“Skaters can only do this race every 10 or 11 years because that’s when the rivers freeze up,” Sirocko said. “I thought to myself, ‘There must be a reason for this,’ and it turns out there is.”
![dutch-canal[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/dutch-canal1.jpg?resize=640%2C480&quality=83)
WASHINGTON – Scientists have long suspected that the Sun’s 11-year cycle influences climate of certain regions on Earth. Yet records of average, seasonal temperatures do not date back far enough to confirm any patterns. Now, armed with a unique proxy, an international team of researchers show that unusually cold winters in Central Europe are related to low solar activity – when sunspot numbers are minimal. The freezing of Germany’s largest river, the Rhine, is the key.
Although the Earth’s surface overall continues to warm, the new analysis has revealed a correlation between periods of low activity of the Sun and of some cooling – on a limited, regional scale in Central Europe, along the Rhine.
“The advantage with studying the Rhine is because it’s a very simple measurement,” said Frank Sirocko lead author of a paper on the study and professor of Sedimentology and Paleoclimatology at the Institute of Geosciences of Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz, Germany. “Freezing is special in that it’s like an on-off mode. Either there is ice or there is no ice.”
From the early 19th through mid-20th centuries, riverboat men used the Rhine for cargo transport. And so docks along the river have annual records of when ice clogged the waterway and stymied shipping. The scientists used these easily-accessible documents, as well as additional historical accounts, to determine the number of freezing episodes since 1780.
Sirocko and his colleagues found that between 1780 and 1963, the Rhine froze in multiple places 14 different times. The sheer size of the river means it takes extremely cold temperatures to freeze over making freezing episodes a good proxy for very cold winters in the region, Sirocko said.
Mapping the freezing episodes against the solar activity’s 11-year cycle – a cycle of the Sun’s varying magnetic strength and thus total radiation output – Sirocko and his colleagues determined that ten of the fourteen freezes occurred during years around when the Sun had minimal sunspots. Using statistical methods, the scientists calculated that there is a 99 percent chance that extremely cold Central European winters and low solar activity are inherently linked.
“We provide, for the first time, statistically robust evidence that the succession of cold winters during the last 230 years in Central Europe has a common cause,” Sirocko said.
With the new paper, Sirocko and his colleagues have added to the research linking solar variability with climate, said Thomas Crowley, Director of the Scottish Alliance for Geoscience, Environment, and Society, who was not involved with the study.
“There is some suspension of belief in this link,” Crowley said, “and this study tilts the argument more towards thinking there really is something to this link. If you have more statistical evidence to support this explanation, one is more likely to say it’s true.”
The study, conducted by researchers at Johannes Gutenberg and the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science in Zurich, Switzerland, is set to be published August 25 in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.
When sunspot numbers are down, the Sun emits less ultraviolet radiation. Less radiation means less heating of Earth’s atmosphere, which sparks a change in the circulation patterns of the two lowest atmospheric levels, the troposphere and stratosphere. Such changes lead to climatic phenomena such as the North Atlantic Oscillation, a pattern of atmospheric pressure variations that influences wind patterns in the North Atlantic and weather behavior in regions in and around Europe.
“Due to this indirect effect, the solar cycle does not impact hemispherically averaged temperatures, but only leads to regional temperature anomalies,” said Stephan Pfahl, a co-author of the study who is now at the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science in Zurich.
The authors show that this change in atmospheric circulation leads to cooling in parts of Central Europe but warming in other European countries, such as Iceland. So, sunspots don’t necessarily cool the entire globe – their cooling effect is more localized, Sirocko said.
In fact, studies have suggested that the extremely cold European winters of 2010 and 2011 were the result of the North Atlantic Oscillation, which Sirocko and his team now link to the low solar activity during that time.
The 2010 and 2011 European winters were so cold that they resulted in record lows for the month of November in certain countries. Some who dispute the occurrence of anthropogenic climate change argue that this two-year period shows that Earth’s climate is not getting any warmer. But climate is a complex system, Sirocko said. And a short-term, localized dip in temperatures only temporarily masks the effects of a warming world.
“Climate is not ruled by one variable,” said Sirocko. “In fact, it has [at least] five or six variables. Carbon dioxide is certainly one, but solar activity is also one.”
Moreover, the researchers also point out that, despite Central Europe’s prospect to suffer colder winters every 11 years or so, the average temperature of those winters is increasing and has been for the past three decades. As one piece of evidence of that warming, the Rhine River has not frozen over since 1963. Sirocko said such warming results, in part, from climate change.
To establish a more complete record of past temperature dips, the researchers are looking to other proxies, such as the spread of disease and migratory habits.
“Disease can be transported by insects and rats, but during a strong freezing year that is not likely,” said Sirocko. “Also, Romans used the Rhine to defend against the Germanics, but as soon as the river froze people could move across it. The freezing of the Rhine is very important on historical timescales.”
It wasn’t, however, the Rhine that first got Sirocko to thinking about the connection between freezing rivers and sunspot activity. In fact, it was a 125-mile ice-skating race he attended over 20 years ago in the Netherlands that sparked the scientist’s idea.
“Skaters can only do this race every 10 or 11 years because that’s when the rivers freeze up,” Sirocko said. “I thought to myself, ‘There must be a reason for this,’ and it turns out there is.”
Title:
“Solar influence on winter severity in central Europe”
Abstract:
The last two winters in central Europe were unusually cold in comparison to the years before. Meteorological data, mainly from the last 50 years, and modelling studies have suggested that both solar activity and El Niño strength may influence such central European winter coldness. To investigate the mechanisms behind this in a statistically robust way and to test which of the two factors was more important during the last 230 years back into the Little Ice Age, we use historical reports of freezing of the river Rhine. The historical data show that 10 of the 14 freeze years occurred close to sunspot minima and only one during a year of moderate El Niño. This solar influence is underpinned by corresponding atmospheric circulation anomalies in reanalysis data covering the
period 1871 to 2008. Accordingly, weak solar activity is empirically related to extremely cold winter conditions in Europe also on such long time scales. This relationship still holds today, however the average winter temperatures have been rising during the last decades.
Authors:
Frank Sirocko and Heiko Brunck: Institute of Geosciences, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz;
Stephan Pfahl: Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
==============================================================
I hope to have a copy of the paper soon – Anthony
UPDATE: Dr. Leif Svalgaard provides the paper, as did the AGU press agent Kate Ramsayer per my emailed request, along with a copyright admonishment. Thank you both. Figure 6a and 6b are interesting:
From the paper:
In agreement with the 20th Century Reanalysis central European temperature observations from the CRUTEM3 dataset [Brohan et al., 2006] from winters directly following a sunspot minimum are also significantly lower than the average temperature during the remaining winter seasons (Fig. 6a). The relation between cold winter conditions and sunspot activity is thus not specific to rivers alone (which could also be affected by a number of additional factors, for example warm water from the numerous powerplants constructed along the river). The strong variations of the time series in Fig. 6a, which are largely independent of the sunspot cycle, show the important role of internal, stochastic variability of the atmosphere for European winter temperatures. The relation shown above holds true only for central European temperatures. When the CRUTEM3 winter temperature data are averaged over the whole Northern Hemisphere, no relation to the solar minima is found.
This suggests a regional circulation pattern effect, as the authors state connected to figure 5a and 5b:
To identify the atmospheric circulation anomalies in the North Atlantic and European region associated with cold winters during solar minima, Fig. 5a shows the difference in the geopotential height fields at 500 hPa (Z500) between the winters directly following a year with a sunspot minimum and the remainder of the period 1871 to 2008, obtained from the 20th Century Reanalysis dataset [Compo et al., 1996]. A strong, statistically significant positive anomaly occurs over the eastern North Atlantic in the region of Iceland, while negative anomalies are found over the Iberian peninsula and over north-eastern Europe (the latter being not significant). These Z500 anomalies are associated with an enhanced northerly flow and cold air advection from the Arctic and Scandinavia
towards central Europe, leading to significantly negative temperature anomalies over England, France and western Germany (Fig. 5b). The centre of the cooling is in the region of southern England, the Benelux countries and western Germany down to middle Rhine area. Eastern and southern Germany are not effected as much as the above region. Accordingly, it is only the Rhine and possible some Dutch rivers that provide the possibility to reconstruct this specific temperature anomaly pattern, which corresponds to an anomalously negative NAO and a preference for blockings over the eastern North Atlantic.


John Finn says
That’s why UAH temperatures
Henry says
apparently they are admitting now that UAH is reading too high.
we shal wait and see for the correction that is reportedly coming.
E.M Smith says
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/23/agu-link-found-between-cold-european-winters-and-solar-activity/#comment-1064046
Henry says
The problem is that they still seem to think it will get better….somehow
but I say: the worst is still to come.
Leif in this instance is correct. There is nothing conclusive in this paper only nefarious.
Hmm, the Sun does affect the Rhine … but nowhere else of course.
With regularity, a large proportion of these winters occur at the lows in the Ap index, which is typically one and two years after the solar cycle minima, and on and just after the maxima.
E.M.Smith says:
August 24, 2012 at 12:59 am
@Henry P:
Trust the Garden as thermometer. The tomato never lies……
___________________________________
I would believe a tomato long before I would believe a tree ring.
The Rhine has not frozen over since 1963, which is true. But there are several factors that have made it more difficult for the river to freeze over in modern times:
– Ships have become much larger and produce more wave pertubations, making the formations of ice floats more difficult.
– The above-mentioned heating of the river by industry.
– A very important aspect was and still is the at times massive pollution of the river with waste salt from the Alsatian potash production industry at the upper Rhine, reducing the temperature at which the river freezes.
.
The 2011 winter was close to freeze the Rhine over again. One morning when I biked to work in the bitter cold I observed the formation of palm-size ice floats. But the next day thawing started.
Greetings from the Rhine, Germany
Gail Combs says: August 24, 2012 at 4:24 am
E.M.Smith says: August 24, 2012 at 12:59 am
@Henry P:
Trust the Garden as thermometer. The tomato never lies……
I would believe a tomato long before I would believe a tree ring.
…….
Tony B is the top UK’s outdoor tomato growing enthusiast, and he ain’t a happy man.
Oh and here in Drizzmal North Carolina it is a brisk 64F (17C) at 7:30am BRRrrrr
For what it is worth HenryP. The Sanford Jetport is a sleeply little more or less private airport with daily min/max records back to 1973. link to Wunderground.
It is in the middle of the state in the piedmont area about 150 miles from the coast and ~ 150 miles from the Appalachians. It is also where I found the “break” between northern weather and Willis’s Thermostat theory a few years ago. South of Sanford you get a lot of afternoon summer thunderstorms. North you do not get that many. This is as long as the Jets are zonal and the wind from the west. The Jets changed a couple of years ago.
The wind direction for June is rather interesting to look at too. Unfortunately the data base only goes back to 2001. (Cycle 22/23 min was 1996-1997) You can see an almost 45 degree angle straight line from the bottom of the chart to the top as the Rossby wave of the jet stream moves through the area.
2001 – 2 waves
2002 – 3 waves and a 1/2 wave at start and finish
2003 – 2+1/2 wave in first 10 days then + no Records
2004 -2
2005 -1
2006 – spotty mostly from the west
2007 very spotty very calm wind
2008 – 2
2009 – 2
2010 – spotty
2011 – 6 very fast waves
2012 – wind direction jumps all over the place.
(Note: the data base has a tendency to “jump” weather stations. So be careful using it.)
Another decent town to look at in North Carolina is Fayetteville about 50 miles south where Willis’s Thermostat is still working. It has data back to 1933. link and wind data back to 1973.
These two cities are worth looking at because they are in the “Rain Shadow” of the Appalachians and the mountains have a tendency to breakup any weather fronts coming in from the west. Hurricanes also normally do not really hit the area.
Geoff Sharp says:
August 23, 2012 at 11:23 pm
Current EUV levels are around 1.4000E+10. The corresponding period of SC23 saw levels at least double this value.
What is ‘corresponding’ period? If you just mean ‘maximum’, then SC24 is only half of SC23, as predicted, so nothing special.
As an Aussie visiting Amsterdam in Jan-Feb 1974 and 1975, I can attest to frozen canals. Some residents had a bad habit of throwing garbage into canals; next morning, after a freeze, it sat on top, Oh, the shame. A not-so-uncommon object was a bicycle that one could imagine saved a walk home at the expense of the owner.
Ed Zuiderwijk says:
August 24, 2012 at 1:21 am
I have a bet going with my brother-in-law for a bottle of something that we will see another Elfstedentocht (11 cities skating race, the one refered to above) by 2015.
Here are the Elfstedentochten and solar activity: http://www.leif.org/research/Elfstedentochten.png
One climate factor that I agree on with the authors of the paper is the impact of El Ninos on our global climate , but mostly climate altering strong El Ninos . Prior to the 1970’s there was typically about one such strong El Nino per decade, but during the period 1970’s, 1980,s and 1990’s there were 2 per decade . Notice the rise in winter temperatures after 1970. Also ocean cycles are not always in sync with solar cycles as demonstrated by El Ninos happening during or near solar minimums 1878, 1889,1965,1972/73,1987/86 . El Nino winters also tend to have a negative AO which causes cold Arctic air to be pushed into parts of Europe.
There is some good science here, but the presentation is so corrupted by warmist nonsense that it’s actually quite sickening. It shows the extent of the dead grip that the AGW religion has on science.
.
Their belief that the sun’s influence is magically focused on certain parts of the world is almost comical. Obviously, to admit that solar activity can influence the global climate would be heresy.
Sigh….
Chris
****
Phillip Bratby says:
August 23, 2012 at 9:46 am
I wonder how much the Rhine’s temperature has risen because of all the waste heat that gets dumped into the river from industry and power stations.
****
I think it makes a big difference. When I was at a power-plant, it took lows near zero F for several days to make significant ice on the river. Jan 1994 was cold enough to freeze the river banks & produce extensive chunks & rafts of ice in the middle. However, the river at & downstream of the condenser water outlet remained conspicuously ice-free for at least half a mile downstream. And this was a meager 330 MW plant in a rural area w/no other heat inputs even close. Imagine an industrialized area w/far more heat input to a river (like the Rhine or the Thames).
A glance at the Central Europe graph above shows that the majority of coldest winters since 1900 happened when the ENSO signal was in NEUTRAL mode or in a few cases during or after an El Nino [ like 1940/1941]. Both of these cases allow colder Arctic air to seep down into Europe as the wind patterns and jet stream change . This seems to be a mostly local [European ]event and not always a Northern Hemisphere event. It does not seem to be caused by solar cycles directly.
http://www.dw.de/dw/article/0,,16177185,00.html
The Finnish tree rings also had something to tell about other climate events. The climate curves gave information about volcano eruptions, because in the wake of these events, temperatures generally drop by about 0.7 degrees Celsius. Warm and cold periods can also be identified this way. During Roman times, temperatures were very high. The same goes for the so-called Medieval Climate Optimum, a warm period in the Middle Ages. This was followed by a colder phase, the so-called small ice age. In the second decade, temperatures started rising again.
Leif Svalgaard says
Here are the Elfstedentochten and solar activity:
Gail says
You can see an almost 45 degree angle straight line from the bottom of the chart to the top as the Rossby wave of the jet stream moves through the area.
Henry @Gail, Leif
thanks for that. I note that the 3 Elfstedentochten after another were held at the end of the last cooling period .
it is the acceleration /deceleration of warming /cooling that appears to form certain weatherpatterns.
Plot that and you will figure it all out.
Leif Svalgaard says:
August 23, 2012 at 5:50 pm
Jim G says:
August 23, 2012 at 3:27 pm
I will ask the question again.
“The question didn’t make sense the first time, nor the second, and still won’t the third.”
The answer discredits your comment regarding “lag”, so no answer forthcoming.
Leif Svalgaard says: August 23, 2012 at 3:17 pm
Thermal systems have indeed lag because of heat capacity. As already said this is about air circulation and redistributing cold and warm air; not heating of the air.
Not really. Those very cold winters are caused by blocking of air masses [and high pressure over Russia]. Those are hard to change and are not just the sun disappearing behind a cloud..
———————————————-
Actually, Leif, the cold European winters are caused by the jetstreams traveling in different directions and lowering in terms of latitude. (They have recently been coming from the NW down the N Atlantic and through the Med, some 500 km further south than usual). It is the position of the jet streams that determines the position of the blocking highs, and not vice versa.
The question is, therefore, is what changes the positions of the jetstreams, and that has never been fully explained. Could this be a butterfly-wing effect, where a small solar change can produce a large change in jetstream trajectory? Who knows.
.
Leif Svalgaard says: “I don’t see such use in the paper under discussion.”
Definitely a fair point, the work would be substantially improved if they developed a solid theoretical model to attempt to explain their results.
However, I was offering the physics/mathematics rationale for the “lag” comments. The functional form in question explains why there are immediate effects even though the bulk of the response would be significantly delayed. This means that even with a method that doesn’t take into account any “lag” one should still be able to detect some of the immediate effects-which, because of the nature of the system, are significantly damped in magnitude. Of course, add to that the presence of significant noise and the immediate effects become difficult to detect.
“The question is, therefore, is what changes the positions of the jetstreams, and that has never been fully explained. Could this be a butterfly-wing effect, where a small solar change can produce a large change in jetstream trajectory? Who knows.”
Quite so.
Solar spectral and particle variations alter the vertical temperature profile of the atmosphere so as to change the slope of tropopause height between equator and poles.
Jet stream tracks are then able to change as do cloud quantities and the amount of energy able to enter the oceans then changes for a net cooling or net warming effect.
Global albedo is significantly altered by small solar changes.
The latitudinal jet stream and climate zone shifting appears to be in the region of 500 to 1000 miles going by changes seen from MWP to LIA to date.
I would be surprised if human CO2 emissions change it by as much as 1 mile.
Trent Valley UK.
Another distinctive feature of the Trent Valley is its power stations, with cooling towers seeming to loom over every horizon.
In fact, power stations are the biggest users of water from the Trent, surpassing farmers and water companies.
BBC News Online was invited to West Burton power station for a look at how it uses water from the river.
The coal-powered station takes an average of 200 million litres a day from the Trent.
The coal-powered station takes an average of 200 million litres a day from the Trent.
The water is used for various processes, in particular cooling the steam which drives its huge turbines.
Much of the water is lost to evaporation, but about half is returned to the river, approximately 5C warmer than when it was abstracted.
Radcliff on soar, 2000MW
Staythorp C 1750 MW
High Marnham 1000 MW
Cottham powerstations (2) 2400 MW
WesrtBurton 2000 MW
Keadby Power Station 720 MW
There were more but some have been decommissioned.
Just wondered how much these would raise temperature in the valley, my old teacher said 2 degrees.
Any like these on the Rhine.
Robuk says:
August 24, 2012 at 11:41 am
Trent Valley UK.
Radcliff on soar, 2000MW
Staythorp C 1750 MW
High Marnham 1000 MW
Cottham powerstations (2) 2400 MW
WesrtBurton 2000 MW
Keadby Power Station 720 MW
Just wondered how much these would raise temperature in the valley, my old teacher said 2 degrees.
My back of the envelope calculation says that’s equivalent to about 6x6km of solar insolation at 300W/m^2 (worth double checking).
Geoff Sharp says:
August 24, 2012 at 1:32 am
John Finn says:
August 24, 2012 at 1:03 am
You are falling into the same trap as your previous comments. It is important to realize more than one driver. Reduced UV will provide sudden atmospheric changes that batter some areas with severe cold and others with warmth, but the longer term effects from reduced ocean heat uptake (albedo changes) work over longer time periods.
I’m not falling into any trap. If you could perhaps show some evidence of the the link between reduced solar activity and reduced ocean heat uptake working over longer periods of time that might be helpful. What is the scale of these “longer periods of time”? When, for example, was cooling fully realised following the Dalton minimum? I think Leif may have touched on this issue earlier. It appears things work over longer periods of time when the data doesn’t fit. It doesn’t fit now.