The Higgs boson takes science center stage for 2012

From the American Association for the Advancement of Science  the winner and many worthy runners up in science for this year. No mention of Climate/AGW.

One possible way the Higgs boson might be prod...
One possible way the Higgs boson might be produced at the Large Hadron Collider. Similar images at: http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/Conferences/2003/aspen-03_dam.ppt (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Science’s Breakthrough of the Year: Discovery of the Higgs boson

Long-sought particle completes physicists’ standard model of particle physics

The observation of an elusive sub-atomic particle, known as the Higgs boson, has been heralded by the journal Science as the most important scientific discovery of 2012. This particle, which was first hypothesized more than 40 years ago, holds the key to explaining how other elementary particles (those that aren’t made up of smaller particles), such as electrons and quarks, get their mass.

In addition to recognizing the detection of this particle as the 2012 Breakthrough of the Year, Science and its international nonprofit publisher, AAAS, have identified nine other groundbreaking scientific achievements from the past year and compiled them into a top 10 list that will appear in the 21 December issue.

Researchers unveiled evidence of the Higgs boson on 4 July, fitting into place the last missing piece of a puzzle that physicists call the standard model of particle physics. This theory explains how particles interact via electromagnetic forces, weak nuclear forces and strong nuclear forces in order to make up matter in the universe. However, until this year, researchers could not explain how the elementary particles involved got their mass.

“Simply assigning masses to the particles makes the theory go haywire mathematically,” explained Science news correspondent Adrian Cho, who wrote about the discovery for the journal’s Breakthrough of the Year feature. “So, mass must somehow emerge from interactions of the otherwise mass-less particles themselves. That’s where the Higgs comes in.”

As Cho explains, physicists assume that space is filled by a “Higgs field,” which is similar to an electric field. Particles interact with this Higgs field to obtain energy and—thanks to Einstein’s famous mass-energy equivalence—mass as well. “Just as an electric field consists of particles called photons, the Higgs field consists of Higgs bosons woven into the vacuum,” he explains. “Physicists have now blasted them out of the vacuum and into brief existence.”

But, a view to the Higgs boson did not come easy—or cheap. Thousands of researchers working with a 5.5-billion-dollar atom-smasher at a particle physics laboratory near Geneva, Switzerland, called CERN, used two gargantuan particle detectors, known as ATLAS and CMS, to spot the long-sought boson.

It is unclear where this discovery will lead the field of particle physics in the future but its impact on the physics community this year has been undeniable, which is why Science calls the detection of the Higgs boson the 2012 Breakthrough of the Year. The special 21 December issue of the journal includes three articles written by researchers at CERN, which help to explain how this breakthrough was achieved.

Science’s list of nine other pioneering scientific achievements from 2012 follows.

The Denisovan Genome: A new technique that binds special molecules to single strands of DNA allowed researchers to sequence the complete Denisovan genome from just a fragment of bone from an ancient pinky finger. The genomic sequence has allowed researchers to compare Denisovans—archaic humans closely related to Neandertals—with modern humans. It also revealed that the finger bone belonged to a girl with brown eyes, brown hair and brown skin who died in Siberia between 74,000 and 82,000 years ago.

Making Eggs From Stem Cells: Japanese researchers showed that embryonic stem cells from mice could be coaxed into becoming viable egg cells. They clinched the case when the cells, fertilized by sperm in the laboratory, developed into live mouse pups born of surrogate mothers. The method requires female mice to host the developing eggs in their bodies for a time, so it falls short of scientists’ ultimate goal: deriving egg cells entirely in the laboratory. But, it provides a powerful tool for studying genes and other factors that influence fertility and egg cell development.

Curiosity’s Landing System: Though unable to test their rover’s entire landing system under Martian conditions, mission engineers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, safely and precisely placed the Curiosity rover on the surface of Mars. The 3.3-ton rover entry vehicle was too massive for traditional landings, so the team took inspiration from cranes and helicopters to create a “sky crane” landing system that dangled Curiosity, wheels deployed, at the end of three cables. The flawless landing reassured planners that NASA could someday land a second mission near an earlier rover to pick up samples the rover collected and return them to Earth.

X-ray Laser Provides Protein Structure: Researchers used an X-ray laser, which shines a billion times brighter than traditional synchrotron sources, to determine the structure of an enzyme required by the Trypanosoma brucei parasite, the cause of African sleeping sickness. The advance demonstrated the potential of X-ray lasers to decipher proteins that conventional X-ray sources cannot.

Precision Engineering of Genomes: The revision and deletion of DNA in higher organisms has generally been a hit-or-miss proposition. But, in 2012, a tool known as TALENs, which stands for “transcription activator-like effector nucleases,” gave researchers the ability to alter or inactivate specific genes in zebrafish, toads, livestock and other animals—even cells from patients with disease. This technology, along with others that are emerging, is proving to be just as effective as (and cheaper than) established gene-targeting techniques, and it may allow researchers to determine specific roles for genes and mutations in both healthy and diseased individuals.

Majorana Fermions: The existence of Majorana fermions, particles that (among other properties) act as their own antimatter and annihilate themselves, has been debated for more than seven decades. This year, a team of physicists and chemists in The Netherlands provided the first solid evidence that such exotic matter exists, in the form of quasi-particles: groups of interacting electrons that behave like single particles. The discovery has already prompted efforts to incorporate Majorana fermions into quantum computing, as scientists think “qubits” made of these mysterious particles could be more efficient at storing and processing data than the bits currently used in digital computers.

The ENCODE Project: A decade-long study that was reported this year in more than 30 papers revealed that the human genome is more “functional” than researchers had believed. Although only two percent of the genome codes for actual proteins, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements, or ENCODE, project indicated that about 80 percent of the genome is active, helping to turn genes on or off, for example. These new details should help researchers to understand the ways in which genes are controlled and to clarify some genetic risk factors for diseases.

Brain-Machine Interfaces: The same team that had previously demonstrated how neural recordings from the brain could be used to move a cursor on a computer screen showed in 2012 that paralyzed human patients could move a mechanical arm with their minds and perform complex movements in three dimensions. The technology is still experimental—and extraordinarily expensive—but scientists are hopeful that more advanced algorithms could improve these neural prosthetics to help patients paralyzed by strokes, spinal injuries and other conditions.

Neutrino Mixing Angle: Hundreds of researchers working on the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment in China reported the last unknown parameter of a model that describes how elusive particles, known as neutrinos, morph from one type or “flavor” to another as they travel at near-light speed. The results show that neutrinos and anti-neutrinos could possibly change flavors differently and suggest that neutrino physics may someday help researchers to explain why the universe contains so much matter and so little antimatter. If physicists cannot identify new particles beyond the Higgs boson, neutrino physics could represent the future of particle physics.

###

Science‘s 2012 Breakthrough of the Year feature, along with a related editorial by Bruce Alberts, Science‘s Editor-in-Chief, and three related articles about the Higgs boson, a podcast interview and other multimedia, will be available for free after the embargo lifts with registration at www.sciencemag.org/special/btoy2012.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is the world’s largest general scientific society, and publisher of the journal, Science as well as Science Translational Medicine and Science Signaling. AAAS was founded in 1848, and includes some 261 affiliated societies and academies of science, serving 10 million individuals. Science has the largest paid circulation of any peer-reviewed general science journal in the world, with an estimated total readership of 1 million. The non-profit AAAS is open to all and fulfills its mission to “advance science and serve society” through initiatives in science policy; international programs; science education; and more. For the latest research news, log onto EurekAlert!, the premier science-news Web site, a service of AAAS.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

63 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PaulH
December 23, 2012 10:20 am

I get a kick out of subjects like sub-atomics and string theory, although I wish I had a better level of understanding of how they work.

Richard Keen
December 23, 2012 10:36 am

What – 16 years of no warming inspiring Santer’s peer-reviewed paper that we need 17 years to make it so isn’t on the list?

December 23, 2012 10:46 am

Mr. Higgs went to a Catholic church and was refused entrance! So Mr. Higgs said:
Fair enough, but without me …….. you cannot have…mass! boom boom!!

J. Murphy
December 23, 2012 10:56 am

I don’t understand why you felt you had to mention that there was “no mention of Climate/AGW”.
Why should either have been mentioned amongst the most important scientific discovery or groundbreaking scientific achievements of 2012 ? Surely AGW has already been discovered ?
Is there any significance from evolution not being mentioned either ? Or the moon landings ?

george e. smith
December 23, 2012 10:58 am

Well I know the answer to why there is more matter, than there is anti-matter.
It goes back to the time when some idiot declared that electrons have a negative charge, so that the much rarer positrons have a positive charge. As a result, we have the apparent absurdity that electric (electron) currents go one way, while all the mass travels in the opposite direction; since by definition, the positive direction of current is the direction in which there is a net flow of positive charge. Some military (maybe Navy) electronics schools even teach (or taught) “electron current” back in the vaccuum tube days. So in their view, current travels from anode to cathode, while electrons boil off the filament, or cathode, and travel to the anode.
So faced with this huge fox pass; what sort of idiot, would call the majority material of the universe “antimatter”, instead of the more logical “matter”.
Does anybody in the USA care about the anti-laws and anti-bills that the Congress does not pass.
So there you have it. It simply makes common sense; even 4-H club science sense, to call what you have “matter”, and what you don’t have, “anti-matter.

Doug Huffman
December 23, 2012 11:18 am

About the Higgs Boson gauge boson to the Higgs Field, it is clear from reading “science journalists” drivel on it that they have no idea of what is a field. I agree that its characterization and identification is a story of the year and in the running for science story of the century.
Think of it in Popper’s paradigm of science, an extreme hypothesis not falsified after a half-century of effort and now validated with huge data.

December 23, 2012 11:24 am

I suppose there is a limit on how far a sceptic can reasonably go. Are there those who dispute what happened in CERN? Can we take on trust that there has been such a discovery? Will it be replicated and verified? They spent a lot of money and were looking for signs that this nanosecond or two ephiphany did happen. You can see the damage that swashbuckling climate scientists have done to one scienceophile!

cui bono
December 23, 2012 11:29 am

Good to know real science proceeds apace.
But they did miss the curious discovery of Majorana Mannions, climate activists who (among other properties) act as their own antimatter and annihilate themselves.

Berényi Péter
December 23, 2012 11:29 am

Ah, no breakthrough in non-equilibrium thermodynamics (just genetics & particle physics). Therefore it is still not understood how a closed dissipative system works, one with a vast number of non-linearly coupled internal degrees of freedom, interacting radiatively with its environment, backed by a practically inexhaustible free energy supply.
Of which class terrestrial climate system is but a humble example.
One of the few as yet unconquered bastions of nature still stands firm and desolate against meager attacks of classical physics. That’s how settled the science is.

Stephen Richards
December 23, 2012 11:30 am

My understanding of the science is that the HB has not and cannot be ‘seen’. It’s presence is determined by statistical analysis. If the analysis passes a predetermined threshold then they assume it’s chance of being present by how much that threshold is passed. So just pass 60%, moderately pass 80%, well pass 95%. The last figure I heard was not very impressive and left room for doubt. That was about mid-this year.

Jeff
December 23, 2012 11:41 am

Last I heard, the Higgs-Bosun had not yet actually been observed, but that there were unknown particles behaving in an unexpected manner which they were postulating “might” be HB’s, and that the detectors were not sensitive enough yet. I haven’t seen this issue of “Science” yet. Is there something more definitive?

Zeke
December 23, 2012 11:46 am

It just goes to show, if you have faith as a little grain of Higgs…

December 23, 2012 11:58 am

In the looking glass climate science world, there would have been no need to construct CERN. The collision simulations would have been executed “successfully” in ‘robust” computer simulations and an overwhelming consensus of scientists would hold the Higgs boson as fact. Those asking to see the code of the simulations or questioning the lack of empirical data would be labeled Higgs denialists.

December 23, 2012 12:11 pm

I just wanted to say, but you beat me to it Jeff. Let hem first discover it for real. Maybe it would help if they knew the actual energy of the particle they where looking for, that would be less like a fishing trip. This is getting to have all the earmarks of a grants suction machine.

Mooloo
December 23, 2012 12:14 pm

J. Murphy says:
I don’t understand why you felt you had to mention that there was “no mention of Climate/AGW”.
Why should either have been mentioned amongst the most important scientific discovery or groundbreaking scientific achievements of 2012 ? Surely AGW has already been discovered ?
Is there any significance from evolution not being mentioned either ? Or the moon landings ?

The Higgs boson* was postulated a while back by Higgs. Now it’s existence, despite some of the infantile posturings above, is beyond question (at least within the context of our understanding of particles at all).
If only AGW had reached that position! But sadly it’s “discovery” is not evidence of its existence. There’s been quite a few things discovered that turned out to be non-existent (phlogiston, the aether etc).
Stephen Richards says:
My understanding of the science is that the HB has not and cannot be ‘seen’. It’s presence is determined by statistical analysis.

No, not “statistical analysis”. Actual observing and counting of things, and then working backwards from there to calculate what must have been present first, because the original item doesn’t stay around for very long.
You can’t show my my biological great-great-great-great grandparents, but I’m willing to believe that I had 64 of them based entirely on theory. My existence is pretty much proof, in itself, that I had great-great-great-great grandparents, even without observing them directly.

December 23, 2012 12:19 pm

george e. smith says:
“… the positive direction of current is the direction in which there is a net flow of positive charge. Some military (maybe Navy) electronics schools even teach (or taught) “electron current” back in the vaccuum tube days. So in their view, current travels from anode to cathode, while electrons boil off the filament, or cathode, and travel to the anode.”
Not sure where you are getting this. The only time I ran across the concept of “hole flow” or voltage flow was in the Mk-36 DLS course. A totally foreign way of thinking in my book, but workable if you work at it.
Electron flow is Cathode to Anode. That’s also the way it is taught. I taught it that way. (Eight years of instructor duty, four specifically in Electronics technology… the basics)

Kev-in-Uk
December 23, 2012 12:24 pm

Jeff says:
December 23, 2012 at 11:41 am
I think that’s semi-correct. The HB cannot be directly observed (as with some other particles?) but is ‘inferred’ by the production and tracks of other particles (which can be seen) and their unique decay patterns from H-B collisions with them.

ianrs
December 23, 2012 12:25 pm

HB does not exist long enough to be “seen” but its effects can be observed in 2 resulting anti-quarks.

DirkH
December 23, 2012 12:27 pm

J. Murphy says:
December 23, 2012 at 10:56 am
“I don’t understand why you felt you had to mention that there was “no mention of Climate/AGW”.
Why should either have been mentioned amongst the most important scientific discovery or groundbreaking scientific achievements of 2012 ? Surely AGW has already been discovered ?
Is there any significance from evolution not being mentioned either ? Or the moon landings ?”
We’re all awaiting a groundbreaking discovery in climate modeling that would shatter our worldview, J. Murphy. Which is currently that climate models are junk.

SMC
December 23, 2012 12:28 pm

It’s nice to see this kind of article from time to time. A nice change of pace from the usual.

Gerry
December 23, 2012 12:35 pm

“Blasted them …into brief existence” ……I think there is a problem with the definition of existence then ……maybe they mean recognition?

Mike M
December 23, 2012 12:38 pm

It sounds a little reminiscent of ‘ether’ which used to be required for the propagation of EM waves which reminds me an old joke:
In 1900 a young man in Kamchatka tells his mother he’s been accepted to study electrical engineering at Lomonosov Moscow University. He goes there for his first year of freshman subjects then returns home during summer break. He tries to explain what he learned to his mother which included telegraph communication but she just does not understand anything about electricity. So he thinks of an analogy telling his mother, “Imagine there is a donkey but one so big that its head is in Kamchatka and it tail is back in Moscow. Imagine I am Moscow and pull on the donkey’s tail so that it brays here. I pull on the tail in a way to make coded signals that you then decode to understand my message.” This the mother understands.
The son returns to Moscow for another year of schooling then returns home. His mother asks what he studied his second year and he tries to tell her about radio. Again she just cannot fathom what he describing to her but then he remembers his analogy to describe the telegraph to her.
“Mother, remember the year before I told you about the giant donkey to describe telegraph?” “Yes, it is something like that?” she asks. “Yes mother, it is exactly the same as that except for one thing … there is no donkey.”

RomanM
December 23, 2012 12:42 pm

Mooloo December 23, 2012 at 12:14 pm

You can’t show my my biological great-great-great-great grandparents, but I’m willing to believe that I had 64 of them based entirely on theory. My existence is pretty much proof, in itself, that I had great-great-great-great grandparents, even without observing them directly.

But not necessarily 64 different ones. Not a good example… 🙂

n.n
December 23, 2012 12:43 pm

Stephen Richards, Jeff:
That was my impression as well. They have indirect, circumstantial evidence of a physical behavior which resembles that associated with the hypothesized Higgs boson. I don’t recall that they have determined the cause of the behavior or that it may be exclusively attributed to a single particle.

kuhnkat
December 23, 2012 12:49 pm

I don’t think so. I will go with Miles Mathins on this one:
http://milesmathis.com/higgs3.pdf
“First posted December 18, 2012
Incredibly, new data from the Higgs is already confirming my summation to my previous paper, where I predicted that various large particles could be found in the 120GeV range. This is because my quantum spin equations allow me to predict stacked spins that sum at this energy.
In new data revealed on December 3, 2012, the LHC is now admitting they have at least two new
Higgs masses very near to one another. They are calling one a di-photon Higgs and the other a 4-lepton Higgs, but that is just speculation. The reported masses are 123.5 and 126.6. Also curious is that they are now calling their particles “Higgs-like.” ScienceWorldReport.com, reporting on Stephen Hawking’s FPP prize, said, An identical cash prize of $3 million (£1.8million) was shared between the seven scientists who led the effort to discover a Higgs-like particle at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.
So they already appear to be backpedaling from the Higgs claim…

1 2 3