Gore’s green money machine

Excerpted from The Liberal War on Transparency by Chris Horner

So, Al Gore came to do good and ended up doing really, really well, according to the Washington Post. That’s actually not unique for Washington, except possibly as a matter of scale: Gore went from being worth $2 million when leaving office to about $100 million now.

Gore, of course, “invested” in or otherwise found profitable arrangements with many companies whose financing mostly comes courtesy of the taxpayer, either directly, or indirectly in that private money flocks to that which politicians wed themselves to — the “halo effect” — on the knowledge that once the spigot opens it is difficult to turn off for fear of having a taxpayer-funded flop on their hands.

I couldn’t help but be reminded, by this story, of the personnel executing these programs for President Obama, he of the $90 billion in “green energy” money squandered on boondoggles whose own owners’ sales pitch for the dough was unless you give me this money, I won’t exist.

For example, in one of those funny coincidences of life, did you know that Obama appointed the CEO of Al Gore’s own pro-green energy advocacy group, Alliance for Climate Protection, to be his Assistant Secretary of Energy for Renewable Energy? I detail this in a chapter of my new book, The Liberal War on Transparency: Confessions of a Freedom of Information “Criminal” (greens hailed this move as akin to his coup of plucking Van Jones!)

After it became clear that she was not about to be confirmed for a higher position to which Obama moved her, Ms. Zoi moved out to start a Gore-like fund with some guy named Soros. But while Zoi was in government, I obtained some of her emails under the Freedom of Information Act. I also obtained a whole lot more discussing her orders and actions. More on that in the book, but here’s the big-picture.

Proving that transparency in government can be as entertaining as it is illuminating, I got hold of an email from Ms. Zoi’s close pal, the Managing Director of Solyndra’s outside political consulting firm. Just a note to let her know he was “at [the] poolside bar at Caesars having a drink” with her “Senior Advisor” (a twenty-something poli-sci grad). Right about then, back in Washington, President Obama’s political team was leaning on colleagues in government to get a campaign bundler’s company — Solyndra — a historically wasteful loan guarantee, soon to be predictably squandered.

Cheers! Other emails showed assistant secretary Zoi bantering as close confidantes do with yet a different partner in Solyndra’s political firm, for example arranging dinner at her house that weekend which promised to be a blast as “a couple of other fun political animals will be there”. Other Zoi emails showed her enlisting the same firm, apparently pro bono (although that would seem to be a legal no-no under The Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 USC § 1342), to help pull together materials she wanted to consider when developing DOE’s campaign, pushing the same agenda but from the inside.

But, no, that whole Solyndra and “green stimulus” boondoggle and the cronies that made out at the taxpayer’s expense, that came about due to the merits.

With the current administration, risibly self-congratulating as the most transparent in history, we now know to ask sooner than we did with Solyndra, even if by the time that scandal broke I had already used information requests to expose the basic but thorough corruption of Obama’s “green energy” operation. For example, another of my FOIA requests to Zoi’s fiefdom in the Department of Energy led to a treasure trove of emails exposing what Investor’s Business Daily called “The Big Wind Cover-Up.” This also uncovered the collaborative effort to smear the Spanish “green jobs” economics professor and his team’s work documenting the true disaster of liberal plans to reorganize America’s economy as “the clean energy economy.”

FOIA allowed me to chase down the genesis of this panic-driven attempt at discrediting people viewed as political opponents, this instance confirmed aggressive violations of Barack Obama’s promises of transparency and to banish lobbyists from insider roles in the policy process.

But documents pried out of the administration also let slip revealing details of how this defense of a “renewables” industry that Solyndra later made famous but all along made Gore and other well-connected types wealthy was coordinated with industry lobbyists and left-wing pressure groups. These included Soros’s project, the Center for American Progress, using the industrial wind lobby as the go-between in anticipation of DOE claiming, for example, to Congress that it “had no direct contact with” CAP or another pressure group to which the windmill lobbyists served as DOE’s “cutout” contact.

IBD described these records as being as substantively explosive as the previously described “Climategate” leak in 2009 of emails and computer code, because it showed senior Obama political appointees doing the bidding for industries that were propped up in the name of an anti-energy ideology and crony capitalism joined with the assault on abundant domestic energy sources that work and therefore also disfavored for ideological reasons.

With truths like these trickling out while we still have access to public records, it’s no surprise that Al Gore did so well “investing.” How he does if taxpayers decide that enough is enough remains to be seen.

Christopher C. Horner is a Washington, D.C. attorney and author of the new book The Liberal War on Transparency: Confessions of a Freedom of Information “Criminal” (Threshold Editions, published October 2, 2012)

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Justa Joe
October 15, 2012 12:30 pm

Garethman says:
…Remember, lefties do not form close alliances with big business, that’s capitalism, a different political and opposite group.
————————————————
Have you ever heard of Solyndra, GE, Goldman Sachs, or Generation Investment Management LLP (GIM) just to name a very few?
You should join up with Professor Lewandowski. You guys both excel at creating and/or buying into self serving yet inadequate definitions.

Garethman
October 15, 2012 1:02 pm

Whoa! One at a time guys, I am in a tennis match against 6 players here! Joe, the debate is about whether Obama is a Communist. You will note that in supposedly communist societies alliances with big business is rare. I can’t recall Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin, Lenin or even the the “Great leader” Kim doing it.This bunch of miscreants were far to busy abusing their societies while their interest was not money, it was power. There will always be exceptions, no system is 100% consistent, though being on the other side of the Atlantic I’d appreciate further info on which these Communist dictators these firms teamed up with. No-one who claims Obama is a Communist has posted any reliable objective links showing any evidence, I’ve made multiple postings and references showing the idea is nonsense. Maybe Professor Lewandoski is not the only one lacking reliable references for his claims? By the way Joe who is ‘you guys’? You make me sound like some sort of organisation which I am not. I work closely with politicians of all sides, but keep my own political beliefs close to my chest. I’m a fairly average European, which I imagine in tea party terms that makes me a rampant Marxist.

Justa Joe
October 15, 2012 3:09 pm

You will note that in supposedly communist societies alliances with big business is rare.
Actually I will not note this. I see no basis to assume this. Communist countries utlimately still need to produce (crappy) goods and services. They still must have entities albeit govt controlled to one extent or another to do this, and if a business is allowed to operate you better believe that they are alligned with the party. Somebody already attempted to explain to you that no system of government is pure.
My compatriot that called Obama a communist wasn’t literally suggesting that Obama marches around with a peaked cap with a little red star on it and modeled his administration after the old USSR. Surely you must realize this. Although he did have to fire a top lieutenant for publicly proclaiming her admiration Mao. I believe that the other poster was suggesting that Obama has a collectivist ideaology. Collectivism is a tenant of communism, no? Anyway it’s a bit of American hyperbole but nevertheless contains a kernel of truth. Maybe Euros don’t get it?
I’d appreciate further info on which these Communist dictators these firms teamed up with. No-one who claims Obama is a Communist has posted any reliable objective links showing any evidence,
Nobody has posted anything because it would be too tedious to point out how some policy of Obama’s is collectivist or contrary to free market economics, and then have to argue with you about it as you attempt to some sophistic defense about how Stalin never actually had an identical policy or some such rubbish. I found it humorous how you tried to suggest that govt run healthcare isn’t a socialist concept and to further suggest that govt run health care was not a feature of communist/socialist regimes. That took some real logical gymnatstics. I give you an A for effort. As far as a commie firms how about Mikoyan-Gurevich Design Bureau, or Chinese held ICBC bank?
…keep my own political beliefs close to my chest. I’m a fairly average European, which I imagine in tea party terms that makes me a rampant Marxist.
It’s fairly obvious which way you lean politically.

David Ball
October 15, 2012 4:51 pm

Garethman is doing what in hockey is called the “double reverse head fake”. The left are clearly aware of Obama’s socialist leanings and are trying to redirect people away from this until it is too late. His reactions are typical: denying who Obama has surrounded himself with, denying that Obama’s “collectivist actions” are not socialism, denying that Obama’s background leads to this unfailing conclusion. I stopped arguing with him as soon as I saw typical leftist responses and knew that he was no longer worth the effort, as nothing I say would convince him of anything. The general public have a sense of what is going on. They’re on to the “double reverse head fake”.

D Böehm
October 15, 2012 7:01 pm

Of course Obama is a Communist.

Goldie
October 15, 2012 10:29 pm

Here’s some keys tests;
1) does he delegate power or does he consolidate power in the Federal Government?
2) is he making (Federal) Government smaller or larger?

Resourceguy
October 16, 2012 10:19 am

I do hope Tipper was well compensated with hush money.

bushbunny
October 18, 2012 7:57 pm

Are there any communist countries left? Or are they now termed socialist? (Difference as I see it in socialist countries you can still vote, even if it doesn’t solve domestic problems). And are they amongst the poorest in the world?