A new paper in Quaternary Science Reviews titled:
Combined dendro-documentary evidence of Central European hydroclimatic springtime extremes over the last millennium
…demonstrates that there is evidence for extreme weather during both the Medieval Warming Period and the Little Ice Age, in fact it was seen as common according to the tree ring records examined. Unlike the Yamal debacle, it seems they did a much broader sampling of trees, both living and historical fir (Abies alba Mill.), and sampled across France, Switzerland, Germany, and the Czech Republic. Even better, unlike the irascible Dr. Mann, they didn’t have to truncate the tree samples after 1960 because they didn’t agree with the premise. Their samples continuously span the AD 962–2007 period and no hide the decline was needed.

annual-resolve and 40-year low-passed Central European April-May precipitation variability.
Unfortunately. this paper is published paywalled in Elsevier, which is being boycotted by thousands of academics worldwide, so I can’t recommend that anyone purchase it. But with a little sleuthing, I found a copy on one of the author websites here.
Abstract
A predicted rise in anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and associated effects on the Earth’s climate system likely imply more frequent and severe weather extremes with alternations in hydroclimatic parameters expected to be most critical for ecosystem functioning, agricultural yield, and human health. Evaluating the return period and amplitude of modern climatic extremes in light of pre-industrial natural changes is, however, limited by generally too short instrumental meteorological observations. Here we introduce and analyze 11,873 annually resolved and absolutely dated ring width measurement series from living and historical fir (Abies alba Mill.) trees sampled across France, Switzerland, Germany, and the Czech Republic, which continuously span the AD 962–2007 period. Even though a dominant climatic driver of European fir growth was not found, ring width extremes were evidently triggered by anomalous variations in Central European April–June precipitation. Wet conditions were associated with dynamic low-pressure cells, whereas continental-scale droughts coincided with persistent high-pressure between 35 and 55°N. Documentary evidence independently confirms many of the dendro signals over the past millennium, and further provides insight on causes and consequences of ambient weather conditions related to the reconstructed extremes. A fairly uniform distribution of hydroclimatic extremes throughout the Medieval Climate Anomaly, Little Ice Age and Recent Global Warming may question the common believe that frequency and severity of such events closely relates to climate mean stages. This joint dendro-documentary approach not only allows extreme climate conditions of the industrial era to be placed against the backdrop of natural variations, but also probably helps to constrain climate model simulations over exceptional long timescales.
I found Table 1 and the historical accounts fascinating:
Conclusions
Numerous laboratories, institutes and universities independently developed a unique pool of nearly twelve thousand living and historical fir TRW measurement series from northeastern France, northern Switzerland, southern Germany, and the Czech Republic.
This worldwide unique conifer compilation continuously spans from medieval times into the 21st century, and was now for the first time, dendro-climatologically analyzed. Three regional subsets reveal an exceptionally high amount of common fir growth variability on inter-annual to multi-centennial timescales. An overall weak relationship between ring formation and climate variation, however, contradicts the pronounced year-to-year growth coherency across the lower elevation Central European mountain systems north of the
Alpine arc. Frequency and severity of regional- to continental-scale fir TRW extremes was equally distributed over the past millennium, and was likely controlled by anomalous departures in Central European April-June precipitation totals. Positive growth extremes
were associated with wet conditions that coincided with low pressure,
whereas negative TRW departures were related to dry conditions and high-pressure. Independent documentary evidence confirms many of the TRW extremes back into medieval times.
Quantitative indices and qualitative descriptions provide exclusive high-resolution insight on ambient climate conditions, including detailed information on possible causes and consequences of hydroclimatic anomalies. Cross checking tree-ring reconstructions of
extreme events with corresponding narrative documentary sources is indispensable for detecting possible disagreement in specific years. Uncertainties in our results comprise methodological limitations related to the tree-ring standardization and chronology
development techniques used, complex and possibly lagged responses of fir growth to climate change, some temporal mismatch between the dendro and documentary data, and statistical trials associated with the index calculation methods applied. Nevertheless,
our study does allow Central European hydroclimatic springtime extremes of the industrial era to be placed against a 1000 year-long backdrop of natural variations, and may possibly also offers a realistic and independent benchmark to improve the absolute dating of lower resolution proxy archives, and even to constrain climate model
simulations over pre-industrial timescales. Beside its palaeoclimatic value will this interdisciplinary dataset and approach likely appear beneficial for biologists, ecologists and archeologists, and will ideally also stimulate the re-assessment of additional and possibly even older historical tree-ring measurements that exist in Europe and
have so far widely been ignored for purposes other than dating.
=========================================================
Next time you hear someone wailing about climate change driving severe weather and this being a recent phenomenon caused by AGW, show them this.
If that fails, use Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.’s handy button:
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.




![195_180_l[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/195_180_l1.jpg?w=320&h=232&fit=320%2C232&resize=320%2C232)
It’s about time some real science appeared on WUWT. Of course, it remains to be validated by peer review and placed in the context of the entire body of global climate change knowledge.
Uh, Peter, duh the climate changes. What does that have to do with whether or not CO2 causes climate change?
As for increase of CO2 causing greater incidence of extreme weather events:
I doubt it.
Bad extratropical windstorms, bad blizzards in low elevation areas of northeast
USA and associated with major storms, bad Nor’Easters, and USA tornadoes
F2/EF2 and stronger, especially if they have long tracks: These have major
dependence on horizontal temperature gradient between the Arctic and the
topics. According to models and the past 33 years of history, that item is
decreasing.
The record of USA tornadoes F2/EF2 and stronger shows slight decline after
1950. F1/EF1 hardly increased, and F0/EF0 increased, likely due to increased
detection of small-&-weak tornadoes.
For that matter, the great tornado outbreak of early April 1974 has some of
its records still standing.
1978-2010 had what I consider “merely fair share” of snowfall records. In a
few locations in northeast USA, the worst blizzard on record is still the one of
March 1888 – on snowfall alone, not counting extreme wind and protracted
extreme cold. Philadelphia still has a few March days with record lows and
spectacular record-lowest-highs from that storm, even though most of the
snow fell farther to the north. Washington, DC had tidal waters blown down
to spectacular low levels by historic “white hurricane” winds from the
northwest, along with a mere 6 inches of snow, but also record cold and
record lowest-highs for those days, and likely record windchills for March.
Thank you for saying ‘titled’ rather than the usual, painfully erroneous ‘entitled’.
The former refers to something having a title, while the latter refers to persons.
Academics may scoff but this guy has dug up loads of historical observations of UK weather and is at least as accurate as any UEA utterance.
http://www.booty.org.uk/booty.weather/climate/wxevents.htm
example……
http://www.booty.org.uk/booty.weather/climate/1750_1799.htm
Try this link and look at 1703 – if that happened now can you imagine the hysteria from the Greens!
http://www.booty.org.uk/booty.weather/climate/1700_1749.htm
Here are a few links to extreme weather events going back over a thousand years.
http://www.breadandbutterscience.com/climatehistory.pdf
http://www.breadandbutterscience.com/Weather.pdf
http://booty.org.uk/booty.weather/climate/wxevents.htm
I’m afraid, that leaving aside all the told you so and now you didn’t claims I personally remain very sceptical of dendroclimatology.
Although I do find it laughable to have one of the earlier contributors claim that as this was a study based only on north western Eurpoean trees it can’t be a proxy for global conditions (true enough). But remind me, how is it that a handful of trees from one Siberian peninsula can (Mann et al)?
Don’t panic, all is well. The weather here in southern England is back to “normal” … this morning we have had: brilliant sunshine, drizzle, sunshine, torrential downpour with hail and thunder, and it’s back to sunshine. April, don’t you love it!
Anthea