AGW threat seen under every rock and behind every tree

Forest lake in summer
Forest lake in summer (Photo credit: Axel-D)

Global warming threat seen in fertile soil of northeastern US forests

In ‘vicious cycle,’ heat may boost carbon release into atmosphere, UCI-led study finds

— Irvine, Calif., June 11, 2012 —

Vast stores of carbon in U.S. forest soils could be released by rising global temperatures, according to a study by UC Irvine and other researchers in today’s online Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, D.C.

The scientists found that heating soil in Wisconsin and North Carolina woodlands by 10 and 20 degrees increased the release of carbon dioxide by up to eight times. They showed for the first time that most carbon in topsoil is vulnerable to this warming effect.

“We found that decades-old carbon in surface soils is released to the atmosphere faster when temperatures become warmer,” said lead author Francesca Hopkins, a doctoral researcher in UCI’s Earth system science department. “This suggests that soils could accelerate global warming through a vicious cycle in which man-made warming releases carbon from soils to the atmosphere, which, in turn, would warm the planet more.”

Soil, which takes its rich, brown color from large amounts of carbon in decaying leaves and roots, stores more than twice as much of the element as does the atmosphere, according to United Nations reports. Previously, it wasn’t known whether carbon housed in soil for a decade or longer would be released faster under higher temperatures, because it’s difficult to measure. The team, using carbon isotopes, discovered that older soil carbon is indeed susceptible to warming.

Forest lands, which contain about 104 billion tons of carbon reserves, have been one of the biggest unknowns in climate change predictions. Northeastern woodlands that were once farm fields are currently one of the Earth’s beneficial carbon sinks, holding nearly 26 billion tons. But climate scientists worry that trees and soils could become sources of greenhouse gas emissions rather than repositories.

“Our results suggest that large stores of carbon that built up over the last century as forests recovered will erode with rising temperatures,” said Susan Trumbore of the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry and UCI, who led the research team, which also included Margaret Torn, head of the Climate & Carbon Sciences Program at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Microbes in soil near tree roots, in particular, eat carbon, and it’s then diffused into the air as carbon dioxide, already the largest greenhouse gas in the atmosphere.

“These are carbon dioxide sources that, in effect, we can’t control,” Hopkins said. “We could control how much gasoline we burn, how much coal we burn, but we don’t have control over how much carbon the soil will release once this gets going.”

Hopkins, who is also a visiting researcher at the Max Planck Institute, received funding from the National Science Foundation, the ARCS Foundation, and a Ralph J. & Carol M. Cicerone Graduate Fellowship. Additional support was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Forest Service, Michigan Technological University and the Canadian Forest Service.

=============================================================

Animation of Carbon cycle in a forest. Obtaine...
Animation of Carbon cycle in a forest. Obtained from http://www.nps.gov/olym/hand/process/ccycle.htm (This makes me dizzy.) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

First, this really isn’t surprising. Anyone that has ever worked with bacteria and petri dishes can tell you the bacteria are far more active at warmer temperatures. That’s why cultures are incubated to enhance growth.

I think the thing really missing from this study is the fact that the surrounding flora will likely utilize much of the CO2 released from the forest floor. They make no mention of where it goes, only that heating the soil allows for more bio-action by CO2 producing microbes.

The CO2 then gets sequestered in the trees and plants, until such time they die and decay.

I really can’t get too worked up about this.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

106 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 12, 2012 12:28 pm

I downloaded the article in PNAS and scanned it. I don’t think the researchers are nearly as dumb as the “News Release” has indicated. I did not find any mention of AGW or speculation as to run away out gassing of CO2. The news release is written to draw attention to the article. One thing they discovered in their Duke Forest experiment is that the mean age of the emissions is around 10 years. My analysis indicates that anthropogenic emissions cycle through the environment in about 10 years. http://www.retiredresearcher.wordpress.com. All those emissions from over 90 coal fired power plants in North Carolina are being rapidly consumed by all those trees (plus moist soil). The average time for decomposition in the soil is probably around 10 years. My analysis is based on global concentrations and emission rates which indicates decomposition rates in the oceans are about the same.

June 12, 2012 1:02 pm

Several Years ago they released high concentrations of CO2 into Duke Forest and observed the increased growth rate of the trees. More biomass to decay and release CO2 about 10 years later.

June 12, 2012 2:04 pm

“Naivety (or naïvety, naïveté, etc.), is the state of being naive—having or showing a lack of experience, understanding or sophistication – often in a context where one neglects pragmatism in favor of moral idealism. One who is naive may be called a naif.” Naivety

All they had to do is ask a gardener or an organic farmer and they would have been told that warmer air temps really get a compost pile rolling, but once it starts to get warm, it stays that way. My pile gets up to 120F even in the winter, which makes their temperatures look a little puny to me; in fact a compost pile doesn’t do much fermenting at all until it gets up past 110-115 anyways. Once it gets rolling it doesn’t matter what temp it is, it’ll cook until it is finished. If you ever poke around in the woods in the winter, you find the deer staying warm nesting over big pile of fallen leaves and weeds.

AnonyMoose
June 12, 2012 3:21 pm

Even if the worms and bacteria are able to eat faster than before, the critters die and leave some carbon behind which might not be digestible. Their sequestration process is merely running faster.

June 12, 2012 11:12 pm

Budgenator says:
June 12, 2012 at 2:04 pm
If you ever poke around in the woods in the winter, you find the deer staying warm nesting over big pile of fallen leaves and weeds.

We’ve found lost kids who’ve survived sub-freezing nighttime temperatures in the woods by burrowing into wind-drifted leaf piles. Their body heat never registered on our thermal systems, which means that the still air trapped between the leaves also makes a pretty good insulator.

Man Bearpig
June 13, 2012 4:46 am

Oh my god, we’re all going to die again.

1 3 4 5