing the detection of this particle as the 2012 Breakthrough of the Year, Science and its international nonprofit publisher, AAAS, have identified nine other groundbreaking scientific achievements from the past year and compiled them into a top 10 list that will appear in the 21 December issue.
Researchers unveiled evidence of the Higgs boson on 4 July, fitting into place the last missing piece of a puzzle that physicists call the standard model of particle physics. This theory explains how particles interact via electromagnetic forces, weak nuclear forces and strong nuclear forces in order to make up matter in the universe. However, until this year, researchers could not explain how the elementary particles involved got their mass.
“Simply assigning masses to the particles makes the theory go haywire mathematically,” explained Science news correspondent Adrian Cho, who wrote about the discovery for the journal’s Breakthrough of the Year feature. “So, mass must somehow emerge from interactions of the otherwise mass-less particles themselves. That’s where the Higgs comes in.”
As Cho explains, physicists assume that space is filled by a “Higgs field,” which is similar to an electric field. Particles interact with this Higgs field to obtain energy and—thanks to Einstein’s famous mass-energy equivalence—mass as well. “Just as an electric field consists of particles called photons, the Higgs field consists of Higgs bosons woven into the vacuum,” he explains. “Physicists have now blasted them out of the vacuum and into brief existence.”
But, a view to the Higgs boson did not come easy—or cheap. Thousands of researchers working with a 5.5-billion-dollar atom-smasher at a particle physics laboratory near Geneva, Switzerland, called CERN, used two gargantuan particle detectors, known as ATLAS and CMS, to spot the long-sought boson.
It is unclear where this discovery will lead the field of particle physics in the future but its impact on the physics community this year has been undeniable, which is why Science calls the detection of the Higgs boson the 2012 Breakthrough of the Year. The special 21 December issue of the journal includes three articles written by researchers at CERN, which help to explain how this breakthrough was achieved.
Science’s list of nine other pioneering scientific achievements from 2012 follows.
The Denisovan Genome: A new technique that binds special molecules to single strands of DNA allowed researchers to sequence the complete Denisovan genome from just a fragment of bone from an ancient pinky finger. The genomic sequence has allowed researchers to compare Denisovans—archaic humans closely related to Neandertals—with modern humans. It also revealed that the finger bone belonged to a girl with brown eyes, brown hair and brown skin who died in Siberia between 74,000 and 82,000 years ago.
Making Eggs From Stem Cells: Japanese researchers showed that embryonic stem cells from mice could be coaxed into becoming viable egg cells. They clinched the case when the cells, fertilized by sperm in the laboratory, developed into live mouse pups born of surrogate mothers. The method requires female mice to host the developing eggs in their bodies for a time, so it falls short of scientists’ ultimate goal: deriving egg cells entirely in the laboratory. But, it provides a powerful tool for studying genes and other factors that influence fertility and egg cell development.
Curiosity’s Landing System: Though unable to test their rover’s entire landing system under Martian conditions, mission engineers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, safely and precisely placed the Curiosity rover on the surface of Mars. The 3.3-ton rover entry vehicle was too massive for traditional landings, so the team took inspiration from cranes and helicopters to create a “sky crane” landing system that dangled Curiosity, wheels deployed, at the end of three cables. The flawless landing reassured planners that NASA could someday land a second mission near an earlier rover to pick up samples the rover collected and return them to Earth.
X-ray Laser Provides Protein Structure: Researchers used an X-ray laser, which shines a billion times brighter than traditional synchrotron sources, to determine the structure of an enzyme required by the Trypanosoma brucei parasite, the cause of African sleeping sickness. The advance demonstrated the potential of X-ray lasers to decipher proteins that conventional X-ray sources cannot.
Precision Engineering of Genomes: The revision and deletion of DNA in higher organisms has generally been a hit-or-miss proposition. But, in 2012, a tool known as TALENs, which stands for “transcription activator-like effector nucleases,” gave researchers the ability to alter or inactivate specific genes in zebrafish, toads, livestock and other animals—even cells from patients with disease. This technology, along with others that are emerging, is proving to be just as effective as (and cheaper than) established gene-targeting techniques, and it may allow researchers to determine specific roles for genes and mutations in both healthy and diseased individuals.
Majorana Fermions: The existence of Majorana fermions, particles that (among other properties) act as their own antimatter and annihilate themselves, has been debated for more than seven decades. This year, a team of physicists and chemists in The Netherlands provided the first solid evidence that such exotic matter exists, in the form of quasi-particles: groups of interacting electrons that behave like single particles. The discovery has already prompted efforts to incorporate Majorana fermions into quantum computing, as scientists think “qubits” made of these mysterious particles could be more efficient at storing and processing data than the bits currently used in digital computers.
The ENCODE Project: A decade-long study that was reported this year in more than 30 papers revealed that the human genome is more “functional” than researchers had believed. Although only two percent of the genome codes for actual proteins, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements, or ENCODE, project indicated that about 80 percent of the genome is active, helping to turn genes on or off, for example. These new details should help researchers to understand the ways in which genes are controlled and to clarify some genetic risk factors for diseases.
Brain-Machine Interfaces: The same team that had previously demonstrated how neural recordings from the brain could be used to move a cursor on a computer screen showed in 2012 that paralyzed human patients could move a mechanical arm with their minds and perform complex movements in three dimensions. The technology is still experimental—and extraordinarily expensive—but scientists are hopeful that more advanced algorithms could improve these neural prosthetics to help patients paralyzed by strokes, spinal injuries and other conditions.
Neutrino Mixing Angle: Hundreds of researchers working on the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment in China reported the last unknown parameter of a model that describes how elusive particles, known as neutrinos, morph from one type or “flavor” to another as they travel at near-light speed. The results show that neutrinos and anti-neutrinos could possibly change flavors differently and suggest that neutrino physics may someday help researchers to explain why the universe contains so much matter and so little antimatter. If physicists cannot identify new particles beyond the Higgs boson, neutrino physics could represent the future of particle physics.
Science‘s 2012 Breakthrough of the Year feature, along with a related editorial by Bruce Alberts, Science‘s Editor-in-Chief, and three related articles about the Higgs boson, a podcast interview and other multimedia, will be available for free after the embargo lifts with registration at www.sciencemag.org/special/btoy2012.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is the world’s largest general scientific society, and publisher of the journal, Science as well as Science Translational Medicine and Science Signaling. AAAS was founded in 1848, and includes some 261 affiliated societies and academies of science, serving 10 million individuals. Science has the largest paid circulation of any peer-reviewed general science journal in the world, with an estimated total readership of 1 million. The non-profit AAAS is open to all and fulfills its mission to “advance science and serve society” through initiatives in science policy; international programs; science education; and more. For the latest research news, log onto EurekAlert!, the premier science-news Web site, a service of AAAS.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“””””…..Donald L. Klipstein says:
December 23, 2012 at 6:10 pm
Richard Keen says December 23, 2012 at 10:36 am:
“What – 16 years of no warming inspiring Santer’s peer-reviewed paper that
we need 17 years to make it so isn’t on the list?”
This 16 year figure is looking like it’s getting parroted a fair amount lately.
But, smoothed HadCRUT3, RSS or UAH looks like 11-12 years without
warming, not 16. For example:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/…….”””””””
Well I looked at your reference, and it seems they can’t make up their mind. I found four different graphs, all purporting to be the global average temperature anomaly from 1850 to 2011. Well they also were plotted with four different scales of Temperature. Really robust data reporting, I must say..
I bet they had really good southern hemisphere data in 1850; probably Phineas Fogg, made a whole bunch of measurements.
I do believe that many researchers note the 1987/8 El Nino anomalous anomaly, as being an interloper event that isn’t part of the true trend, and fogging that out puts the flattening corner at about 1995, which is 17 years ago on my calendars.
joe arrigo says:
December 23, 2012 at 4:59 pm
Nothing has been reported about Higgs discovery, if it shines any light, or gets us closer to the Theory of Everything (TOE).
###
42.
I’m a bit out of date with particle physics, etc., the last 6 years I’ve been studying origin of life, disease and immunity, climate, geology and stuff like that. Previously I was into string theory, and loop quantum gravity, etc. One simple question about the Higgs boson: supposedly it’s what gives mass to the other particles in quantum field theory, but it’s also a boson with mass, as I understand, and according to kuhnkat, a bit over 120 Gev. Er, how does it get mass, if it’s the particle that ‘gives’ mass? Infinite regress?
Mooloo says:
December 23, 2012 at 12:14 pm
You are being a jerk. It cannot be seen nor can it’s path in the buble chambers as with other larger particles. It can only be determined statistically at the moment by showing that an event occured in the predicted range eV range. At the moment they have a statistical candidate but, as always, they need more time and money to prove it is the HB. It will come done to an acceptable probability.
Stephen Richards BSc Physic, MScphysic (solid state).
What if – the more energy they put into their colliders, the more undiscovered massive particles pop out?
If, when they push the LHC up to full power (it is not already at full power), and something more massive than the Higgs energy appears, then the standard model, far from having been completed with the discovery of the Higgs, will in fact be shattered.
Now that would be interesting.
Peter Hannan says:
December 24, 2012 at 12:27 am
… Previously I was into string theory, and loop quantum gravity, etc. One simple question about the Higgs boson: supposedly it’s what gives mass to the other particles in quantum field theory, but it’s also a boson with mass, as I understand, and according to kuhnkat, a bit over 120 Gev. Er, how does it get mass, if it’s the particle that ‘gives’ mass? Infinite regress?
Well, you see, there are some 10^68 atoms and ionized atoms in the solar system, and each atom has between 1 and 239 protons and neutrons within its structure. So there should be more than 10^70 Higgs Bosuns running around – if they were detectable.
On the other hand, if the Higgs Bosun is required to give all the other bosuns their mass, but it undetectable on its own by our sensors – which is what the elegantly trained few who have decided that they have correctly deciphered their arcane higher levels of math assure us – then I assume we must believe their hieroglyphics (hire physics ?) and trust them explicitly .
Now, if only one Higgs Bosun was required to create the mass of all of the other 10^70 bosuns that we KNOW are present in our solar system, and that one Higgs Bosun is unobservable yet capable of influencing all other bosuns in the nearby solar system, then I equally can say that the CERN physicts have proven that God exists and Creation must be true.
Donald L. Klipstein says:
December 23, 2012 at 6:10 pm
“But, smoothed HadCRUT3, RSS or UAH looks like 11-12 years without
warming, not 16. For example:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/
”
Well, they smooth using a 21 year filter. What do you expect, Donald? What is the length of the impulse response of a 21 year smoothing filter? See I could smooth it with a 100 year filter and you wouldn’t even see the cooling of the 50ies to 70ies anymore.
BTW, as they say they use a CENTERED 21year smoother the values they get for 2001 onwards are moot and subject to change anyway…
“In order to extend the simple smoothing to the very ends of the time series it is necessary to either extend the data series, or shorten the filter. Howsoever it is done, the data near the endpoints will be treated differently to data in the middle of the series. Extending the data series can be done in a number of ways, but the method used on these pages is simply to continue the series by repeating the final value. ”
Wait. WHAT?
DirkH says:
December 24, 2012 at 9:25 am
“Wait. WHAT?”
I should have gotten used to the careless attitude of these “scientists” by now. Their extrapolation of the signal (which they don’t call an extrapolation but it is one) is a MODEL, a PREDICTION; they have built into their extrapolation the ASSUMPTION that temperatures stay constant forever. I am at a complete loss as to why one would do that. It’s like running their filter over a cliff into a signal that is completely different from the one of the past; completely different spectrum.
The best thing would have been to stop their smoothing filter in 2001 as it stays free from such assumptions to that time. But in that case, people would have NOTICED that they don’t look at the real time series but a derived low frequency emphasized processed signal, and Donald wouldn’t have been confused about it, or not that confused.
BEST did a similar trick, publishing their results with a 10 year running average stopping in 2000 right near the peak of the 1998 EL Nino and saying to the stupid journos, Yup, I’ve been a skeptic but this proves the Earth is still warming – and they all printed the graph not understanding the trick Muller had played on them.
Sometimes you just gotta find new tricks, Mike’s old nature trick doesn’t do it anymore.
Neural prosthetics will probably be taxed under the affordable care act.
Last I read is that the Higgs Boson discovery is still the the “maybe” class of discoveries, even using their statistical approach to such “discoveries”. Not quite at the statistical significance required. The question posted above regarding how the “God” particle that gives all other particles mass also gives itself mass is, indeed, very interesting even when one considers the wave nature of such a supposed particle. I am skeptical of this entire routine. No one ever wants to tell the emperor he has no clothes.
It’s still the Higgs Bogus “particle”.
A very, very rare event happened destroying…. or the sparks from attempting to destroy these “particles”. So how can an object constrained to three dimensions actually have a field?
They proved it is rare so the field off these rare particles flying out would of shook the place. distorting mass therefore time so all the readings gathered by CERN would of been awry.
It didn’t. Therefore it wasn’t.
Now I want you to consider if CERN was a fail and they admitted it by saying the Higgs Bogus does not exist. The whole pack of cards had to be thrown in. There is a lot of job security and credibility at stake.
Robert Austin says:
December 23, 2012 at 11:58 am
“In the looking glass climate science world, there would have been no need to construct CERN. The collision simulations would have been executed “successfully” in ‘robust” computer simulations and an overwhelming consensus of scientists would hold the Higgs boson as fact. Those asking to see the code of the simulations or questioning the lack of empirical data would be labeled Higgs denialists.”
The real contrast between climate science, as practiced today, and particle physics is that the climate scientists confuse their simulations with reality.
The great achievement of particle physics through CERN is that the scientists were able to use their theory to formulate some of their most important questions in a way that can be answered through experiment. They were able to predict some characteristics of the HB. They have discovered that some of those characteristics can be detected. This is good science. If we substitute the question “Does the HB exist or not?” for their theoretical formulations then we are replacing the science with metaphysics.
“””””…..Andyj says:
December 25, 2012 at 3:37 am
t’s still the Higgs Bogus “particle”.
A very, very rare event happened destroying…. or the sparks from attempting to destroy these “particles”. So how can an object constrained to three dimensions actually have a field?…….”””””
So would you consider a photon to be constrained to three dimensions; if not, to how many dimensions ? So now why is there an electro-magnetic field, that is infinite in range; just like gravity ??
I don’t know, so I’m anxious to learn from you.