From NASA: Research Links Extreme Summer Heat Events to Global Warming
A new statistical analysis by NASA scientists has found that Earth’s land areas have become much more likely to experience an extreme summer heat wave than they were in the middle of the 20th century. The research was published today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Earth’s Northern Hemisphere over the past 30 years has seen more “hot” (orange), “very hot” (red) and “extremely hot” (brown) summers, compared to a base period defined in this study from 1951 to 1980. This visualization shows how the area experiencing “extremely hot” summers grows from nearly nonexistent during the base period to cover 12 percent of land in the Northern Hemisphere by 2011. Watch for the 2010 heat waves in Texas, Oklahoma and Mexico, or the 2011 heat waves the Middle East, Western Asia and Eastern Europe. Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio |
Anthony comments on the NASA animation by Dr. James Hansen of surface temperature trends from 1955-1999:
There are many issues with this presentation. It seems to be a big Cherry Picking exercise.
1. Note all of the missing southern hemisphere data. There are operating weather stations during his time, but they are excluded from the analysis. Why?
2. The period chosen, 1955-1999 (in the bell curve animation) leaves out the warmer 1930’s and the cooler 2000’s. Why?
3. The period from 2000-present has no statistically significant warming. Leaving that period out (of the bell curve animation) biases the presentation.
4. The period chosen exhibits significant postwar growth, urbanization is not considered.
5. As for severe weather, Hansen ignores the fact that neither tornadoes nor hurricanes have shown any increase recently. Only smaller tornadoes show an increase, due to reporting bias thanks to easily affordable and accessible technology. NOAA’s SPC reports that July 2012 seems to be at a record low for tornadoes.
6. My latest results in Watts et al 2012 suggest surface station data may be biased warmer over the last 30 years.
The statistics show that the recent bouts of extremely warm summers, including the intense heat wave afflicting the U.S. Midwest this year, very likely are the consequence of global warming, according to lead author James Hansen of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York.
“This summer people are seeing extreme heat and agricultural impacts,” Hansen says. “We’re asserting that this is causally connected to global warming, and in this paper we present the scientific evidence for that.”
Hansen and colleagues analyzed mean summer temperatures since 1951 and showed that the odds have increased in recent decades for what they define as “hot,” “very hot” and “extremely hot” summers.
The researchers detailed how “extremely hot” summers are becoming far more routine. “Extremely hot” is defined as a mean summer temperature experienced by less than one percent of Earth’s land area between 1951 and 1980, the base period for this study. But since 2006, about 10 percent of land area across the Northern Hemisphere has experienced these temperatures each summer.
|
James Hansen and colleagues use the bell curve to show the growing frequency of extreme summer temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere, compared to the 1951 to 1980 base period. The mean temperature for the base period is centered at the top of the green curve, while hotter than normal temperatures (red) are plotted to theright and colder than normal (blue) to the left. By 1981, the curve begins to shift noticeably to the right, showing how hotter summers are the new normal. The curve also widens, due to more frequent hot events. Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio |
Comments from Anthony:
This bell curve proves nothing, as it has the same problems with data as the surface temperature visualization above: cherry picking period, missing data, and contradictory severe weather statistics. This is nothing but a political ploy from a man who has abandoned any pretext of professionally done science in favor of activism. However, in spite of this, it will be used as “proof” by non-thinking individuals like Bill McKibben to promote a political end. Prepare for a barrage of such stories trying to link any observed weather aberration to climate. They’ll use the same level of fact checking like we saw with the melting street lamps last week.
In 1988, Hansen first asserted that global warming would reach a point in the coming decades when the connection to extreme events would become more apparent. While some warming should coincide with a noticeable boost in extreme events, the natural variability in climate and weather can be so large as to disguise the trend.
To distinguish the trend from natural variability, Hansen and colleagues turned to statistics. In this study, the GISS team including Makiko Sato and Reto Ruedy did not focus on the causes of temperature change. Instead the researchers analyzed surface temperature data to establish the growing frequency of extreme heat events in the past 30 years, a period in which the temperature data show an overall warming trend.
NASA climatologists have long collected data on global temperature anomalies, which describe how much warming or cooling regions of the world have experienced when compared with the 1951 to 1980 base period. In this study, the researchers employ a bell curve to illustrate how those anomalies are changing.
A bell curve is a tool frequently used by statisticians and society. School teachers who grade “on the curve” use a bell curve to designate the mean score as a C, the top of the bell. The curve falls off equally to both sides, showing that fewer students receive B and D grades and even fewer receive A and F grades.
Hansen and colleagues found that a bell curve was a good fit to summertime temperature anomalies for the base period of relatively stable climate from 1951 to 1980. Mean temperature is centered at the top of the bell curve. Decreasing in frequency to the left of center are “cold,” “very cold” and “extremely cold” events. Decreasing in frequency to the right of center are “hot,” “very hot” and “extremely hot” events.
Plotting bell curves for the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, the team noticed the entire curve shifted to the right, meaning that more hot events are the new normal. The curve also flattened and widened, indicating a wider range of variability. Specifically, an average of 75 percent of land area across Earth experienced summers in the “hot” category during the past decade, compared to only 33 percent during the 1951 to 1980 base period. Widening of the curve also led to the designation of the new category of outlier events labeled “extremely hot,” which were almost nonexistent in the base period.
Hansen says this summer is shaping up to fall into the new extreme category. “Such anomalies were infrequent in the climate prior to the warming of the past 30 years, so statistics let us say with a high degree of confidence that we would not have had such an extreme anomaly this summer in the absence of global warming,” he says.
Other regions around the world also have felt the heat of global warming, according to the study. Global maps of temperature anomalies show that heat waves in Texas, Oklahoma and Mexico in 2011, and in the Middle East, Western Asia and Eastern Europe in 2010 fall into the new “extremely hot” category.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
JohnnyBoy says:
August 6, 2012 at 10:55 am
Hahahahahahahahahaha…… please tell me this is a joke. Nobody can be this dense, can they?
In my comment above, I had meant to link to my animation. See also Joanne Nova’s illustration of the main point: Not only is the set of thermometers that make it into the data set not constant over the years, the patterns inspire, shall we say, curiosity.
The propaganda/lies from the Climate Liars is becoming more outlandish and desperate each day. They’ve given up the pretext of even doing phoney science, now it’s science fiction science. The only reason this scam has gone on as long as it has is the lamestream media is fronting fools like Hansen/NASA. If MSM journailism has an ounce of integerity left, Hansen would be outted as the Kook he is within days, but since the MSM supports Hansen’s political agenda, the climate lies will continue ad nauseum until the next ice age.
Is there a link to the PNAS paper? There doesn’t appear to be anything at the NASA link except the uninformative news blurb…
Obviously, he doesn’t leave out the 2000’s (Watts’ points 2 and 3 are not correct). The whole point is that the 2003 Europe, 2010 Russia and 2011 Texas show up well in this animation. Why would he leave those out when they make his main point for him? Read the captions.
Phil Clarke,
Please. Enough with the BEST nonsense.
And Hansen is continually making alarmist “adjustments” to the temperature record. Could Hansen/GISS be less honest?
click1
click2
click3
click4
click5
click6
click7
That’s strange, I don’t remember any hot summers in the UK recently. 1976 was a good year and 2003 wasn’t bad.
Just another example of the Warm = Warming = Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming non-sequitur.
It is all we’ll get from them, because that is all they’ve got, because it isn’t warming and they know it.
They have a limited amount of time to try to get their political lock in place, before the lack of warming vs their models becomes untenable to the majority of scientists who are not personally invested in their oversold conjecture. They know that too, so expect the frequency and stridency of these opportunistic shenanigens increase.
Anthony, if you read the paper you wouldn’t look like such a fool.
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/07/30/1205276109.full.pdf
REPLY: Well John Sully, if the press release can’t stand on its own, then it needs to be revised. I wonder if the writer of that read the paper, especially since there’s no link to it? That’s what the public sees, that’s what I’m reacting to. And I’m the one who looks like a fool?
See also; http://www.drroyspencer.com/2012/08/u-s-surface-temperature-update-for-july-2012-1-11-deg-c/ -A
Here in the MidWest this summer, we’re having heat like when I lived in Las Vegas. But the worst part is the accompanying drought.
Be careful what you wish for.
Both satellite temperature and sea surface temperature summer anomalies have increased while winter anomalies have decreased. The effect is large, more than half the warming in recent decades.
This is the opposite of what greenhouse gas warming predicts. It’s almost certainly due to decreased clouds/aerosols.
Hansen’s ‘global warming’ isn’t from greenhouse gases. He’s lying by omission.
Didn’t Hansen have some input on this paper back in the 70’s ?
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/173/3992/138.short
”Effects on the global temperature of large increases in carbon dioxide and aerosol densities in the atmosphere of Earth have been computed. It is found that, although the addition of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does increase the surface temperature, the rate of temperature increase diminishes with increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. .. S. I. Rasool, S. H. Schneider
”
So it cant be Carbon Dioxide causing Hansen’s warming. If the logarithmic effects of CO2 are correct, (http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/08/the-logarithmic-effect-of-carbon-dioxide/) then the rate of warming ass described in this new paper can not be CO2 and would have to be some other natural phenomena.
Cute, Jimmy. Take a well-known 66-year cycle, and look only at the latter half of the cycle. While you’re at it, why don’t you model a typical day by starting at noon and ending at midnight. You’ll conclude that it’s GETTING DARKER AND DARKER AND DARKER!!!!! WE’LL NEVER HAVE LIGHT AGAIN! IT’S ALL OUR FAULT! WE MUST ALL DIE!
I’ve decided that the only solution is to apply the same principle to funding. Extrapolate from a part to the whole. Climate science is crazy, therefore all science is crazy. Therefore we should stop funding ALL SCIENCE, including medical research.
That’s the only way we’ll get the honest scientists (if there are any, which I’m no longer sure about) to disown the climate criminals.
They also assume that any trend in heat waves / extreme weather etc… is directly caused by co2 levels but provide no physical mechanism for this and exclude/ignore hundreds of other potential factors. Even is droughts were getting more frequent, it could be due another cuase, for example changes in ocean currents etc… cherry picked and extremely week, the AGW crowd will jump straight onto this, its their kind of science i.e. it reafirms their beliefs like a christian who finds a piece of wood in the desert confirming Noah was there
Using Hanson scientific methods, calculations, cherry picking and models. NASA would never have landed on the moon or accomplished a brilliant Mars landing last night. Hanson and his warmist cabal are a disgrace to real world scientist’s and engineers. Witchcraft/voodoo so called climate experts does not come close to real world scientific professionals, they have to achieve workable and provable results or they are sent to the back or the bus.
Congratulations to the real NASA!
Now please fire Hanson so he can get a job a Greenpeace, stopping the Coal death trains -LOL
When you compare cold periods to warm periods, warm periods are warmer! It’s Science!
… particularly easy when you first adjust the temperature records.
Harder to do is the implication that an entity is the cause of the change. Is that science or religion?
It hasn’t been hot in England, at least not in July when I was there, and in the week that I’ve been home, according to my daughter who lives there.
And here it’s just a normal August so far. I say my anecdotal evidence trumps theirs. 🙂
Have a look at the Geoengineering map here, I see no mention of possible manipulation in any of the topics above, perhaps we should also consider this as a factor in any figures.
http://www.etcgroup.org/content/world-geoengineering
Winter lows won’t count again of course.
Back in my days in the creationist wars, I used to see probability arguments like this:
used as proof that God HAD to have created life on Earth.
Now I don’t mean to get that particular kerfuffle started in here; however I find it highly significant that climate science has reached the point of using probability as evidence.
In the paper, they say
I am pretty sure the selective disappearance of thermometers from this data set has something to do with their results. Also, I don’t have time to check this right now, but it would be interesting to see if that thermometer a short distance away from Hansen’s office started reporting measurements again.
Wonder if a similar analysis of the early 1900 warming would show or not the same “bell” movie. From the looks of GISS’ manipulated data seems lkely.
JamesS says:
August 6, 2012 at 1:05 pm
Yep… a sure sign the warmists are getting increasingly desperate.
It was cooler in 1951-1980? Really, Jimbo?
He’ll go down in history with Blondlot and his N-Rays… one of the greatest pseudoscientists in history.